Tesla Sales Could Be Suspended In California
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has filed a lawsuit seeking to suspend Tesla's sales and manufacturing operations in California for at least 30 days.
The lawsuit, first filed in 2022 and amended in 2023, accuses Tesla of misleading consumers about the self-driving capabilities of its 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' features, both of which are highly-advertized selling points for Tesla vehicles.
Newsweek contacted California's DMV and Tesla for comment on this story via email.
Why It Matters
California represents a critical market for Elon Musk's company, as the largest state by population. Tesla's success here is helped greatly by the San Francisco market, which leans heavily towards electric vehicles and new technology.
A 30-day sales ban could significantly disrupt the company's revenue and reputation. The DMV's lawsuit highlights broader scrutiny on how automakers market semi-autonomous features, and its outcome may influence industry standards nationally.
What To Know
Representatives of Tesla and the DMV will meet this week in California to discuss the 30-day pause on sales.
In the court filings, California attorneys have picked out four phrases or product descriptions from Tesla's website which the state believes are misleading to the point of being false advertising.
Phrases like 'autopilot', 'full self-driving capability' and the claim that Tesla vehicles are "designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat" were all pointed out in court filings by California's Department of Justice representatives.
The exterior of the Tesla automotive company manufacturing facility on September 18, 2023 in Fremont, California.
The exterior of the Tesla automotive company manufacturing facility on September 18, 2023 in Fremont, California.
Getty Images
Attorney General Rob Bonta, writing on July 17 in a statement on the lawsuit, said: "These labels and descriptions represent specifically that respondent [Tesla]'s vehicles will operate as autonomous vehicles, which they could not and cannot do."
Tesla's legal team has said the company "has always made clear" that the cars it makes are not technically fully autonomous, because they require "active driver supervision" from a human.
What People Are Saying
In statements that the DMV highlighted as legally questionable, Tesla advertising said: "The system is designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat.
"From Home – All you will need to do is get in and tell your car where to go. If you don't say anything, your car will look at your calendar and take you there as the assumed destination. Your Tesla will figure out the optimal route, navigating urban streets, complex intersections and freeways. To your Destination -When you arrive at your destination, simply step out at the entrance and your car will enter park seek mode, automatically search for a spot and park itself. A tap on your phone summons it back to you."
What Happens Next
The outcome of the DMV's lawsuit could result in a 30-day suspension of Tesla's dealer and manufacturing licenses in California. Such a measure would affect Tesla's short-term sales and could lead to further regulations on how automakers promote advanced driver assistance systems.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘His income is limited': Should I pay $800 a month towards my husband's $67,000 student debt?
My husband is 40 and I am 44. When we got married a year ago, I was aware that he had about $67,000 in student-loan debt as well as credit-card debt from living paycheck-to-paycheck. He never consolidated his student loans and they all have varying interest rates between 5% to 8%. I did not have him consolidate the loans as there were potential benefits under the Biden administration for him not doing so. In the meantime, I was able to get him to change his spending habits and pay off all his credit cards by helping him understand the principles behind how interest and payments work. He also has his own business, which has a small financial footprint supported by his income. As for myself, my income allowed me to purchase a house in 2020 with a 2.6% interest rate. I am able to pay all the bills to support us both and then some. Wall Street braces for deluge of Treasury bills, a crucial test of market demand Why Tesla analysts are mostly upbeat about earnings, but investors aren't happy 'If I was writing the checks at Coke, I wouldn't write the check for this,' one expert says about cane-sugar Coke Related: The 5 huge changes coming for student-loan borrowers and colleges under GOP megabill I have stopped short of paying for his business, his car payment and health insurance. Yes, there are a few incidentals he also helps support for our family, such as food, but his income is limited due to his new business and part-time work. I would like to grow my retirement and emergency funds some more, but I am very aware of my husband's student-loan debt, which he is not paying down in a timely manner. I graduated with about $57,000 worth of student loans in the early 2000s. A modest lifestyle on an income that rarely topped $15 per hour and low rent helped me pay off my own student-loan debt in 10 years. I have been working for the same company for over 15 years and I have built a career path that has led me to