‘Serious consequences for Australian democracy': Author uses prize speech to warn against censorship
In her acceptance speech for the prestigious literary award, the Sri Lanka-born author said she believed truthful speech about what the Israeli government is doing in Gaza is being shut down and accused the Australian government of being complicit with 'material and diplomatic support'.
'That complicity has had serious consequences for Australian democracy. We've seen scholars, creatives and journalists silenced, their funding revoked and their contracts cancelled for expressing anti-genocide views ... We've seen our institutions and our media betray the principles they're supposed to uphold,' she said.
'We've seen language suffer Orwellian distortions. We've seen our leaders pander to the anti-Arab racism of that global bully the United States. And all of this damage has been done to prop up Israel: a brazenly cruel foreign power, whose leaders are internationally wanted criminals.'
According to the Sydney-based author, the aim of this suppression is to intimidate.
'In Australia today it isn't those applauding mass murder who have cause to be afraid, but those speaking out against it. Principally targeted are Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, First Nations people, people of colour, queers,' she said.
'All the time I was writing these words, a voice in my head whispered, You will be punished. You will be smeared with labels as potent and ugly as they're false.'
'I'm still afraid. But I've just accepted a prize that is not about obedience. It's not about feel-good narratives, it's not about marketing, it's not even about creativity – Stella is about changing the world.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
29 minutes ago
- Perth Now
'Catastrophic': Australia condemns Israel plan for Gaza
Australia has united with four counterparts to condemn Israel's plan to intensify the war on Gaza and assume full control of the territory. Foreign Minister Penny Wong warned the looming military operation risked violating international law and putting the lives of hostages and civilians in more danger. In a statement on Saturday, Senator Wong joined Germany, Italy, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to "strongly reject" Israel's decision to launch a large-scale military operation in Gaza. "The plans that the government of Israel has announced risk violating international humanitarian law," the ministers said. "Any attempts at annexation or of settlement extension violate international law." The foreign ministers said the plans would aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages and further risk the mass displacement of civilians. "We urge the parties and the international community to make all efforts to finally bring this conflict to an end now, through an immediate and permanent ceasefire," they said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went against the advice of his military leaders to declare he intended to take military control of all of Gaza. "We intend to," Mr Netanyahu told Fox News when asked if Israel would take over the entire territory. Israel would eventually hand over the territory to Arab forces, which would govern it, he said. "We don't want to keep it," Mr Netanyahu said. "We want to have a security perimeter. We don't want to govern it. We don't want to be there as a governing body." The move could displace an estimated one million Palestinians and has sparked international outrage. Germany has suspended arms sales to Israel, concerned the weapons could be used in Gaza. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, a conservative whose support for Israel was a foundation of his election campaign, said he would not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza "until further notice". The development marks a major shift in German foreign policy. The UN Security Council is set to discuss the proposed escalation while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to discuss the war during a meeting with his New Zealand counterpart, Christopher Luxon, in Queenstown. The Israeli government is pursuing "total victory" in its war with Hamas, which attacked the nation's south in October 2023, killing approximately 1200 people and taking about 250 hostages. Israel's retaliatory assaults have killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry. Some 200 people, almost half of them children, have reportedly died of starvation. The worsening humanitarian situation has driven plans from the UK, France and Canada to call for the recognition of Palestine at a UN meeting in September, pending conditions such as Hamas returning the remaining hostages. Australian government ministers have said the nation's recognition of Palestinian statehood is a matter of "when, not if".
