O2 and Vodafone mobile customers warned of network problems TODAY due to ‘essential works'
The tech giants will be carrying out essential maintenance work, which may affect services until 8 pm this evening.
1
The work is being carried out in Exeter in the EX4 neighborhood, which stretches across St Thomas, Redhills and Pennsylvania.
The news is expected to leave a sour taste in the mouths of O2 customers in Devon's capital city after recent complaints over the network in the area.
The telecoms company, owned by Virgin Media O2, has previously responded to problems in the St Thomas area.
A message was sent to customers, which read: "To make our network more reliable, we'll be starting essential works in the area.
"This may affect your services for a while. We know this isn't ideal, but we aim to have you back online by 8pm on July 29."
The message also included a link for users to track the progress of the work being carried out.
O2 blamed the 'congestion' in the region and has promised customers to improve its service.
And hopes that the latest maintenance work would bring improved 5G to the area have been squashed.
Signalchecker.co.uk reveals that Vodafone and O2 do not currently provide 5G mobile in the area.
Vodafone confirmed the work is not related to increasing 5G coverage.
A spokesperson for the company said: "Our team is undertaking essential site maintenance in this area.
"We encourage customers to sign up to Network Checker to receive status updates regarding network issues and planned work.'
5G is the fifth generation in mobile network technology and was launched across the UK in 2019 and 2020.
EE was the first company to launch commercial 5G and Vodafone followed shortly after, treating customers to the service in Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Glasgow, Manchester, Liverpool and London.
O2 rolled out its 5G service in October 2019 and covered Belfast, Cardiff, Edinburgh, London, Slough and Leeds.
Giffgaff, which uses O2's infrastructure, only started offering 5G in January 2021.
How to tackle phone addiction
Mobile phone addiction is becoming a growing concern, with many people spending an excessive amount of time glued to their screens. This constant engagement with our devices is not just a harmless habit; it can lead to a range of health issues. Experts have warned that the overuse of smartphones can contribute to problems such as eye strain, poor posture, and disrupted sleep patterns. The blue light emitted by phone screens can interfere with the production of melatonin, the hormone that regulates sleep, making it harder for individuals to fall asleep and stay asleep.
Moreover, the addiction to phones can have psychological effects. The pressure to stay constantly connected and the barrage of notifications can lead to increased stress and anxiety. Social media, in particular, can contribute to feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem, as people often compare their lives to the seemingly perfect lives portrayed online. This can lead to a vicious cycle where individuals seek validation through their phones, further entrenching their addiction.
To mitigate these effects, it is important to establish healthier phone usage habits. Setting boundaries, such as designated phone-free times or areas, can help reduce screen time. Engaging in activities that do not involve screens, such as reading a book or going for a walk, can also be beneficial. By taking proactive steps to limit phone use, individuals can improve both their physical and mental well-being.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Tech giants blocking some Ukraine and Gaza posts under new online rules
Social media companies are blocking wide-ranging content - including posts about the wars in Ukraine and Gaza - in an attempt to comply with the UK's new Online Safety Act, BBC Verify has new legislation, which came into effect last Friday, imposes fines on social media companies and other websites which fail to protect under-18s from pornography, posts promoting self-harm, and other harmful content. In serious cases, services could be blocked in the BBC Verify found a range of public interest content, including parliamentary debates on grooming gangs, has been restricted on X and Reddit for those who have not completed age verification warn companies are risking stifling legitimate public debate by overapplying the law. Sandra Wachter, a professor of technology and regulation at the Oxford Internet Institute, expressed alarm at the restrictions and told BBC Verify that the new bill was "not supposed to be used to suppress facts of public interest, even if uncomfortable".Organisations can be fined up to £18m or 10% of their global revenue if they are found to have failed to stop harmful content appearing on their platforms. Under the act harmful content includes posts containing pornography, or any which encourage self-harm, eating disorders or promote Sonia Livingstone - an expert in children's digital rights at the London School of Economics - said that companies might "get better over time at not blocking public interest content