making almost six figures annually. I have an estimated retirement income of about $6,500 per month. I believe I can contribute about $800 per month to paying off my husband's student-loan debt. From what I understand, I am not legally responsible for his student debt, which was all taken out by him before we were married. We also keep our bank accounts separate so that if something should happen where the government lands on student loans, my income is in no way touched and all the normal bills could be paid like normal. Am I better off paying toward my husband's student-loan payments, or should I take this monthly amount and invest it elsewhere? Thank you for your kind attention. Student Loans Are Killing Us All Don't miss: 'Why am I so afraid to retire?' I'm 60 and lost $1.2 million in a divorce. Can I rebuild my life? I have a funny feeling you're going to do what you're going to do. But since you asked… You married this man, who may be a wonderful guy, and appear to be paying the lion's share of the bills. You are now considering crossing that imaginary line and helping him pay off other extraneous expenses, and are now giving serious consideration to paying off his student debt. Paying your husband's bills won't teach him to make smarter financial decisions in the future, nor will it help you in your own retirement goals. The fact that he would actually accept $800 a month from you to pay off his student debt also gives me pause. It tells me: He ain't gonna change his financial habits. You are not responsible for these loans, as I'm sure you are aware, given that they were taken out before your marriage. So I wonder why you have the 'disease to please' or, in this context, the 'fret about his debt,' and see it as much your obligation to pay off as his. Why do you see his debts as your duty to pay? You don't have to pay his bills. You don't have to make up the shortfall because his business is not performing. You don't have to take money from your own retirement fund in order to pay off his student loan because he didn't do what you did —live far below your means and work a $15-an-hour job. You didn't clear your own loan so you would have the time/money to clear his debts. If you paid off this loan solo — let's say your husband became overwhelmed with other expenses, which would not be so farfetched given his current and previous financial situation — it would take you more than 10 years and end up costing you nearly $100,000, including roughly $33,000 in interest. If you and he paid $800 each, it would take half that time (five years) and cost just over $76,000, including $9,000 interest. Related: My husband and I are 40. I have $200,000 in student debt, while he has $600,000 in retirement savings. Are we in trouble? It's important to see what you are giving up by paying your husband's debts: Let's say you invested $800 a month in the S&P 500 SPX for 10 years and 4 months — the same amount of time it would take you to pay off his student loan alone. At an average annual return of 7%, compounded monthly, you would end up with $138,000 for your retirement and/or emergency fund by the time you're 54. Nice work, if you can get it. If you do the math, it makes more sense for you to invest that $800 and tell your husband that he should put together a plan to pay his student loan just like you did. If you don't pay his student loans, it doesn't mean that you don't love him. It doesn't make you a bad person or an uncaring or unsympathetic partner. It does make you somebody who values their own financial independence and intends to lead by example. Let me share a story with you that I have not thought about in many years. When I was a kid, I had a paper route. It was, you might say, my first job in journalism. I finished school early on a Wednesday afternoon and I delivered newspapers for exactly one penny per paper. It sounds like I grew up in Dickensian times, but it was Ireland before the economic boom. It was my first taste of earning my own money and it felt bloody great. One week, I finished my paper route shortly after lunch and my friend who lived on my street neglected to do his route until late in the day, so I suggested helping him. It never occurred to me to ask for money and, if he did offer, I refused. Either way, I arrived home empty handed feeling pretty good about my good deed. My mother went through me for a short cut. She told me I should not have done half of his route in addition to my own. That's a roundabout way of saying: Allow your husband to deliver his own newspapers. Related: My daughter has $500K in med-school expenses. Can my wife and I afford to pay it off? My daughter has $500K in med-school expenses. Can my wife and I afford to pay it off? Can my husband contest his late brother's $600K will? He experienced oxygen deprivation due to COPD before he died. I have early Alzheimer's and my husband has stage 4 kidney disease. We just inherited $50K. How can this help us? . 'I'm already up $45,000 in about an hour' — Reddit traders boast about wins as meme-stock mania returns Dow cuts dividend in half in reaction to 'lower-for-longer' earnings The S&P 500 just did something it's only done four times in 50 years. Here's what happened next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Tesla wants to bring its robotaxis to San Francisco. Here is what's standing in the way.
