Sorry doesn't cut it: How female voters turned on the Coalition's confusing cost-of-living pitch in the space of just a few months
There was the rightly-proud Jodie Haydon planting a passionate smacker on her victorious fiancé Anthony Albanese, now a back-to-back PM.
And then stoic Kirilly Dutton, her eyes brimming and mustering up a smile on stage for her husband Peter while he apologised to the nation for losing the only political fight of his life that mattered.
'We didn't do well enough during this campaign,' Mr Dutton said, swallowing hard.
'That much is obvious tonight. I accept full responsibility for that.'
But in reality the now ex Opposition leader should have said sorry for letting down Australian women, especially working mums, because he pitched confusion ahead of reassurance especially on household finance.
It was no secret that women had abandoned Mr Dutton before Saturday's vote.
For 11 days before the ballot box, we all knew via a Newspoll for The Australian that there was a staggering reversal in the attitude of female voters who once favoured the Coalition.
A lead of 51-49 in January slumped to an eye-watering shift of 46-54 to Labor by April.
Just like the Coalition failed to capitalise on momentum after the failed Voice referendum, they did not seriously address the concerns of women even though the data was there.
Three words Mr Dutton - cost of living.
And if you lose the CEO of households across Australia you are, to be plain speaking, stuffed.
The Coalition's crushing defeat is more than a political misstep.
It is a backlash from women fed up with being treated like a test subject in focus groups.
No matter our views on Trump and a legitimate fatigue with woke ideology, we didn't want Mr Dutton to align himself with the MAGA movement as a campaign strategy.
We didn't want more than a dozen campaign press conferences at petrol stations talking about 12 months of somewhat cheaper fuel, a tactic which only reinforced his blokey focus.
Mr Dutton's ham-fisted attempt to roll back remote work then hit women the hardest and you have to wonder why he did not see the backlash coming.
The eventual policy backflip did nothing to suture the wound especially when approximately 40 per cent of Australians now work from home on a regular basis.
Sorry, Mr Dutton said.
Again with the 'sorry' from the first Federal Opposition leader to then lose his seat.
'We made a mistake on the policy,' Mr Dutton later admitted.
'We got it wrong. We're listening to what people have to say and we apologise.'
He also backed down on a goal to slash 41,000 public service jobs which meant many perplexed female voters I know were now asking one key thing.
How will the Coalition deliver its major election promises when they are linked to savings from the public sector cuts?
Sure Labor ran a dirty campaign with Mediscare and lured voters with fear politics but the party did prioritise the material concerns of women and made those policies public early, forcing the Coalition to play catch up.
These included the much-vaunted universal early childhood education pledge for a guaranteed three days of subsidised childcare per week, investment in women's health and significant funding to tackling domestic and family violence.
In his concession speech, Mr Dutton said: 'One of the great honours of being the leader of this party is we have met people from every side, every corner, the length and breadth of this country. And there are many amazing stories.'
But did those stories - particularly from women - sink in?
We are not liabilities to be managed.
The message here for the freshly buffed-up Labor is important to note, too.
The trust women have placed in your promises is not a blank cheque.
You got the female votes and now it is time to deliver.
Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Australia dodges bullet as Trump keeps base tariff at 10pc
Australia has dodged a bullet for now with US president Donald Trump deciding leaving unchanged the basic 10 per cent import tariff he has applied to Australian goods. To the relief of the Albanese government, there was no specific mention of Australia on Friday morning AEST when Trump issued an executive order updating the reciprocal tariffs on more than 40 countries which he announced on 'liberation day' in early April.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump holds tariff rate at 10 per cent for Australia
Australia has dodged a higher tariff from the US as President Donald Trump unleashed a wave of increased levies on imports from other countries on Thursday. Mr Trump signed in higher rates for many countries under a new executive order, but the tariff on Australian imports will remain at the original baseline of 10 per cent. The US leader had earlier threatened to increase tariffs on Australia to 15 or 20 per cent. In a statement from Thursday morning, the Whitehouse said President Trump had decided to 'adjust' his 'reciprocal' tariff regime, first announced on April 2, in response to trade negotiations with individual countries. 'Several countries have agreed to, or are on the verge of agreeing to, meaningful trade deals and security agreements with the United States,' the statements reads. 'Some countries, through negotiations, have offered terms that, in the President's judgment, do not sufficiently address the national emergency he declared on April 2. 'Some countries have not negotiated at all with the United States. 'Based on this additional information and recommendations from senior officials, among other things, the President has determined that it is necessary and appropriate to modify the reciprocal tariff rates for certain countries.' The Whitehouse then lists a set of countries under 'Annex 1', with individual tariff rates set out for each nation. 'Countries not listed in Annex I will be subject to a 10 per cent tariff,' the Whitehouse said. Australia is not included in Annex 1. Several countries, including ostensible US allies, now face steeper import duties. Canada has been whacked with a higher 35 per cent tariff, a move up from its original 25 per cent hit. Taiwan, a key US ally in Asia, faces a 20 per cent rate. Small nations with tiny economies have also been slammed. The Pacific country of Vanuatu, with a population of some 330,000, faces a 15 per cent tariff, while Laos has copped a 40 per cent tariff blow. A tariff is a tax placed on imports and steep tariffs can effectively cripple exports. The hold at 10 per cent is likely to engender relief in Australian business and political circles. A spokesman for Trade Minister Don Farrell confirmed no country had reciprocal tariffs lower than Australia. 'While we remain in the best possible position under the US' new tariff regime, we will continue to advocate for the removal of all tariffs in line with our free trade agreement,' the spokesman said. Australia has a free-trade agreement with the US and does not place tariffs on US exports. The hold comes one week after the Albanese government agreed to allow beef imports from North America into the domestic market. The government denied the timing of the decision had anything to do with drawn-out tariff exemption talks with the US. Cattle producers have flagged biosecurity risks to the move, but the government insists beef sourced from Canada and Mexico and processed in the US would be safe. 'It was not a trade decision … the American systems were assessed by our independent officials over the last several months and found to be up to scratch,' Health Minister Mark Butler said. IG markets analyst Tony Sycamore said the initial market reaction to news had been 'relatively subdued', but retaliatory tariffs from impacted countries could trigger volatility. 'Market reactions to the newly announced tariffs have been relatively subdued, largely due to recent trade agreements with the EU, Japan, and South Korea and others that have mitigated their impact,' he said. 'What could change this situation, is retaliatory tariffs from impacted countries which in turn could lead to higher tariffs from the US than the ones announced this morning.' More to come. Originally published as US President Donald Trump holds tariff rate for Australia at 10 per cent
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Spy agency cracking down on ‘reckless' boasts by people with top-secret clearance
Top-secret security-clearance holders will be banned from posting about their position on social media in a move to protect the country from the $12.5 billion a year threat of espionage. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said on Thursday that more than 35,000 Australians had exposed themselves by 'recklessly' implying on professional networking sites they had access to sensitive information, with almost 2500 declaring they had a security clearance. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said on Friday stricter conditions would be enforced to stamp out the practice after the government moved responsibility for the highest levels of clearance to ASIO's purview from the dedicated agency which handles lower level security passes. 'What ASIO is going to start doing with those top secret clearances is just make it a condition [to not post about it online], he told ABC's News Breakfast. 'And if you start putting it up on social media, then what you put up on social media will no longer be true because you won't hold the clearance any more. If you're going to have a top-secret clearance, you need to show that you're worthy of it.' Burke said the government had given similar advice to security-clearance holders after the issue was first raised by Burgess in 2023, resulting in an 85 per cent reduction in the number of people boasting of security clearances online. He said Australians needed to be aware that spies wanted to steal both commercial and government secrets. Loading 'It doesn't all have to be defence and military. A lot of it could be commercial information. It doesn't mean you treat everybody with paranoia or anything like that, but you be discreet. And you work on the basis that if information's confidential, it's confidential for a reason,' he said. Burke said he understood the people's desire to market themselves to potential employers, but declared that foreign spies should not be able to identify targets by simply Googling.
