Kari Lake brought back a skeleton crew to Voice of America. They're ‘angry most of the time'
'I am angry most of the time I'm in there,' one staffer told Poynter this week.
In March, President Donald Trump issued an executive order calling for the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees VOA and its sister outlets, to reduce staffing down to the 'statutory minimum.' Lake, the failed Arizona politician who now serves as senior adviser overseeing the agency, subsequently laid off hundreds of contracted employees and placed the rest of VOA's staff on indefinite leave.
Following a series of lawsuits from VOA employees and executives, Lake was ordered by a district court judge last month to restore Voice of America and bring back its workforce. Additionally, the judge ruled that the administration needed to reinstate Radio Free Asia and Middle East Broadcasting Networks.
'Not only is there an absence of 'reasoned analysis' from the defendants; there is an absence of any analysis whatsoever,' Judge Royce C. Lamberth wrote.
Earlier this month, however, a three-judge appellate court panel decided to freeze the lower court's injunction, saying it needed more time to consider the merits of the case. On Thursday, the full appellate court said it would not intervene at this time.
'We are devastated and concerned that this ruling might lead to further adverse reactions from the administration,' Patsy Widakuswara, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit and VOA's White House bureau chief for Voice of America, told The Independent about the appeals court decision. 'But our day in court is not over yet, and we are committed to fighting until we can return to our congressionally mandated right to broadcast factual, balanced, and comprehensive new.'
After Lamberth's initial order to return Voice of America to the air and staff it back up, a small group of 30 employees – from a staff of 1300 workers on leave – was brought back by Lake earlier this month. In an article for Poynter, Liam Scott – VOA's press freedom reporter until he was placed on leave in March and informed he would be terminated this month – spoke to several of the staffers who returned this month and described the 'grim and confusing' atmosphere in VOA headquarters.
'People who are in there do not see this as some kind of hopeful return,' one employee told Scott. 'I am angry most of the time I'm in there… They can't credibly say that they haven't shut us down when zero people are working,'
Prior to the president's executive order, VOA broadcast in 49 languages around the world to a weekly measured audience of roughly 360 million people, some of whom live in highly censored authoritarian states. Now, according to those at the pared-down network, Voice of America's content is only translated into Dari, Mandarin Chinese, Pashto and Persian.
'The amount of programming that's being produced is not a credible replacement for what was on air before,' a staffer said.
'We were a 24/7 news operation. Now we're a five-minutes-a-day, five-days-a-week operation,' another source added. 'We all know that this is not what this place is meant to be doing.'
Voice of America's primary English-language newsroom, meanwhile, produces just one television segment and a handful of articles a day, which are then translated into four different languages and published, according to Poynter. Notably, with press freedom experts expressing concern about Kremlin propaganda filling the airspace left vacant by VOA's absence, the network is not publishing in Russian in its current depleted state.
At the same time, the small cohort that is currently working to produce what little VOA content they can is still following the network's charter, noting that they haven't received any editorial requests from the agency since returning. Interestingly, despite Lake's recent announcement that VOA had partnered up with MAGA cable channel One America News to provide a news feed, Voice of America has yet to air any OAN content.
'No one's really in charge,' a staffer told Poynter, noting the lack of clear leadership at VOA right now. Mike Abramowitz, the network's director, remains on administrative leave.
The Independent has reached out to Lake and the USAGM for comment.
While fewer than three dozen employees man the ship, hundreds of other full-time VOA staffers remain on the sidelines and in limbo as they wait to hear from the administration about their fate. All the while, Lake has cut other 'frivolous expenditures' from VOA and its sister broadcasters.
In March, for instance, she canceled the agency's contracts to carry reporting from wire services such as Reuters, Associated Press and Agence France-Presse. The media agency also reneged on a 15-year lease for new office headquarters – even though it actually saved the government more than $150 million.
Though much of the network's full-time staff remains on administrative leave, such as Widakuswara, hundreds of others have already been told they are gone. Last week, Lake announced that 584 total employees were terminated across the agency, the majority of whom came from VOA.
