Poll: NZ First keep rising as National and Labour fall
Both National and Labour have slid in the latest 1News/Verian poll, while New Zealand First have moved to their strongest position in eight years.
If an election were to be held today the right bloc of National, ACT and New Zealand First would have 63 seats — enough to form a coalition, while the left bloc of Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori would have 58 seats.
This is a small change from the last Verian poll in April, where the coalition had 64 seats.
Winston Peters' party moves up to 8%, according to the survey of 1002 eligible voters from May 24 to May 28.
National has fallen by 2%, down to 34%. That ties with their worst result since they were elected, matching February's result.
ADVERTISEMENT
The poll was taken just after Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced her second Budget, which included Kiwisaver changes and used savings from stopping pay equity negotiations to help balance the books.
Labour is also going backwards with the party dropping by 3% since April, down to 29%.
(Source: 1News)
This is their worst result since December — the party had been as high as 33% at one stage this year.
The biggest risers in the poll are the Greens, who are up by 2% to 12%.
New Zealand First is up by 1% to 8%, its highest result since September 2017.
ACT has fallen by 1%, down to 8%, and is now level with New Zealand First.
ADVERTISEMENT
Te Pāti Māori have regained 1% to move back to 4%. They were as high as 7% in December.
Few sweet moments for political parties to relish from the latest polling of public opinion. (Source: 1News)
Meanwhile, the public's positive perception of the economy is growing.
Economic optimism is up by 2% to 41% on the last poll, while economic pessimism has remained steady on 21%.
Today's numbers mean National would have 43 seats in Parliament, down 6 on their current allocation, Labour would have 37, up 3. The Greens would have 15 the same number as at present, while ACT would have 10 down by 1.
(Source: 1News)
New Zealand First would have 10, up 2, and Te Pāti Māori would also have 6, as they do at present. There would be an extra seat in a 121 seat Parliament as a result of an overhang — assuming that Te Pāti Māori held on to their six electorate seats.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Elected to do a job'
NZ First leader Peters said, despite his party's strong showing: "We've never believed in the polls in this country."
Asked why Labour and National had a drop-in support, Peters said: "I know why it is, but I think I should keep it to myself."
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said: "There's lots of different polls doing lots of different things. I am focused on delivering for New Zealanders and that means making sure we drive more economic growth into this country."
When asked why his popularity hasn't shifted in the polls, he said: "I was elected in 2023 to do a job." He added: "I have three years, I have 12 quarters to get things done for New Zealanders. They'll make that decision at the next election, that's all I care about."
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said: 'We expect the polls to bounce around a bit at this point in the electoral cycle. We're focused on making sure we're building our support as we head towards next year's election."
Preferred for the top job
ADVERTISEMENT
In the preferred prime minister stakes, neither Christopher Luxon or Chris Hipkins are proving particularly popular.
Luxon is steady on 23%, while Hipkins has fallen by 1% to 19%.
Winston Peters is the third preferred option, falling by 1% to 6%.
Chlöe Swarbrick moves up slightly by 1% to 5% and David Seymour is also up 1% to 4%.
Rounding out the honourable mentions on 1% are former PM Jacinda Ardern, Te Pāti Māori's Hana Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, Finance Minister Nicola Willis, and two new entrants – Greens Co-Leader Marama Davidson and Housing Minister Chris Bishop.
(Source: 1News)
The poll comes after Nicola Willis revealed the Government's budget. It included changes such as the investment boost, cuts to Kiwisaver contributions and the tightening of jobseeker for 18- and 19-year-olds who can get assistance from their parents.
ADVERTISEMENT
But the most significant change was the scrapping of 33 pay equity claims under urgency to save $12.8 billion dollars. The changes resulted in protests outside Parliament and MPs' electorate offices.
It also comes after the privileges committee's recommended suspending Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer from Parliament for 21 days and Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven days for performing a haka in the House last year.
The poll was taken just days before David Seymour took over the Deputy Prime Minister reins from Winston Peters.
