Stop Funding Hate campaign group accused of amplifying ‘anti-Semites'
Followers of Stop Funding Hate, which runs campaigns against the Right-wing media, have used its Facebook page to post slurs about Marks & Spencer (M&S) supporting 'Nazis' and 'genocide'.
Stop Funding Hate claims to challenge 'all forms of discrimination without exception', but MPs say it has failed to act when Jewish people are the target of hatred on its own social media account.
The group has been targeting Marks & Spencer for advertising on GB News.
Comments from third parties that have appeared on Stop Funding Hate's Facebook page in recent months have included 'M&S support Nazis', 'M&S are a company run by misogynistic fascists' and 'I refuse to shop at M&S because I object to my hard-earned money being used to support fascists'.
Marks & Spencer, founded by Michael Marks, a Jewish immigrant, has been a favourite target of anti-Israel protesters, who object to the brand selling Israeli-sourced goods.
Anti-Semitic slurs
Stop Funding Hate is encouraging people to sign a petition calling on M&S to stop advertising on GB News's radio station, which has been supported by people who have in the past used remarks such as 'Jew vermin' and other anti-Semitic hatred.
Stop Funding Hate is run by Richard Wilson, a Jeremy Corbyn supporter who aims to 'defund' Right-leaning media outlets by running social media campaigns against companies that advertise with them.
The campaign group has received £100,000 from a foundation that receives grants from the taxpayer, The Telegraph reported in January.
It regularly retweets posts on X from people who say they are backing the anti-M&S petition. Some of those signatories of the petition have in the past posted vile anti-Semitic slurs.
One of them has in the past described Israelis as 'Jew vermin' and said 'Israel is a Jewish terrorist state'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
What is there to be optimistic about for British business?
In this season of scant corporate news – a Ryanair rant against the French here, a new BP oilfield there – it's hard to know what business leaders are thinking about the cold months to come. Until, that is, you read a survey conducted last month for the Institute of Directors. Given that I'm writing from France this month, I'd call it an absolute croissant-dropper. The nub is that 639 UK businesses, large and small, report 'optimism in prospects for the UK economy' at -72, lower even than their darkest pandemic sentiment at -69 in April 2020. Export hopes and investment intentions are down, wage expectations are sharply up and, unsurprisingly, headcounts are set to fall. No less than 85 per cent of respondents believe 'government policy so far will be unsuccessful in driving up economic growth'. Significantly, this isn't just traditional anti-Labour boardroom sentiment: the confidence index spiked in positive territory immediately after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory. But it plunged after Rachel Reeves's October Budget and is now at its lowest since the series began in 2016. Many firms are 'struggling to plan amid a cacophony of risk', adds the Institute's chief economist Anna Leach. 'The government must urgently quash rumours of further tax rises for business this autumn, and accelerate planning reforms and deregulation.' To which Downing Street spinners might respond, 'Who listens to the diminished IoD these days?' But then again, who else out there is trying to interpret the exigencies of hard-pressed business to Labour's cabinet of incompetents and union toadies? Where are they now, the 121 'business leaders and investors' (albeit many we'd never heard of) who signed a pre-election letter last May endorsing Labour's plan for growth which so rapidly turned to dust? The bitter truth is that this is the least business-savvy government for the past 50 years. And if a cross-section of frontline corporate chiefs are as utterly disheartened as the IoD survey suggests, things can only get worse. Airport scuffle I hesitate to wade into an airport scuffle between two entities I admire, namely Ryanair and, in a very broad sense, the French Republic. But the airline claims that 36,000 of its flights between January and July suffered delays caused by mismanagement and strikes in French air traffic control. It also says that a hike in 'solidarity tax' on short-haul fares from €2.63 to €7.40 has rendered many French routes uneconomic, necessitating a 750,000-seat cull for the coming winter and further cuts in 2026 that will 'leave French regional airports half empty' – where it might otherwise have invested $2.5 billion for a doubling of passenger numbers. Normally I'd cheerlead for Ryanair here, but its stand-off includes the total closure of services to two airports, Bergerac and Brive, I use often – and I won't be taking private jets instead, since they now incur a tax of €420 per passenger. Perhaps Donald Trump's special diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff could usefully be re-routed to negotiate a peace settlement. Shape-shifting BP Even the most ardent climate-change activist – though perhaps not Ed Miliband – should admire the resilience of BP. The energy giant has announced a major oil and gas discovery in the Santos basin off Brazil following finds in Trinidad and north Africa and, in defiance of Miliband, the reopening of the mothballed Murlach field in the North Sea. This is the company that suffered huge flak for its Texas City refinery fire in 2005 and Deepwater Horizon rig explosion in 2010, took write-offs of $24 billion on its exit from Russia in 2022 – and declared a pivot towards renewables which it has lately abandoned in favour of lots more oil and gas. Meanwhile its share price stands lower than 20 years ago, as does its reputation among peers, summed up by a rival director as 'leaden-footed, high-cost and over-bureaucratic'. Just as the once world-scale Royal Bank of Scotland has shrunk to a string of north-of-the-border branches, so by rights BP ought to have survived as little more than a filling-station logo. But it's still a global player – and that shape-shifting power of self-renewal is, for me, what makes the big corporate world such a fascinating field of study. The hat man's lament The hat merchant of Monpazier is so lugubrious, despite selling my party several sunhats then inviting himself to join us for a beer, that I wonder whether he might be president of a French branch of the Institute of Directors. Consumer spending really is flatter than a flat cap this summer, he tells me, especially by the tribe of campeurs hollondais who are the paradigm of tight-fisted tourism in these parts. And as a purveyor of cheap baseball caps from India and pricier Panamas from Ecuador, he's a tiny cog in a global trade machine that's spluttering under the onslaught of Trump's tariffs and the retreat of globalisation. So his doom-laden tour d'horizon is not without cause. It rhymes with reports that unemployment for French 15- to 24-year-olds persists at around 19 per cent, within an overall rate of 7.5 per cent – compared with ours at 4.7 per cent, if you believe the way it's measured – and that tens of thousands more jobs are at the mercy of Trump's whim. Against that backdrop, did I perhaps over-egg the francophilia when I wrote last week about the animal spirits of my own revivified village of St Pompon? Saturday's marché gourmand nocturne offers a test. In early evening heat close to 40°C, the crowd and the trade are thin. But as the sun sets, the trestle tables fill up, the food queues lengthen, even the Dutch campers spend freely – and at dusk the DJ plays a version of 'Le Madison' that brings out 30 spontaneous line dancers, including the village postmaster, in perfect formation. Rosé from Puy l'Évêque at €7 a bottle helps, but the upbeat energy I was looking for is here – and my eyes are filled with tears.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Labour's new ‘dark arts' strategy
Senior Labour figures have given up hope of beating Nigel Farage in 2029. There are two causes for this pessimism. One is the economy. Forecasts suggest living standards will continue to decline over the next four years. The other is illegal immigration, which Keir Starmer will continue to make noises against, but which his human-rights-lawyer instincts prevent him from tackling. Faced with such a grim future, some Labour advisers are speaking about leaving the government to avoid having their reputations tainted by what comes next. Others are more ruthless. They point to another tool: the practice called 'opposition research' but known better as the 'dark arts'. The aim is to target Farage not by engaging with his ideas, but by using the press to reveal compromising information about his inner circle to tarnish Reform's reputation. This is not a new feature of politics, but Labour's recent personnel changes suggest a hardening in strategy. Damian McBride – whose tactics when employed by Gordon Brown were so toxic that even Alastair Campbell denounced them – is back as an adviser to Yvette Cooper. Paul Ovenden, the government's new director of strategy, spent his time in opposition directing Labour's attack and rebuttal unit. Sources tell me that an 'attack team' has been assembled in No. 10 with the remit of challenging Reform. The team will work under Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's political secretary, who was brought into the centre of politics by the original 'Prince of Darkness', Peter Mandelson. In the early 2000s McSweeney worked on Mandelson's 'Excalibur system', a database which New Labour used to gather information about internal political rivals and intimidate recusant party members. He then led the purges against the Corbynites and supporting media institutions, such as the Canary, in part through the digital collection of anti-Semitic activity on social media. Farage has been so scrutinised in his decades on the front line of politics that even Labour knows digging up his old controversial comments is pointless. Instead, I am told, the attack operation will focus more on the people surrounding him. George Cottrell, officially an unpaid Reform adviser, who in 2016 served eight months in an American jail for wire fraud, has been mentioned as a potential target. Public records and Meta's own transparency tools show Reform UK's official Facebook page has at least one administrator based in Montenegro – where Cottrell lives and operates part of his business empire. This finding has been verified through Facebook's 'Page Transparency' feature. In recent days, a mysterious Substack named 'The State of UK' has published detailed investigations into Cottrell's business network. Much of this is reminiscent of the tactics which Democratic operatives attempted to use with Donald Trump: pursuing legal, financial and reputational warfare against not just him, but those around him. The campaign is likely to fail here for the same reason it failed in America. It hands Farage the narrative that he is a popular figure being hounded because he is a threat to the establishment. The political class no longer controls the conversation in the way it once did. The idea that stories can be seeded in the Times and picked up by Newsnight and assumed to have public impact belongs to a media ecosystem that no longer exists. Most voters will not hear smears unless they are mocked or repurposed on social media – and by that point, they usually serve the opposite purpose. How the establishment responds to the increasingly credible prospect of Farage becoming PM will have consequences for the future of liberal democracy. The two-party system has historically survived by accommodating challenges. Unlike our continental neighbours, we avoided revolutions not through suppression, but by absorbing dissenting voices into the system, allowing change to happen peacefully. A hysterical reaction to Farage risks ending that tradition. He is not calling for violence but for politics rooted in the national interest, democratic instinct and popular consent. If the response to that is smears and legal warfare, it will not be him who looks dangerous – it will be the system itself.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
S&P 500, Nasdaq hit new closing highs on rate cut hopes
NEW YORK, Aug 13 (Reuters) - The benchmark S&P 500 and Nasdaq indexes hit new closing highs for the second straight day on Wednesday on hopes that the Federal Reserve was getting close to a monetary easing cycle. But the market reflected weakness in some technology stocks after the previous day's strong gains. Signs that U.S. tariffs on imports have not fully filtered into headline consumer prices came as a relief for investors this week as they seek insight on the impact of trade uncertainty on the economy. Some large technology stocks including Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab - among the so-called Magnificent Seven stocks - were lower as investors searched for new growth drivers. "Valuations are elevated. I do think, though, at the end of the day, the key will be the delivery of earnings, and that's what we're seeing," said Katherine Bordlemay, co-head of client portfolio management, fundamental equities at Goldman Sachs Asset Management. She said the dispersion of stock-level returns in the U.S. is at one of the higher levels of the last 30 years. Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab rose as Bloomberg News reported the company is plotting expansion into AI-powered robots, home security and smart displays. According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab gained 21.01 points, or 0.33%, to end at 6,466.77 points, while the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab gained 32.08 points, or 0.15%, to 21,713.99. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI), opens new tab rose 469.10 points, or 1.06%, to 44,927.71. The Russell 2000 index (.RUT), opens new tab, which tracks rate-sensitive small-cap companies, added more gains to hit a six-month high. Traders are now fully pricing in a 25 basis-point interest rate cut, according to the CME's FedWatch Tool. The central bank last lowered borrowing costs in December. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Wednesday he thought an aggressive half-point cut was possible, given recent weak employment numbers. Investors were also taking notice of other sectors following the recent tech-led rally in U.S. stocks that has pushed valuations of the S&P 500 above long-term averages. Healthcare stocks (.SPXHC), opens new tab, which have been beaten down for much of the year, led gains among the 11 S&P 500 sectors. Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee said on Wednesday the U.S. central bank is grappling with understanding whether tariffs will push up inflation just temporarily or more persistently, which would inform its decision on when to cut interest rates. CoreWeave (CRWV.O), opens new tab, which is backed by Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, fell sharply after the AI data center operator reported a bigger-than-expected quarterly net loss. Paramount Skydance (PSKY.O), opens new tab jumped as the company won exclusive broadcasting rights to the Ultimate Fighting Championship for seven years.
