Conference of the disoriented: How an Indian event was a window into Western decline

Russia Today

26-03-2025

Every spring, New Delhi becomes a global hotspot – at least for a few days. Politicians, analysts, think tankers, and journalists flock to the Indian capital for the Raisina Dialogue, South Asia's premier geopolitical conference. It aspires to be the region's answer to the Munich Security Conference – high-level, influential, and agenda-setting.
Over the past decade, Raisina has grown steadily in stature, faithfully reproducing the trappings of a major global event: the same luxury hotel, plenty of panel sessions, and a cast of international VIPs flown in to weigh in on the world's most pressing problems. But, as in Munich, Raisina's inclusivity has clear limits. While the German conference has barred Russians since 2022, the Indians quietly exclude Chinese delegates – a revealing nod to the tensions between BRICS' two largest powers.
India is not just a host. It's also the first line of engagement – if not confrontation – between the global North and South. And it plays this double role with confidence. Raisina is India's showcase: a platform to present itself to the West as the intellectual and technological leader of the South, and to the South as a country that can hold its own in global forums.
To underline its distinct identity, each Raisina Dialogue is built around a concept drawn from India's civilizational heritage. In 2024, it was Chaturanga, the ancient precursor to chess, symbolizing strategic depth. This year's theme was Kalachakra, the
'wheel of time'
– a Buddhist metaphor for interconnectedness and the idea that changing yourself can change the world. Poetic, yes – but quickly overtaken by the less elevated realities of contemporary geopolitics.
In truth, the stage was dominated by Western institutions and voices. Raisina is funded by the likes of Meta, the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Lockheed Martin, and Palantir. And their priorities – military, commercial, ideological – make clear that most of the guests came to talk about changing the world, not themselves.
Read more
Orban makes a daring bet as the West weakens
Western Europeans, in particular, struck a peculiar note. Emotionally agitated and politically adrift, many of their delegates stuck to familiar talking points:
'Putin's Russia'
is the number one threat to Europe's peace and security. Some added
'Trump's unpredictability'
to the mix, highlighting fears that the next US administration may walk away from global commitments. The shared solution? A call for
'European strategic autonomy.'
But no one could explain how that's possible without cheap Russian energy or Chinese goods – the twin pillars of the EU's post-Cold War prosperity.
The Western Europeans wanted to sound brave. But they came off as disoriented.
By contrast, the Gulf states were self-assured. Iran is contained, Gaza is winding down, Trump is back in the picture, and the Abraham Accords are quietly returning to the agenda. Confidence radiated from their delegates.
The Americans? Not so much. Most came from hawkish, right-leaning think tanks – once champions of liberal interventionism, now adjusting to the new mood in Washington. Their rhetoric was more muted this year. Less preaching, more explaining. Fewer calls for
'democracy,'
more realpolitik. It was an awkward adjustment – and many European guests found it unsettling.
Some of the most revealing moments weren't in the sessions, but in the sniping between Western delegates. Old disputes between
'globalists'
and
'nationalists'
resurfaced in side conversations. A reminder that the so-called
'collective West'
is far from united.
Read more
The Americans want Zelensky out – Is this woman their Plan B?
Meanwhile, India played its host role with aplomb. It indulged some speakers and quietly ignored others. And it never missed a chance to remind the audience that it is the world's
'oldest democracy'
– albeit on its own terms.
The broader picture from Raisina is that the world is in flux –
'multipolar and non-polar at once,'
as some described it. It's a world where a Yemeni analyst offers insights on US-China tensions; a Luxembourg minister speaks on the Ukraine conflict; and advisers from Romania and Moldova pronounce confidently on the future of the Middle East. Ministers from Latvia and Liechtenstein weighed in on global security. It was the illusion of seriousness – panels of people speaking on matters they barely influence.
There was also, as usual, a linguistic and philosophical confusion. Asian delegates were visibly puzzled by the semantic divide between
'rules-based order,'
as Westerners call it, and
'international law,'
as Moscow prefers. Aren't they the same thing? Not in today's world.
It's worth remembering what Raisina is not. It's not a venue for compromise or diplomacy. Russia wasn't represented officially. China wasn't welcome. It's a stage – a place to display power, posture, and polish. But also a mirror, reflecting how different regions interpret the world order's transformation.
At Raisina, many talk about turning the
'wheel of time.'
Few realize it may roll right over them.
Mahatma Gandhi once said,
'Strength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an indomitable will.'
Perhaps that's the most relevant piece of Indian wisdom for this moment. Because many delegates at Raisina came with the illusion that they were steering global change – when in fact, they were simply trying not to get crushed beneath it.
This article was first published by the magazine
Profile
and was translated and edited by the RT team
.