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Foreign Minister Penny Wong joins five-country condemnation of Israel's Gaza plan
Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong has joined a five-country push to 'strongly reject' Israel's plan for new military actions in the Palestinian territory of Gaza and call for a immediate and permanent ceasefire. Alongside ministers from Germany, Italy, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, Penny Wong lent her voice to a statement condemning the Israeli Security Cabinet's decision. 'It will aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians,' the statement released on Saturday morning reads. 'The plans that the Government of Israel has announced risk violating international humanitarian law. Any attempts at annexation or of settlement extension violate international law.' The five-countries' Foreign Ministers called for parties involved in the conflict, and the international community, to bring the 'terrible conflict' to an end and provide 'massive, immediate and unimpeded' humanitarian assistance. '... the worst-case scenario of a famine is unfolding in Gaza,' the statement continues. 'A political resolution based on a negotiated two-state solution requires the total demilitarisation of Hamas and its complete exclusion from any form of governance in the Gaza Strip, where the Palestinian Authority must have a central role.' The move follows the Israeli Security Cabinet approving a plan this week to take control of Gaza City through renewed military action. 'The Security Cabinet has approved the Prime Minister's proposal for the defeat of Hamas,' the Prime Minister's Office said Friday. 'The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones.' 'More unbearable suffering' The statement from the foreign ministers echoes comments from UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk, who called for the Israeli Government's plan for a complete military takeover of the occupied Gaza strip to be 'immediately halted'. 'It runs contrary to the ruling of the International Court of Justice that Israel must bring its occupation to an end as soon as possible, to the realisation of the agreed two-State solution and to the right of Palestinians to self-determination,' he said. 'On all evidence to date, this further escalation will result in more massive forced displacement, more killing, more unbearable suffering, senseless destruction and atrocity crimes. 'The war in Gaza must end now. And Israelis and Palestinians must be allowed to live side by side in peace.' In his first public comments since the plan was approved, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied there would be an occupation of Gaza. 'We are not going to occupy Gaza - we are going to free Gaza from Hamas,' he posted on X. 'Gaza will be demilitarized, and a peaceful civilian administration will be established, one that is not the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas, and not any other terrorist organization. 'This will help free our hostages and ensure Gaza does not pose a threat to Israel in the future.' Approximately 1,200 people were killed and about 250 taken hostage during the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, to which Israel responded with a large-scale ground offensive in Gaza. Originally published as Foreign Minister Penny Wong joins five-country condemnation of Israel's Gaza plan
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
The price of inaction: why our communities can't afford a weak climate plan
The Australian government is about to make one of the most consequential economic decisions of the decade: setting our national climate target for 2035. This is about shaping the kind of economy we want in the years ahead. Do we want to remain shackled to geopolitically volatile fossil fuel markets? Or do we want to build a cleaner, more resilient economy that delivers secure, skilled jobs in every corner of the country? As someone who's spent decades working across energy systems in Australia and abroad - from oil and gas to wind and solar - I've seen how strong, clear targets drive investment and job creation. And I've seen the costs when governments do too little. The economic damage from climate pollution is already here. According to the Insurance Council annual average cost of extreme weather has more than doubled in the last 30 years. Marine heatwaves are battering fisheries, aquaculture and tourism. Back-to-back floods have devastated regional communities. Drought is hitting farmers hard. The risks are rising, and they are being felt on the ground - in jobs lost, bills rising, and industries under pressure. But there's another side to this story: if we act decisively, we can turn this challenge into one of Australia's biggest economic opportunities. We're already seeing signs of what's possible. There are more than 30,000 Australians employed in clean energy generation, storage and transmission. Rooftop solar is cutting bills and creating work for electricians and engineers. Renewable energy zones and battery hubs are supporting new projects and new careers, particularly in regional areas. This is just the beginning. With the strongest possible 2035 climate target - one that aligns with a cut of at least 75 per cent to climate pollution - we can unlock hundreds of thousands of jobs in clean industries. These are jobs in construction, advanced manufacturing, critical minerals, green hydrogen and clean exports. Jobs that will underpin our economic future and help Australia remain competitive in a decarbonising global economy. We have the ingredients: world-class solar and wind, critical minerals, skilled workers, and trusted trade relationships. What we need now is policy certainty. A strong 2035 target will send a clear signal to investors, industries and international partners that Australia is serious about being a clean energy leader. The Productivity Commission's recent report on climate change makes it clear: tackling climate change isn't just about safety - it's critical to Australia's productivity and long-term prosperity. Climate damage is already undermining key industries, from farming to tourism to insurance. But cutting climate pollution, and doing it faster, can keep us safer and provide a boost to our economy. We've made good progress over the last few years. But after a lost decade, we have catching up to do. We must accelerate the growth of our renewable energy-based resources, for that is where our comparative advantage lies. We must electrify our transport and strategically couple the grids and vehicles, delivering massive battery energy storage and further consolidating resilience. We must use the abundant electricity we create to transition manufacturing and industrial processes to an emission-free future, further enhancing Australia's resilience and economic strength. Accelerating action now means stronger economic growth, and more employment opportunities for communities