while also protecting children" as the law beds in over the restricted content identified by BBC Verify was a video post on X which showed a man in Gaza looking for the dead bodies of his family buried among the rubble of destroyed buildings. The post was restricted despite not showing any graphic imagery or bodies at any point in the clip. X subsequently removed the warning after being approached by BBC users who had not verified their age attempted to access the post they were met with a message reading: "Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age." The same warning was experienced by users who attempted to view a video of a Shahed drone destroyed mid-flight in Ukraine. The Iranian-made drones, which are widely used by Russia in the full-scale invasion, are unmanned and nobody was injured or killed in the has introduced similar restrictions. The platform, which hosts countless communities which discuss major news events, now requires age checks for some groups when users try to access them via search the Reddit communities which have been restricted is one called R/UkraineConflict, a message board with 48,000 members that frequently posts footage of the war. Similar restrictions, which urge users to "log in to confirm your age", have been imposed on several pages which discuss the Israel-Gaza war and communities which focus on clips of parliamentary debates have also been swept up in the restrictions. A speech by Conservative MP Katie Lam, containing a graphic description of the rape of a minor by a grooming gang, is available to view without restriction on Parliament's official streaming website, ParliamentLive, but is restricted on who was elected in 2024, wrote on social media: "The British state won't protect children from mass gang rape. But it will 'protect' adults from hearing about it." Another post restricted on X shared an image of Francisco de Goya's 19th-century painting entitled Saturn Devouring His Son. The striking work depicts the Greek myth of the Titan Cronus - known as Saturn by the Romans - eating one of his children in fear of a prophesy that one would overthrow him and has been described as depicting "utter male fury".The examples gathered by BBC Verify are largely focussed on X and Reddit, as they clearly flag age-restricted content. Meta has a different system whereby 'teen' profiles are a different type of account with parental control - making it harder for us to identify which content is is unclear exactly how many posts commenting on debates of public interest are being restricted. X and Reddit did not respond to a request for Prof Livingstone noted that it was "possible that the companies are over-blocking to undermine the Act".X owner Elon Musk has been highly critical of the Online Safety Act. The billionaire has launched a stream of attacks against the legislation online and X suggested that it could dissuade companies from launching products in the UK."[The law's] purpose is suppression of the people," Musk wrote on X on Monday, before sharing several posts by the far-right activist Tommy Robinson which also opposed the suggests that the legislation could heavily impact adults in the UK. Large proportions of users - up to 37% on X and 59% on Reddit - access these platforms whilst logged out, according to data from the platforms. This means those users won't be age-verified and will experience the internet in the same way as Department of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) emphasised to BBC Verify that it was up to social media platforms themselves to decide how to implement the requirements of the act, but insisted that the risk-based approach must not "censor political debate".What the Online Safety Act is - and how to keep children safe onlineWhich sites will require age verification under new law?Ofcom investigates 34 porn sites over age checksOfcom, the UK media regulator tasked with enforcing the act, has warned that firms could face fines not only for failing to protect children, but also for breaching freedom of speech under the Verify's analysis also suggested that the legislation had succeeded in blocking some harmful material online. Since Musk bought X, previously called Twitter, the platform has earned a reputation for being flooded with pornographic material, as well violent, antisemitic and racist we found that violent and pornographic content was significantly restricted when using an account without age new obligations effectively puts firms in a position where they must comply with the law. Prof Livingstone suggested that they could still be in a period of "working out how best" to make judgements over the sort of content on their sites, which could be refined over Prof Wachter said that the level of self-regulation afforded to tech companies in choosing how to comply with the Online Safety Act called for well-staffed moderation teams equipped with "time, resources, expertise and nuance" to effectively make also noted that many major social media companies, such as X and Meta, have slimmed down their moderation teams in recent years or dissolved them completely."This trend is very worrying when opaque rules are now applied to make these take down decisions, especially in the current political climate," Prof Wachter said. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
