
Will Californians' taxes go down with Trump tax cuts? It could come down to one thing
Republican lawmakers are debating a tax policy that could have major implications for Californians.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, enacted during the first Trump administration, imposed a limit on how much of your state and local taxes could be deducted from your federal taxable income. The limit, referred to colloquially as the 'SALT cap,' was set at $10,000.
It is set to expire at the end of the year, along with many other provisions of the 2017 Trump tax bill. But Republicans are preparing a new package of tax changes, and whether to raise or eliminate the SALT cap has been a major talking point.
For more than a century, there was no limit on SALT deductions. The deduction was first added to the tax code in 1913 with the idea that people shouldn't be taxed twice on their income — and thus, you should be able to subtract what you've already paid in state and local income taxes, property taxes and personal property taxes from the amount on which you're being assessed for federal taxes.
But after Trump took office in 2017, Republicans saw a new $10,000 cap as a much-needed source of tax revenue. It also happened to target states that didn't vote for Trump.
The impact of the cap was disproportionately felt by higher-income people in coastal blue states, including California and New York. That's because to claim the SALT deduction rather than the standard deduction, taxpayers file an itemized return, and higher-income people are more likely to itemize their deductions. Also, wealthy blue states tend to have higher taxes because they offer more government services, and have higher home prices that command higher property taxes. (Though California's Prop 13 property tax increases for homeowners who stay put.)
To compare: The median existing home-sale price in March was $403,700 nationally, $884,350 in California and a whopping $1.4 million in the Bay Area, according to data from the National Association of Realtors and its California branch.
Richard Pon, a certified public accountant and certified financial planner based in San Francisco, said his clients were initially upset by the new limit on deducting state and local taxes. But the 2017 law also increased the income level at which the alternative minimum tax, or AMT, kicks in. Pon said many of his clients, most of whom make over $200,000 annually, were no longer subject to AMT under the changes, and so owed less as a result, helping offset the losses from the SALT cap.
But politicians from both sides of the aisle representing California, New York and other affected states have been advocating to raise or eliminate the SALT cap. While campaigning last year, Trump courted New York voters with a post on Truth Social saying he would 'get SALT back.'
The SALT cap led to an estimated 1 million California taxpayers owing $12 billion more annually, according to data from the state Franchise Tax Board cited by CalMatters in 2019. The majority of those taxpayers, 62%, made between $100,000 and $250,000 annually, the data showed.
Funds raised by the newly imposed SALT cap helped offset other tax cuts in Trump's signature legislation: In addition to limiting the SALT deduction, the TCJA doubled the standard deduction, eliminated personal exemptions and a number of miscellaneous deductions, reduced the maximum mortgage interest deduction, doubled the maximum child tax credit to $2,000, created a $500 credit for older dependents and created a generous deduction for many pass-through entities not subject to corporate income tax, like businesses with sole proprietorships,.
Almost all of its changes for individuals are set to expire at the end of this year, while nearly all of the corporate ones, including cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, are permanent.
Part of the debate in Congress right now comes down to whether the SALT cap will be lifted entirely, raised, or limited to certain income levels. Pon said another consideration would be pegging the amount to inflation — the $10,000 hasn't come up for discussion since 2018 — or removing the marriage penalty on the limit, since under the current tax code the cap is $10,000 for both single people and for married couples filing jointly.
'I don't see that there's a real interest from anybody, Republican or Democrat, in helping millionaires and billionaires,' said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., according to Politico. She proposed lifting the cap for people with household incomes 'under the $400,000-$500,000 range.'
But others — so-called 'SALT Republicans' from predominantly blue states — say they want the SALT deduction limit completely eliminated. And on the other end of the spectrum, 32 Republicans from the House signed a letter saying they wouldn't support the new tax package unless there were $2 trillion in concrete spending cuts, and the bill must not add anything to the deficit, meaning raising or lifting the SALT cap would have to be offset by increased taxes or decreased spending elsewhere.
