
The tables have turned, and Putin's Russia is now in dire trouble
Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron have together pulled off a remarkable feat of high statecraft. They may have averted a strategic debacle of the first order in Ukraine, and with it irreparable damage to the credibility of the West.
The long-fraught US-Ukraine minerals deal signed in Washington – actually a shale gas deal – is a radically different document from Donald Trump's original demand for $350bn (£262bn) of war debt 'reparations' and the US colonial takeover of the country's infrastructure.
The full story behind Trump's Damascene conversion will emerge over time, but Ukrainian officials say the British and French leaders played a critical role in steering the US president away from his pro-Kremlin infatuation, as did Boris Johnson. It was this patient whispering that paved the way for the Trump-Zelensky tête-à-tête on the marble floors of St Peter's in Rome.
Jonathan Powell, Downing Street's unflappable national security adviser, will deserve his knighthood when the time comes, and something more than bachelor grade if this is indeed the turning point after weeks of diplomatic calamities.
The tables have turned: it is suddenly Vladimir Putin who is in trouble, trying to hold together an exhausted war economy as the price of Urals crude crashes to $56 a barrel – from $77 in mid-January – and as the global economic downturn tips the whole commodity complex into a cascading bear market. The spot price of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in Asia has fallen 30pc over two months.
It comes as China tries to charm Europe, urgently seeking to preempt any EU moves to raise its own barriers against a diversionary flood of Chinese exports shut out of America. Xi Jinping may have to dial down his 'no-limits friendship' with Putin – and reduce his covert help for Russia's war – if he wants a serious hearing.
The minerals accord remains a bitter pill for Kyiv to swallow, but at least it is plausibly compatible with the Ukrainian constitution and does not obstruct EU membership. Deputy prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko says Ukraine retains full ownership of 'all resources on our territory'.
Ukraine will be able to purchase US weapons on a quasi 'lend-lease' basis. The first $50m tranche of military support was approved last night.
The debt clock starts ticking from today, wiping the slate clean on the $120bn in total American aid since the war began, most of which was spent on production within the US or consisted of semi-obsolete inventory due to be scrapped.
Neither side will have a controlling vote over the investment fund. The US pledges to help Ukraine mobilise capital via the Development Finance Corporation, the geopolitical arm of the US treasury and commerce departments.
This opens the way for serious investment in the shale gas resources of the Yuzivska field. As I reported earlier this month, an internal study by Ukrainian experts concluded that the carbon ratio, porosity and thickness match the best US shale basins in the Marcellus and Permian.
'We could replace half the lost Russian gas exports to Europe,' said Andríy Kóbolyev, ex-head of Ukraine's energy giant Naftogaz. If so, Russia can kiss goodbye to its European gas market forever. Ukrainian pipeline gas and American LNG will suffice.
Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, warned Putin that the deal committed Washington to 'a peace process centred on a free, sovereign, and prosperous Ukraine'.
One never knows quite whom to believe when the Trump administration speaks, but the Kremlin has clearly overplayed its hand, miscalculating how far it could push its maximalist demands and how long it could keep stringing along a prickly and impatient US president.
Republican senator and Trump golf partner Lindsey Graham is going for the jugular. He may soon have a veto-proof 67 votes in the Senate for legislation that imposes 500pc punitive tariffs on any country that buys Russian energy or strategic minerals, if the Kremlin 'refuses to negotiate a peace agreement, violates a peace agreement or invades Ukraine again in the future'.
Russia's 'hot Keynesian' war machine is now in the same state of exhaustion as the imperial German war machine in 1917. Germany had been able to preserve something close to a normal civilian economy over the early years of the First World War but the Allied blockade, chronic shortages, lack of manpower and money eventually forced the military to take over the whole productive apparatus. That too failed, and ultimately incubated Weimar hyperinflation.
Russia has depleted the liquid and usable reserves of its rainy-day fund. Military spending almost certainly exceeds 10pc of GDP in one way or another and it is being funded off-books by coercing the banks into lending some $250bn to defence contractors, storing up a crisis for the banking system.
Is that what Anton Siluanov, Russia's finance minister, was referring to this week when he advised Russians to read Nikolai Gogol's Dead Souls and Anton Chekhov's Cherry Orchard, the first about fraudulent finance, the second about crippling debts? He has already introduced a string of new taxes this year. He is now drawing up fresh emergency measures.
The trade-off between guns and butter can be postponed no longer. Serious austerity is coming for the first time since Putin launched his fateful misadventure.
Russia is no longer the proverbial 'petrol station masquerading as a country' but it still relies on raw material exports to fund a quarter of the budget. Oil exports fund the war. Kirill Bakhtin, from BCS, says tighter US and UK sanctions on Russia's shadow fleet – Biden's parting shot – have pushed the discount on Urals crude to around $15.
That lowers the de facto market value of Russian crude exports to $45. Another big drop from here, which may well happen as Saudi Arabia keeps adding barrels to an oversupplied market, would make it extremely hard for Russia to keep prosecuting the war beyond the summer.
The latest Russian offensive has largely petered out, at terrible human cost. Russia is not close to conquering the four oblasts so presumptuously annexed. 'The movements on the map are tiny, and have nothing of strategic value. Ukraine is big enough to trade space for time,' said a Western military expert on the ground.
'The Ukrainians can't take back lost territory, but they're not going to get rolled over either. This has come down to a war of economic attrition. It's what's happening in the Russian rear that decides this.'
Trump may change his mind again. The mineral deal does not give Ukraine a bankable security guarantee. Europe is fractious and weary.
But the balance of probability is that Vladimir Putin will now fail to turn Ukraine into a castrated vassal state along the lines of Belarus.
