Red tape and frustration: Mississippi public housing struggles as federal funding lags
From cinderblock, single-story duplexes and quadplexes to rows of brick townhomes, public housing projects aren't difficult to spot in Mississippi — particularly those that buckle under the weight of their age.
Getting these properties cleaned up comes with much federal red tape and frustration for many local leaders. As these past housing solutions go offline, underfunded authorities hope to address community needs by doing more with less.
One abandoned public housing project in Poplarville, Glenwild, was built in 1967 with asbestos and lead paint and now sits vacant. The city has little power to address its condition.
'We would love to be able to just come in, demolish it and do something, but it's not that easy,' said the Rev. Jimmy Richardson, a director for South Mississippi Housing Development. 'There's so much red tape … let alone the dollar amount it would take.'
Federal law requires a replacement plan before redevelopment. Glenwild's cost estimate is around $10 million, and even if a project is planned, the South Mississippi Housing Authority must prove it has the financial backing to proceed.
Public housing authorities nationwide have struggled with budget shortfalls for decades. Justin 'Jimmy' Brooks, president of the South Mississippi Housing Authority, said funding has been insufficient since the 1980s.
'When I was a director at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in in the 2010 time period, we estimated there was about a $40 billion shortfall in what we needed to take care of our priorities nationwide, and that was in 2010 — it's probably more than tripled since then,' Brooks said.
To offset this shortfall, HUD introduced the Rental Assistance Demonstration program, shifting public housing to a private funding model with capped rents.
'A lot of large housing authorities — us, included — just dove right in. We took all of our public housing out of the public housing program — put it all this private program. It's been an absolute challenge ever since, because we don't generate enough revenue to take care of the properties, and now we've eliminated our ability to get federal grant funding,' Brooks said.
Now, the South Mississippi Housing Authority must generate its own revenue, much of it from capped rents. In some cases, rent prices are set at half the market rate.
'For example, a two-bedroom rent here, the market rent is $1,000 — we might be getting $540 a month. We're literally being asked to do the same thing as the private market, with substantially less funding,' Brooks said. 'We're stuck with it until Congress takes action, which is to be determined.'
Brooks said the biggest challenge for Mississippi public housing has been rising insurance costs, which have been eating away at the authority's operational budget.
'When I came here (in June 2021), it cost about $1.2 million to insure all of our properties. Now, the cost to insure our real estate is over $4 million,' Brooks said. 'We're scared to death to see what our May 1 renewal is going to look like this year, but whatever it is, the properties can't afford it today, and we could barely afford what the insurance was last year.'
The South Mississippi Housing Authority, the largest in the state, serves about 26,000 people. It manages 917 active units and about 100 deteriorating ones across Mississippi's lower 14 counties. As costs rise, more units may go offline.
'We've got lagging income, we've got expenses that are just on a rocket ship ride. We've got insurance that is completely unaffordable to anyone in luxury apartments down to government-subsidized housing, and if you can get the materials that you need to maintain your properties, you're going to pay probably 50% higher than what you could realistically budget for. And we've got all of those factors rolling into what is ultimately going to be the biggest crisis that I've seen in affordable housing,' Brooks said.
As a result, many of these public housing projects sit untouched, falling into further dilapidation.
'Which creates friction with cities, with counties, with code enforcement, with the community who's saying, 'Hey, you really need to do something about these properties,' Brooks said. 'And then you have public housing authorities like us that are saying, 'Well, we're already investing $2 million of losses back into to the properties to keep them at the status quo.''
In Poplarville alone, the South Mississippi Housing Authority loses more than $100,000 annually to keep public housing units online for low-income families. In 2025, as the South Mississippi Housing Authority faces these pressures, more units will go offline, Brooks said.
For smaller properties like Glenwild, projected revenue from capped rents does not cover the costs of redevelopment. The South Mississippi Housing Authority has a plan to demolish the 12 units and partner with a nonprofit to build affordable single-family housing, a plan not yet approved by HUD.
Despite these challenges, housing authorities across Mississippi are still working to provide new public housing solutions. The South Mississippi Housing Authority is about to begin construction on a 40-unit project in north Gulfport called North Park Estates Phase 2, which involves demolishing old, dilapidated units for a rebuild.
'We've had supply issues. We've had construction pricing issues. You know, the 40 units, we estimated it would cost about ten million to build it. We're up to about $14 million in estimated cost right now,' Brooks said.
Brooks said large projects are more cost-effective for public housing developers because they produce more revenue, but getting money on the front end is challenging. He said much funding for affordable housing at the city and county level has dried up in the past two decades.