Times
7 hours ago
- Times
Labour ‘cronyism' as firm linked to tech secretary wins contracts
A consultancy that had a senior staff member seconded to work for the technology secretary while Labour was in opposition has won more than £10 million worth of government contracts since the election. Public Digital, which specialises in transforming digital services, seconded one of its partners to work for the technology secretary, Peter Kyle, and help write Labour's technology policies before the general election. A donation by the firm was registered with the Electoral Commission as being equivalent to £100,000. The company has received a string of contracts to overhaul IT systems across government since the election last year. These included a £5 million contract to help oversee a government programme to reform local public services, which was awarded by the Cabinet Office. Public Digital was also given £3 million to lead the Post Office's IT transformation. Kyle's department did not award any of Public Digital's contracts but the technology secretary has been a vocal advocate of using technology to reform the public sector. His department hired Emily Middleton, the Public Digital partner seconded to his office last year, in a senior civil service role shortly after the election. While on secondment she had continued to be paid by Public Digital. A Public Digital spokesman said the firm 'has a proven track record of delivering exceptional digital transformation services'. He added: 'Our team's expertise, not political affiliations, has earned us the trust of government bodies.' A government spokesman said all contracts were awarded under procurement rules and that some of them were managed via a third-party procurement company. The spokesman added that Public Digital had also won government and quango contracts under the previous Conservative administration. The value of Whitehall contacts won by Public Digital, however, has surged since Labour entered office. Public Digital was given on average £2.56 million a year from government departments in the three years before the election. In the 12 months after, the firm has been awarded £10.2 million, a fourfold increase in annual cash terms. The Conservative Party has called for an independent investigation into the links between Public Digital and the Labour Party, while the country's biggest anti-corruption charity has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest. Alex Burghart, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, called for an 'urgent and independent investigation' into Public Digital's relationship with the government. 'More sleaze and scandal from Starmer's government,' he said. Duncan Hames, director of policy at Transparency International UK and a former MP, said: 'This case raises serious questions about how public money is now spent under the new government. 'When a company gives senior staff to support a political party and then receives valuable government contracts after they take power, this raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest.' Public Digital was first embroiled in a row over alleged Labour cronyism shortly after last year's election. Before Middleton began to work for Kyle, she was also seconded to Labour Together, a think tank with close ties to Sir Keir Starmer and his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. She was at the centre of cronyism allegations last year when she was appointed to a senior civil service role in Kyle's Department for Science, Innovation and Technology weeks after the election. She was hired as a department director general in a fast-track process, officially classed as an 'exception' appointment, which bypassed the usual open recruitment process. The government said at the time that Middleton's appointment, which came with a salary upwards of £125,000 a year, followed the appropriate civil service recruitment rules. One of Public Digital's executives also became a director at HMRC months after the election, but stepped down from the position in April. A government source said it had been 'ridiculous' and 'foolish' to appoint Middleton to a director general role, especially as it put a target on Labour's back so early into Starmer's term. 'She may be very clever, but that is a very senior position for someone who is quite early in their career,' the source added. Her appointment was one of several to be subject to an investigation by the Civil Service Commission in the months after Labour's election victory. The commission said it was 'largely satisfied' with the current recruitment processes in place. A government spokesman said: 'All contracts are awarded in line with public procurement legislation. 'Public Digital is a leading digital consultancy and a long-running supplier for government and the wider public sector, holding a number of contracts awarded under previous administrations.'
