logo
China in BIG trouble due to Israel-Iran war; Xi Jinping now depends on Putin for..., good news for Russia due to...

China in BIG trouble due to Israel-Iran war; Xi Jinping now depends on Putin for..., good news for Russia due to...

India.com5 hours ago

(File)
China's support for Iran in the recent Israel-Iran war may prove costly for Beijing as the South Asian power is likely to bear the brunt of a potential oil crisis if the conflict reignites. Beijing issued a harsh condemnation of Israel and the United States, after the two allies bombed Iranian nuclear sites last week.
But experts believe that China's support for Iran will likely decrease in the future due its emerging role as a mediator in the Middle East and the damage caused by Tehran's threats to block the Strait of Hormuz. On the other hand, Russia is expected to benefit more from the Israel-Iran war, which is why Moscow largely distanced itself from the conflict, barring a few strong statements, even though Tehran is a major ally. China now more dependent on Russia for energy needs
As per media reports, China, which purchases a large chunk of Iran's oil and gas produce, is worried because Tehran will likely blockade the Strait of Hormuz in case of another attack by Israel and/or the US, which will negatively impact Beijing's energy needs. The situation has forced China to once again consider Russia's proposed Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.
Citing anonymous sources close to Beijing, the WSJ report said China has begun showing interest in the Power of Siberia 2 project, after Beijing had earlier disagreed with Moscow's proposals regarding the ownership and cost of the proposed pipeline. The report also noted that China does not want to be overly dependent on any single source for its energy needs, and is considering to purchase more oil and gas from other oil-producing countries apart from allies like Iran and Russia.
Notably, about a third of China's gas imports come as LNG from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the WSJ report said, citing data from Rystad Energy. Additionally, Russia is China's third-largest LNG supplier after Australia and Qatar, and according to S&P Global, Russia is also China's largest pipeline supplier, via Siberia 1, whose throughput is set to reach 38 billion cubic meters this year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘About the worst': US defense Secy Pete Hegseth rips former Fox News colleague over Iran question
‘About the worst': US defense Secy Pete Hegseth rips former Fox News colleague over Iran question

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘About the worst': US defense Secy Pete Hegseth rips former Fox News colleague over Iran question

Pete Hegseth (AP) and Jennifer Griffin (She said podcast) US defense secretary Pete Hegseth ripped Fox News reporter and his former colleague Jennifer Griffin on Thursday, saying she has 'been about the worst' in the media when it comes to reporting on the American bombings of multiple Iranian nuclear sites. Addressing the press briefing organised by the Pentagon on Operation Midnight Hunter, Hegseth said Griffin was arguably the most high-profile journalist to 'misrepresent what the President says' regarding the operation. The remarks came after Griffin, Fox News' chief national security correspondent, who has been with the channel for over 25-years, questioned Hegseth about how effective the strikes had been and whether he was certain that highly enriched uranium was present at the Fordow nuclear facility during the US strike, noting that satellite images had captured trucks at the site two days earlier. 'Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow Mountain?' Griffin asked. 'Are you certain none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?' Hegseth, a former Fox & Friends co-host, seemed visibly irritated by the question, prompting his sharp response. "Of course, we're watching every single aspect. But, Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most, intentionally, what the president says." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In response to Hegseth's remarks, Griffin stood by her reporting on Fordow, stating she was the first to accurately detail the B-2 bombers, their midair refueling, and the overall mission, adding, 'so I take issue with that.' He is not the first member of the Trump administration to attack and discredit the media on the questions over the effectiveness of Iran strikes. After a leaked initial assessment by the Pentagon's defence intelligence agency, suggested that US strikes last week on Iran's nuclear sites may have left core components of facilities largely intact, and that Iran's nuclear program has essentially only been set back by months rather than 'obliterated.' President Trump himself expressed frustration with media outlets like CNN and The New York Times for questioning the success of the operation, labeling them 'scum' for their coverage. Other members of his administration, including Marco Rubio, Tulsi Gabbard, and John Ratclif have dismissed the report as false, with Gabbard stating that U.S. intelligence confirms the sites were 'destroyed.'

'We don't play your little games…': Pete Hegseth scolds Fox reporter over Iran question
'We don't play your little games…': Pete Hegseth scolds Fox reporter over Iran question

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'We don't play your little games…': Pete Hegseth scolds Fox reporter over Iran question

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was involved in a heated exchange with one of the senior-most reporters at the Pentagon and his former colleague, Fox News' Jennifer Griffin, at the press briefing Thursday. Hegseth was addressing 'intelligence leak' claims days after the US' strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The verbal clash between Hegseth and Griffin came amid a broader push to discredit media outlets over reporting on intelligence laying out the extent of damages done by U.S. strikes to Iranian nuclear sites. Hegseth insisted Thursday that American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were a success, backing President Donald Trump and berating the media for questioning the results of the operation. Show more Show less

'Given Power Of These Bombs': IAEA Chief Says Iran's Uranium Centrifuges Disable After US Strikes
'Given Power Of These Bombs': IAEA Chief Says Iran's Uranium Centrifuges Disable After US Strikes

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

'Given Power Of These Bombs': IAEA Chief Says Iran's Uranium Centrifuges Disable After US Strikes

Last Updated: Grossi said the damage was a result of the United States dropping 'bunker busters' on key Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities last week The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, on Thursday said that Iran's uranium-enriching centrifuges are likely 'no longer operational" following US airstrikes. Grossi said the damage was a result of the United States dropping 'bunker busters' on key Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities. Last week, American B-2 stealth bombers struck two of the sites using GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs, while a guided missile submarine launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at the third facility. 'We can't fully assess, and no one can say exactly what the extent of the damage is. But we already know that, given the power of those weapons and the technical characteristics of a centrifuge, we know that these centrifuges are no longer operational," Grossi told French broadcaster, Radio France Internationale. 'These are machines with delicate positioning—there are rotors, there are parts—so the damage must have been total," he added. The UN nuclear chief also said that Iran's nuclear programme had suffered 'enormous damage," although he stopped short of backing US President Donald Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear sites had been 'obliterated." 'I think annihilated is too much," he said. 'The attacks resulted in significant physical damage to Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, where Iran concentrated most activities related to uranium enrichment and conversion." Grossi noted that while these three sites had taken major hits, 'there are other nuclear sites in Iran that were not affected." He added, 'I know there are many assessments (the reference was to Trump's claim) but to what degree there is annihilation or total destruction, I can only tell you… there is very considerable damage." The military campaign comes after Israel launched an unprecedented air assault on June 13, targeting Iranian nuclear sites, key scientists, and senior military leaders. Israel's goal, reportedly, is to halt what it views as Iran's progress towards building nuclear weapons—though Tehran continues to insist its programme is for peaceful, civilian purposes. US President Donald Trump had spent weeks trying to negotiate a new nuclear agreement with Tehran after withdrawing from the earlier deal during his first term in 2018. However, he eventually chose to authorise military action. The US operation was extensive, involving more than 125 aircraft, including stealth bombers, fighter jets, aerial refuelling tankers, and a guided missile submarine. (With inputs from agencies) Location : Paris, France First Published:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store