logo
Trump yanks brief reprieve for immigrants he said are 'good, long time workers'

Trump yanks brief reprieve for immigrants he said are 'good, long time workers'

CNBC5 hours ago

Farmworkers work in a strawberry field on June 12, 2025 in Oxnard, California.
The Trump administration has reopened arrests of immigrant workers at hotels, restaurants and agricultural businesses, backtracking on the brief reprieve they got after President Donald Trump stated they were necessary, good, longtime workers whose jobs were almost "impossible" to replace.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary in the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement Tuesday "there will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts."
Worksite enforcement "remains a cornerstone" of its immigration enforcement efforts, which McLaughlin said "target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation."
The announcement backpedals on Trump's statement last week on social media that "changes are coming" after farmers and hotel and leisure business employers had complained that "our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace."
Just six days ago, Immigration and Customs Enforcement paused arrests at worksites in agriculture industries, including fisheries and meatpacking plants, restaurants and hotels, according to an internal policy memo obtained by NBC News last Thursday.
"Effective today, hold on all worksite enforcement investigations/ operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants, and operating hotels," said the memo from Tatum King, Homeland Security Investigations special agent in charge of the San Francisco field office.
But by Tuesday morning, the White house was contradicting that position, saying "anyone present in the United States illegally is at risk of deportation."
The field memo that announced the pause had noted that it would be difficult for ICE to maintain a monthly arrest quota of 3,000 that the administration had directed field offices to achieve.
"We acknowledge that by taking this off the table, that we are eliminating a significant # of potential targets," King wrote.
Asked about the change during a gaggle with reporters aboard Air Force One on his return from the G7 summit, Trump said: "We're going to look everywhere. But I think the biggest problem is the inner cities." He repeated campaign rhetoric, blaming former President Joe Biden and saying he let prisoners, gang members, drug dealers and the "mentally insane" into the country.
Trump said cities are where "the really bad ones are, the murderers."
"We're going to get them out," Trump said. "There are for more in the inner cities, Democrat-run cities, sadly, and I'm just giving you, there's far more in there than you have on a farm or someplace."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

G7 summit ends without joint communiqué, but Canada, India reach diplomatic truce
G7 summit ends without joint communiqué, but Canada, India reach diplomatic truce

Hamilton Spectator

time21 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

G7 summit ends without joint communiqué, but Canada, India reach diplomatic truce

KANANASKIS - Canada failed to rally the U.S. to voice the same support for Ukraine as European and Japanese allies, but ended the G7 summit in Alberta on Tuesday with an agreement with India to restore top diplomats in both countries. The G7 summit came to a close after the group's leaders issued a series of joint statements on key priorities. As expected, the leaders did not issue a joint communiqué, the lengthy statement outlining shared views that typically ends G7 summits. Instead, there were several statements on individual issues ranging from transnational repression and migrant smuggling to AI and quantum technology. There was no joint statement on the war in Ukraine, even though Prime Minister Mark Carney had made support for the country one of the summit's key discussion topics on Tuesday, inviting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend the event in person. A senior Canadian government official — who briefed reporters at the G7 on background — said the U.S. was offside with the other countries on Ukraine and sought weaker language than what the other members proposed. Canada planned to use the language the other countries agreed to in its closing chair's statement. Ottawa did not want to release a weak statement, the official said. The official said that it was challenging to get the U.S. to agree on a statement on Ukraine in part because Washington is trying to negotiate a ceasefire or peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Carney outlined $4.3 billion in new Canadian support for Ukraine's defence and another set of sanctions on Russia as he met with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the G7 summit on Tuesday morning. That sum includes $2 billion for the purchase and donation of weapons and matériel, along with a $2.3-billion loan to help the embattled country rebuild its infrastructure, to be repaid by interest on frozen Russian assets. French President Emmanuel Macron said Carney fulfilled his mission as G7 host by preserving the unity of the multilateral organization. 'We shouldn't ask the Canadian presidency to resolve every issue on earth today. That would be unfair. But he held the group together,' said Macron, who will host the G7 next year. The G7 leaders note they are 'deeply concerned by growing reports of transnational repression,' defined in the statement as an aggressive form of foreign interference which sees states or their proxies try to intimidate, harass, harm or coerce people outside their borders. The statement condemns all forms of transnational repression, which can include activities ranging from cyber-surveillance to assassination. It says a G7 initiative led by Canada that tracks online misinformation and threats to democracy, the Rapid Response Mechanism, will have its public reports include updates on transnational repression, and that the group will co-ordinate ways to counter those threats. The statement was published just before Carney met with his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi, whose government has been singled out by Canadian intelligence officials as a prolific perpetrator of foreign interference in Canada, including transnational repression. As their bilateral meeting began Tuesday, Carney said it was 'a great honour' to host Prime Minister Modi at the G7. 'It's a testament to the importance of your country, to your leadership, and to the importance of the issues that we look to tackle together,' Carney said, noting those issues include the energy transition, the future of AI and the fight against transnational repression and terrorism. Speaking through a translator, Modi said attending the G7 summit offers a great opportunity to serve the world. 'I believe that India-Canada relations are extremely important, and India and Canada should work together,' Modi said, noting that the two countries share democratic values. Following their meeting, Carney's office said the two leaders agreed to designate new high commissioners and restore regular diplomatic services to citizens in both countries. In 2023 and 2024, former prime minister Justin Trudeau and the RCMP said there was evidence linking agents of the Indian government to the murder of Canadian Sikh separatist activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey, B.C., in June 2023. Last October, RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme said the Mounties had evidence linking Indian government officials to other crimes in Canada, including extortion, coercion and homicide. Later that month, Canada announced it had expelled six Indian diplomats who refused to waive their diplomatic immunity in order to participate in the RCMP investigation — including the high commissioner. India expelled the acting Canadian high commissioner in New Delhi and five other Canadian diplomats in response, and the posts have remained vacant since then. Carney's decision to invite Modi to the G7 drew criticism from some Sikh organizations in Canada. The G7 leaders also signed on to a statement pledging to tackle migrant smuggling, including by exploring the potential use of sanctions to target criminals involved in migrant smuggling and human trafficking operations. Another statement pledged to explore ways to benefit public services using artificial intelligence, including a Canadian initiative to 'increase government efficiency' at a time when Ottawa and most G7 peers seek to cut back spending on their civil service. A wider group of signatories, which includes Australia, India and South Korea, is committing to working together to invest in responsible critical minerals projects. Australia, India, Mexico, South Korea and South Africa also signed on with the G7 to a wildfire charter that calls for co-operation to prevent, fight and recover from devastating fires. The G7 leaders did release a statement Monday evening calling for a de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East in response to continued fighting between Israel and Iran. That came shortly before U.S. President Donald Trump announced he planned to leave the summit a day early to deal with the ongoing crisis. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained in Kananaskis on Tuesday as the American delegation's lead. — With files from Emilie Bergeron in Kananaskis and Sarah Ritchie in Ottawa This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 17, 2025. Note to readers:This is a corrected story. A previous version said that the G7 leaders could reach agreement on a statement about the ongoing war in Ukraine. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran

US stock futures fell as investors braced for ongoing Israel-Iran hostilities that could draw in the US, along with the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate decision. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) slipped 0.3%. President Trump met with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss Israel and Iran, raising speculation that the US could join Israel's attack. The White House did not provide any details on the meeting, and the president spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu afterward. Iran has reportedly readied missiles for strikes on US bases in the event the US takes action. Stocks fell during the day on Tuesday and oil jumped as Trump appeared to more directly align with Israel's aims in Iran, saying "our patience is wearing thin" and calling for "unconditional surrender" from Iran. Reports also circulated ahead of his national security meeting that the president is seriously considering joining Israel's strikes. The developments marked a dramatic shift from the day before, when Iran said that it wanted to reach a ceasefire and return to the negotiating table on its nuclear program. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Prior to Israel's opening salvo on Iran Friday, Wall Street anticipated the Fed's next interest rate announcement would dominate market news this week. The central bank is due to reveal its decision on Wednesday at 2 p.m. ET, and analysts expect policymakers to hold rates steady. The Fed's "dot plot" and Fed Chair Jerome Powell's comments at a 2:30pm ET press conference will be in high focus as investors seek clues as to whether two rate cuts are still on the table this year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports
Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports

New York Times

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports

A federal judge in Boston granted class-action status to transgender and nonbinary Americans on Tuesday in a lawsuit challenging a U.S. State Department policy that requires passports to reflect only the holder's sex recorded on their original birth certificate. The order extends a preliminary injunction blocking the State Department from enforcing the policy against six plaintiffs to apply to all class members who apply for or update passports while the case proceeds. In the earlier order from April, U.S. District Judge Julia E. Kobick concluded that the passport policy likely violates the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee because it discriminates based on sex and is 'rooted in irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans.' The State Department filed an appeal of the preliminary injunction last week. The government maintains that it has a strong interest in passports that accurately reflect the holder's sex. The State Department adopted the new policy earlier this year to comply with an executive order from President Trump directing all government agencies to limit official recognition of transgender identity and mandating that federal documents reflect what it termed the 'immutable biological classification as either male or female.' In court documents, plaintiffs argued that a mismatch between the sex listed on their passport and their gender identity puts them at risk of suspicion and hostility that other Americans do not face. During the first weeks of Mr. Trump's administration, several plaintiffs received passports with an 'F' or 'M' marker contrary to the one they had requested. Another learned that selecting an 'X' marker, indicating a nonbinary gender identity, was no longer an option, though it had been allowed since 2022. The government argued against certifying trans and nonbinary passport holders as a legal class in the case, contending that gender identity is subjective and that a class-wide injunction would create an undue administrative burden. Judge Kobick, who was nominated by former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., found that those claims did not outweigh significant harm faced by transgender and nonbinary passport holders. She noted that plaintiffs in the case had described being forced to 'effectively 'out' themselves every time they presented their passports,' leading to anxiety and fear safety fears. 'These are the types of injuries that cannot adequately be measured or compensated by money damages or a later-issued remedy,'' she wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store