on the frontlines of change. READ MORE: We cannot avoid all that projected climate changes will bring, but we can and must build resilience in our communities, infrastructure and economy by identifying weaknesses and investing in strengthening or eliminating where possible those weaknesses. This is a strategic imperative. We cannot afford to aim low. A weaker target risks locking Australia out of new markets, putting regional jobs at risk, and burdening our children with even greater climate and economic disruption. A strong 2035 climate target is entirely achievable, economically sound, and in line with the direction our trading partners are heading. This isn't just about reducing pollution. It's about creating good, lasting jobs and securing a fairer, safer future for all Australians. The decisions we make in the next few months will define the opportunities for the coming decades. Let's make them count. The Australian government is about to make one of the most consequential economic decisions of the decade: setting our national climate target for 2035. This is about shaping the kind of economy we want in the years ahead. Do we want to remain shackled to geopolitically volatile fossil fuel markets? Or do we want to build a cleaner, more resilient economy that delivers secure, skilled jobs in every corner of the country? As someone who's spent decades working across energy systems in Australia and abroad - from oil and gas to wind and solar - I've seen how strong, clear targets drive investment and job creation. And I've seen the costs when governments do too little. The economic damage from climate pollution is already here. According to the Insurance Council annual average cost of extreme weather has more than doubled in the last 30 years. Marine heatwaves are battering fisheries, aquaculture and tourism. Back-to-back floods have devastated regional communities. Drought is hitting farmers hard. The risks are rising, and they are being felt on the ground - in jobs lost, bills rising, and industries under pressure. But there's another side to this story: if we act decisively, we can turn this challenge into one of Australia's biggest economic opportunities. We're already seeing signs of what's possible. There are more than 30,000 Australians employed in clean energy generation, storage and transmission. Rooftop solar is cutting bills and creating work for electricians and engineers. Renewable energy zones and battery hubs are supporting new projects and new careers, particularly in regional areas. This is just the beginning. With the strongest possible 2035 climate target - one that aligns with a cut of at least 75 per cent to climate pollution - we can unlock hundreds of thousands of jobs in clean industries. These are jobs in construction, advanced manufacturing, critical minerals, green hydrogen and clean exports. Jobs that will underpin our economic future and help Australia remain competitive in a decarbonising global economy. We have the ingredients: world-class solar and wind, critical minerals, skilled workers, and trusted trade relationships. What we need now is policy certainty. A strong 2035 target will send a clear signal to investors, industries and international partners that Australia is serious about being a clean energy leader. The Productivity Commission's recent report on climate change makes it clear: tackling climate change isn't just about safety - it's critical to Australia's productivity and long-term prosperity. Climate damage is already undermining key industries, from farming to tourism to insurance. But cutting climate pollution, and doing it faster, can keep us safer and provide a boost to our economy. We've made good progress over the last few years. But after a lost decade, we have catching up to do. We must accelerate the growth of our renewable energy-based resources, for that is where our comparative advantage lies. We must electrify our transport and strategically couple the grids and vehicles, delivering massive battery energy storage and further consolidating resilience. We must use the abundant electricity we create to transition manufacturing and industrial processes to an emission-free future, further enhancing Australia's resilience and economic strength. Accelerating action now means stronger economic growth, and more employment opportunities for communities on the frontlines of change. READ MORE: We cannot avoid all that projected climate changes will bring, but we can and must build resilience in our communities, infrastructure and economy by identifying weaknesses and investing in strengthening or eliminating where possible those weaknesses. This is a strategic imperative. We cannot afford to aim low. A weaker target risks locking Australia out of new markets, putting regional jobs at risk, and burdening our children with even greater climate and economic disruption. A strong 2035 climate target is entirely achievable, economically sound, and in line with the direction our trading partners are heading. This isn't just about reducing pollution. It's about creating good, lasting jobs and securing a fairer, safer future for all Australians. The decisions we make in the next few months will define the opportunities for the coming decades. Let's make them count. The Australian government is about to make one of the most consequential economic decisions of the decade: setting our national climate target for 2035. This is about shaping the kind of economy we want in the years ahead. Do we want to remain shackled to geopolitically volatile fossil fuel markets? Or do we want to build a cleaner, more resilient economy that delivers secure, skilled jobs in every corner of the country? As someone who's spent decades working across energy systems in Australia and abroad - from oil and gas to wind and solar - I've seen how strong, clear targets drive investment and job creation. And I've seen the costs when governments do too little. The economic damage from climate pollution is already here. According to the Insurance Council annual average cost of extreme weather has more than doubled in the last 30 years. Marine heatwaves are battering fisheries, aquaculture and tourism. Back-to-back floods have devastated regional communities. Drought is hitting farmers hard. The risks are rising, and they are being felt on the ground - in jobs lost, bills rising, and industries under pressure. But there's another side to this story: if we act decisively, we can turn this challenge into one of Australia's biggest economic opportunities. We're already seeing signs of what's possible. There are more than 30,000 Australians employed in clean energy generation, storage and transmission. Rooftop solar is cutting bills and creating work for electricians and engineers. Renewable energy zones and battery hubs are supporting new projects and new careers, particularly in regional areas. This is just the beginning. With the strongest possible 2035 climate target - one that aligns with a cut