Russia launches another record drone attack on Ukraine
The city of Lutsk, which lies in Ukraine's northwest along the border with Poland and Belarus, was the hardest hit, though 10 other regions were also struck, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.
Lutsk is home to airfields used by the Ukrainian army. Cargo planes and fighter jets routinely fly over the city. Western regions of Ukraine are a crucial logistical backbone in the war, as airfields and depots there receive vital foreign military aid before forwarding it to other parts of the country. Russian long-range attacks have increasingly sought to disrupt those supply corridors.
The Russian Defense Ministry said that its forces took aim at Ukrainian air bases and that "all the designated targets have been hit."
Russia has recently tried to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses by launching massive aerial assaults, including adding more decoy drones to its attacks. Russia launched its previous largest aerial assault late in the night of July 4 into the following day, with the biggest prior to that occurring less than a week earlier.
Russia's bigger army has also launched a new drive to punch through parts of the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, where short-handed Ukrainian forces are under heavy strain.
U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he's "not happy" with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who hasn't budged from his ceasefire and peace demands since Trump took office in January and began to push for a settlement.
Trump said Monday that the U.S. would have to send more weapons to Ukraine, just days after Washington paused critical weapons deliveries to Kyiv amid uncertainty over the U.S. administration's commitment to Ukraine's defense.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Trump "has quite a tough style in terms of the phrasing he uses," adding that Moscow hopes to "continue our dialogue with Washington and our course aimed at repairing the badly damaged bilateral ties."
Zelenskyy said that the Kremlin was "making a point" with the overnight attack on western parts of Ukraine, as U.S.-led peace efforts flounder. He urged Ukraine's partners to impose stricter sanctions on Russian oil and those who help finance the Kremlin's war by buying it.
"Everyone who wants peace must act," Zelenskyy said. The Ukrainian leader was due to meet Pope Leo XIV on Wednesday during a visit to Italy.
Two people were wounded in the Kyiv region during the overnight barrage, officials said, as emergency crews continued to assess the damage.
Poland scrambled its fighter jets and put its armed forces on the highest level of alert in response to Russia's attack, the Polish Armed Forces Operational Command wrote in an X post.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned Tuesday that Russia could pose a credible security threat to the European Union by the end of the decade. She called for defense industries in Europe and Ukraine to be ramped up within five years.
Ukraine's air defenses shot down 296 drones and seven missiles during the overnight attack, while 415 more drones were lost from radars or jammed, an air force statement said.
Ukrainian interceptor drones, developed to counter Russia's Shahed drones, are increasingly effective, Zelenskyy said, noting that many targets were intercepted and that domestic production of anti-aircraft drones is being scaled up in partnership with some Western countries.
Western military analysts say Russia is boosting its drone manufacturing and could soon be capable of launching 1,000 drones a night at Ukraine.
"Russia continues to expand its domestic drone production capacity amid the ever-growing role of tactical drones in front-line combat operations and Russia's increasingly large nightly long-range strike packages against Ukraine," the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank, said late Tuesday.
Ukraine has also built up its own offensive drone threat, reaching deep into Russia with some spectacular long-range strikes.
Russia's Defense Ministry said Wednesday that air defenses downed 86 Ukrainian drones over six Russian regions overnight, including the Moscow region.
Flights were temporarily suspended at Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport and the international airport of Kaluga, south of Moscow.