The authority's other active project, Coastal Pointe, includes more than 12 funding sources to form a $16 million plan viable to HUD. The project will demolish older units on a property called Canal Pointe and move residents into 60 units of new, three-story apartment buildings.
Sheleatha McCullum, 44, was born and raised in Gulfport public housing. Currently a nursing assistant, she said her six years at Canal Point has allowed her to achieve some financial stability is looking forward to the new project.
'(Public housing) has helped me tremendously in trying to get to where I'm trying to get to,' McCullum said. 'I don't plan on moving, but if I did, this would be a start — for anybody.'
Tamillia Black, a Moss Point native, moved into Canal Point three years ago. She is thankful for what she finds to be a peaceful community.
'I was homeless. I had nothing. It's a blessing to have a roof over my head,' Black said. 'I was on a wait list; I think I waited five years to get out here. I was home to home, living off others. It was tough for me at some points, really tough.'
Black said public housing is necessary, and that new development at Coastal Pointe is necessary to answer the aging structures in the community.
'With public housing, you face a dual problem, because public housing in Section 8 usually has rent limits as to what the federal government will let an owner of public housing charge, and it doesn't accommodate any increase in insurance every year,' said Mike Chaney, Mississippi Commissioner of Insurance.
After Hurricane Katrina, the state Legislature formed the Comprehensive Hurricane Damage Mitigation Program, which provides grant funding to make properties, particularly those of lower-income individuals, less vulnerable to storm damage in the six coastal counties: Pearl River, Stone, George, Hancock, Harrison and Jackson counties.
Mississippi state law requires insurance companies to give discounts for homes mitigated to the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety FORTIFIED standard, which includes reinforced roofs and windows.
'If you mitigate a home or public housing or storm damage, you reduce the insurance rates anywhere from 30 to 40%, and that's been our proactive choice,' Chaney said.
The program was unfunded until last year, when it received $5 million to provide $10,000 to each selected recipient to fortify buildings and to measure public interest in such a program.
House Bill 959, currently in the hands of the Senate, would extend the program. While Chaney hopes to see more funding appropriated to the program, he has not seen much interest in the state legislature.
Chaney also said the federal government is unlikely to help curb the impact of insurance rates on public housing anytime soon.
'I don't see the government putting any money out at all to try to raise any of the rent subsidies that they give out for the cost of living, or the cost of insurance,' Chaney said.
U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, chair for the upper house's Transportation, Housing and Urban Development subcommittee, did not respond to our request for comment on developments at the federal level.
As Mississippi housing authorities balance these increasing financial strains, Brooks said policy responses will have to be made at the state and federal levels to keep the state's public housing at the status quo.
'This isn't a Mississippi problem. It's certainly not a Poplarville problem. It is a nationwide challenge that I would say is starting to get to crisis level,' Brooks said. 'There are millions of units of public housing that are that are in this situation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
JHA hosts block party; ideas sought from residents to make neighborhood improvements
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. – Coopersdale Homes residents came together Wednesday to share some camaraderie during the West End Block Party and to also learn more about the community's ongoing Choice Neighborhoods planning grant program. The Johnstown Housing Authority received $500,000 in U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funding last September to develop a plan for stabilizing and revitalizing the public housing complex and surrounding area. JHA has 30 months from the time of receiving the award to complete the plan. It is currently soliciting input from residents, city officials, nonprofits and businesses regarding what improvements could be made. 'It's important to hear from the people what they need in their units, in their neighborhood because you can't, as an outsider, tell someone else what they need, so it's just best to gather input from people,' Jaden Bennett, manager for JHA's Choice Neighborhoods project, said. Bennett has noticed some common concerns among residents. 'One thing that really stood out to us was there was mention that there isn't enough lighting for individuals that are walking to (local supermarkets) Giant Eagle or Save A Lot from Coopersdale,' Bennett said. 'There was a big emphasis on getting better lighting so that in the nighttime it's easier to see people, pedestrians that are walking to those places to get essentials. Also, transportation is a big barrier for a lot of individuals.' Shaqueena Murphy, a project ambassador and Coopersdale Homes resident, also mentioned the transportation barrier. 'We don't have any stores to go to around here,' Murphy said. 'You have to go all the way to Richland. Everybody don't have cars to travel, to get around, so it's like kind of hard to like get around to do anything.' After the authority's plan is developed, it will attempt to acquire federal money for implementation of its ideas. But even if that economic support does not materialize, JHA and the city will have an outline to use when possibly pursuing funding from other sources. 'To have that in place means really everything because now we'll know what people want and what people need,' Bennett said. 'No matter what the outcome is, we're able to better understand where some of the struggles are as a community, as a whole and really come together to create ' Dave Sutor is a reporter for The Tribune-Democrat.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Could a new tax incentive get the Village at Harbor Hill across the finish line?