'We will continue to scale back the bloat at [the agency] and make an archaic dinosaur into something worthy of being funded by hardworking Americans,' she told The Washington Post of the terminations before adding: 'Buckle up. There's more to come.'
Widakuswara, meanwhile, bluntly described how she feels that Lake and the administration are treating the VOA staff at the moment.
'My assessment of the situation is that this is just more emotional terror that they're applying to us,' she told The Independent. 'There's no rhyme or reason why they're bringing people back and then kicking them out. To me, it feels like emotional terror to ensure obedience.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Abortion and the 2026 Elections
On the third anniversary of the Supreme Court Dobbs' decision that returned abortion to the states, news outlets provided summaries of new developments, and Gallup, among other pollsters, helpfully updated its attitudinal trends. Much of the coverage was muted and missed a salient point. But first, let's look at what has changed since the decision was handed down in June 2022. According to a new #WeCount report, the number of abortions was higher in 2024 than 2023 or 2022. One in four of these was provided through telehealth services. Many state ballot measures protecting or enshrining abortion legality in state constitutions have passed, but there have been exceptions. In 2024, broadening abortion rights did not meet the high 60% threshold for passage in Florida, and in two other states, Nebraska and South Dakota, these measures failed. In 31 states and Washington, DC, abortion is broadly legal. Abortion is not the top issue in recent major polls, lagging significantly behind people's concerns about the economy, foreign policy, and the Trump presidency. Democrats themselves, who generally strongly support abortion rights, are also placing other issues than abortion at the forefront. Recent critical New York Times and Wall Street Journal pieces on troubling internal politics at Planned Parenthood may diminish the support of a reliable election ally for Democrats. Court cases challenging Medicaid-related cuts to Planned Parenthood clinics are also unlikely to generate significant national interest. Attitudes at the state level significantly vary, as PRRI (formerly the Public Religion Research Institute) found. Eighty percent in Vermont, for example, said abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while only 43% in Louisiana echoed that response. Opinion on abortion rights expansion is generally supportive but far from unanimous, as Gallup shows in its recent updates on abortion attitudes. It is also politically important that Donald Trump has muddied the waters on abortion nationally with his ambivalent and sometimes contradictory positions. Taken together, these factors suggest that abortion won't be a top-tier national issue next year. The highly regarded Democratic pollster Celinda Lake hinted at what I think was missing in much of the coverage of the Dobbs anniversary when she told the Washington Post: 'Despite a lot of efforts, the economy became nationalized and abortion became localized, and that was a bad situation for the Democrats.' Lake and other pollsters know that it is difficult to sustain the intensity that an issue like abortion had immediately after the Court's Dobbs' is especially true when issues such as the economy take center stage. When an issue is 'localized' as Lake suggests, it gets significant local coverage, but absent broader developments, it is unlikely to animate the whole country. The issue recedes as a national flashpoint. This is federalism at work. Recent abortion policy cases in South Carolina and West Virginia and several other states are unlikely to capture national attention. The FDA's review of the latest data on mifepristone may become a potential national flashpoint, but most other cases have more of a local impact. So what does this mean for 2026 and beyond? The margin in the House of Representatives is very narrow and the Democrats could take control. Abortion will no doubt play a role in some races, especially in states with measures on the ballot. At this early point, Ballotpedia finds that there are two on the ballot (Missouri and Nevada). Women are more likely than men to be engaged on the issue, but it is too early to tell how important it will be for most of them. In Gallup's May survey, 61% of women compared to 41% of men identify themselves as pro-choice and 56% of them compared to 41% of men say it should be legal in any or most circumstances. Partisanship plays a strong role here, too. Far more Democrats, 81%, believe abortion should be legal in any or most circumstances compared to 20% of Republicans. As Gallup noted, the groups that were most supportive of abortion legality before Dobbs are even more supportive today. As we get closer to the election next year, pollsters will likely update a question that asks people whether abortion will be the most important issue in casting their vote, one of many important issues, or not central to their vote. The 'most important' response has risen in Gallup's data from 13% in 1992 to 32% in 2024 among registered voters. These responses indicate people's feelings about the issue, and they don't necessarily translate into a vote decision. The action in 2026 will be in the states, and the issue will be muted nationally.


The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Wes Moore should take his talents to the White House
In 2022, I identified two rising stars who could redefine America's political future: Wes Moore and Kari Lake. I was half-right. In 2022, Lake was the Republican candidate for governor in Arizona. She was a well-respected television journalist with high name identification, and great communication skills. She seemed poised to win, but her campaign violated a cardinal rule of politics: Campaigns are about addition, not subtraction. Tying herself closely to Donald Trump, she demanded that any John McCain supporters ' get the hell out.' That's hardly the right formula for a Republican candidate to win in Arizona. In 2024, Lake ran another losing campaign — this time against Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), for an open U.S. Senate seat. Today, the former journalist is Trump's choice to supervise the dismantling of Voice of America. So I was wrong about Lake. But I think I was right about Moore. In 2022, Moore won a competitive Democratic primary to succeed two-term Republican Gov. Larry Hogan. Facing a Trump 2020 election-denier, Dan Cox, Moore won in a landslide. There are three things a candidate needs to win the presidency. First, to hold the right office at the right time. In 2016, Trump did not hold any elective office, but he presented himself as a successful businessman who could fix Washington, D.C. around a time when fewer than one in five Americans trusted the government to do what was right. Right candidate, right background. In 2020, Joe Biden was the insider the country wanted to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Having been a long-time U.S. senator and two-term vice president, Biden's governmental experience was viewed as an asset. Right background, right time. Today's voters are not looking for candidates hailing from the halls of a dysfunctional Congress. Although some members are positioning themselves to mount a 2028 presidential campaign, I doubt they will succeed. My bet is that voters will want someone who can cut through red tape and solve problems. Governors are ideally positioned to deliver results. Moore is holding the right office at the right time. And he presents himself as a problem solver. When the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed in 2024, Moore got to work and quickly mobilized the government to remove the debris paralyzing the vital port of Baltimore. Today, the bridge is being rebuilt. In another crisis situation engendered by Trump's massive layoffs of federal workers, Moore is using the state's resources to find them employment, especially in the state's classrooms. And as governor, Moore has encouraged more apprenticeships that promise good paying Maryland jobs. A second requirement for a winning candidate is the ability to tell a compelling personal story. Moore has that. In his autobiography titled ' The Other Wes Moore,' he recounted his life's story and contrasted it with another man named Wes Moore who took a different path and is serving a life sentence for murder. Moore's story begins with the untimely death of his father in 1982, thanks to a lack of proper medical care. Raised by his mother and grandparents, he was a rebellious child who by the age of 11 was in trouble with the law. When Moore turned 17, his mother signed him up to join the military. That decision helped to turn Moore's life around. He was a member of the Army Reserve and was deployed to Afghanistan, where he later received a Bronze Star for 'meritorious achievement.' Running for governor in 2022, Moore repeated a lesson he learned during his military service: ' Leave No One Behind.' As governor, he has devoted himself to making sure no one is left behind, particularly veterans. That is in sharp contrast to what Moore describes as Trump's message to voters: 'You're on your own.' In what is likely to be another change election in 2028, voters will be looking for something very different from Trump. Moore's story has a patriotic cornerstone that will resonate with voters. As the nation's third elected African American governor, he recently told graduates of Lincoln University how his great-grandfather, a minister in the Dutch Reformed Church, was chased out of South Carolina by the Ku Klux Klan and returned to his native Jamaica. But his son, Moore's grandfather, returned to the U.S. because, in Moore's words, he 'loved America too much to let the cruelty of others determine his destination.' Moore's evocation of a liberal agenda combined with a devotion to country is reminiscent of Robert Kennedy's 1968 presidential candidacy. In a recent treatise, authors Richard D. Kahlenberg and Ruy Teixeria noted that Kennedy's call for equality for all, together with his deeply personal commitment to American ideals, resonated with voters. The third requirement for a successful candidate is charisma. Barack Obama had it. Trump had it. And Moore has it. Actor George Clooney, who knows something about how to command an audience, describes Moore as 'levitating above ' other