The governor of Russia's Kursk border region, Alexander Khinshtein, said that a Ukrainian drone attack on the region's capital city just before midnight killed three people and wounded seven others, including a 5-year-old boy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
MTV Lebanon
5 hours ago
- MTV Lebanon
More than 1,000 people laid off at US State Department
More than 1,000 employees of the US State Department have been laid off as part of the Trump administration's efforts to reduce its federal workforce. The involuntary staff reductions included 1,107 civil service and 246 foreign service employees, according to a notice sent to State Department employees on Friday and obtained by CBS News, the BBC's US news partner. More than 1,500 other State Department employees took voluntary departures earlier this year as part of the federal government's massive reorganisation effort. Critics have argued the mass cuts will affect the work the department does. CBS News reported that nearly all civil service officers in the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration's office of admissions - a programme that resettles refugees in the US - were cut. Individuals who worked for the State Department's Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts (CARE) office were also among the cuts. Videos shared on social media show civil service members in the lobby of the department, leaving the building with their belongings. Other employees are seen applauding former colleagues and hugging one another. Outside the building protesters gathered with signs that read "Thank you to Americas diplomats" and "We all deserve better". "It's not a consequence of trying to get rid of people," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said while in Malaysia on Thursday. "But if you close the bureau, you don't need those positions. Understand that some of these are positions that are being eliminated, not people." Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee issued a statement saying the "decision to fire hundreds of members of the Civil Service and Foreign Service at the Department of State undermines our national security". "While there are targeted reforms that our government can pursue to maximize the impact of every tax dollar, that's not what this is," the senators wrote. "Blanket and indiscriminate cuts - the legacy from Elon Musk's failed DOGE effort - weaken our government's ability to deliver for the American people in a cost-effective manner." The layoffs come just days after the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration's plan to slash the sized of the federal workforce could move forward. Earlier this year, in a letter notifying Congress of the department's intention to reduce its workforce by 18% through voluntary departures and layoff, the department said it had more than 18,700 US-based employees. The cuts to the workforce originate from a campaign promise from President Donald Trump cut government spending. Earlier this month, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) officially closed its doors, at the directive of the Trump administration. More than 80% of all the agency's programmes were cancelled as of March, and on 1 July the remainder were formally absorbed by the state department.
Ya Libnan
5 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Lebanon's Moment of Truth
A person holds a sign with the Arabic slogan 'we will not relinquish arms' as Lebanese Shiite Hezbollah supporters take part in a ceremony during the peak of Ashura, in Beirut's southern suburbs on 6 July 2025. Photo by ANWAR AMRO/AFP via Getty Images. The Lebanese government must stop shirking its responsibilities and push Hezbollah to disarm – taking advantage of the historic momentum in the region. By Bilal Y. Saab . Associate Fellow, Middle East and North Africa Program On 19 June, President Donald Trump's Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack delivered a US proposal to Lebanese officials, calling for the Lebanese state to disarm Hezbollah. Until last year, such a goal was unthinkable. But with Hezbollah badly mauled following its war with Israel, which destroyed much of its military infrastructure and decapitated its leadership, the United States sees an opportunity to work with Lebanon's government to remove a long-standing threat to Lebanon's internal stability. The deal is simple: in return for Hezbollah's disarmament, Israel would end its periodic attacks against the group, withdraw from the five Lebanese hilltops it occupied after the November 2024 ceasefire agreement, and release Lebanese prisoners held in Israel. In addition, Washington would help reconstruct southern Lebanon and reboot the country's debt-stricken economy. The Lebanese government emphasized in its response that the Lebanese state is committed to regaining its monopoly over the use of force (a clause that has been in the Lebanese constitution for decades). But the government also said that further progress on Hezbollah's disarmament requires Israel first to withdraw from all Lebanese territory and halt what it calls violations of Lebanese sovereignty. Surprisingly, Barrack said he was 'unbelievably satisfied' with this response. Lebanese officials were expecting an uncompromising US position, believing that the Trump administration was losing patience with Beirut for its slow progress on disarming Hezbollah. Barrak was criticized by several White House officials for making such a statement Despite this positive US feedback, there is still a considerable gap between the Lebanese and US positions. Although Lebanese officials are almost certainly relieved, they have hardly any reason to celebrate or think that the Trump administration has suddenly softened its position as evident from comments made by the White officials which triggered Barrak to warn Lebanon over the urgency of resolving the issue of Hezbollah arms when he stated today in an interview that Lebanon faces an existential threat if the issue is not quickly resolved The gap between Washington and Beirut's positions is also not limited to sequencing. The more fundamental problem is Hezbollah's rigid attitude towards its weapons. Even though the Iran-backed group relinquished some of its weapons to the Lebanese army in the area