Gold rises on weaker dollar as investors eye developments
Spot gold was up 0.5 per cent at $3,365.49 per ounce by 0751 GMT. US gold futures rose 0.5 per cent to $3,373.20.
'The modest support comes from a weaker US dollar. With the tariff August 1 deadline coming closer, the market focus will be if trade deals are announced, or tariffs are implemented,' said UBS commodity analyst Giovanni Staunovo.
The dollar eased 0.2 per cent against a basket of other major currencies, making gold less expensive for their holders.
United States Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday he was confident the United States can secure a trade deal with the European Union, but August 1 is a hard deadline for tariffs to kick in.
Gold, often considered a safe-haven asset during economic uncertainty, tends to do well in a low interest rate environment.
The US Federal Reserve's next policy meeting is scheduled for July 29-30, following its decision to hold rates steady last month.
'Elevated inflation expectations and strong economic data are weighing on expectations around the number of Fed rate cuts this year. Despite this, the buy-on-dip strategy remains in place, protecting downside risks for gold prices,' ANZ analysts said in a note. Last week, Fed Governor Christopher Waller said he still believes that the US central bank should cut rates next week.
Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
7 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Early wins for US, but dynamics of EU alliance is changing
4 Aug 2025 23:55 SULTAN KHALIFA AL RUBAEI*Tariffs have once again taken centre stage in US and international trade, following the August deadline set by United States President Donald Trump for countries to present trade agreement proposals or face steep tariffs. The US administration secured deals with several of its trading partners, most notably the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom. However, the global trade landscape now appears to be bracing for profound changes in trade rules that go beyond the post-World War II US agreement with the EU included a 15% tariff on European goods (significantly lower than the 30% previously threatened by the US president), an exemption for pharmaceutical products, and limited exceptions for aircraft and medical equipment. In return, the EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy products and investing approximately $600 billion in the US. This agreement secured substantial additional revenue for the American 'America First' policy pursued by the United States in its dealings with both partners and non-partners pushes it toward manoeuvring economic policies. But beyond the deals and manoeuvres lies US-European relations, particularly with the EU, the foundation of which is no longer only partnership, but also competition, or rather, the partnership is taking a backseat in the face of competition. This shift may be attributed to internal divisions among the EU's 27 member states, the multiple challenges facing the ageing continent, and the heavy reliance on the United States when it comes to defence forces. At this time, none of the EU countries can afford the economic strain of a trade the American side, the current administration has shown little regard for the mutual trust in the transatlantic free trade relations, nor for the existing rules of international trade. As a result, there is a possibility that other global actors may adopt similar protectionist policies, posing a threat to the stability of international markets, particularly in light of the tensions that the current environment may create at the level of international trade the changes and uncertainty, the EU chose to stay aligned with America, albeit at a high cost. The newly imposed tariffs place a heavy financial burden on EU-based companies, forcing them to bear additional billions in expenses. While EU member states acknowledge the agreement's potential harm to their economies, they have viewed it as the best possible option under the current circumstances. It may mark the beginning of a longer negotiation process rather than the end, given the limited options available. Without formal trade agreements with Washington, the EU risks being subjected to US terms, leading to imbalanced deals or potential trade United States emerged as the winner in the agreement with the EU. However, the outcome also places a burden on American consumers, who are likely to face higher prices for imported goods as companies pass on the additional costs. This is particularly significant given that Germany is one of the largest exporters to the US, with exports exceeding €161 billion in 2024. Ireland's exports to the US reached €72 billion and Italy's €64 billion in the same year, according to Eurostat, the EU's statistical office. In total, 20% of the EU's goods exports are directed to the United States. This makes the agreement the least damaging option for Europe to avoid a trade confrontation between two allies who together account for nearly one-third of global trade. The effects of this deal may become visible in the US market in the coming this agreement, the US aims to achieve economic balance and address its trade deficit with the EU, which reached $235.6 billion in 2024. Although the deal helps avoid a trade war, it shows that the dynamics of old alliances are shifting, international trade is being reshaped amid global economic uncertainty, and competition for each country to achieve huge gains has become a defining feature of today's international economic and trade relations. *The columnist is a researcher with the think-tank firm, TRENDS Research & Advisory
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Oil prices decline on Opec+'s September output hike decision
Oil prices dropped on Monday after oil producers' alliance Opec agreed to another large output hike in September. Brent, the benchmark for two thirds of the world's oil, fell 2.2 per cent to $68.12 a barrel by 5.09pm UAE time on Monday, and West Texas Intermediate, the gauge that tracks US crude, declined 2.5 per cent to $65.6 a barrel. The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, known as Opec, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, the latest in a series of accelerated output hikes to regain market share. The move marks a full and early reversal of Opec's largest tranche of output cuts, amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4 per cent of world demand. 'The meeting lasted just 14 minutes, suggesting there was no pushback and broad support for the decision,' said Giovanni Staunovo, a strategist at the Swiss bank UBS. 'With Sunday's decision, the group fully unwound one layer of the 2.2 million barrels per day [mbpd] of voluntary crude production cuts. The production quota increase between March and September is closer to 2.5mbpd, as it includes a capacity-related quota adjustment for the UAE of 0.3mbpd.' So far, the oil market has been able to absorb the additional barrels coming from Opec very well, with Brent crude moving mostly sideways in a $60 to $70 per barrel range in recent months, Mr Staunovo explained. With some countries in the group producing above the quota, as well as those that previously overproduced facing compensation cuts and some members probably maxed out in terms of capacity, the actual production increases are likely to be lower this and next month as well, he added. 'All eyes now shift to US President Donald Trump's decision on Russia later this week and whether he targets buyers of Russian oil with secondary sanctions or tariffs,' Mr Staunovo said. Recent geopolitical tensions have added to oil market volatility this year. A 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran earlier this year drove oil prices up by more than 13 per cent before they retreated below prewar levels. Vijay Valecha, chief investment officer of Dubai-based Century Financial, said the escalating geopolitical tensions surrounding Russian oil could significantly tighten global supply. US President Donald Trump's aggressive stance, threatening 100 per cent secondary sanctions on Russian crude buyers, risks removing up to 2.75 million bpd from the seaborne market, potentially forcing major importers like India and China to seek alternative, more expensive sources, he added. 'This prospect of substantial supply disruption, combined with renewed expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts following weaker US jobs data, could stimulate demand as a weaker dollar makes oil more affordable,' according to Mr Valecha. 'Should these sanctions materialise and global growth avoid a significant downturn, the tightening supply-demand balance would create a powerful tailwind for oil prices.'