Could an affordable housing initiative help get the Village at Harbor Hill across the finish line? The city of Gig Harbor is considering a potential tax exemption program aimed at encouraging rent-restricted housing. The Village at Harbor Hill, a proposed retail site in the Gig Harbor North area that has been stalled for years, could be its first test case. Talks to develop the 18.5-acre property go back at least a decade, according to The News Tribune's reporting. Last year, the property owner began considering adding multifamily housing to make the development more feasible financially. The development has struggled to land a grocer to anchor the project. A multifamily property tax exemption program, or MFTE, could make developing those housing units — and the project as a whole —more attractive, though representatives for the city and the property owner haven't shared any concrete timelines for moving forward. MFTE programs have been popular among developers in other area cities and are a tool for cities and counties to encourage housing development, including more affordable units. Tacoma, for example, offers three options. Those include an 8-year all-market rate version and 12- and 20-year versions, which require a percentage of units to be rent-restricted, or what the programs call 'affordable.' As defined by the state and as part of its Growth Management Act (GMA), the MFTE program offers a property tax exemption in exchange for the development of market-rate multifamily units or multifamily affordable housing of at least four units in designated 'residential targeted areas,' via the 8, 12- and 20-year versions. The property owner does not pay property taxes on the residential improvements for the designated number of years, but still pays tax on the land and any nonresidential improvements, such as a commercial portion of a mixed-use building. Cities and counties can tailor programs to meet policies, such as what percentage of area median income the 'affordable' units are based on, generally tied to figures from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). All cities, many towns, and Clark, King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties are eligible to offer an MFTE program, according to the state Department of Commerce. The city of Gig Harbor hasn't been shy about mentioning the potential benefits of an MFTE program for the long-anticipated retail site. At one time, Village at Harbor Hill was planned as a business park at Borgen Boulevard and Harbor Hill Drive, anchored by a Town & Country Market grocery store and surrounded by banking, restaurants, shops and medical services. Plans for the site stalled as a legal battle over transportation impact fees and eventual settlement between the developer and the city took time to reach. Town & Country was out of the project by the summer of 2020 and two years later also abandoned plans to set up shop at the Peninsula Shopping Center on Judson Street. After a community meeting about the project last summer, property owner representative Jon Rose confirmed to The News Tribune in December that residential was now in the mix, along with the audience's receptivity to a discount grocer. Rose is vice president of real estate with Florida-based Raydient/Rayonier, which owns the Village at Harbor Hill property. In a city newsletter March 19, the city announced that 'Discussion of (an MFTE) mechanism, beginning with the Village at Harbor Hill, will focus on the opportunity to promote multi-family workforce/affordable housing in the community near transit and other key services.' The city council heard an overview of the program at its study session on March 13 and a formal proposal introducing a 12-year MFTE version with at least 20 percent of units designated as rent-restricted housing for low- and moderate-income households at the council meeting on April 28. Households are considered low-income if they earn 80% or less of the area median income, and moderate-income if they earn between 80 to 100%, as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, per the city's draft ordinance presented April 28. As of April 1, the median family income in Pierce County is $120,800. A household of five is considered low-income if they make $104,400 or less in a year, according to the Tacoma Housing Authority. A one-person household qualifies as low income if they make $67,700 or less. The Gig Harbor City Council heard a first reading on April 28 but did not vote on an ordinance that would establish an MFTE program in the city. A second reading of the ordinance, scheduled for May, was removed from the agenda. Instead, city staff are planning a town hall to discuss the program with the community, according to City Clerk Josh Stecker. The council may consider the program again afterward under a new ordinance, he wrote in an email. That town hall is still being scheduled, but city staff are looking at the first three weeks of July, City Administrator Katrina Knutson said. Attendees will be able to learn more about a potential MFTE program as well as the spate of state housing bills passed in recent years that affect the city. Speaking about the Village at Harbor Hill project, Jon Rose, the property owner representative, told the city council at the April 28 meeting that 'multifamily developers that we have talked to are supportive of this version of the MFTE.' Gig Harbor Community Development Director Eric Baker explained to The News Tribune that an MFTE program could make a mixed-use project with housing more feasible because it could help the developer save on the housing portion. The property tax exemption wouldn't apply to the land and any commercial components of the project. He added that he doesn't have insight into the Village at Harbor Hill project specifically but understands how multi-use projects tend to proceed. Baker also explained that the tax exemption would result in a 'tax shift' onto the rest of the city's property owners. To make up for the lost revenue, residents and businesses would