south of the Litani River, it refuses to give up the rest. And its remaining arsenal is considerable , including armed drones and long-range precision-guided missiles stored north of the Litani, in the Bekaa Valley, and the southern suburbs of Beirut. Hezbollah's game plan is to cooperate minimally on disarmament to contain what it hopes is temporary international pressure, while gradually rebounding and staying deliberately vague about the future of its weapons. Naim Qassem, Hezbollah leader since only October 2024 and who fled to Tehran reiterated the group's position in a video speech last weekend before thousands of supporters gathered in Beirut's southern suburbs. He also rejected any notion of potential Lebanese normalization with Israel, implying that his group, not the Lebanese state, still calls the shots on issues of war and peace. Weapons have been integral to Hezbollah's existence since it emerged in the early 1980s. To give them up would be tantamount to throwing in the towel, which is foreign to the group's philosophy of struggle and martyrdom. Hezbollah would rather fight to the end than declare it is surrendering to Israel and the United States , its eternal enemies. It knows that without its guns – which it has directed several times against fellow Lebanese – it would lose most, if not all, its political clout and its appeal among its Shia base. It is highly unlikely to transition to a 'normal' political party. Although it held much of its ground in May's municipal elections , this was under the banner of armed resistance. There are also indications its support may be failing in southern Lebanon . It is therefore unclear whether an unarmed Hezbollah could compete effectively in free elections, within Lebanon's complex political system. Hezbollah's game plan is to cooperate minimally on disarmament to contain what it hopes is temporary international pressure, while gradually rebounding and staying deliberately vague about the future of its weapons. Qassem, like his predecessor Hassan Nasrallah whom Israel killed in September of last year, has tied the weapons issue to a national dialogue, which has been tried before but gone nowhere (a negotiation cannot take place with one side pointing a gun at the other's head). Hezbollah's stance is the reason why the Lebanese government's response to the US proposal lacks any formal or legal commitment to fully disarm the group or a timetable for doing so. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, both reformist leaders with the best of intentions, have voiced two main concerns. First, forcing Hezbollah to completely disarm, especially before Israel stops its attacks and withdraws completely from southern Lebanon, could lead to domestic sectarian conflict. Second, until there is strategic clarity on the unstable relationship between Iran and the United States, making a move on Hezbollah without top cover from Washington is fraught with risks. The first concern is overstated and short-sighted. Aoun and Salam must recognize that the chances of sectarian tensions are higher with the status quo unchanged. Indeed, if nothing is done to seriously address the issue of Hezbollah's arms, Israel will likely strike again and cause more physical damage and human casualties. If that happens, war-weary and economically dispossessed Lebanese could blame Hezbollah for causing even more death and destruction. This would in turn increase the risk of sectarian violence and people taking up arms against Hezbollah and its supporters. What Aoun and Salam should worry about is…the risk that the US loses interest in Lebanon and the country misses the train of peace and prosperity in the region. The second concern is irrelevant. Whether the United States goes to war with Iran to fully destroy its nuclear program or reaches a diplomatic settlement, it does not change Lebanon's own obligations to disarm Hezbollah. For decades, Lebanese officials have linked issues of holistic domestic reform with changes in the international environment. This shirking of responsibilities has led to nothing but national ruin. Taking full responsibility is the only way forward. What Aoun and Salam should worry about is not US backroom dealing or fighting with Tehran but rather the risk that the US loses interest in Lebanon and the country misses the train of peace and prosperity in the region. 'If you don't want change, it's no problem', Barrack said bluntly . 'The rest of the region is moving at high speed'. For Lebanon, the choice should be clear. CHATAM HOUSE
Ya Libnan
8 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Putin urges Iran to take 'zero enrichment' nuclear deal with U.S., sources say
File: Putin (R) meets with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in Moscow in January. Photo: Kremlin Press Office via Getty Russian President Vladimir Putin has told both President Trump and Iranian officials that he supports the idea of a nuclear deal in which Iran is unable to enrich uranium, sources familiar with those discussions tell Axios. Russia has been Iran's main diplomatic backer on the nuclear issue for years. But while Moscow publicly advocates for Iran's right to enrich, Putin has taken a tougher position in private in the wake of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Moscow has encouraged the Iranians to agree to 'zero enrichment,' according to three European officials and one Israeli official with knowledge of the issue. Israeli and U.S. strikes seriously damaged Iran's nuclear facilities but did not destroy all of Iran's highly enriched uranium. It's unclear whether any of Iran's centrifuges survived. Putin and other Russian officials have conveyed their support for a 'zero enrichment' deal to the Iranians several times of the last few weeks, the sources say. Friction point Putin's position is particularly notable given the extensive support Iran has provided Russia during its war with Ukraine, including by supplying hundreds of attack drones and surface-to-surface missiles. The Russians have made clear in public and private that if a deal is reached, they are willing to remove Iran's highly enriched uranium. White House envoy Steve Witkoff has been talking to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about resuming nuclear negotiations.