Party vote
National – 34% (down 2% since April)
Labour – 29% (down 3%)
Green – 12% (up 2%)
ADVERTISEMENT
ACT – 8% (down 1%)
New Zealand First – 8% (up 1%)
Te Pāti Māori – 4% (up 1%)
The Opportunities Party (TOP) – 1% (down 1%)
New Zeal - 1% (up 1%)
NZ Outdoor and Freedoms Party – 1% (steady)
Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party - 1% - (up 1%)
ADVERTISEMENT
Don't know / refused to say – 11% (down 1%)
Seats in the House
National – 43
Labour – 37
Green – 15
ACT – 10
New Zealand First – 10
ADVERTISEMENT
Te Pāti Māori – 6
Preferred prime minister
Christopher Luxon – 23% (steady)
Chris Hipkins – 19% (down 1%)
Winston Peters – 6% (down 1%)
Chlöe Swarbrick – 5% (up 1%)
David Seymour – 4% (up 1%)
See the full results and methodology here
Between May 24 and May 28 2025, 1002 eligible voters were polled by mobile phone (500) and online, using online panels (502). The maximum sampling error is approximately ±3.1%-points at the 95% confidence level. Party support percentages have been rounded up or down to whole numbers, except those less than 4.5%, which are reported to one decimal place. The data has been weighted to align with Stats NZ population counts for age, gender, region, ethnic identification and education level. The sample for mobile phones is selected by random dialling using probability sampling, and the online sample is collected using an online panel. Undecided voters, non-voters and those who refused to answer are excluded from the data on party support. The results are a snapshot in time of party support, and not a prediction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Expert Commentary: NZ Privacy Commissioner Provides Clarity For Retailers On Facial Recognition Technology
Press Release – Optic Security Group Finding published yesterday by NZ Privacy Commissioner on supermarket facial recognition trial places retailers on notice, says FRT technology risk expert. Nicholas Dynon is Brand Strategy & Innovation Director at Optic Security Group. He is a certified security risk professional and counter terrorism practitioner. 'The inquiry report found that the live facial recognition technology (FRT) model trialed by Foodstuffs North Island Limited (FSNI) in 25 of its supermarkets complied with New Zealand's Privacy Act. While the Privacy Commissioner assessed the level of privacy intrusion as high due to every shopper's face data being collected, the privacy safeguards in the trial reduced it to an acceptable level. 'The outcome has been met with strong and immediate political support, with Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith lauding the result as 'great news' and stating that he now expects the Ministerial Advisory Group for Victims of Retail Crime to 'continue to look at this technology as an option to be used more widely'. 'The outcome also provides some much-needed clarity for retailers – and other organisations – who have held back on considering FRT as a potential solution to their security issues due to the fear of ending up on the wrong side of privacy legislation. But it's not a green light. 'The Privacy Commissioner has highlighted several changes that FSNI needs to make in order to make its trial permanent or to expand it to more stores. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) has also set out nine key expectations for organisations that are considering using FRT. 'Compliant FRT deployment is about more than just the technology itself. Factors such as identifying and assessing the specific purpose for which you want to use FRT, maintaining watchlists, protecting the system from misuse and information breach, communications to customers, staffing and training, customer interventions, incident response, managing enquiries and complaints, and maintaining and monitoring the system, are all critical to compliance – and they involve significant research, planning, testing, and careful implementation. 'At the same time, retailers should be aware that the results of an OPC survey published just weeks ago demonstrate that many New Zealanders are not supportive of the use of FRT in retail stores. 'The survey of over 1,200 New Zealanders found that 41% of respondents are 'concerned' or 'very concerned' about the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in retail stores to identify individuals. A total of 25% are neutral on the topic, 31% are either not so concerned or not concerned at all, and 3% are unsure. 49% of Maori respondents indicated concern over FRT in retail. 'For retailers considering FRT, this means not only ensuring all the privacy legislation boxes are ticked but also taking a step back and asking whether FRT is the most appropriate solution to your security problem. 'Inappropriate FRT deployment exposes an organisation not only to legal risk but also to significant reputational risk. Engaging with trusted experts to understand the privacy dimensions and factors influencing social licence to operate this emerging technology are critical.'
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Southland woman's $800k tax evasion
Debra Monteith. Photo: ODT Files A Southland woman providing school lunches has been sentenced to home detention after failing to pay more than $800,000 in tax through her catering company. Debra Lee Monteith was sentenced in the Invercargill District Court to 11 months home detention for failing to account for PAYE between March 2021 and February 2024, Inland Revenue said in a statement. Monteith's company, Lee 19, was primarily involved in food catering including the Ministry of Education's Ka Ora, Ka Ako Healthy School lunches and catering at the Alliance Lorneville meat processing plant. In 2019, Lee 19 registered as an employer and began paying its workers. The next year several employees phoned Inland Revenue stating their KiwiSaver deductions were not being paid. No PAYE returns were filed until 2020 when returns for seven periods were returned all at once with $82,894.86 immediately due and payable. Monteith entered into an instalment arrangement in 2020 for the debt, but this was cancelled in 2022 because of missed payments. Then the company stopped paying PAYE entirely from March 2021 until February 2024. The PAYE not accounted for over this period totalled $801,928.79. Monteith told Inland Revenue the PAYE was used to keep the company afloat and pay for food costs. Her personal expenses were paid out of the company's finances and her groceries were taken from the company's pantry. Monteith benefitted by just over $300,000 between 2020 and 2024, although she wasn't otherwise taking a salary from the company. Lee 19 also applied for and received more than $780,000 in COVID-19 support money from various schemes. The company, at Monteith's direction, was receiving significant taxpayer support while at the same time not meeting its own tax obligations. In March 2024, Lee 19 was placed into liquidation. Monteith, who ran four other companies since the late 1980s, was made bankrupt in 2013. - APL
