Health secretary Wes Streeting could lose seat to pro-Gaza rival under Labour plans to reduce the voting age to 16
Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood are among a string of senior Labour figures at risk from a potential surge in support for independent candidates running on a pro-Palestine platform.
Labour has been accused of trying to 'rig the political system' by giving the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds, who have traditionally been seen as being more Left-wing.
But analysis by the polling organisation More In Common suggests the big winners could be hard-Left figures such as the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and pro-Gaza independents, who stunned the party by winning four seats at last year's election.
The research found there are seven Labour seats where the number of 16 and 17-year-olds is bigger than the sitting MP's majority over a pro-Palestine independent at last year's election.
They include Ilford North, where Mr Streeting clung on by just 528 votes, and Birmingham Ladywood, where Ms Mahmood saw her majority slashed to less than 3,500 following a 40 per cent collapse in Labour's vote share.
Mr Streeting, who is tipped as a potential future Labour leader, has been urged by allies to seek a safer seat before the next election – known at Westminster as 'doing a chicken run'.
But he appeared to rule out the move earlier this year, insisting he does not believe in 'cutting and running'.
Ms Mahmood said her local campaign had been 'sullied by harassment and intimidation', with some opponents trying to 'deny' her Muslim faith.
Also possibly at risk is the seat of outspoken Home Office minister Jess Phillips, whose majority last year was cut to just 693 following a vigorous campaign by a local pro-Gaza candidate.
Ironically, elections minister Rushanara Ali, who is responsible for introducing the change in the law, could also be ousted. Ms Ali held on in Bethnal Green and Stepney by just 1,689 votes last year.
Mr Corbyn has already formed a loose 'Independent Alliance' at Westminster with the four pro-Gaza MPs. They are now in talks with former Labour MP Zarah Sultana about creating a new party to fight the next election.
The More In Common analysis found that a party led by Mr Corbyn would top the poll with Gen Z voters.
The study found that the overall impact of extending the franchise to 16-year-olds was likely to be limited. But it added: 'It is likely that independent candidates running on pro-Gaza tickets could do very well out of this change.'
The findings will fuel concerns among some Labour strategists that the rule change could backfire.
Election experts have suggested the Greens, Lib Dems and Reforms could do well among the new electorate.
Nigel Farage, who has a large youth following on TikTok, accused Labour of an 'attempt to rig the political system', but said: 'We intend to give them a nasty surprise'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
No 10 quashes Rayner's demand for tourism tax
Downing Street has backed Rachel Reeves and rejected Angela Rayner's proposal for a tourist tax. After her dispute with the Chancellor over councils charging visitors to use hotel rooms, the Deputy Prime Minister has been lobbying the Treasury to allow councils and regional mayors to be given new powers to charge 'Barcelona-style' taxes. She has teamed up with Labour mayors, including Sir Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham, in calling for more 'fiscal devolution' and called it 'deeply disrespectful' to councils that Westminster dictates their budgets. But Ms Reeves is opposed to the idea and has refused to grant any further tax-raising powers, The Telegraph reported on Monday. She strongly objected to the idea of local authorities raising their own money beyond the council tax already charged on properties. Labour sources said the difference in opinion was at the heart of their rift on tax policy, and that Ms Rayner had long called for more devolution from Westminster. Downing Street has now said that there are 'no plans' to introduce tourist taxes, in an apparent rebuke of Ms Rayner's position. 'Places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through working with their local tourism sector, using the accommodation business improvement district model,' Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesman said on Tuesday. 'Tourism obviously plays an important role in the UK's economy.' 'Transformative' impact Pressed on whether Ms Rayner had been lobbying in favour of the policy, and why her department had discussed it with some local authorities, the spokesman added: 'There are no plans to introduce it. 'Obviously, the Government regularly consults on a wide range of issues.' The issue is the latest in a series of disputes between Ms Rayner and Ms Reeves on tax policy. Earlier this year, The Telegraph revealed a leaked memo written by Ms Rayner suggesting a range of tax hikes to the Treasury. The ideas were rejected by Ms Reeves, who let it be known she is solely responsible for tax policy. Councils and mayoralties have been pushing for tourist levies for some time, believing that they could have a 'transformative' impact on their areas at a relatively low cost to visitors. Manchester and Liverpool have both introduced a flat rate charge of £2 per night on hotel stays within their 'business improvement districts', but are barred from making the tax city-wide by Westminster. Many European cities, including Barcelona, Lisbon and Amsterdam, charge a flat rate or percentage-based tax on hotel stays. The hospitality industry is opposed to a similar system being introduced in the UK, arguing that Britain's 'tourism competitiveness' has been eroded by higher rates of VAT than in many European countries. Ms Reeves is understood to agree with the sector that further taxes on their profits should be kept to a minimum after the hike in employer National Insurance rates in last year's Budget and new workers' rights rules that would be costly to implement. One hotelier in Dorset said a tourism levy would cost them £600,000 a year, and that travellers would go elsewhere to avoid it. But Sir Sadiq told a podcast last month that tourists 'don't mind' paying a 'small levy' in European cities. He said: 'We could spend more money improving the public realm, which would encourage more tourists to come but also improve the quality of life for residents in London.'