be subject to a slight levy rate increase, which he said city staff expects to be 'a relatively small number' but haven't quantified yet. City Administrator Knutson said that she has directed city staff to do a full comprehensive look at the proposed MFTE program and 'what the property tax offset would be' if used at the Village at Harbor Hill site, so that they can present that to the public and the city council for informational purposes. Knutson said Wednesday that the city is aware of at least two grocers 'in regular contact' with the Village at Harbor Hill property owner. She declined to comment on whether a budget grocer like Winco or a Trader Joe's is still a possibility for the site, but said 'that's a great question.' Since the Village at Harbor Hill is a private development project, the city's role is primarily regulatory, Knutson said. But the city is also aware that the project is of strong interest to many residents in the Gig Harbor North area, and has been in 'proactive and regular communication with the property owner and their agents in order to be responsive to what they may need to accomplish the project,' she said. In an interview on May 29, Rose noted that without a residential component or viable grocer as a possibility, the Village at Harbor Hill site likely would go back on the market. Since the community meeting with Gig Harbor residents in 2024, he said, 'probably six or seven grocers have brought their boats into the dock for a look, and most of them have taken a look and moved on.' As Rose explained, 'It's one thing to take over a space, like if the QFC emptied, you're buying a used space where it was built with dollars and expenses that were from 30 years ago. It's like buying a used car, you don't pay the same as new for a used car.' 'And some of the grocers, some of them that are particularly well liked and desired, have never done a ground-up retail,' he added. 'They don't have to. There's some in particular that just go to 15,000-square-foot spaces that are already there.' But he also noted there is some good news about the site, with several grocery entities that 'have stuck around.' 'And with the apartment idea, we have checked it with other apartment developers, just to make sure we're not chasing a dream. And there's interest from both sides.' While Baker, the Gig Harbor community development director, said the site has been rezoned to allow for multifamily development, Rose remained neutral on any MFTE benefits to the project. 'We'd love if our project was helpful, but the city needs to meet certain growth targets ... mandated by the GMA, and the affordable housing is also mandated,' he said. 'So it's up to the city. If it's offered as a program, people who develop multifamily and our project will consider using it.' 'If they don't offer it, there will still be apartments, and they just won't meet any affordable housing criteria,' he added. 'So we're not going to weigh in and start lobbying people. This is an internal issue for the city more than it's an issue for us.' 'But I can tell you, there's legitimate and strong interest from grocers — more than one. And same with the multifamily.' Previous reporting from The News Tribune contributed to this report.


Axios
5 days ago
- Axios
Why developers have stopped building apartments
The economics of building apartments in the Twin Cities doesn't work, and it could be a long time before it does. Why it matters: The metro area is already undersupplied on housing. A staggering decline in multifamily building could drive up prices in the years to come. By the numbers: After peaking at 15,500 in 2022, permits issued to begin apartment construction in the metro fell to 5,000 last year and are on an even slower pace this year, according to preliminary data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Zoom in: Sherman Associates has been one of the most prolific local developers in recent years, building hundreds of units in Minneapolis and beyond. The company doesn't have a single project under construction right now, and as CEO Chris Sherman told Axios, his Minneapolis firm can't make it work without public subsidies. State of play: While there can be some outliers, the typical cost to build a midrise apartment building (think four to five stories) has reached $320,000-$340,000 a unit, Sherman said. Meanwhile, the average price paid for Class A apartment buildings was $223,400 per unit last quarter, said Heidi Addo, a broker who sells multifamily communities for Michel Commercial Real Estate. This massive gap is a nonstarter for most developers, especially merchant builders, who develop apartment communities, fill them up with renters and then sell. The big picture: The three main reasons for the slowdown: Construction costs have risen nearly 40% since 2020, according to general contractor Mortenson's Construction Cost Index for Minneapolis. Interest rates have risen dramatically since 2022, and there's a correlation between them and what price sellers can get for apartments. When interest rates were historically low in 2022, the average sale price of apartments peaked at $285,000 per unit, according to a Michel Commercial Real Estate report. Rents have not kept up with rising costs. Asking rents in the metro increased only 1.4% year over year in March, to an average of $1,543 per unit, according to the report. Friction point: Sherman said apartment sales prices will have to eclipse $400,000 per unit before his firm begins building again, with the exception being projects that receive public subsidies, like the one they're working on in St. Louis Park. "The numbers are just upside down — and not by a little, but a lot," Sherman said. What we're watching: Both Addo and Sherman believe rent increases are coming. Addo is already tracking major hikes in areas of the metro where few units have been delivered in recent years, particularly the northern suburbs. Sherman said the sweet deals renters have been getting — like free months of rent for new leases — will be drying up soon.