Increasing Support For Social Media Ban
A new poll has found increasing support for a ban on social media for children under 16, and decreasing opposition.
In a poll by Curia Market Research and commissioned by Family First NZ, 1,000 respondents were asked: Would you support or oppose a law that bans children from all social media until they reach 16 years of age?
56% of respondents support banning children under 16 from social media, and 26% are opposed.
A similar poll with the same wording by the same research company in April 2024 found opposition at 45% and support at just 39%.
Support for a social media ban has grown from 39% support to 56% support in just over 12 months. Opposition has dropped form 45% to 26%. In both polls, 16-18% are uncertain.
Those with dependent children were more likely to support the ban (62%) than those without dependent children (53%).
Interestingly, when comparing the two polls, net support for a ban has risen amongst National, Labour and Green voters.
Family First has long advocated for better regulation of social media and support for parents so as to protect young people.
'First and foremost, there needs to be a community response where parents unite to ensure their young children are not exposed to social media, but there is also room for government support to empower parents,' says Mr McCoskrie.
Dr Jonathan Haidt - author of ' The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness ' - notes in his acclaimed research that there is a clear correlation between the introduction of smart phones and a significant decline in young people's mental health. (Dr Haidt was a guest at last year's Forum on the Family and he called on New Zealand and other countries to do more to protect young people from the harms online.)
'This is an important discussion which should not be delayed any further.'
The nationwide poll was carried out between 19 May and 21 May and has a margin of error of +/- 3.1%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Halfway down ‘Dickhead' Road
When was the last time you really, truly respected one of our politicians? Looked up to one, even? Don't spend too long mulling over your answer. If it hasn't come to mind within a few seconds, then that probably tells you all you need to know. The times have changed, of course, since such prominent leaders as National's Keith Holyoake and John Marshall ("Gentleman Jack") and Labour's Bill Rowling strode the New Zealand political stage, emanating careful concern, politeness and a genuine desire to treat others graciously and with dignity. Today we might be tempted to call them stuffy or pompous, prim and proper. But one thing they weren't, at least in public, was nasty or loud-mouthed. The rise in nastiness and adoption of rabble-rousing techniques came in with the arrival of the doughty, confrontational Robert Muldoon as prime minister in the mid-1970s. It would be far from truthful to say every politician since has exhibited such truculence, as plenty during the decades since have continued to be trustworthy and garner public respect. However, Mr Muldoon certainly opened the door to a new spiteful and pugnacious style of politicking. Leader of the House is one of the most senior and important roles in Parliament. The minister bestowed with that title at the behest of the prime minister has to manage the passage of government business through the House and takes primary responsibility for the programme of making new laws. The holder of these tasks is expected, one might think, to display maturity and gravitas. That person should lead by example, and be worthy of being ranked in the government's top three or four ministers. Hutt South MP Chris Bishop has been Leader of the House since November 2023 and also holds several large portfolios, including transport and housing. He has been a colourful and somewhat controversial minister since first being elected as a list MP in 2014. As affable as Mr Bishop is, he has also shown he is unafraid of speaking out bluntly on issues he views as too left-wing or woke. Leader of the House Chris Bishop. Photo: ODT files Fast forward to last Thursday evening's Aotearoa Music Awards in Auckland and an episode which was caught on video. Seemingly irritated by a performance by singer Stan Walker which featured Toitū Te Tiriti banners and others waving tino rangatiratanga flags, Mr Bishop uttered "what a load of crap". Kiwi musician Don McGlashan decided to take Mr Bishop to task for his outburst, although he said after he did not realise at first who he was. "I could hear an enormous amount of ranting, kind of against the whole thing. I didn't get the full gist of it, but it was basically — 'the hīkoi is ages ago, sit down everybody'," Mr McGlashan told RNZ. "Shut up, you dickhead," Mr McGlashan said and then repeated when Mr Bishop replied, "What did you say to me?". By then, he recognised who Mr Bishop was. In the subsequent reporting imbroglio, Mr Bishop admitted his comments were poorly judged and "on reflection, I should have kept my thoughts to myself". But he denied claims he had remarked specifically on the hikoi and presented the red herring that the response was a "political smear job". He subsequently declined to apologise to Walker. Unsurprisingly, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon does not want a bar of it. Also unsurprisingly, Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour has backed Mr Bishop, saying a senior minister should not stop having opinions and that "it may be that people will agree with him". Yes indeed, Mr Bishop, you should have kept your thoughts to yourself. This occasion was neither the time nor the place for such conduct, especially not for someone of such seniority. Even in this more casual world, we expect our ministers to behave less like larrikins and more like role models. If Mr Bishop is struggling to think of some recent examples of humility, civility and quiet determination in the House, how about Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Sir Don "McKinnon, Sir Pita Sharples, Nikki Kaye, Dame Jacinda Ardern, Doug Woolerton, Jeanette Fitzsimons? Is it too much to ask for politicians we can respect again?