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
AstraZeneca to invest $50B in US as tariff threat looms
AstraZeneca plans to plough billions of pounds into US manufacturing as the drugs giant faces the threat of looming tariffs. There are also reports the FTSE 100 pharmaceuticals giant plans to abandon London as its home. AstraZeneca on Tuesday said it would invest $50 billion (£37.1 billion) in the US by 2030, creating 'tens of thousands' of highly skilled 'direct and indirect' jobs, while 'powering growth and delivering next generation medicines'. Boss Pascal Soriot told investors in April the drugmaker is 'firmly committed to investing and growing in the US' as the White House continues to threaten the sector with looming tariffs on US imports. President Donald Trump last week outlined a plan to introduce levies that would steadily climb higher over time with the potential to hit 200 per cent after a 'year, year and a half'. Trump said: 'We're going to start off with a low tariff and then give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build and then we're going to make it a very high tariff. 'There's two ways you do it. You make money and/or you have them move here so they don't have to pay the tariff.' Howard Lutnick, US Secretary of Commerce, said on Thursday: 'For decades Americans have been reliant on foreign supply of key pharmaceutical products. President Trump and our nation's new tariff policies are focused on ending this structural weakness.' It also comes amid reports Soriot is weighing moving AstraZeneca's headquarters away from the UK as well as its main stock market listing. Soriot, 66, has lambasted the UK and the rest of Europe for falling behind other countries such as the US and China in developing medicines. AstraZeneca is planning its 'largest single manufacturing investment in the world' in the state of Virginia, with the site earmarked to produce drug substances for its weight management and metabolic portfolio. 'The facility will leverage AI, automation, and data analytics to optimise production,' AstraZeneca said. The rest of the investment will boost AstraZeneca's existing R&D and manufacturing facilities among other plans. AstraZeneca said the investments will help deliver its target of reaching $80 billion in total revenue by 2030, of which it expects 50 per cent would be generated in the US. Soriot said: 'Today's announcement underpins our belief in America's innovation in biopharmaceuticals and our commitment to the millions of patients who need our medicines in America and globally.' UK government 'will be kicking itself' AstraZeneca's decision will come as a blow to the Labour government as it struggles to encourage firm's to invest in the UK. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said the government 'will be kicking itself', with the country set to miss out on associated economic benefits of the investment. He added: 'That money, if invested in the UK, would have created a large number of jobs and help shine a light on the country for scientific excellence. 'AstraZeneca pulling out of a £450 million vaccine plant expansion in Liverpool earlier this year was the big clue that it was losing patience with the UK government. 'At the time, it hinted that without a certain level of support, it wasn't financially viable to invest that money. The previous government had pledged £90 million in grants and other aid, but the support was cut when Labour came to power. 'The more business it does in...[the US], the greater the likelihood that investors might push for AstraZeneca to switch its main stock listing to the US. That would be bad for the UK stock market as it is one of the biggest names in the FTSE 100.'
BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
Dumfries town board boss steps down with immediate effect
The man leading a board set up to help spend £20m to regenerate a Scottish town centre is stepping down with immediate Nicoll took up the role in Dumfries last year after it emerged as one of seven "overlooked" towns around the country in line for the said it had not been an easy decision to step down but, due to "upcoming changes" to his professional priorities, he could not give the time to the position he Nicoll said that as a "born and bred Doonhamer" it had been "one of the most meaningful and rewarding roles" he had ever had. The funding was announced in 2023 by the then prime minister Rishi Sunak to be put "in the hands of local people" to revitalise their high - along with Greenock, Irvine, Kilmarnock, Coatbridge, Clydebank and Elgin - was on the support was subsequently confirmed by the new Labour government and Mr Nicoll had been leading efforts to invest the funds - to be delivered over a 10-year he said he was no longer in a position to lead the town board set up as part of the investment process. 'Extremely proud' He said he was "incredibly proud" of what the board had achieved in terms of a regeneration strategy and "meaningful engagement" with others."We've begun building something truly unique and this is something that I am extremely proud of - a model unlike any other town board in the country," he said."One that is independent, community-led, and free from political interference."It's a model rooted firmly in the voice and will of the people of Dumfries."He highlighted Dumfries Shine - a community clean-up initiative - as one example that "meaningful, local-led change" was possible."My personal ethos has always been that you are either fully in or respectfully out," he added."With upcoming changes in my professional priorities, I do not want to reach a point where I'm missing meetings or limiting my contribution."The people of Dumfries deserve full commitment; nothing less."He said he would support his replacement and urged whoever it was to reflect the needs of local people not the agenda of any political organisation.