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I tried Dyson's new Airwrap Co-anda 2x to see if it lived up to the hype - here's my honest opinion
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more As someone who's tried just about every hair tool under the sun (hot brushes, wands, curling irons and hairdryers with attachments that promise too much), I can confidently say that the Dyson Airwrap launch back in 2018 changed the hair game. Then with 2024's Airwrap i.d's collection, it became the tool with equal parts wizardry and wind tunnel. So, when Dyson announced a new and improved model, the Airwrap Co-anda 2x, I had one question: how can it get better? I mean, it already curled without frying, smoothed without straightening plates, and made me feel like a tech-savvy professional hairstylist in my own home. But also, was it going to be faster? Lighter? Smarter? And would it finally tame my long bangs in one pass instead of two? After spending a week putting it through its paces on my fluffy, shoulder-length hair, I have thoughts - many of them enthusiastic, a few constructive. Here's everything you need to know about the new kid in the Dyson lineup. Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x multi-styler and dryer Powered by the new Dyson Hyperdymium 2 motor - delivering twice the air pressure. Better curling. Faster drying. Straighter styles. No heat damage. Includes the new AirSmooth2x finishing attachment, the perfect finishing tool for a straighter style using only air pressure. Shop How does the Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x work? If you're unfamiliar with the Airwrap concept, here's the quick science bit: it doesn't fry your hair into submission like traditional hot tools. Instead, it uses a clever phenomenon called the Co-anda effect, where high-speed airflow naturally attracts and wraps the hair around the barrel. This all leads to the Dyson's famous smooth curls, waves, or sleek finishes without heat damage. Now, the Co-anda 2x has taken this up a few notches, powered by Dyson's most advanced motor yet - the Hyperdymium 2, which spins at a huge 150,000rpm. If that sounds like a maths equation, that's twice the air pressure compared to previous models and 30 per cent more power, so you're essentially wielding a tornado in a pretty ceramic pink (or deep Jasper Plum) wand. The tool comes with six attachments (all with savvy Radio Frequency Identification 'RFID' chips), each auto-adjusting to optimal airflow and heat settings when clicked into place. New tech like the i.d. curl feature even automates the curling process, adjusting airflow and temperature for a set-curl-release sequence. So lazy girls like me don't even have to think. What makes the Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x stand out? First things first, this thing is lighter and smaller. Dyson's engineers have been busy miniaturising the motor while increasing power. I noticed the difference instantly, especially when reaching around to the back of my head (no more tiring bicep workouts). The attachments have had a glow-up too. And then there's the Fast Dryer 2x, which now performs on par with the Dyson Supersonic. My Review I've been using this tool daily, and I have to say it has been great. About my hair: I have medium length, fine, and non-processed hair. If I'm using a regular blow dryer, it takes at least 10 minutes to dry and a further 15 to 20 minutes to curl. And because my locks are so fine, my hair doesn't hold a curl well, even with loads of hairspray. The increased airflow of this new device means my curls hold better and faster, and the lighter body has made styling smoother, and less of an arm workout overall. The intelligent attachments take the guesswork out of setting temperatures, which is especially helpful if (like me) you're too impatient to read the instruction manuals. But, (yes, there's a but) the Conical barrel and the root smoother, my beloved two attachments from earlier models, are gone. And I miss them. The conical tong created natural, beachy curls that were tighter at the root and looser at the ends, something the uniform-width barrels just don't replicate quite as well. The root smoother on the other hand was great for those fuzzy flyaways. So Dyson, if you're listening… please bring these back. My lived-in texture is depending on you. I also noticed immediately that the cord is really (read: annoyingly) short, so you'll likely have to buy an extension cord if your plug isn't right next to your mirror. That said, the Co-anda 2x is undeniably the most sophisticated styling tool I've ever used. It feels future-forward but intuitive, and the ability to personalise curls via the MyDyson app is a brilliant touch (once you get past the initial setup). With a luxury price tag, it's no impulse buy. But if you're someone who regularly styles your hair and wants to maintain its health long-term, this machine is an investment. Would I recommend it? Absolutely, but I would say also that this does work best alongside the Dyson styling products. Another expense, but they're amazing and do last for absolutely ages. To shop the new Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x multi-styler and dryer, click here. Dyson provided Daily Mail with the Dyson Airwrap Co-anda 2x multi-styler and dryer for testing purposes. All thoughts and opinions expressed are entirely the reporter's own.
