
Dodge is pulling the plug on electric Charger Daytona R/T amid lackluster sales
Dodge is pulling the plug on electric Charger Daytona R/T amid lackluster sales
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Stellantis: The automaker's history, legacy
Explore the history of Stellantis, the automotive giant formed in 2021 through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group.
Fewer than 2,000 electric Dodge Charger Daytonas sold in the United States in the first three months of 2025.
Dodge will launch gas-powered Chargers later this year.
Dodge is pulling the plug, so to speak, on its base model electric Charger Daytona, the R/T, as it deals with slow sales, but don't expect what appears to be a limited-edition run of vehicles to turn into collector's items, according to a key industry watcher.
'Rarity does not make a collectible. You need to have demand for it,' said Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecasting for AutoForecast Solutions. 'You can't presume that this will be a Charger Daytona of 1970. They couldn't sell those originally and years later they were collectible.'
Fiorani said it's risky to bet on a car of today becoming something that brings big dollars in the years to come, even when the numbers of those made and sold are relatively small.
Still, Dodge will continue to offer the more powerful and expensive electric Charger Daytona Scat Pack for the upcoming model year, even as it prepares to launch several gas-powered versions.
While it's not clear how many Dodge Charger Daytonas will be produced this year, so far the sales picture is showing a fairly light impact. Electric Charger sales – the company did not distinguish between versions – for the first three months of this year were at 1,947. Granted, they were just beginning to arrive in showrooms in January after months of delays.
However, the automaker likely had higher hopes. Fiorani noted that he'd recently driven by a Dodge dealership and saw a row of Chargers waiting to be sold.
In a statement, Dodge CEO Matt McAlear said 'production of the Dodge Charger Daytona R/T is postponed for the 2026 model year as we continue to assess the effects of U.S. tariff policies. The Charger's flexible, multi-energy STLA Large platform allows us to focus on the Charger Daytona Scat Pack's performance as the world's quickest and most powerful muscle car, add the new four-door model to the Charger mix for the 2026 model year and lean into the new Charger SIXPACK models that will launch in the second half of the year.'
Sixpack refers to the engine, the inline-six Hurricane, which will come in 550-horsepower or 420-horsepower variants.
The current electric Scat Pack promises a peak power base of 630 horsepower with a limited push-button burst to 670 horsepower called the Power Shot. The Dodge website lists the Scat Pack all-wheel drive with a starting price of $73,985, excluding destination charge.
Adding gas-powered versions to the lineup is not a surprise, as Dodge had previously said that was the plan. However, the decision, reported earlier by MoparInsiders.com, to end the electric R/T's run so soon does highlight how the market has changed, both in terms of the slower adoption of electric vehicles and President Donald Trump's embrace of tariffs. The Charger Daytona is assembled at the Windsor Assembly Plant in Ontario, but the batteries initially were to come from South Korea.
Fiorani offered some perspective on the potential tariff impact, however.
'Everybody is leaning on tariffs for every change in production or sales, whether real or not,' he said.
Market realities are, however, what they are.
'The idea that an internal combustion engine version would hit the market better at the moment is a strong one,' according to Fiorani. 'Buyers haven't warmed up to EVs as a performance vehicle yet, especially since every EV is a performance model now.'
Fiorani noted also that the company's planned shift in production volume toward the gas-powered Charger would also take the focus off the less expensive EV version – the R/T was listed with a starting price of $59,595, not counting destination.
'(They) kind of want to focus on the vehicle that will make money versus the entry-level models that will sell on price,' Fiorani said.
New car prices surge: Car-buying frenzy continues, pushing new vehicle prices higher
The moves for Dodge follow news that Ram is also adjusting its electric plans. Crain's Detroit Business, citing a memo to suppliers, reported this week that the electric Ram 1500 REV would be delayed until summer 2027, a year later than what the automaker told the Free Press in January, and the extended range Ramcharger is being pushed from later this year to early next year.
The company, in a statement provided by spokesman Nick Cappa, cited "slowing consumer demand for half-ton" battery electric pickups and noted that "we also are extending the quality validation period for the Range Extended Ram to support a successful launch and the highest build quality."