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: the hospital, rubbish and Parliament
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including so much for our "kick-arse" hospital, passing a cleanup to another generation, and the dignity of Parliament. Not so much kicking when beds announced Our new hospital is to have 424 overnight beds. That is 2.78 beds per thousand Dunedin residents. The OECD average is five beds per thousand. If we consider the hospital as serving the population of Otago then we are down to about 0.6 of a bed per thousand. Seems we might have to share a bed. So much for the "kick-arse" hospital the PM promised. Pile on Max Reid (Letters 30.5 25) notes that the new hospital outpatient building (not inpatient, as he incorrectly says) is not too far off completion, and takes me to task that my "field of piles" billboard (28.5.25) was misleading. The field of piles is where, if Labour had only been on their game, the key building, that is, the much larger inpatient building, with beds, intensive care, Xray, PET scanner, operating theatres, and so on, should at least have been well under way. They had six years in charge, but chopped and changed and faffed around and failed the people of the South. Outpatients was the easy build. It only needed lots of rooms and decent plumbing. A billboard is necessarily succinct, so this subtlety had to be left to the viewer to discern. On the other hand, he is right to berate National. The recent announcement from Minister Brown that, in respect of "... delivering the hospital that the people of Otago and Southland have been waiting far too long for", his claim that "This government is focused on delivery — and that's exactly what we are doing" is Orwellian speech at its finest. The field of piles is still, after a year and a-half of his government, out there in the open, untouched and unbuilt-upon Distasteful rubbish Jacqui Legg of Winton has said (Letters 31.5.25) that she and some other residents do not want outside-province refuse coming to AB Lime's quarry/landfill site which is 4km distant from the outskirts of Winton. AB Lime is the South Island's largest lime quarry, employing 48 people, many from Winton, and out-of-province refuse is not much different from Southland refuse except that it will help make better use of their 200 years of landfill capacity, improving AB Lime's profitability and work prospects for Wintonites. Is Ms Legg's distaste for our interprovincial refuse business just because of rugby, or is there some other rational explanation? Disgraceful behaviour Metiria Stanton Turei (Opinion ODT 30.5.25) comes out in strong support of the three Te Pāti Māori party anarchists currently facing sanctions for their disgraceful behaviour in the New Zealand Parliament. The behaviour of these three members in particular has been abhorrent from the moment they entered Parliament. They show zero respect for the dignity and rules by which the Parliament operates, and they make it quite clear when they are there, which isn't very often, that their intent is to disrupt the proceedings as much as possible. If Metiria Stanton Turei thinks that supporting this type of behaviour is helping Māori, then she is deluded. The majority of people in this country have had enough of this anarchy. It would be nice if Māori radicals like Metiria Turei Stanton put their energies into helping their own people grapple with the darker aspects of their culture, instead of trying to bring this country to its knees. 1995 called, and it wants its decision back Is this the best the Dunedin City Council can come up with, a decision made in 1995? They would rather put Dunedin ratepayers into even more debt just so we keep our own rubbish. What are they thinking? They are about to spend millions removing rubbish dumped a hundred years ago. As usual passing another cleanup to another generation. Our beautiful beach at Brighton will be at risk. Dunedin airport already at risk of bird strike. We are minimising rubbish sent to landfill now. We could do better. Building and manufacturing waste won't be using Smooth Hill, it will be far to expensive. DCC needs to remember who is paying the bills. Honorable discharge It will be interesting , indeed enlightening, to learn what punishment those responsible for capsizing that new warship in North Korea receive, and compare it with our own recent naval debacle in Samoa. Given the Samoan incident was described by Minister of Defence Judith Collins as ' a maritime success' can we expect that the skipper featured in the King's Birthday Honours? Bug repellant After reading your excellent editorial "A moth in the night" (28.5.25) I would not be surprised if Shane Jones was seen lurking around Macraes with a can of fly spray. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
Poll: NZ First keep rising as National and Labour fall
