US, China trade row could ease after Trump-Xi talks: Treasury chief
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that President Donald Trump could speak with China's Xi Jinping "very soon," and that such a call could help break the logjam in the trade talks between the world's two biggest economies.
Trump on Friday accused Beijing of violating a deal reached last month in Geneva negotiated by Bessent to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs they had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days.
China's slow-walking on export license approvals for rare earths and other elements needed to make cars and chips have fueled US frustration, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday a concern since confirmed by US officials.
But Bessent seemed to take the pressure down a notch, telling CBS's "Face the Nation" that the gaps could be bridged.
"I'm confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call that this will be ironed out," Bessent said, however noting that China was "withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement."
When asked if rare earths were one of those products, Bessent said, "Yes."
"Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with" Xi, he said.
On when a Trump-Xi call could take place, Bessent said: "I believe we will see something very soon."
Since Trump returned to the presidency, he has slapped sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on Chinese imports.
New tit-for-tat levies on both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent.
China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125 percent to 10 percent.
In an interview with ABC's "This Week," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said China was "slow-rolling the deal," adding: "We are taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation."
"Our president understands what to do. He's going to go work it out," Lutnick said.
sst-gl/md
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
32 minutes ago
- India Today
Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has expressed strong optimism regarding the imminent finalisation of a trade deal between India and the United States, saying that an agreement could be reached in the "not-too-distant future".Secretary Lutnick highlighted that both nations have found a common ground that "really works for both countries," suggesting a breakthrough in long-standing negotiations.'You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future... When they put the right person in India, put the right person on the other side of the table, and we've managed (that), I think," Lutnick said at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum's Leadership Summit in The two countries intensified trade deal discussions after US President Donald Trump recently announced reciprocal tariffs on nations accused of causing trade imbalances, including India. However, the tariffs were later paused for 90 days, except for remarks, delivered at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) in Washington, underscore a significant push by the Trump administration to expedite trade US Commerce Secretary's remarks came just days after reports suggested that India is seeking a complete exemption from the additional 26 per cent tariff imposed by the United States on its goods, as both sides race to finalise an interim trade deal before July 8. The remarks also follow President Trump's claim that India had offered the US a tariff-free trade deal, a statement New Delhi rejected, clarifying that discussions are still ongoing to reach a win-win Monday, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said India and the US desire to give preferential market access to each other's businesses and teams of both countries are working together on the proposed bilateral trade agreement."Both countries are committed to work together, both countries desire to give preferential access to each other's businesses and we are working towards the bilateral trade agreement," Goyal said. In February, US President Trump and Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi announced plans to negotiate the first tranche or phase of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) of 2025. It is aimed at more than doubling the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 from the current level of USD 191 billion.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs
Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The Justice Department's request came after San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked large-scale federal layoffs , known as " reductions in force ," in a May 22 ruling siding with a group of unions, non-profit groups and local governments that challenged the administration. The case involves the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, among others. Controlling the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in the filing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente Acabe com o Fungo Undo "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential authority. The Supreme Court requested a response by the plaintiffs in the case to the administration's filing by June 9. Live Events Trump directed federal agencies in February to "promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force" as part of his administration's restructuring plans. Illston wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston wrote. Illston on May 9 had initially blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs. She continued most of that relief in her May 22 ruling. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the Trump administration 's request to halt the judge's ruling. The 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit. "The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations." Trump's administration has sought relief from the Supreme Court in a growing number of cases following rulings by lower courts impeding various policies since he returned to office in January.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'
Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: 'No one needed to persuade us' "We have enormous respect for the American presidency, and we will speak with that respect in mind. But broadly speaking, our understanding is a bit different... No one needed to persuade us to stop. We had already said to stop. If there was any persuasion by the American president or his senior officials, it would have been persuasion of the Pakistanis. They would have had to be persuaded. We don't need to be persuaded because we don't want war. We want to focus on development. That's the basic message," says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, as the delegation he is leading will be in the US for its last leg of the visit. More details are being added.