Tesla is launching an even-more-limited version of its early robotaxi service in San Francisco this weekend, according to Business Insider, after an initial rollout began last month in Austin, Texas. The company plans to send invites to Tesla owners to test the service, according to the report. Depending on how and if Tesla proceeds, its actions could violate state regulations — and even if there's a human safety driver sitting behind the wheel while its vehicles operate autonomously. Two state agencies regulate aspects of autonomous vehicles in California. The California Department of Motor Vehicles regulates the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles, and requires permits for all three stages: testing with a driver, testing without a driver, and driverless deployment. Tesla holds a permit for testing autonomous vehicles with a human safety operator behind the wheel. It doesn't have a permit for driverless testing or deployment. And as of Wednesday it had not yet applied for additional permits, according to the DMV. (Mercedes-Benz, Nuro, and Waymo are the only three companies that hold driverless deployment permits.) Nor does Tesla have the proper permits from the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates the commercial aspects of ride-hailing and chartered transportation by humans as well as those steered by autonomous vehicle systems. Tesla has a Transportation Charter Party permit, which allows a human driver to drive a traditional vehicle (not an AV) for charter services with the public, CPUC spokesperson Terrie Prosper told TechCrunch in an email. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW This is distinctly different from an autonomous vehicle permit for passenger transportation, according to Prosper. So-called AV authorizations, which Tesla doesn't have, allows for the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles with or without a driver. Tesla has not received approval from the CPUC to offer autonomous passenger service to customers, paid or unpaid, with or without a driver (nor has the company applied), Prosper explained in the email. Tesla also doesn't hold a 'Drivered Pilot AV permit' from the CPUC, so it cannot even use an autonomous vehicle with a human operator behind the wheel for passenger service. This means that if Tesla deploys its robotaxis and the autonomous systems are engaged it will be violating state regulations even if the rides are free and there is a human safety operator behind the wheel. The push into California comes as the DMV is currently trying to stop Tesla from selling vehicles in the state as part of a years-long lawsuit over the promises the company has made about its cars' self-driving abilities. Tesla is also currently on trial in a lawsuit over deaths related to the use of its less-capable driver assistance system, Autopilot. Tesla has been running an invite-only version of its robotaxi service in Austin since June 22. It's so far been a far cry from what Musk has spent years teasing. The service is mostly limited to Austin's downtown core and main corridors. There is a safety operator in the front passenger seat who can intervene if the car is about to do something wrong or dangerous. While the service launched with around 10 vehicles, it's not clear how many Model Y SUVs are in operation in the city, nor is it clear how many times those safety operators have had to intervene. That's a long way from the 'general solution' that Musk said Tesla was working on for a decade. Musk was once so confident in the autonomous software Tesla was developing that he said it would take a car from Los Angeles to New York — a stunt that never happened. Musk said this week that Tesla is also trying to expand to Florida and Arizona. TechCrunch reported earlier this month that Tesla had begun the required certification process to test and operate with and without a driver in Arizona.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Oscar Piastri Sends a Message With Sprint Qualifying Domination at Spa
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Drivers' Championship leader Oscar Piastri secured pole position for the Belgium Grand Prix Sprint Race, setting a blistering time which rival Max Verstappen could not beat. Piastri cleared Verstappen by more than four-tenths and cleared his teammate Lando Norris by six-tenths. The Australian driver topped the times during Free Practice 1 as well, although he narrowly missed out in SQ2 after his lap was deleted for exceeding the limits. After the session, Piastri addressed his "scare" during the second part of qualifying. Max Verstappen of the Netherlands and Oracle Red Bull Racing congratulates Oscar Piastri of Australia and McLaren in Parc ferme during Sprint qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Belgium at Circuit de... Max Verstappen of the Netherlands and Oracle Red Bull Racing congratulates Oscar Piastri of Australia and McLaren in Parc ferme during Sprint qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Belgium at Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps on July 25, 2025 in Spa, Belgium. More Photo by"It was a good lap. A little scare in SQ2 with the lap deletion but the car has been mega all day. I feel like I was able to put in a lot of good laps. Thanks to the team, the car has been great," he said. "This is a track I love. It's my favourite one of the year. Maybe that gave me an extra couple of tenths. "When the car is handling as well as it was today, it's a pleasure." Even though he is starting at the top, he will need to watch out for Verstappen, who appears rapid at one of his best tracks. The RB21 was set up well, and Piastri is well aware of the threat behind him for the sprint race start. "Red Bull are quick in a straight line. That will make life difficult and Spa is probably the worst track to have pole at," he added. "I think the pace in the car is really strong and I felt good today, so hopefully we can have a good day tomorrow." Piastri has the opportunity to grow his championship lead again on Saturday, given that his only true rival for the title is his teammate Lando Norris, who appears out of sorts with the car at Spa. He is eight points ahead of Norris and a whopping 69 points ahead of Verstappen. In a title race, a sprint race win could help Piastri gain a big edge heading into the upcoming summer break. Belgium Grand Prix Sprint Qualifying Results
