The obscene priorities in education funding
Heartbreak high
I am both heartbroken and furious to learn that the Labor Allan government is choosing to short-change Victorian state school students.
The reality at the coalface of under-resourced schools is heartbreaking. Parents might be wondering why their child has a shared class or doesn't have a school nurse or librarian. This is the reality of schools working under a decade-long funding deficit. Teachers are pushed to teach their maximum face-to-face allotment (making up any extra time by moonlighting as a nurse, librarian or team teaching to ensure no minute is left idle).
When these overworked teachers are sick, schools are routinely redistributing students to other teachers, pushing class sizes into the 30s. Teachers are being pressed to 'volunteer' to take extra classes to cover absences, anything, to reduce the school's spend on casual teachers.
Jacinta Allan pointing to increases in capital funding is a furphy. The building of a hall (projects green lit to help COVID recovery) does nothing to help the tired teachers and undersupported students sitting down to Monday morning assembly.
The added insult is watching students walk to the campuses of private schools carrying their full funding allocation to pre-class swimming training in an Olympic-sized pool.
Kate Rose, teacher, Rosanna
Electoral favours
That the Victorian government will provide, as part of an extended drought package, a $5000 grant to Victorian farmers to help their family businesses pull through the temporary drought is laudable.
I look forward to similar benevolence to the family-owned milk bars and local butcher businesses facing competition from their local mega-supermarket rivals; or the local family-owned hardware stores and nursery businesses facing challenges from the encroaching DIY megastores; or the family-owned gift shops, florists, clothing and toy shops facing devastation from the expanding big box chains. Why do farming small businesses get favourable government attention? I suspect it's all about electoral politics.
Dennis Richards, Cockatoo
What's the point?
I wish to add my voice to the letters in The Age (30/5) despairing the decision to extend the North West Shelf project. So many of us are trying our hardest to reduce plastic, compost, save water, live sustainably in every way we can with future generations in mind, and it is a huge slap in the face that makes one feel 'what is the point?' Goodness knows what the despair of Indigenous communities is like.
Libby Gillingham, Outtrim
Yesterday's man
It may have escaped Tony Abbott's notice that he is a ″yesterday's man″, which is a nice way of saying he is living in the past. Sussan Ley should ignore him. He is one of the cadre of Liberals, mostly ex-PMs, who are becoming more out of touch with ordinary Australians. Victoria is showing the effects of a poor opposition and listening to conservative Liberals won't improve matters.
Adrian Tabor, Point Lonsdale
Heed the regions
Waleed Aly (Comment, 30/5) has a vision where the National Party becomes a bit teal, and therefore enables the Coalition to compete politically with Labor. It won't happen. Urban Australia needs regional Australia more than vice versa. They feed Australia's cities. They dig the coal and minerals that keep the economy ticking over and Australia's export income high.
We repay them with second-rate healthcare, a food market that is stacked against producers, and a steady flow of city refugees who make regional housing unaffordable to locals.
If we urbanites occupy their minds at all, what they would see is a bunch of hypocrites who ramble on about the post-carbon economy but in international terms are heavy carbon polluters.
Maybe the teals and other city-driven politicians could pay a great deal more attention to regional Australia. Then they might listen to us.
Alun Breward, Malvern East
Changing Australia
Waleed Aly is spot on, especially with the changing demographic of Melbourne's regions.
George Megalogenis also noted in his Foreign Affairs essay 'Changing Face of Australia″ that the children of Chinese and Indian migrants are also better educated than those from an Anglo background and this has allowed them to be part of the middle class too.
These skilled migrants are a dilemma for some in the major parties who don't acknowledge and understand the nation's changing identity and are still stuck in that Anglo past with a lack of diversity in their candidates.
This class divide between the white working classes was reflected in voting patterns as well, especially in the outer suburbs.
Mel Smith, Brighton
Soul of humanity
As a non-religious person, I was moved by Sunday's Faith column (25/5) by Warwick McFadyen where he discussed the virtues of the The Piano. I agree with everything he said and I congratulate the ABC for having produced it. My view, which I believe coincides well with McFadyen's, is 'that music is the soul of humanity'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Let's stop kidding ourselves. Taxes will have to go up
Before the election, the business press was terribly concerned about the decade of budget deficits and ever-rising public debt the Albanese government had clocked up. Something must be done! After the election, however, when the government pressed on with a move to save up to $3 billion a year by making rich men pay more tax on their superannuation, it was appalled. The sky would fall. What the two contradictory positions have in common was that both are criticisms of a government few of its business readers would have much sympathy for. But the episode also shows the way voters' attitudes towards the budget abound in wishful thinking – something the pollies encourage. 'You want more, but don't want to pay for it? Sure, I can do that.' In Treasury secretary Dr Steven Kennedy's speech to the Australian Business Economists last week, he showed a graph of the budget's 'structural' deficit stretching all the way out to 2035-36. (The structural component of the budget balance is the bit that's left after you've allowed for the effect on the balance of where we happen to be in the business cycle of boom and bust.) The structural deficit for next financial year is estimated to be 1.5 per cent of gross domestic product. Kennedy noted that spending on the National Disability Insurance Scheme is expected to reach more than our spending on defence. But he reminded us that (thanks mainly to our good friend Mad King Donald) defence spending is likely to grow a lot in coming years. And that's just the feds. The combined state and territory budget deficits are likely to be 1.8 per cent of GDP in the financial year just ending – which is 1.5 percentage points higher than their pre-pandemic long-run average, Kennedy said. So the states have been really going at it, with their combined debt at the end of this month expected to reach 18.9 per cent of GDP, its highest in the 30-plus years they've had control over their own finances. 'We are sitting on a wretched generational bargain, and it has gone on for long enough.' Aruna Sathanapally, Grattan Institute And yet politicians, federal and state, persist in running election campaigns where they promise bigger and better spending on this, that and the other, without any mention of how it will have to be paid for. Worse, no matter how much they've promised, the Liberals always claim that their taxes will be lower than Labor's, without this having any effect on their spending on 'essential services'. (Perhaps this boils down to a promise not to rely on bracket creep – the 'secret tax of inflation' – quite as much as Labor does.)
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Let's stop kidding ourselves. Taxes will have to go up
Before the election, the business press was terribly concerned about the decade of budget deficits and ever-rising public debt the Albanese government had clocked up. Something must be done! After the election, however, when the government pressed on with a move to save up to $3 billion a year by making rich men pay more tax on their superannuation, it was appalled. The sky would fall. What the two contradictory positions have in common was that both are criticisms of a government few of its business readers would have much sympathy for. But the episode also shows the way voters' attitudes towards the budget abound in wishful thinking – something the pollies encourage. 'You want more, but don't want to pay for it? Sure, I can do that.' In Treasury secretary Dr Steven Kennedy's speech to the Australian Business Economists last week, he showed a graph of the budget's 'structural' deficit stretching all the way out to 2035-36. (The structural component of the budget balance is the bit that's left after you've allowed for the effect on the balance of where we happen to be in the business cycle of boom and bust.) The structural deficit for next financial year is estimated to be 1.5 per cent of gross domestic product. Kennedy noted that spending on the National Disability Insurance Scheme is expected to reach more than our spending on defence. But he reminded us that (thanks mainly to our good friend Mad King Donald) defence spending is likely to grow a lot in coming years. And that's just the feds. The combined state and territory budget deficits are likely to be 1.8 per cent of GDP in the financial year just ending – which is 1.5 percentage points higher than their pre-pandemic long-run average, Kennedy said. So the states have been really going at it, with their combined debt at the end of this month expected to reach 18.9 per cent of GDP, its highest in the 30-plus years they've had control over their own finances. 'We are sitting on a wretched generational bargain, and it has gone on for long enough.' Aruna Sathanapally, Grattan Institute And yet politicians, federal and state, persist in running election campaigns where they promise bigger and better spending on this, that and the other, without any mention of how it will have to be paid for. Worse, no matter how much they've promised, the Liberals always claim that their taxes will be lower than Labor's, without this having any effect on their spending on 'essential services'. (Perhaps this boils down to a promise not to rely on bracket creep – the 'secret tax of inflation' – quite as much as Labor does.)
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Warren Mundine calls on Labor to abandon 'nonsense' approach to Indigenous issues, focus on 'great things' rather than highlighting gap in outcomes
Warren Mundine has called on Labor to abandon its "nonsense" approach to Indigenous issues. Following the defeat of the Voice referendum in 2023, the Albanese government has received criticism for a lack of action on improving the lives of Indigenous Australians. A lack of progress in hitting health, education and other socioeconomic targets in the Closing the Gap report led to further scrutiny, as well as calls from some in the community for a return to basics approach. Despite this, Labor has maintained it remains committed to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, adding it was focused on turning outcomes around. Speaking to Sky News Australia, though, Mr Mundine argued the government's approach would continue to fail so long as they kept seeking ways to implement the Uluru Statement instead of focusing on fundamental needs. "The No vote (against the Voice) was almost twice the size of what the Albanese government got in this election, so let's get back to the reality," he said. "The reality is none of these things will ever fix anything or the problems within Aboriginal and the rest of Australia. "We have to come up with some serious stuff and there is some great stuff that is happening out there. "Let us talk about them, let us work on those, instead of just talking about all this nonsense all the time which has been so strongly rejected, not only by the wider Australian community, but by Aboriginal people." Mr Mundine is not alone in calling for greater focus on the "great stuff" occurring in some Indigenous communities. New shadow minister for Indigenous Australians, Kerrynne Liddle, has been outspoken on the need to change perceptions about First Nations peoples. "It is disingenuous to suggest that every Aboriginal person is impoverished because that is not true. There are many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people working well and effectively in organisations," she told The Australian last week. Mr Mundine echoed that view, citing the Indigenous Business and Economic Program as he argued Labor needed to shift its focus to promoting the success of Indigenous communities. "I sat at a conference once and it talked about health problems in Aboriginals, it talked about crime in Aboriginals, it talked about unemployment in Aboriginals," he said. "I'm a very positive person. By the end of that conference, I sat there and said: 'God, I must be one of the most miserable people on the planet'. "We're not recognising the incredible success of what's happening. You look at the Indigenous Business and Economic Program. It's gone from a 6.7 million program to 8.2 billion, 40,000 jobs for, not only for Aboriginal people, 25,000 for Aboriginal people, but 20,000 other people in Australia who are working for Aboriginal businesses." Mr Mundine added the government could only change outcomes by injecting "positivity" into the conversation around Indigenous issues, warning: "If we keep talking about negative stuff, then we'll always end up with negative stuff".
