Were dinosaurs headed for extinction even before massive asteroid strike? Scientists offer new clues
It's a long-standing debate in paleontology: Were dinosaurs thriving when an asteroid hit Earth one fateful spring day 66 million years ago, or were they already on their way out, and the space rock delivered a final, devastating blow?
To find answers, a team of researchers studied North America's fossil record, focusing on the 18 million years before the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period. The new analysis, published Tuesday in the journal Current Biology, adds to a growing body of evidence that the dinosaurs were doing just fine before the asteroid's deadly impact.
However, at face value, the fossils available for study from this time — more than 8,000 — suggest the number of dinosaur species peaked about 75 million years ago and then declined in the 9 million years leading up to the asteroid strike.
'It comes down to the fossil record and its fidelity, or its quality. And so there's been an awareness since the 1970s that the fossil record is not accurate, but it is a biased reflection in the past,' said lead study author Chris Dean, a research fellow in paleontology at University College London.
'It's only in very recent years that we've started to see the full extent of (the bias issue), when using these large databases of fossil occurrences,' he said.
To understand better what was going on at the time of the dinosaurs' demise, Dean and his colleagues turned to a statistical approach called occupancy modeling to estimate the probability of a dinosaur being present at a site. Used in present-day ecology and conservation, occupancy modeling aims to account for the fact that a species may be overlooked or not detected even when present in a particular area. This study marks the first time the approach has been used to look at dinosaurs and over a large scale, Dean said.
'Applying a new technique is really hard,' Dean noted. 'I don't think it will be the last word. I'm sure there's a lot more to be said.'
For the new study, the researchers looked at four main dinosaur families: Ankylosauridae (armored plant-eating dinosaurs such as the club-tailed Ankylosaurus), Ceratopsidae (large three-horned herbivores including Triceratops), Hadrosauridae (duck-billed dinosaurs), and Tyrannosauridae (carnivores such as Tyrannosaurus rex).
'We looked at these bigger groupings so we could have more data, effectively,' Dean said. 'We gridded up North America into a big spatial grid (and determined) the places where we can find fossils, (the places where we) have physically found fossils and how many times people have gone to look for fossils (in these places).'
The information was fed into a computer model, and Dean and his colleagues compared the physical fossil record with that proposed by the model and found a mismatch.
The model suggested that, during the 18 million-year time period in question, the proportion of land the four dinosaur clades likely occupied remained constant overall, suggesting their potential habitat area remained stable, and the risk of extinction stayed low.
One of the factors that could have clouded the true diversity patterns of dinosaurs was the lack of rock exposed at the Earth's surface during that window of time — and thus available for fossil hunters today to scrutinize.
'In this study, we show that this apparent decline is more likely a result of a reduced sampling window, caused by geological changes in these terminal Mesozoic fossil-bearing layers — driven by processes such as tectonics, mountain uplift, and sea-level retreat — rather than genuine fluctuations in biodiversity,' said study coauthor Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza, a Royal Society Newton International Fellow at University College London's department of Earth sciences, in a statement.
'Dinosaurs were probably not inevitably doomed to extinction at the end of the Mesozoic,' Chiarenza said. 'If it weren't for that asteroid, they might still share this planet with mammals, lizards, and their surviving descendants: birds.'
The study helped to highlight what biases may affect scientists' understanding of the true pattern of dinosaur diversity leading up to the extinction event, said Darla Zelenitsky, a paleontologist at the University of Calgary in Alberta who wasn't involved in the research.
'Because of the nature of the rock record, (paleontologists have) found it was more difficult to detect dinosaurs and thus understand their diversity patterns in that window of time just before the mass extinction,' she said.
'It certainly makes sense as we know there are biases related to the rock record that can obscure true biological patterns. The more rock that is exposed at the surface (today), the better our chance of finding dinosaurs in that rock, which in turn leads to a better understanding of their diversity patterns.'
Mike Benton, a professor of vertebrate paleontology at the UK's University of Bristol, called the paper 'thorough and detailed' but said it doesn't prove there was no reduction in dinosaur diversity ahead of the extinction event. Benton's work has suggested that dinosaurs were in decline before the asteroid wiped them out. He wasn't involved in the new study.