So the future of the SALT cap is still up in the air. GOP leaders have been hoping to get a vote on the new tax package set for the House Ways and Means Committee this week. If you feel strongly about it, consider getting in touch with your elected representative to let them know. (You can look them up on the House ' Find Your Representative' webpage.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
27 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
MAGA Freaks Out as Man Arrested for Allegedly Handing Out ‘Bionic' Face Shields to Protesters
Chaos has been happening in isolated areas of Los Angeles, where federal forces and the LAPD are clashing with angry protesters and rioters. The Trump administration claims it is maintaining public order against lawlessness. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, meanwhile, says that the White House is engaged in an authoritarian power grab. As the drama in the city continues, a recent arrest would seem to be yet another opportunity for both sides to bicker with one another about who is right. A man named Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested by the FBI on Thursday morning and is now expected to face a charge of conspiracy to commit civil disorders. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who was appointed by Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi in April, announced Orellana's arrest on social media, writing, 'Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested this morning by @FBILosAngeles on an allegation of Conspiracy to Commit Civil Disorders (18 USC 371) for distributing face shields to suspected rioters on Tuesday.' He added: 'We are moving quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and/or supporting civil disorder in Los Angeles.' In case you missed that, it would appear that Orellana has been arrested because he helped distribute gas masks to protesters. Pictures of the supposed masks that have circulated on social media seem to show that they are a 'bionic' face shield designed to protect against tear gas. Orellana's arrest is now being used by authorities to bolster a claim made by President Trump, which is that the protests in LA are being funded and organized by outside groups. 'These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They're tough. They're smart. They're probably paid many of them. As you know, they're professionals,' Trump said during a press conference on Wednesday. Relatedly, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt highlighted Orellana's arrest on social media on Thursday. 'Once again, President Trump was right,' Leavitt wrote on X. 'The President rightfully raised the important question of who is organizing and funding these dangerous riots in Los Angeles. This morning, the FBI arrested Alejandro Theodoro Orellana for conspiracy to commit civil disorders after handing out face shields to anti-ICE rioters.' This whole thing is bizarre for many reasons, but perhaps the most bizarre is that, despite the fact that cars have been set on fire and federal buildings have been attacked, one of the only people whose arrest has been actively platformed by the Trump administration is a guy whose sole alleged crime (as far as we know) is helping to hand out protective face coverings so that people's eyes don't get burned by tear gas. Also, handing out gas masks is not a crime, so what are officials even really talking about? It's not totally clear. It's easy to feel like they just arrested this guy for nothing. Many other things about the incident remain unclear. The Daily Mail reports that Orellana was not the person who actually handed out the masks, and was only driving the vehicle that delivered them. Another, so far unidentified woman, is said to have actually handed out the masks. When reached for comment by Gizmodo, a public information officer for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California did little to clarify the situation. They said, 'Mr. Orellana was arrested today. We expect his initial appearance will be scheduled for tomorrow at 1:30 p.m. PDT in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.' The officer added that the office anticipates that Orellana will be charged with conspiracy to commit civil disorders and aiding and abetting civil disorders. There have been over 350 arrests in recent days, and the LA district attorney is expected to begin bringing cases soon, so Orellana is unlikely to be the last protester to grace the headlines. Still, right-wingers have been having a field day with his arrest and have used the incident to spin a larger conspiratorial narrative. The usual cast of MAGA voices have jumped into the fray to imply that Orellana is associated with some sort of vast conspiracy to 'fund' and coordinate the protests in LA. 'This militant and his network are part of the conspiracy to raise cash to buy riot gear,' MAGA influencer Any Ngo posted on Thursday. 'Who is funding and supplying the insurgents in Los Angeles and in other cities? The FBI has arrested the insurgency leader observed handing out $60 'bionic shield' face masks to rioters,' another frequent conspiracy poster with over 600,000 followers wrote. The Daily Signal, a conservative news site that was originally created by the Heritage Foundation, recently ran a news article entitled: 'Who Organized the LA Anti-ICE Protests That Escalated Into Riots?' It's incredibly unclear who is doing what in LA, so—hypothetically—it's not totally out of the realm of possibility that someone is giving supplies to some of the activists. But, last I checked, that's not a crime—nor is not wanting to get hit in the face with tear gas.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ask Jordan: Who authorized the El Salvador prison contract?
'Who authorized the $6 million contract with taxpayer money [to imprison immigrants in El Salvador]?' — Gina Hi Gina, Your question provides a platform to spotlight a new lawsuit — the first of its kind, per the plaintiffs who brought it. The suit aims to invalidate the agreement between the Trump administration and El Salvador to remove people from the U.S. and hold them incommunicado and potentially indefinitely in a Salvadoran prison known for human rights abuses. To answer your specific question, the complaint that launched the suit said the State Department made the agreement. As for the possible legal basis to strike down the deal, the complaint cites a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires federal agency actions to be both reasonable and reasonably explained. The lawsuit argues the agreement fails to meet those requirements because it is 'arbitrary and capricious' and 'was entered into without any legal basis.' While it called the facts 'extraordinary,' the suit says the application of the law to the deal is an 'ordinary' one requiring striking it down. The plaintiffs are a coalition of groups: Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigration Equality and the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice, all of whom are represented by Democracy Forward. (RFK Human Rights, which is named for former senator and attorney general Robert F. Kennedy Sr., not the current health and human services secretary, is also representing itself.) It's still early in the new case, which was assigned to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, Washington, D.C.'s chief federal trial judge, who is also presiding over separate litigation stemming from the administration's illegal Salvadoran renditions. The government hasn't yet responded in court to this latest suit; we don't know how it's going to play out or when it will be resolved. But the case provides another possible legal tool against one of the centerpieces of Trump's second-term agenda. Whatever the result of this latest litigation, it may uncover more information about the agreement along the way. Have any questions or comments for me? Please submit them on this form for a chance to be featured in the Deadline: Legal Blog and newsletter. This article was originally published on

29 minutes ago
As legal fight over Guard deployment plays out, Noem vows to continue Trump's immigration crackdown
LOS ANGELES -- Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours after her comment Thursday, a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test" and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief." The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hourslong demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for," she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it "inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. ___ Rodriguez reported from San Francisco and Seewer from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press writers Julie Watson in San Diego, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed.