logo
University welcomes Glass Centre closure questions

University welcomes Glass Centre closure questions

Yahoo4 hours ago

Sunderland University has said it welcomes questions from the local authority over the decision to close the National Glass Centre.
The chief executive of the council is expected to write to the university and demand more information about the centre's repair costs and finances after a motion was passed on Wednesday evening.
Save the National Glass Centre campaigners said they were "surprised and delighted" to see cross-party support for the move, and called for the building to be taken into public ownership.
A spokesperson for the university said it had been "completely transparent in its decision making" about the closure.
The National Glass Centre is set to shut in July 2026.
The university had said damage to the building would cost between £14m and £45m to repair - and "no individual or organisation" had offered financial support towards the refurbishment.
But the motion, put forward by Conservative councillor Michael Hartnack, questioned the accuracy of the estimated repair bill.
It also demanded information about the site's ownership and finances.
A university spokesperson said consultation reports about the repair costs had been available to the public on their website for the past two years.
"We welcome the questions from the chief executive of Sunderland Council and will continue to be open and transparent in our answers," they added.
A spokesperson for the campaign group to save the centre said the latest development was "a powerful and encouraging step forward".
They said: "For years, we have been calling for local leadership to stand up for the National Glass Centre, and we're genuinely heartened that councillors have united to take action.
"We also renew our call for the University of Sunderland to be more transparent about the circumstances leading to the closure."
A university spokesperson said it had accepted an invitation to appear at the council's Economic and Prosperity Committee in January over the closure, but was asked to provide a written statement instead due to the number of items on the agenda.
"This was supplied as requested," they said.
The upcoming letter is also expected to ask questions about Glassworks, the new facility set to replace the centre.
It would be based in the former Peter Smith antiques warehouse in Sunniside and be run by arts organisation Sunderland Culture.
However, the motion said the new scheme "fails to address the loss of expertise" caused by the closure of the national centre and was only "partially costed".
The £7.5m facility has secured £5m from the government's Cultural Development Fund, with efforts under way to raise the remaining £2.5m.
A spokesperson for Sunderland Culture previously said its fundraising target reflected the costs "for making the building fit for purpose as a glass-making space".
Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Concerns raised about glass centre's repair costs
Why is the National Glass Centre closing?
Proposed new Glassworks site announced
National Glass Centre

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer Eases Welfare Cuts in Blow to Budget, and His Authority
Starmer Eases Welfare Cuts in Blow to Budget, and His Authority

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Starmer Eases Welfare Cuts in Blow to Budget, and His Authority

Keir Starmer agreed to pare back a divisive £5 billion ($6.9 billion) cut to welfare to quiet a rebellion by his own party, a decision that will likely leave both Britain's fiscal plans and the prime minister's own leadership in need of repair. Starmer agreed on Thursday to soften the blow of a sweeping welfare overhaul meant to press more people back to work and off benefits, according to people familiar with the matter. He offered, among other things, to let hundreds of thousands of existing claimants receive benefits at their current level, said the people, who asked to be named while discussing plans that haven't been publicly announced.

Church of England, Disestablish Thyself
Church of England, Disestablish Thyself

Wall Street Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Church of England, Disestablish Thyself

The Church of England has always been a hybrid entity. Since its establishment by King Henry VIII in 1534, the church has adroitly juggled piety with politics to conserve its role as Britain's moral center. Yet last week Parliament passed two policies so rebarbative to the Christian principle of human dignity—the decriminalization of self-administered abortion at any time, for any reason, and the legalization of assisted suicide for the terminally ill—that even this adaptable church will struggle to reconcile them with its mission. Christian doctrine prizes the dignity of all and the duty to care for the vulnerable. Early Christians were noted for rescuing unwanted babies, routinely abandoned in Roman times. Through European history the establishment of hospitals and houses for poor relief was associated with the Christian faith.