of at least 75 per cent to climate pollution - we can unlock hundreds of thousands of jobs in clean industries. These are jobs in construction, advanced manufacturing, critical minerals, green hydrogen and clean exports. Jobs that will underpin our economic future and help Australia remain competitive in a decarbonising global economy. We have the ingredients: world-class solar and wind, critical minerals, skilled workers, and trusted trade relationships. What we need now is policy certainty. A strong 2035 target will send a clear signal to investors, industries and international partners that Australia is serious about being a clean energy leader. The Productivity Commission's recent report on climate change makes it clear: tackling climate change isn't just about safety - it's critical to Australia's productivity and long-term prosperity. Climate damage is already undermining key industries, from farming to tourism to insurance. But cutting climate pollution, and doing it faster, can keep us safer and provide a boost to our economy. We've made good progress over the last few years. But after a lost decade, we have catching up to do. We must accelerate the growth of our renewable energy-based resources, for that is where our comparative advantage lies. We must electrify our transport and strategically couple the grids and vehicles, delivering massive battery energy storage and further consolidating resilience. We must use the abundant electricity we create to transition manufacturing and industrial processes to an emission-free future, further enhancing Australia's resilience and economic strength. Accelerating action now means stronger economic growth, and more employment opportunities for communities on the frontlines of change. READ MORE: We cannot avoid all that projected climate changes will bring, but we can and must build resilience in our communities, infrastructure and economy by identifying weaknesses and investing in strengthening or eliminating where possible those weaknesses. This is a strategic imperative. We cannot afford to aim low. A weaker target risks locking Australia out of new markets, putting regional jobs at risk, and burdening our children with even greater climate and economic disruption. A strong 2035 climate target is entirely achievable, economically sound, and in line with the direction our trading partners are heading. This isn't just about reducing pollution. It's about creating good, lasting jobs and securing a fairer, safer future for all Australians. The decisions we make in the next few months will define the opportunities for the coming decades. Let's make them count. The Australian government is about to make one of the most consequential economic decisions of the decade: setting our national climate target for 2035. This is about shaping the kind of economy we want in the years ahead. Do we want to remain shackled to geopolitically volatile fossil fuel markets? Or do we want to build a cleaner, more resilient economy that delivers secure, skilled jobs in every corner of the country? As someone who's spent decades working across energy systems in Australia and abroad - from oil and gas to wind and solar - I've seen how strong, clear targets drive investment and job creation. And I've seen the costs when governments do too little. The economic damage from climate pollution is already here. According to the Insurance Council annual average cost of extreme weather has more than doubled in the last 30 years. Marine heatwaves are battering fisheries, aquaculture and tourism. Back-to-back floods have devastated regional communities. Drought is hitting farmers hard. The risks are rising, and they are being felt on the ground - in jobs lost, bills rising, and industries under pressure. But there's another side to this story: if we act decisively, we can turn this challenge into one of Australia's biggest economic opportunities. We're already seeing signs of what's possible. There are more than 30,000 Australians employed in clean energy generation, storage and transmission. Rooftop solar is cutting bills and creating work for electricians and engineers. Renewable energy zones and battery hubs are supporting new projects and new careers, particularly in regional areas. This is just the beginning. With the strongest possible 2035 climate target - one that aligns with a cut of at least 75 per cent to climate pollution - we can unlock hundreds of thousands of jobs in clean industries. These are jobs in construction, advanced manufacturing, critical minerals, green hydrogen and clean exports. Jobs that will underpin our economic future and help Australia remain competitive in a decarbonising global economy. We have the ingredients: world-class solar and wind, critical minerals, skilled workers, and trusted trade relationships. What we need now is policy certainty. A strong 2035 target will send a clear signal to investors, industries and international partners that Australia is serious about being a clean energy leader. The Productivity Commission's recent report on climate change makes it clear: tackling climate change isn't just about safety - it's critical to Australia's productivity and long-term prosperity. Climate damage is already undermining key industries, from farming to tourism to insurance. But cutting climate pollution, and doing it faster, can keep us safer and provide a boost to our economy. We've made good progress over the last few years. But after a lost decade, we have catching up to do. We must accelerate the growth of our renewable energy-based resources, for that is where our comparative advantage lies. We must electrify our transport and strategically couple the grids and vehicles, delivering massive battery energy storage and further consolidating resilience. We must use the abundant electricity we create to transition manufacturing and industrial processes to an emission-free future, further enhancing Australia's resilience and economic strength. Accelerating action now means stronger economic growth, and more employment opportunities for communities on the frontlines of change. READ MORE: We cannot avoid all that projected climate changes will bring, but we can and must build resilience in our communities, infrastructure and economy by identifying weaknesses and investing in strengthening or eliminating where possible those weaknesses. This is a strategic imperative. We cannot afford to aim low. A weaker target risks locking Australia out of new markets, putting regional jobs at risk, and burdening our children with even greater climate and economic disruption. A strong 2035 climate target is entirely achievable, economically sound, and in line with the direction our trading partners are heading. This isn't just about reducing pollution. It's about creating good, lasting jobs and securing a fairer, safer future for all Australians. The decisions we make in the next few months will define the opportunities for the coming decades. Let's make them count.
