
The Dalai Lama, his successor, and China
The 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, will turn 90 on July 6. Why is this birthday of the spiritual leader and the head of Tibetan Buddhism particularly significant?
The Dalai Lama was born in the hamlet of Taktser in north-eastern Tibet — now Qinghai province of China — on July 6, 1935, and was identified at age 2 as the reincarnation of Thubten Gyatso, the 13th Dalai Lama.
A year after the communists took power in China, the People's Liberation Army invaded Tibet. In 1951, Tibet was annexed by China, and in March 1959, a Tibetan national uprising was crushed by Chinese troops.
That month, the Dalai Lama escaped from Lhasa along with a group of his followers, and crossed into India at Khenzimane in Arunachal Pradesh. In 1960, Jawaharlal Nehru's government settled him in McLeodganj, Dharamshala, where the Tibetan government-in-exile was established.
On March 14, 2011, the Dalai Lama wrote to the Assembly of Tibetan People's Deputies, known as the Tibetan parliament-in-exile, asking to be relieved of his temporal authority. The formal transfer of political power to the democratically elected leader of Tibetans living in exile took place on May 29 that year, ending a 368-year-old tradition in which the Dalai Lama was both the spiritual and political head of Tibetans.
The Dalai Lama, literally 'Ocean of Wisdom, is believed to be the manifestation of Avalokiteshvara or Chenrezig, the Bodhisattva of compassion, and the patron saint of Tibet. Bodhisattvas are persons who are on the path to becoming a Buddha, but who put the liberation of other sentient beings ahead of entering nirvana themselves.
The institution of the Dalai Lama is part of the tulku concept in Tibetan Buddhism, in which spiritual masters are reincarnated upon their death, so that their teachings can be preserved and carried forward.
The first Dalai Lama, Gedun Drupa, was born in 1391. Beginning with Lobsang Gyatso (1617-82), the fifth of the line, the Dalai Lama became both the spiritual and political leader of Tibetan Buddhists.
The present Dalai Lama was found by a search party in 1939, six years after the 13th Dalai Lama Thupten Gyatso passed away in 1933. The reincarnation was recognised by several signs, including a vision revealed to a senior monk. In 1940, the little boy was taken to Potala Palace in Lhasa and officially enthroned.
Since 1969, the Dalai Lama has said that whether or not his reincarnation should be recognised was 'a decision for the Tibetan people, the Mongolians, and people of the Himalayan region to make'.
In a statement released on September 24, 2011, he said: 'When I am about ninety I will consult the high Lamas of the Tibetan Buddhist traditions, the Tibetan public, and other concerned people who follow Tibetan Buddhism, and re-evaluate whether the institution of the Dalai Lama should continue or not. On that basis we will take a decision.'
It is because of this statement that the Dalai Lama's coming birthday on July 6, when he turns 90, has assumed significance.
The statement said that if it was decided 'that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama should continue and there is a need for the Fifteenth Dalai Lama to be recognized, responsibility for doing so will primarily rest on the concerned officers of the Dalai Lama's Gaden Phodrang Trust.
'They should consult the various heads of the Tibetan Buddhist traditions and the reliable oath-bound Dharma Protectors who are linked inseparably to the lineage of the Dalai Lamas. They should seek advice and direction from these concerned beings and carry out the procedures of search and recognition in accordance with past tradition. I shall leave clear written instructions about this.'
On Monday, the Dalai Lama said: 'There will be some kind of framework within which we can talk about the continuation of the institution of the Dalai Lamas.'
China denounces the 14th Dalai Lama as a 'splittist', 'traitor', and an exile with 'no right to represent the Tibetan people', and prohibits any public show of devotion towards him.
In his 2011 statement, the Dalai Lama had said that his reincarnation should be found in a 'free country, not under Chinese control'. He also said that 'no recognition should be given to a reincarnation selected for political purposes by the Chinese government'.
In his book, Voice for the Voiceless, published this March, the Dalai Lama said that his successor would be 'born outside China'.
There is fear among Tibetans that as the Dalai Lama grows older, Beijing could announce a successor of its choice, and use it to tighten its control over the Tibetan Buddhist religion and culture.
In 2004, the Chinese government abolished the Religious Affairs Regulations that lay down the process for selecting the Dalai Lama, and in 2007 decreed that 'No group or individual may carry out activities related to searching for and identifying the soul boy for the living Buddha without authorization.' A draw of lots, called the 'Golden Urn method', was institutionalised to select the Dalai Lama.
In 2015, Padma Choling, a retired Chinese politician of Tibetan ethnicity and chairperson of the Standing Committee of the People's Congress of Tibet, objected to the Dalai Lama's insistence that no government had the right to choose the next Dalai Lama for political purposes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
The Dalai Lama is India's trump card, so why hide it?
