logo
Some Amazon sellers are pulling out of Prime Day amid Trump tariffs

Some Amazon sellers are pulling out of Prime Day amid Trump tariffs

USA Today29-04-2025

Some Amazon sellers are pulling out of Prime Day amid Trump tariffs
NEW YORK, April 28 (Reuters) - Amazon's AMZN.O Prime Day is losing its luster among a critical group: sellers.
Some third-party merchants who previously sold China-made goods during Amazon's premier July shopping event are sitting it out this year or reducing the amount of discounted merchandise they offer.
The planned pullback, which hasn't been previously reported, is a way for sellers to protect profit margins amid the U.S.-China trade war triggered by steep tariffs placed by U.S. President Donald Trump on Chinese goods, according to four merchants and six consultants collectively advising hundreds of Amazon sellers.
Among them is Steve Green, who sells $230 bicycles and $60 skateboards from China on Amazon's online marketplace. Green said he's skipping Prime Day for the first time since 2020.
He's holding back merchandise he imported before Trump's tariffs took effect on April 9, to sell later at full price. The China tariffs, which stand at 145%, will more than double his costs of goods on newly imported merchandise, making it "unaffordable," he said.
More: Trade war hits Amazon Prime Day harder than ever as sellers back out
Similarly, Kim Vaccarella, chief executive of China-made tote bag company Bogg Bag, also decided to skip Prime Day this year, to retain some of her unsold U.S. inventory, which she hopes to sell at Macy's M.N Bloomingdale's, Dick's Sporting Goods DKS.N and smaller, independent shops, at full price or for smaller discounts. She's halted production of China-made Bogg Bags, which sell for $70 to $200 on Amazon, while she works to move manufacturing to Cambodia and Vietnam.
Prime Day has traditionally been one of Amazon's biggest shopping events of the year, behind Black Friday and Cyber Monday, respectively. And while participation is optional, Amazon spends millions promoting Prime Day on television and social media ads, telling sellers that they will benefit from a halo effect by getting their merchandise in front of a larger audience of shoppers. Amazon has around 200 million Prime subscribers worldwide.
Tariffs on sellers' goods are putting Amazon in an awkward position for Prime Day, said Arun Sundaram, an analyst at CFRA Research.
"Amazon will be fine, but I do feel for some of the third-party sellers - they're the ones that are going to be hurt the most in this environment," Sundaram said.
An Amazon spokesperson said it is having a "strong response from selling partners to Prime Day 2025."
The deadline for electing to participate in Prime Day is May 23, according to one seller consultant. A pullback by third-party merchants could mean fewer fees and less ad revenue for
Amazon, as well as a more limited selection of discounted items. In prior years the event has generated significant sales and new Prime memberships, which cost $14.99 monthly or $139 annually.
Rick Sliter, CEO of pillow company MedCline, which sells $250 therapeutic pillows made in China and Vietnam, said he was likely to hold off on offering discounts during Prime Day, even though last year's event brought in sales seven times higher than a typical day.
"Last year Prime Day was a no-brainer," said Sliter. "But if tariffs continue, discounting gets thrown out the window."
Prime Day generally pinches profitability for merchants, Sundaram said, because there is so much discounting compared to a regular day. The average Amazon seller reaps about 15% to 20% of a sale as a profit after cost of goods sold and Amazon's fees, according to consultants.
Amazon takes a 15% commission on each unit sold, not including the fees required to advertise and host discounts on Prime Day. Sellers pay Amazon $1,000 to have a discount highlighted as a 'Best Deal' or $500 to have an item highlighted as a 'Lightning Deal," for instance.
Adam Wilkens, who advises about 30 Amazon merchants, said that some of his clients "can't even think about Prime Day yet because they don't have their tariff pricing adjustments finalized."
U.S. shoppers spent $14.2 billion during Prime Day last year, 11% more from the previous year, according to research firm Adobe Analytics. Amazon has not announced the exact date for Prime Day, but said it would spread across four days in July.
Green said that he paid between $200 to $500 in Amazon fees and gave $3,000 to $5,000 in discounts during last year's Prime Day, but the sales event this summer is too risky.
Not all Amazon merchandise comes from third-party sellers. It also has 'first party' relationships with some suppliers, such as Hasbro toys, where it buys products directly wholesale, handling most of the selling details itself. Much of that inventory is also made in China.
Chief Executive Andy Jassy said during a CNBC interview on April 10 that it is doing 'strategic forward inventory buys' and renegotiating terms to keep prices low for shoppers amid the China tariffs. He said he expected sellers to pass along costs to consumers by raising prices.
Amazon has begun surveying some of its largest vendors and third-party sellers to see how tariffs are impacting their businesses ahead of Prime Day, according to consultants that work with Amazon vendors.
Third-party sellers accounted for nearly 62% of units sold in the fourth quarter of 2024, according to e-commerce research firm Marketplace Pulse.
Other sellers are experimenting with price increases, cutting back on advertising or gradually importing merchandise to avoid drastic financial impacts of tariffs, instead of bowing out of Prime Day completely.
Michael Slate usually spends the spring preparing his home goods company KitchenEdge for Prime Day, one of his busiest shopping times of the year. But this year is different.
'With the uncertainty, I can't offer a 20% discount when I don't know what my product cost is going to be in the future," he said.
"Nearly all my clients are pulling back in Prime Day deals," said Jon Elder, a consultant who counts 100 Amazon sellers as clients. "It's rough right now. Lots of difficult decisions are being made."
(Reporting by Arriana McLymore in Los Angeles and Greg Bensinger in Seattle. Editing by Vanessa O'Connell and Michael Learmonth.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