governors who may aspire to the presidency, including Kentucky's Andy Beshear (D) and Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer (D). Not every presidential aspirant possesses the three qualities needed to be successful. But those that do win. Today, Moore denies any interest in running for the presidency. His disclaimers should not be taken at face value. In 2006, Barack Obama told Tim Russert that he would not run for either president or vice president in 2008. One year later, Obama changed his mind. Twenty years later, Moore is running for reelection as governor — a shoo-in in heavily Democratic Maryland. Voters are jealous creatures; they want you to focus on them, not run for office while casting your eye elsewhere. Moore gets that. But the presidency comes around only once. Obama knew it in 2008. Trump knew it in 2016. And there are many ambitious politicians for whom the presidency never comes around. The 2028 cycle is Moore's time. He should go for it.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The Taliban are remaking Afghanistan in their image. It should have us all worried
This article first appeared on our partner site, Independent Persian Since returning to power, the Taliban has made spreading its ideology a key priority. From prisons and rehab facilities to military bases, 'religious education' is becoming a cornerstone of Afghanistan's institutions. By introducing courses in Quranic recitation and exegesis, as well as broader religious instruction, the group aims to bring more Afghans closer to its strict interpretation of Islam and convince them of the merits of its fundamentalist approach. Recently, images of the 'graduation ceremony' of 100 people undergoing treatment for drug addiction at a rehab centre in the western province of Herat were widely promoted in media outlets affiliated with the group. The 'graduands' had completed courses in the correct recitation and pronunciation of the Quran. The ceremony, which also marked the end of their time at the facility, featured white clothing, traditional caps and Taliban flags. Syed Asif, one of the participants on the course who was a patient at the centre, told Independent Persian: 'I'm currently undergoing treatment and have now been able to quit drugs. During this time, I started reading the Holy Quran and memorised many of its parts.' Hayatullah Rouhani, the anti-narcotics chief in the city of Herat, said authorities aim to provide opportunities for religious learning in the rehabilitation process for those struggling with addiction. In addition to offering Quranic instruction, the Taliban also held singing sessions for some of the patients. They were instructed to sign anthems that glorified the group's 20-year war against the former Afghan government and Western forces, recounting bombings, suicide attacks and bloody battles. These songs serve to promote the Taliban's 'jihadist narrative' and legitimise violence. What's concerning is not the introduction of religious education in itself, but the content and nature of what is taught. It is a curriculum designed to push society towards extremism and create fertile ground for Taliban recruitment. During the group's insurgency against the previous government, religious schools were key recruiting hubs. These institutions distort Islamic teachings and glorify violence, preparing students for war and carrying out suicide missions. Their goal is to build a society not just politically dominated by the Taliban, but intellectually and ideologically shaped by its worldview Now that the Taliban have full control of public schools, religious institutions, universities, prisons and rehab centres across Afghanistan, their primary focus has been imposing a rigid, hardline interpretation of Islam. Their goal is to build a society not just politically dominated by their organisation, but intellectually and ideologically shaped by its worldview. The Taliban's expansion of religious education isn't confined to prisons and rehab centres. There has been a sharp increase in the number of mosques and religious schools across the country. The presence of senior Taliban officials at graduation ceremonies, both in religious schools and for religious courses in detention or rehab centres, makes it clear that spreading their version of Islam through 'religious education' is a top priority. These officials have repeatedly called on people to study religion, but with the proviso that this is done according to the Taliban's own interpretation of Islam, which diverges significantly from mainstream Islamic teachings in much of the Muslim world. The growing emphasis on this specific brand of religious education, centred on the Taliban's radical interpretation of Islam, raises serious concerns about the normalisation of religious extremism. By promoting slogans like 'implementing sharia law' and 'establishing an Islamic system', the Taliban is trying to win over more Afghan citizens to its radical ideology and expand the social base it needs to sustain its political and military power. Reviewed by Tooba Khokhar and Celine Assaf