Khaleej Times
13 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
As AI regulation tightens, legal foresight will define success
The clock is ticking for organisations that build, deploy, or rely on AI systems. With phase two of the European Union's AI Act fast approaching, the world's first binding AI regulation is ushering in a new era of enforceable AI governance. The act introduces strict requirements to ensure transparency, safety, and human oversight, grouping AI systems into four risk tiers that define how they are governed. Phase one, which came into force on February 2, 2025, banned AI systems deemed to pose unacceptable risk and required organisations operating in the EU to improve AI literacy among employees. The next phase places new obligations on general-purpose AI, including models such as ChatGPT, Claude, DALL·E, Midjourney, Anthropic, Meta, and Google BERT. These requirements mandate greater transparency, the creation of detailed technical documentation, and the disclosure of copyrighted materials used during training. European companies have already called for a pause on these measures, which the EU has rejected. From my perspective, this signals two realities. The first is that the era of enforceable AI regulation has arrived and will only continue to evolve. And the second, is that while responsible AI frameworks have been discussed for years, many businesses are still working out how to get prepared. Legal foresight as a strategic advantage Treating AI compliance as a reactive exercise has never been sustainable. But today, with the pace at which the regulatory landscape relating to AI and responsible and ethical AI, is evolving, legal foresight is more essential than ever. It must be embedded into how AI systems are built, deployed, and scaled from the outset. This is especially critical for general-purpose models, which are complex, fast-evolving, and capable of broad downstream impact. Integrating compliance into the development process, rather than retrofitting it later, helps reduce operational risk while strengthening trust with customers, partners, and regulators. This proactive approach is already being embraced in forward-looking jurisdictions such as the UAE, where regulation is positioned as a catalyst for innovation. In recent years, the UAE has formalised its AI governance through initiatives like the Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Technology Council (AIATC) and the UAE AI Charter, both of which emphasise ethics, transparency, and public interest. These efforts underscore the importance of co-design between government and industry to ensure that emerging technologies are not only cutting-edge, but also responsibly deployed. The co-regulation imperative No single organisation can navigate this evolving regulatory landscape alone. Engaging with industry peers, policymakers, and technology providers is essential. Co-regulation, where governments, private companies, and civil society collaborate to shape rules and guardrails which promote progress, is emerging as the most effective approach. The UAE's partnership with the World Economic Forum through the Global Regulatory Innovation Platform (GRIP) is a prime example. GRIP provides shared frameworks, benchmarking tools, and collaborative mechanisms that transform regulation from a constraint into an enabling model, aligning speed, inclusivity, and ethical standards. This collaborative mindset also shapes how Core42 designs its infrastructure. We embed regulatory and sovereignty requirements directly into our platforms to ensure compliance is not an afterthought. Our Sovereign Public Cloud, built on Microsoft Azure and supported by our sovereign controls platform Insight, addresses the complex challenges of data sovereignty and compliance for governments and regulated industries while still enabling public cloud innovation. With built-in sovereign control sets, comprehensive audit capabilities, and streamlined compliance management, organisations can manage sensitive data with confidence while benefiting from hyperscale agility and security. For customers requiring fully isolated environments for classified workloads, our Signature Private Cloud extends the same principles by combining the scalability of cloud with the control and assurance of on-premises systems. Preparing for the next frontier As governments worldwide move toward more comprehensive oversight through the regulation of AI, the organisations that thrive will be those that invest in proactive legal strategies today and seek to ensure their perspectives are tabled during the co regulation phase. In the Middle East, we are already seeing this next frontier take shape. The launch of the Responsible AI Foundation by G42 and Microsoft, in collaboration with MBZUAI, is establishing region-specific standards for fairness, transparency, and accountability. Additionally, G42's 2024 report on Sovereign AI Ecosystems highlights the growing importance of robust data governance frameworks as demand for data, storage, and computational power accelerates with AI advancements. As such, future regulations are likely to set clear parameters for data sovereignty, cross-border flows, and the accountability of AI systems operating on national infrastructure, addressing both technical integrity and the socio-cultural considerations unique to the region. In addition, continuous risk assessments, real-time auditing, and sector-specific governance will soon become standard practice. To prepare, legal teams must build cross-functional expertise, be creative and immersed in the dynamism of the environment in which the world is operating and work closely with engineers, product owners and data scientists to anticipate the regulatory landscape that will apply to what they are building rather than react to it. For companies developing or deploying AI, success will not hinge solely on technological breakthroughs but on the ability to navigate an increasingly complex legal environment. Those who approach this with foresight and integrity will be best positioned to earn public trust and capture long-term value.