Hamilton Spectator

time21 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Say Their ‘Partnership' Is Sealed
U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Say Their ‘Partnership' Is Sealed

New York Times

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Times

U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Say Their ‘Partnership' Is Sealed

U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel announced on Friday that they had entered into an agreement with the U.S. government to seal the terms of a 'partnership' between the companies, more than a year after the Japanese steel maker first tried to buy its U.S. competitor. Former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., under pressure from the United Steelworkers union, blocked the deal on the basis that it was a threat to national security. President Trump, who also initially opposed the deal, reversed himself and decided to look for a way to revive it. The companies referred to the deal as a partnership, echoing language that Mr. Trump used in describing the transaction he blessed three weeks ago. But U.S. Steel has not indicated to shareholders that it has altered the $14.9 billion sale to Nippon that they approved in April last year. 'We thank President Trump and his administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the companies said in a statement. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come.' The companies said they had entered into agreement with the U.S. government to alleviate any security concerns posed by the deal, known as a national security agreement, which calls for roughly $11 billion in new investments by 2028. The deal will also give the U.S. government a 'golden share' in the company, a rarely used practice through which the government takes a stake in company. In the United States, the government has typically taken a stake only in companies that are ailing or in particular need of government attention, like General Motors during the 2008 financial crisis. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Dow Jones Index Today: DJIA Drops on Israel Strikes as Consumer Sentiment Jumps
Dow Jones Index Today: DJIA Drops on Israel Strikes as Consumer Sentiment Jumps

Business Insider

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Dow Jones Index Today: DJIA Drops on Israel Strikes as Consumer Sentiment Jumps

The Dow Jones (DJIA) is down by over 1% as the market processes the impact of Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear and military facilities. Meanwhile, oil prices are surging as the conflict threatens to disrupt energy supply chains in the Middle East. Confident Investing Starts Here: On Friday, President Trump said that Israel's strikes will actually be a positive for the market. 'I think ultimately, it would be great for the market because Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. It will be great for the market—should be the greatest thing ever for the market. Iran won't have a nuclear weapon that was a great threat to humanity,' said Trump in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. Trump also added that he was aware of the attack before it occurred and that he plans to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu today. Meanwhile, consumer sentiment has finally reversed a six-month slump based on the University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment. The index's preliminary June reading came in at 60.5, above the estimate for 53.5 and up from 52.2 in May. Furthermore, UM's year-ahead inflation expectation tallied in at 5.1% compared to 6.6% last month. Long-run inflation expectations are now at 4.1%, down from 4.2%. Which Stocks are Moving the Dow Jones? Let's shift our attention to TipRanks' Dow Jones Heatmap, which illustrates the stocks that have contributed to the index's price action. In a weak finish to the week, every single technology stock within the index is falling, led by Salesforce (CRM) and Nvidia (NVDA). In addition, payment providers Visa (V) and American Express (AXP) are taking a hit after the Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon (AMZN) and Walmart (WMT) are exploring the idea of issuing proprietary stablecoins. Elsewhere, communications services, energy, and healthcare, excluding embattled UnitedHealth Group (UNH), are relatively muted as we head into the weekend. DIA Stock Moves Higher with the Dow Jones The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) is an exchange-traded fund designed to track the movement of the Dow Jones. In addition, DJIA can't be bought or sold, although DIA can be. Wall Street believes that DIA stock has room to rise. During the past three months, analysts have issued an average DIA price target of $466.70 for the stocks within the index, implying upside of 9.82% from current prices. The 31 stocks in DIA carry 30 buy ratings, 1 hold rating, and zero sell ratings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store