
Jimmy Lai trial: Closing arguments further postponed due ‘medical issue' with media mogul's heart
The three-judge panel said on Friday that the proceedings will resume next Monday after Lai, 77, received medication prescribed by a doctor and a Holter monitor – a portable device that tracks the heart's electrical activity.
The Apple Daily founder appeared thinner than he was five months ago, when proceedings were adjourned following his 52-day oral testimony.
But the jailed tycoon, who stands accused of foreign collusion charges that could land him in prison for life, also appeared spirited – nodding, waving and smiling to his family sitting at the public gallery and his lawyers, as he has done throughout his trial.
Lai's defence lawyer, Robert Pang, told the court on Friday that his client 'had some episodes where he felt that he was collapsing' as well as heart 'palpitations' in recent months, but he did not want 'undue attention to be concentrated on his health.'
Judge Esther Toh read out a memo prepared by an in-prison medical officer stating that 'no abnormality' was detected in Lai's heart, but a specialist had recommended medication and the heart monitor.
The judges, handpicked by Hong Kong's leader to preside over national security cases, rejected the defence's application to have Lai be absent from the closing argument proceedings, which have been earmarked for eight days. However, they postponed the first hearing until next week so that Lai could receive proper medical attention.
Multiple delays
Lai has pleaded not guilty to two counts of conspiring to collude with foreign forces under the Beijing-imposed national security law, and a third count of conspiring to publish seditious materials under colonial-era legislation.
The founder of the now-shuttered pro-democracy tabloid Apple Daily has been behind bars since December 2020 and his national security trial began in December 2023.
The closing arguments were originally scheduled to begin on Thursday, but a heavy downpour – which prompted the Observatory to raise the 'Black' rainstorm signal for about three hours in the morning – led the Judiciary to cancel hearings for the day.
Prosecutors have accused the media tycoon of requesting foreign countries to engage in hostile activities, such as imposing sanctions, against authorities in Hong Kong and mainland China.
Lai also allegedly used the now-shuttered tabloid Apple Daily – which he founded in 1995 – to publish seditious remarks against the authorities and encourage the public to participate in the pro-democracy protests and unrest in 2019.
He allegedly not only conspired with senior editorial staff of Apple Daily but also was the 'mastermind and financial supporter' of the Fight for Freedom; Stand with Hong Kong (SWHK) advocacy group, which lobbied for international sanctions against Hong Kong and China.
During the trial, multiple prosecution witnesses testified against the former media boss, including senior Apple Daily staff members Cheung Kim-hung and Chan Pui-man, as well as activists linked to the SWHK group, such as Andy Li and Chan Tsz-wah.
Lai also took the witness stand for 52 days. In his testimony, often interpolated with spirited exchanges between himself and prosecutors, Lai denied allegations of foreign collusion and defended his political beliefs.
But he was also grilled by prosecutors and the three judges presiding over the trial about his foreign ties and past remarks, including what he wrote in his Apple Daily column and said in interviews with international media.
Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
11 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Taiwan's residency rule changes amount to ‘attack' on mainland Chinese spouses
Taiwan is overhauling its residency rules to tighten control on mainland Chinese nationals seeking to settle on the island, in an escalating push to counter what it perceives as Beijing's growing infiltration and influence operations. Advertisement The draft amendment covering family-based residency applications drew swift condemnation from Beijing, which accused the administration of Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te of stoking confrontation and suppressing cross-strait exchanges. The regulatory revision – led by the interior ministry and tied directly to Lai's 17-point national security strategy – introduces sweeping restrictions on mainland nationals applying to live or settle in Taiwan. Lai cited escalating threats to the island from Beijing – including identity ambiguity, economic coercion, and military and societal infiltration through cross-strait exchanges – when he announced the strategy in March. The policy marks one of the sharpest turns in cross-strait residency governance in decades and underscores Lai's intent to eliminate dual-status ambiguities that he believes may pose security risks. Advertisement The proposed amendment requires mainland nationals applying to live in Taiwan to provide notarised proof that they have relinquished their household registration in mainland China. Applicants must also provide a certificate saying they have never held, no longer possess, or have officially renounced their Chinese passport. If they still hold one, it must be invalidated by cutting off a corner. A sworn affidavit will be acceptable in the absence of certified proof.


South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Nvidia's efforts to please both US and China get harder as H20 becomes bargaining chip
On his visit to Beijing in July, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang received a rock-star welcome as he announced to Chinese state media that Washington had assured the company that export licences for its H20 chips would soon be granted. Warmly greeted by Chinese entrepreneurs and government officials, Huang – who wore a Tang suit and addressed the audience with his rusty Mandarin at the state-backed China International Supply Chain Expo – earned national fame overnight. Just two weeks after Huang concluded his third visit to China this year, the company saw its fortunes take a dramatic turn. On July 31, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said it had summoned Nvidia executives to question them about the security of its H20 chips. The powerful regulator said the inquiry was partly due to US lawmakers demanding the installation of tracking features into chips for export. That led to a back-and-forth between Nvidia defending the integrity of its chips and intensified pressure from state media for the company to demonstrate its security credentials. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang attends the opening ceremony of the China International Supply Chain Expo in Beijing on July 16. Photo: Kyodo While Beijing has yet to provide evidence of any 'back doors' in Nvidia's products or issue any official ban, it has become politically sensitive for Chinese companies to procure any of the US firm's products, according to local media and industry insiders.


South China Morning Post
17 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
History of Japanese aggression teaches lessons that must not be forgotten
The Victory Day parade in Beijing on September 3 commemorates Japan's formal surrender 80 years ago and the end of the second world war. August 15, the day the Japanese government actually conceded defeat, prompts solemn reflection on the history of Japanese aggression that cost millions of lives. It is timely to recall the quote, 'Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it'. Advertisement On this particular day, lessons of war must be learned, particularly by Japan. As we report, China's People's Liberation Army, in a commentary in the PLA Daily on the same day, criticised Japan for hollowing out its pacifist constitution and 'embarking on the dangerous path of military expansion'. The People's Daily also ran a commentary calling for history not to be forgotten. Remembering history does not entail perpetuating hatred, but safeguarding its lessons for regional and world peace for future generations. Japan should take seriously China's concerns about its military expansion in recent years in the name of 'self-defence', and also about Tokyo's characterisation of a 'China threat' to Taiwan. Japan commemorates the August 15 surrender solemnly on that day. In Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's commemoration address, it was more than necessary to hear him express remorse over the war – the first time the word has been used in a prime minister's speech at the ceremony in 13 years – and pledge to pass on the memory of the conflict to subsequent generations. It is good to see some Japanese political figures, academics and others advocating genuine reflection on war crimes for the long-term interests and peace of Japan and the region. At the same time, Ishiba's remarks coincided with a visit to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine, which commemorates war dead including convicted war criminals, by Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi. Such visits glorify Japanese militarism. The minister's action cannot be tolerated and should be condemned. Advertisement Japan should take China's concerns seriously if it is sincere in improving bilateral relations.