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Parliament's contrary responses to Kashmir attacks spur debate
In February 2019, a vehicle-borne suicide bomber targeted a convoy of Indian security personnel in Pulwama in India-administered Kashmir, killing 40. At the time, Foreign Minister Winston Peters introduced a motion in Parliament condemning the attack. "That this House condemn the 14 February act of terrorism against Indian Central Reserve Police Force personnel in the Pulwama district, leading to a very large loss of life; offer its condolences to the people and Government of India; and express its support and solidarity for the Government of India at this difficult time, as well as offer our deep sympathy for all those who are grievously affected," Peters said. The motion was agreed to and passed. In the wake of another attack in India-administered Kashmir more than six years later, New Zealand's response appears to be starkly different. In April, at least two dozen people died after gunmen opened fire on tourists near the picturesque town of Pahalgam in the Himalayas. Parmjeet Parmar Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom In May, Indian-origin ACT MP Parmjeet Parmar introduced a motion in Parliament that condemned the attack. "My motion was: I move that the House condemns the terrorist attack that occurred in the town of Pahalgam, Kashmir, on 22 April 2025," Parmar told attendees at a community event on Saturday organised by Kiwi Indian Global Connect. "We express our deepest condolences to those who lost friends and family in this tragic event, and we stand in solidarity with the people of Kashmir during this difficult time. "We also acknowledge the impact on the Indian diaspora and communities in New Zealand and India, extending our heartfelt sympathies to those affected. We recognise the shared grief and commit to supporting those impacted." Parmar told the meeting the Green Party had blocked the motion. "The Green Party said they would not support the use of [the phrase] 'terrorist attack' in my motion. And I decided not to take it out," Parmar said. "I felt removing these words would mean minimising the evil motivations behind the action." Failing to get consensus, Parmar's motion failed to pass. Mahesh Bindra Photo: RNZ / Jane Patterson "My question is, 'What changed this time as our Parliament failed to condemn the 22 April terrorist attack in India which took 26 innocent lives?'," said former New Zealand First MP Mahesh Bindra, referring to the 2019 motion. "That's my main problem with it," said Veer Khar, president of New Zealand Indian Central Association, who also addressed the gathering of about 100 people at Bruce Pullman Park in the Auckland suburb of Takanini. "Because of what happened [between ACT and the Greens], the message has gone - New Zealand Parliament failed to condemn the killings of civilians in Kashmir," Khar said. "I would have agreed to the wording as proposed by the Greens and ensured the motion is passed. "Moving forward, the Indian community would try engaging with the Green Party and exchange each other's perspectives on issues." Ricardo Menéndez March Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Responding to the allegations, Green Party MP Ricardo Menéndez March said the Greens wanted to put forward a motion that centred on victims, remained consistent with standing orders and avoided enflaming tensions surrounding the conflict. "We proposed alternative wording, as we understood [that] what the ACT Party had proposed was not consistent with standing orders - in particular SO 102(1), quote '… include only such material as may be necessary to identify the facts or matter to which the motion relates'," Menéndez March said. "The effect of SO 102 is that motions without notice of this kind are succinct statements of the House's recognition of tragedies and significant events," he said. "We would have been entirely supportive of a statement of that kind on the tragic Kashmir attack, consistent with the types of motions without notice that are regularly used in the House," he said. "We proposed an alternative that acknowledged the tragedy in Kashmir but fit within the standing orders. "We would have been open to negotiating this further with Parmjeet, however, we only heard back from them 20 minutes before Question Time." Prithi Pal Singh Basra Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom Prithi Pal Singh Basra, chairperson of the New Zealand Central Sikh Association, said the issue was important to the Indian community. "My family has been in New Zealand for over 100 years," Basra said. "Still, we are culturally and socially linked to India. All of us have strong family ties even now. What happens there affects us here." Former National MP Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi called on Indian New Zealanders to be ambassadors for their homeland. "Talk to as many as locals as possible and explain what is happening in India [in terms of terrorism]," he said. Siva Kilari, a former National Party candidate for Manurewa, called on mainstream media to reach out to members of the Indian community when reporting on South Asia issues. "I urge the New Zealand media to make use of the almost 300,000 [people of Indian origin] we have here to understand a complicated place like the Indian subcontinent," Kilari said. Sunny Kaushal, chair of the ministerial advisory group on retail crime, termed terrorism a global issue. "Terrorism has no religion, no race, no nationality and no place in the world," he said. "New Zealand should always send a united message against any act of terrorism in the world." Dinesh Pahuja Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom Dinesh Pahuja, a spokesperson for the event, acknowledged the condemnation of the April terrorist attack by the government. Both Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters have repeatedly issued statements condemning the attack. "On 22 April, India suffered a devastating terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir," Luxon said early May at a business event welcoming Pabritra Margherita , India's minister of state for external affairs, to New Zealand. "New Zealand condemns terrorism, and we sent our heartfelt condolences to the families of the victims of the attack." "[But] the government is not the voice of the nation, Parliament is," Pahuja said. "It was our expectation all lawmakers condemned the act of terrorism in Kashmir in one united voice, which unfortunately didn't happen."