For 66 years, India has harboured China's greatest ideological threat—the Dalai Lama. Yet despite hosting the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader since 1959, New Delhi has consistently refrained from wielding this powerful diplomatic weapon against Beijing's aggression. When Jawaharlal Nehru granted asylum to the Dalai Lama following China's brutal suppression of the Lhasa uprising, it wasn't merely humanitarian—it was a geopolitical gamble that established India as keeper of Tibet's moral conscience. However, Nehru maintained a rigid separation between hosting the man and supporting his political cause, a policy that has largely persisted across successive This cautious approach has cost India dearly. In 2003, Atal Bihari Vajpayee formally recognised Tibet as part of China, hoping to secure reciprocal recognition of Sikkim and ease border tensions. Instead, China doubled down on supporting Pakistan, blocked India's Nuclear Suppliers Group membership, and continued claiming Arunachal Pradesh. India surrendered leverage whilst China conceded Narendra Modi, there have been tactical shifts—the Dalai Lama's 2017 visit to disputed Arunachal Pradesh sent clear signals to Beijing. Yet after the 2017 Doklam standoff, India quickly retreated, with officials instructed to avoid the Dalai Lama's 60th exile anniversary events. Only following the deadly 2020 Galwan clash did Modi publicly wish the Dalai Lama happy birthday—a symbolic departure from years of paranoia about Tibet reveals India's untapped potential. China fears that any recognition of Tibetan autonomy could inspire unrest across Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Hong Kong. This anxiety represents India's greatest leverage, yet New Delhi has rarely capitalised on it stakes are escalating dramatically. Approaching 90, the Dalai Lama's succession will trigger a geopolitical crisis. Beijing insists on appointing the next Dalai Lama through its puppet institutions, whilst the Tibetan leader has declared his reincarnation will occur outside Chinese control. This threatens to create rival Dalai Lamas—one Chinese-backed, another supported by the exile faces a defining choice: recognise a successor chosen by Tibetan exiles and directly challenge Beijing's legitimacy in Tibet, or remain silent and abandon Tibetans to Chinese control. After decades of cautious diplomacy, India's Tibet card is about to turn nuclear. The question remains whether New Delhi will finally play its hand or continue as Tibet's polite innkeeper rather than its guardian.- EndsMust Watch


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Kanwar Yatra nameplate diktat: Unholy segregation or holy practice? Big debate on Gaurav Sawant's show
A controversy has erupted over orders by the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments requiring food stalls along the Kanwar Yatra route to prominently display the names and licences of owners. Opposition parties have criticised the move as religious profiling, while the BJP has defended it as a measure to allow pilgrims to make informed choices. The orders have sparked a debate on religious sentiments, food preferences during pilgrimages, and concerns over vigilantism. Critics argue it could lead to segregation and targeting of minority-owned businesses, while supporters say it enables transparency for pilgrims observing dietary restrictions. Also on the show, Colonel John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute, discusses India's Operation Sindoor. Spencer analyzes India's changed doctrine towards terrorism, emphasising an immediate and overwhelming response while avoiding nuclear escalation. He highlights India's strategic messaging, targeting of terrorist sites, and the performance of indigenous weapons systems compared to Pakistan's Chinese-supplied equipment. Spencer also discusses the importance of integrated military capabilities and the continued relevance of ground forces in modern warfare alongside advanced technologies.


Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump says Vietnam to face 20% tariff under 'great' deal
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he had struck a trade deal with Vietnam under which the country would face a minimum 20 percent tariff and open its market to US products. Donald Trump said that Vietnam will give total access of their markets to US for trade.(AFP) The deal comes less than a week before Trump's self-imposed July 9 deadline for steeper tariffs on US trade partners to take effect if agreements are not reached. Shares in clothing companies and sport equipment manufacturers -- which have a large footprint in Vietnam -- rose on the news, but later declined sharply after the president released details including the continued tariffs, which were higher than expected. If confirmed, the terms of the agreement will significantly increase the price of shoes and clothing that Vietnam exports to the United States, but Hanoi escapes the threat of the more severe 46 percent tariff threatened by Trump in April. "It is my Great Honor to announce that I have just made a Trade Deal with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam after speaking with To Lam, the Highly Respected General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. He said that under the "Great Deal of Cooperation," imports of Vietnamese goods will face a 20 percent US tariff, while goods that pass through Vietnam to circumvent steeper trade barriers -- so-called "transshipping" -- will see a 40 percent tariff. 'Total Access' Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro has called Vietnam a "colony of China," saying that one third of Vietnamese products are in fact relabelled Chinese goods. Trump said that "in return, Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade," he said. "In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff." The president said he believed US-made SUVs, "which do so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam." In a government statement, Vietnam confirmed that negotiating teams had come to an agreement to address the reciprocal tariff issue, but did not detail any tariff terms. Trump "affirmed that the US will significantly reduce reciprocal taxes for many Vietnamese export goods and will continue to cooperate with Vietnam in resolving difficulties affecting bilateral trade relations, especially in areas prioritized by both sides," the statement said. Trump's announcement comes a week before the threatened US reimposition of steep tariffs on dozens of economies, including the European Union and Japan, many of which are still scrambling to reach deals that would protect them from the measures. Those higher tariffs are part of a package Trump initially imposed in April, citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trading relationships, before announcing a temporary lowering to 10 percent. Without a deal, Vietnam's "reciprocal tariff" would have risen from the baseline 10 percent to 46 percent. Since April, Washington had so far only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower retaliatory duties with China. Both involve the United States maintaining some of Trump's tariffs on the trading partners. The terms of the UK deal are more narrowly focused than those announced by Trump with Vietnam, with London and Washington agreeing to cut US tariffs on cars from 27.5 percent to 10 percent, with a limit of 100,000 vehicles a year. It also fully eliminated the 10 percent tariff on goods such as engines and aircraft parts. In return, Britain agreed to further open its market to US ethanol and beef.