Forest stadium expansion given green light
Forest stadium expansion given green light

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Forest stadium expansion given green light

The plans will increase the City Ground's capacity to 35,000 [PA Media] A major revamp of Nottingham Forest's stadium has been approved. The plans will see the existing Peter Taylor Stand demolished and replaced with a 10,000-seater stand, increasing the City Ground's overall capacity to 35,000. Advertisement Full planning permission was granted unanimously by Rushcliffe Borough Council's planning committee on Thursday evening, subject to a range of conditions. In a statement, the club said it was "delighted" at the decision. "We look forward to working closely with our partners on the next steps and will provide a further update in due course," it said. The Peter Taylor Stand is set to be demolished and replaced [Reuters] Plans for an expansion were first unveiled in 2019, and outline planning permission was initially granted in 2022, but the project has since encountered a number of complications. Council documents published last week said the "extended passage of time" meant the application required "fresh consideration". Advertisement Construction was originally expected to cost about £94m, but an estimate from January 2025 indicates this has risen to £130m. The latest report, however, states the development is expected to boost the local economy by an extra £13m a year and create hundreds of jobs. As a condition of the planning permission, Forest will be required to make contributions to local infrastructure - what is known as a section 106 agreement. These include paying just over £1m to improve local bus services, £150,000 to upgrade the A60/Cattle Market Road junction, and £200,000 for cycle improvements along Lady Bay Bridge. Advertisement The club is also set to enter into a legal agreement with Nottingham Rowing Club to replace its Britannia boathouse, which is set to be demolished as part of the plans. Replacement facilities will have to be in place before any demolition work takes place, but it was stated during the committee meeting that a location for the new boathouse has not yet been identified. The club has also been given outline planning permission to build up to 170 flats next to the stadium, but this element will need further consideration at a later date. The plans for the new stand and the flats were "de-coupled" earlier this year, so that the two do not depend on one another to get planning consent. Advertisement Taking into account the structural roof trusses, the new stand will be approximately 38m (124ft) high, making it the tallest stand at the City Ground. Neil Clarke, leader of Rushcliffe Borough Council, said: "Forest play such an important role in the community. "We are proud they call Rushcliffe home. It's heartening we can support them with their aspirations." A number of objections to the development were raised by local councillors and residents, including increased congestion in the area on matchdays and a lack of parking provision. Councillor Penny Gowland told the meeting the area "grinds to a halt" when Forest play in midweek. Advertisement "Bus services collapse, so a 45-minute commute takes two hours. Bus routes are diverted as they can't get along roads due to appalling parking. People in wheelchairs are stuck at home," she said. The committee report states 2,538 letters of support from the general public were received, along with 116 letters of objection. The approval paves the way for the club to buy the freehold of the land which the City Ground sits upon. Last year, Forest's then-chairman said the club could relocate away from the ground because of a dispute with Nottingham City Council over the rent the club pays. Advertisement The local authority has since agreed to sell the land, but the club previously said any decision to buy the freehold would be "entirely conditional" on it being granted planning permission for the stadium expansion. No date has been set for construction to start, but planning rules mean it will have to begin within three years of a final decision being signed. Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis has previously said he eventually hopes to increase the ground's capacity to 50,000. [BBC] Analysis By Hugh Casswell, BBC Nottingham political reporter If you're a Forest fan, you may be asking yourself two things - why has this taken so long, and why have they had to go through it all twice? Advertisement It's worth noting there is a big difference between the outline planning permission the scheme had before and the full planning permission it has now. It's also an incredibly complex project which has needed all sorts of technical adjustments as well a lot of haggling over those section 106 agreements. But in a funny sort of way, part of the answer may also lie in Forest's success on the pitch. Having spent three years in the Premier League and secured European football since the plans were first considered, the club clearly now has even bigger ambitions. Those ambitions prompted the question - why pump hundreds of millions of pounds into redeveloping a site where the lease will run out in the coming years? Advertisement That triggered the very public row with the City Council last year, and while that row now seems to have been resolved, it was just one factor of many which combined to slow everything down. [BBC] Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. More on this story Related internet links

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store