Both National and Labour have slid in the latest 1News/Verian poll, while New Zealand First have moved to their strongest position in eight years. If an election were to be held today the right bloc of National, ACT and New Zealand First would have 63 seats — enough to form a coalition, while the left bloc of Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori would have 58 seats. This is a small change from the last Verian poll in April, where the coalition had 64 seats. Winston Peters' party moves up to 8%, according to the survey of 1002 eligible voters from May 24 to May 28. National has fallen by 2%, down to 34%. That ties with their worst result since they were elected, matching February's result. ADVERTISEMENT The poll was taken just after Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced her second Budget, which included Kiwisaver changes and used savings from stopping pay equity negotiations to help balance the books. Labour is also going backwards with the party dropping by 3% since April, down to 29%. (Source: 1News) This is their worst result since December — the party had been as high as 33% at one stage this year. The biggest risers in the poll are the Greens, who are up by 2% to 12%. New Zealand First is up by 1% to 8%, its highest result since September 2017. ACT has fallen by 1%, down to 8%, and is now level with New Zealand First. ADVERTISEMENT Te Pāti Māori have regained 1% to move back to 4%. They were as high as 7% in December. Few sweet moments for political parties to relish from the latest polling of public opinion. (Source: 1News) Meanwhile, the public's positive perception of the economy is growing. Economic optimism is up by 2% to 41% on the last poll, while economic pessimism has remained steady on 21%. Today's numbers mean National would have 43 seats in Parliament, down 6 on their current allocation, Labour would have 37, up 3. The Greens would have 15 the same number as at present, while ACT would have 10 down by 1. (Source: 1News) New Zealand First would have 10, up 2, and Te Pāti Māori would also have 6, as they do at present. There would be an extra seat in a 121 seat Parliament as a result of an overhang — assuming that Te Pāti Māori held on to their six electorate seats. ADVERTISEMENT 'Elected to do a job' NZ First leader Peters said, despite his party's strong showing: "We've never believed in the polls in this country." Asked why Labour and National had a drop-in support, Peters said: "I know why it is, but I think I should keep it to myself." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said: "There's lots of different polls doing lots of different things. I am focused on delivering for New Zealanders and that means making sure we drive more economic growth into this country." When asked why his popularity hasn't shifted in the polls, he said: "I was elected in 2023 to do a job." He added: "I have three years, I have 12 quarters to get things done for New Zealanders. They'll make that decision at the next election, that's all I care about." Labour leader Chris Hipkins said: 'We expect the polls to bounce around a bit at this point in the electoral cycle. We're focused on making sure we're building our support as we head towards next year's election." Preferred for the top job ADVERTISEMENT In the preferred prime minister stakes, neither Christopher Luxon or Chris Hipkins are proving particularly popular. Luxon is steady on 23%, while Hipkins has fallen by 1% to 19%. Winston Peters is the third preferred option, falling by 1% to 6%. Chlöe Swarbrick moves up slightly by 1% to 5% and David Seymour is also up 1% to 4%. Rounding out the honourable mentions on 1% are former PM Jacinda Ardern, Te Pāti Māori's Hana Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, Finance Minister Nicola Willis, and two new entrants – Greens Co-Leader Marama Davidson and Housing Minister Chris Bishop. (Source: 1News) The poll comes after Nicola Willis revealed the Government's budget. It included changes such as the investment boost, cuts to Kiwisaver contributions and the tightening of jobseeker for 18- and 19-year-olds who can get assistance from their parents. ADVERTISEMENT But the most significant change was the scrapping of 33 pay equity claims under urgency to save $12.8 billion dollars. The changes resulted in protests outside Parliament and MPs' electorate offices. It also comes after the privileges committee's recommended suspending Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer from Parliament for 21 days and Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven days for performing a haka in the House last year. The poll was taken just days before David Seymour took over the Deputy Prime Minister reins from Winston Peters. Party vote National – 34% (down 2% since April) Labour – 29% (down 3%) Green – 12% (up 2%) ADVERTISEMENT ACT – 8% (down 1%) New Zealand First – 8% (up 1%) Te Pāti Māori – 4% (up 1%) The Opportunities Party (TOP) – 1% (down 1%) New Zeal - 1% (up 1%) NZ Outdoor and Freedoms Party – 1% (steady) Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party - 1% - (up 1%) ADVERTISEMENT Don't know / refused to say – 11% (down 1%) Seats in the House National – 43 Labour – 37 Green – 15 ACT – 10 New Zealand First – 10 ADVERTISEMENT Te Pāti Māori – 6 Preferred prime minister Christopher Luxon – 23% (steady) Chris Hipkins – 19% (down 1%) Winston Peters – 6% (down 1%) Chlöe Swarbrick – 5% (up 1%) David Seymour – 4% (up 1%) See the full results and methodology here Between May 24 and May 28 2025, 1002 eligible voters were polled by mobile phone (500) and online, using online panels (502). The maximum sampling error is approximately ±3.1%-points at the 95% confidence level. Party support percentages have been rounded up or down to whole numbers, except those less than 4.5%, which are reported to one decimal place. The data has been weighted to align with Stats NZ population counts for age, gender, region, ethnic identification and education level. The sample for mobile phones is selected by random dialling using probability sampling, and the online sample is collected using an online panel. Undecided voters, non-voters and those who refused to answer are excluded from the data on party support. The results are a snapshot in time of party support, and not a prediction.