Contact Eric D. Lawrence: elawrence@freepress.com. Become a subscriber. Submit a letter to the editor at freep.com/letters.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
More than 500 jobs at risk in Italy as Stellantis changes oil supplier, union says
ROME (Reuters) -More than 500 jobs are at risk in Italy after automaker Stellantis changed oil supplier from a local brand owned by Malaysia's Petronas to France's Total, a trade union said on Wednesday. Stellantis was not immediately available for comment. Petronas owns the Selenia brand of motor oils, an Italian supplier which was previously part of the Fiat group and marketed products including under the "Olio Fiat" name. Stellantis was created in 2021 from the merger of Fiat-Chrysler with France's PSA, maker of Peugeot and Citroen cars. The group also includes Opel and Jeep. Selenia lost its "historic" supply contract with Stellantis after 112 years of production, the Uilm union said in a statement. The change resulted from the outcome of a competitive tender. Petronas announced it in a meeting with employees, Uilm added, saying this compromised job security for 450 workers in Fiat's hometown of Turin and 70 in Naples, in the south. The union pledged to use "all available tools" to protect the Petronas workers and other auto suppliers who are "under heavy stress" due to Stellantis' decisions. Stellantis is Italy's sole major automaker, and last year its production in the country fell to around 475,000 vehicles, the lowest level since 1956, the FIM-CISL union said in January. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
More than 500 jobs at risk in Italy as Stellantis changes oil supplier, union says
ROME (Reuters) -More than 500 jobs are at risk in Italy after automaker Stellantis changed oil supplier from a local brand owned by Malaysia's Petronas to France's Total, a trade union said on Wednesday. Stellantis was not immediately available for comment. Petronas owns the Selenia brand of motor oils, an Italian supplier which was previously part of the Fiat group and marketed products including under the "Olio Fiat" name. Stellantis was created in 2021 from the merger of Fiat-Chrysler with France's PSA, maker of Peugeot and Citroen cars. The group also includes Opel and Jeep. Selenia lost its "historic" supply contract with Stellantis after 112 years of production, the Uilm union said in a statement. The change resulted from the outcome of a competitive tender. Petronas announced it in a meeting with employees, Uilm added, saying this compromised job security for 450 workers in Fiat's hometown of Turin and 70 in Naples, in the south. The union pledged to use "all available tools" to protect the Petronas workers and other auto suppliers who are "under heavy stress" due to Stellantis' decisions. Stellantis is Italy's sole major automaker, and last year its production in the country fell to around 475,000 vehicles, the lowest level since 1956, the FIM-CISL union said in January. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
American manufacturing needs labor reform, not tariffs
For the first time since the Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930, tariffs are not just a tool of U.S. economic policy – they're its most expansive and aggressively used tool. So far, markets have responded harshly to a costly gamble aimed at reviving American industrial might. Even if trade barriers eventually succeed at bringing back some jobs, the gains won't stick unless we reform antiquated labor policies. Otherwise, we risk rebuilding factories only to watch them shrink under the same outdated union-bargaining system that hollowed them out in the first place. Look no further than Boeing. The company announced it would shrink its workforce by 10%, mostly at commercial airliner manufacturing sites, mere weeks after reaching a new agreement with its machinists union. The settlement ended tensions but added major cost burdens. Workers who cheered the deal now sadly face pink slips. Or consider Stellantis, which slashed more than 1,000 jobs at its Jeep plant in Ohio just months after United Auto Workers secured hefty raises through a costly strike. The ink had barely dried before layoffs arrived, as the automaker scrambled to maintain profitability amid escalating wage bills. Us Trade With The Eu Is Out Of Whack. Trump Needs To Stay Tough On Tariffs To Fix It These headlines echo a long-standing pattern. When contracts overshoot what companies can sustainably pay, the predictable responses are fewer jobs, automation and offshoring. Read On The Fox Business App In new research, we reviewed 147 economic studies spanning three decades. What we found was striking: While unions can secure higher short-term wages, those gains often come at the cost of slower employment growth, reduced capital investment, and higher risk of future layoffs or shutdowns. America's heartland offers a stark example. In 1950, the Rust Belt held 51% of U.S. manufacturing employment. By 2000, its share had fallen to 33%. One recent study from a top economics journal found that labor conflicts and union-driven cost pressures – which took effect long before Chinese imports surged – explain 55% of the plunge. Trump Emerges As 'Closer-in-chief' To Push 'One Big, Beautiful' Tax Bill Through Congress Postwar factories were strike zones. Unions wielding exclusive bargaining rights extracted wages far above market rates and blocked productivity-boosting technologies. The strategy lifted members' pay, yet it discouraged investment, slowed productivity and nudged companies to build plants in the non-union South or abroad. When foreign competition arrived in force, many Midwestern mills were already financially brittle. Globalization merely finished the job. A big part of the problem is a New Deal-era rule granting any union that wins a workplace election a virtual monopoly. The National Labor Relations Act designates any such union as the sole representative for all of a firm's employees – supporters or not. Workers can't negotiate individually or choose a different union. Trump's Tariff Strategy Can Work But America Still Needs Deeper Economic Reform Without ongoing competition, labor leaders overreach. If management concedes, costs explode; if it resists, production halts. Either way, the workforce eventually pays the price. Imagine a worker in Richmond, Virginia, who lives comfortably on a company-wide wage agreement, while their counterpart in New York City struggles to cover rent. New York's cost of living is nearly 80% higher, with housing more than twice as expensive. Applying identical contracts across diverse local economies that are worlds apart is economically incoherent. Other industrial democracies offer smarter models. In Germany, manufacturers set broad wage frameworks but tailor pay at the plant level. In Britain, membership is voluntary as unions compete for members within the same company. These systems preserve workers' voices without forcing one-size-fits-all contracts. The Surprising Way Trump Can Unleash America's Economic Comeback The U.S. could adopt similar discipline through "members-only" bargaining. Unions would simply and fairly represent only employees who opt in. No one would be bound by a contract they didn't approve. Unions would have to maintain support through concessions that grow jobs, not risk them. Reform is especially important now that AI is reshaping the workforce and threatening to make certain roles outdated more quickly than in the past. Unions that are fully responsive to more than 51% of membership in occasional elections would have more motivation to focus on retraining workers and offering new skill development. In addition to protecting existing jobs, they could even guide workers toward higher-paying, future-ready careers. Washington is pouring resources into semiconductor facilities, battery plants and "Buy American" mandates. Layering those investments on top of Depression-era labor law builds monuments to protectionism instead of engines of lasting growth. True re-industrialization starts with modernizing the rules on the shop floor. Fix that, and the next generation of Rust Belt jobs might actually stay put. Click Here To Read More On Fox Business Revana Sharfuddin is a predoctoral researcher with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. They are authors of a new study, "Do More Powerful Unions Generate Better Pro-Worker Outcomes?"Original article source: American manufacturing needs labor reform, not tariffs Sign in to access your portfolio