'The current paper suggests that the 'reduction' can be explained as a statistical artefact,' Benton said via email. 'What it shows is … simply that the reduction could be real or could be explained by reduced sampling, in my opinion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Authorities expose secret pipeline fueling endangered species trade: 'An important threat to the biodiversity ... and the wider region'
Protecting animal species from exploitation and extinction requires accurate information about the animals and how humans are interacting with them. Sometimes, that information is hard to get, as is the case for North Korea due to its lack of open communication with the rest of the world. However, a recent study published in the journal Biological Conservation sheds light on North Korea's wildlife — and, unfortunately, the situation is dire, University College London reported. The information in the report came from interviews with North Korean defectors directly involved in the illegal wildlife trade, including hunters, buyers, and middlemen, gathered between 2021 and 2022. This group revealed that despite North Korea's system of protected habitats and protected species, it is extremely common for endangered animals to be hunted for meat, skins, traditional medicine ingredients, and other resources. Some of the animals and parts are traded within North Korea, with the rest crossing the border to China. The North Korean government itself is involved in illegal wildlife trade, which violates both its own laws and international law regarding the treatment of endangered species. Lead author Dr Joshua Elves-Powell said in the UCL report: "The widespread harvesting of North Korea's wildlife, driven by the economic limitations of the North Korean state and the shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods experienced by many of its citizens, is an important threat to the biodiversity of North Korea and the wider region." Protected animals like Amur tigers, Amur leopards, Asiatic black bears, long-tailed gorals, and Eurasian otters are among the species of most concern in this report. But after an economic collapse and famine in the 1990s, it's likely that almost every mammal species heavier than half a kilogram (just over a pound) has been affected to some extent, UCL reported. As this data makes clear, many people in North Korea are relying on the animals in the country for food or their livelihoods. Unfortunately, wildlife is not an unlimited resource. The more those animal populations are pushed toward extinction, the more the people involved will suffer. Species that are lost can never be recovered, and populations that are damaged may take many years of conservation efforts to restore. It doesn't just impact the animals within North Korea's borders. Normally, animals should be able to cross the border freely, interbreeding and searching for food. Populations near the border will be impacted by the activities that happen on only one side, as there will be fewer individuals to maintain genetically diverse populations. The study authors called on China to crack down on buyers and put economic pressure on North Korea to stop the illegal wildlife trade. As the market for the majority of illegal animal parts that leave North Korea, China has the power to shut down demand. Do you think people should be allowed to keep exotic animals as pets? Yes No It depends on the animal It depends on the person Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Superorganisms' were just seen in the wild for the first time ever
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. For years, scientists have watched nematodes build massive superorganisms in the form of writhing towers. But, they've only seen it happen in the lab. Now, though, researchers write that they've observed these massive, disturbing towers writhing in the wild for the first time ever. Previously, researchers believed that the behavior was meant to be an attempt to escape from the rest of the group. However, new images of the writhing towers appear to suggest they're actually used cooperatively, to benefit many worms instead of just one. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The researchers reported their findings in a report published in Current Biology, writing that these towering superorganisms only existed naturally in their imaginations for the longest of times. Observing the towers also taught researchers quite a bit about how different species of nematode work together. While watching the towers, the scientists note that while many different species crawled through the worm towers, only one species, a tough larval stage known as a dauer, actually participated in building up the writing masses. This specificity in the construction of the tower points to something more than just random cooperation. These towers are truly superorganisms, then, and not just piles of writing worm bodies. This discovery also got researchers thinking: could other worms form writhing towers like this, too? To test that hypothesis, they stuck a toothbrush bristle into a food-free agar plate, then unleashed a bunch of roundworms from the species Caenorhabditis elegans into the structure. Immediately, the worms began to work together and build up a tower. Within two hours, the researchers say the C. elegans had formed a tower using the bristle as its spine. The researchers watched as some worms along the superorganism writhed and acted as exploratory arms. Others acted as bridges between gaps. To see how the superorganism would respond, the researchers tapped the top of the tower with a glass pick. Almost immediately, the worms began to wriggle and move toward the area. This, they say, shows that these towers are always growing and moving toward stimulus. It's an intriguing show of cooperation between the worms, and just one more way that worms continue to astound scientists. It also raises more questions about why these superorganisms form in the first place. Even more interesting, though, is that the roundworms didn't appear to hold any kind of class system in place. Where the nematodes only relied on the larval stage worms to create the tower, all the roundworms chimed in to help build up the mass. Researchers will need to dig deeper to see exactly why worms form these writhing superorganisms. Hopefully other species, like the parasitic hairworm, aren't capable of this same kind of behavior. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
This ‘Tower of Worms' Is a Squirming Superorganism
When food runs out, certain tiny roundworms, barely visible to the naked eye, crawl toward one another and build living, wriggling towers that move as one superorganism. For the first time, we've caught them doing that in nature on video. Scientists spent months pointing their digital microscope at rotting apples and pears to finally catch a glimpse of these living towers formed by Caenorhabditis roundworms in an orchard that is just downhill from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior's location in Konstanz, Germany. 'It wasn't that hard to find. It's just the people didn't have the interest or time or funding for this kind of research,' says biologist Daniela Perez, lead author of the study. Perez and her team at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior then studied this behavior in a laboratory to learn more. To spur the towering, they placed groups of Caenorhabditis elegans in a dish without food, alongside a toothbrush bristle that could work as a scaffold. Dozens of worms quickly climbed on top of the bristle and one another to form a structure that moved in an eerily coordinated manner. The tower responded to the touch of a glass pipe by attempting to latch onto it; it stretched to bridge the gap between the bottom of the dish and its lid; and it even waved its tip around to probe the surrounding environment. The results were published Thursday in Current Biology. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Researchers had previously observed this towering in the lab but didn't know that it was an actual survival strategy in the wild. 'Discovering [this behavior] in wild populations is really important as it shows this is a part of how these animals live and not just a lab artifact,' says William Schafer, a geneticist at the University of Cambridge, who studies C. elegans and was not involved in the study. Why do the worms do this? The researchers think towering helps worms set out to find richer food sources. When resources are limited, 'it probably makes sense for microscopic organisms to cooperate for dispersing by forming something bigger,' says the study's senior author Serena Ding. The towers could allow some of their members to reach new places or to hitchhike on other organisms such as fruit flies. The bigger question is how the worms communicate within the towers. If the worms on top latch onto a fly, how do those at the bottom know to detach from where they're anchored? They could communicate chemically through pheromones and mechanically through movement patterns, Schafer suggests. Perez says her team plans to test this next. 'Every time we have a meeting, we end up with 10 new project ideas,' she says. 'There are so many directions we can take this.'