He may keep the land he already holds and win legal recognition of Crimea, at least from Washington. But if the far-Right ultranationalist hawks in Russia compel him to hold out for total victory, he may not even keep that.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump leaving G7 early was 'no problem' says Mark Carney as summit ends with no statement on Ukraine
Donald Trump's early departure did not derail the G7, summit host Mark Carney insisted. The Canadian Prime Minister said he understood why the US President wanted to return to Washington in order to focus on the Middle East conflict. He spoke as the gathering of world leaders in the mountain resort of Kananaskis finished without the traditional communiqué or an agreed statement on Ukraine. Asked at his closing press conference on Tuesday evening what it said for the G7 that Mr Trump decided to leave, Mr Carney replied that the President had an 'extraordinary' military crisis to manage. 'There was no problem,' he insisted. 'Mr Trump felt it was better to be in Washington, and I can understand that.' The Canadian PM was also challenged on why there had not been a joint statement on Ukraine signed by all seven leaders even though it had been one of the key topics of discussion and the war-torn country's President Volodymyr Zelensky had been invited to attend. Sources have claimed that the US opposed a joint statement on Ukraine while it tries to get Russia to agree to peace negotiations, while Mr Trump avoided meeting Mr Zelensky by leaving early. But Mr Carney - who has clashed with Mr Trump over tariffs and his desire for Canada to become the 51st state - insisted 'nothing' had happened with the US to prevent an agreement, saying 'this was discussed by all seven leaders'. He pointed out that his 'chair's summary' at the end of the event stated: 'G7 Leaders expressed support for President Trump's efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.' 'The language that's in my declaration, directly with President Trump, no adjustments, no adjustments from my fellow leaders,' Mr Carney said. Despite only attending the summit for a day, Mr Trump dominated the proceedings. He signed his trade deal with Sir Keir Starmer – but then dropped the documents on the floor and left the Prime Minister scrambling to pick them up. Mr Trump also raised eyebrows as soon as he arrived on Monday by saying it had been a mistake to remove Russia from what was the G8 a decade ago, and said it was 'not a bad idea' to add China to the group.


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine-Russia war latest: Putin of ‘pure terrorism' after 14 killed in massive attack on Kyiv
Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Vladimir Putin of 'pure terrorism' after at least 15 people were killed and 116 others were injured in a massive attack on Ukraine overnight. The Ukrainian president called the attack 'one of the most horrific' of the war so far, with Ukrainian officials saying 14 were killed in Kyiv and one person was reported dead in Odesa. In total, Russia fired almost 500 drones and missiles across Ukraine, in one of Moscow's largest attacks since invading Ukraine in February 2022. 'Such attacks are pure terrorism. And the whole world, the United States, and Europe must finally respond as a civilised society responds to terrorists,' Mr Zelensky said, adding that it was still unclear how many remained trapped under the debris. The attack came just hours after Donald Trump claimed it was a mistake to throw Russia out of what was formerly the G8. 'This was a big mistake,' said the US president, adding that he believed Russia would not have invaded Ukraine in 2022 had Mr Putin not been ejected from the high-profile group of nations. 'Putin speaks to me. He doesn't speak to anybody else ... he's not a happy person about it,' Mr Trump said.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump meets with military leaders over Iran, after PM insists he wants peace
Donald Trump met with top military advisers over Israel's conflict with Iran, just hours after Sir Keir Starmer insisted the US President was interested in de-escalating the fighting. Mr Trump met with his National Security Council in the White House's situation room shortly after a series of sabre-rattling social media posts, and following his abrupt exit from the G7 summit in Canada. After the high-level meeting, news reports soon followed that the US President was considering joining in Israel's strikes on Iran. Sir Keir earlier said 'nothing' he had heard from the US president suggested Washington was poised to get involved, as western leaders continue to press for de-escalation between the two, long-time foes. But Mr Trump then suggested Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was an 'easy target' whom the US could 'take out' if it chose. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump said: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. 'But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' Without further explanation he also wrote 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' on the platform. And he suggested the US had 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran'. Mr Trump spoke to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, according to a White House official. Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said strikes were taking place around Tehran early on Wednesday after planes had targeted missile launch and storage facilities on Tuesday night. Air raid sirens have been heard in parts of Israel while the US State Department announced it was closing the embassy in Jerusalem for the rest of the week. Iran's Revolutionary Guard said the latest attacks included the use of a hypersonic Fatah missile, while Israel claimed it had killed General Ali Shadmani who it described as Iran's most senior remaining military commander. Mr Trump left the G7 conference in Canada a day early to deal with what he called 'big stuff' and urged Iranian citizens to evacuate from Tehran, which triggered speculation that American forces might join Israeli strikes. Asked whether the US could get involved as the conflict threatens to spiral into all-out war, Sir Keir told reporters with him at the conference in Kananaskis: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict. On the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation.' In a statement on Monday, before Mr Trump's departure, leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. In Westminster, not long after the American president's social media posts, Defence Secretary John Healey suggested Mr Trump was 'leading the calls' for a diplomatic solution to the conflict. Speaking at the Royal United Services Institute's land warfare conference in central London, Mr Healey said British Typhoon fighter jets could be used to help the UK's allies in the region. He said: 'The deployment of Typhoons and other military assets the Prime Minister has announced are part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, to reinforce security in the region, and may also be used to help support our allies.' Elsewhere, Israel's ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely, told LBC her country is 'absolutely not' intending to institute regime change in Iran. 'We are in this military operation for one reason, to defend Israel, to defend the region, to defend the world and to make sure that Iran won't have nuclear capabilities,' she added.