Sick days due to depression up 50% among German workers, report finds
The number of sick days taken by workers in Germany due to depression rose by around 50% last year, figures from a leading health insurance company have showed.
The mental health report by DAK-Gesundheit, released on Sunday, said there were 183 sick days due to depression for every 100 employees the company insured in 2024, up from 122 days in the previous year.
Sick days due to mental health rose from 323 to 342 per 100 employees, the figures showed, with workers in child care and elderly care work particularly affected.
"The high number of mental illnesses is often associated with long absences and stigmatization for the affected employees and their employers," said DAK chief executive Andreas Storm. "We can no longer close our eyes, because mental health is a key success factor for a resilient society and for Germany as a strong business location."
Storm called for increased awareness of the causes and taboo-free information on depression and anxiety disorders as well as support services to strengthen mental health.
All age groups are affected by the rise in depression. The figures for younger people have been gradually increasing for several years, while there was a sharp rise in the older age groups in 2024.
According to the DAK figures, the average duration of sick leave due to mental illness in 2024 was just under 33 days, slightly above the previous year's level.
DAK-Gesundheit is one of the largest statutory health insurance companies in Germany.
The mental health report was conducted using the anonymized data of 2.42 million DAK-insured employees, with the help of the IGES Institute in Berlin.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Greystone Expands FHA Lending Team with the Addition of Corley Audorff and Josh Williams
NEW YORK, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Greystone, a leading national commercial real estate finance company, announced today that Corley Audorff and Josh Williams have joined the firm as Directors. Both based in Atlanta, GA, Mr. Audorff and Mr. Williams will focus on loan originations for multifamily and seniors housing / healthcare assets, reporting to Field Springer, Chief Operating Officer of Greystone's FHA Lending platform. Mr. Audorff brings over 15 years of experience in real estate finance, most recently serving as a Senior Vice President of Production at Colliers Mortgage from 2022 to 2025, where he focused on HUD/FHA, Fannie Mae, USDA and proprietary lending financing solutions for clients. Prior to his role at Colliers, Mr. Audorff served as a Vice President at PGIM Real Estate, where he specialized in HUD financing, and has also spent time as a Managing Director at Monticello Asset Management. Prior to his work in the private sector, Mr. Audorff served approximately seven years in various roles at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, including Senior Underwriter. Mr. Williams also joins from Colliers Mortgage, where he was a Vice President from 2022 to 2025. He previously served as a Senior Associate Loan Officer at PGIM Real Estate and as an Underwriter and Production Associate at Monticello Asset Management. His expertise spans multifamily and healthcare sectors, with a strong background in FHA-insured loan products. 'I'm thrilled to join Greystone, the #1 multifamily and healthcare HUD lender*, and work to continue our success together as a team, in multifamily and healthcare finance,' said Mr. Audorff. 'The company's depth of resources, integrated lending platform, and client-focused culture create an environment where I can contribute meaningfully to impactful transactions in the seniors housing and multifamily sectors.' 'Both Corley and Josh's combined depth of experience across the private and public sectors in multifamily and healthcare financing makes them an invaluable addition to our lending team,' said Mr. Springer. 'Together, they strengthen our reach and capabilities in key asset classes and geographies.' About Greystone Greystone Servicing Company is a private national commercial real estate finance company with an established reputation as a leader in multifamily and healthcare finance, having ranked as a top FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac lender in volume for these sectors. Greystone loans are offered through Greystone Servicing Company LLC, Greystone Funding Company LLC and/or other Greystone affiliates. For more information, visit *For HUD's 2024 fiscal year. Based upon combined firm commitments of Greystone Funding Company LLC and Greystone Servicing Company LLC. PRESS CONTACT:Karen
CBS News
6 days ago
- CBS News
What key GOP senators want to change in Trump's House-passed "one big beautiful bill"
Washington — The Senate this week is taking up the massive budget package containing President Trump's second-term agenda, a measure that squeaked through the House with a one-vote margin, solely with Republican votes. Its path through the Senate seems destined to be similarly narrow, with the package almost certain to be revised, since parts of it are opposed by a handful of GOP senators critical to its passage. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, recently ventured to the other side of the U.S. Capitol to remind Republican senators "that we are one team" and pleaded with them to keep the bill substantially intact. "I encouraged them to make as few modifications as possible, remembering that I have a very delicate balance on our very diverse Republican caucus over in the House," Johnson said in an interview with "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, acknowledged that balance, but told reporters "the Senate will have its imprint" on the bill. He can afford three "no" votes from Republicans if all Democrats vote to block its passage in the Senate, and there are no absences. GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has already indicated he opposes the bill because it will "explode the debt." Including interest, the House bill would increase the debt by $3.1 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Similar to the House, in the Senate, there are Republicans who think there's not enough cost cutting, while others argue some provisions are too draconian. These are the key sticking points as the legislation moves to the Senate: Medicaid changes Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Josh Hawley of Missouri are among the Republicans who have expressed concern about some of the changes to Medicaid, a government program that provides health care to low-income Americans as well as those with disabilities. And the trio of senators supported an amendment to the budget resolution earlier this year that would have removed the language instructing the committee overseeing Medicaid to make $880 billion in cuts. That amendment failed. The House-passed legislation includes new work requirements that would apply to childless Medicaid recipients without disabilities between the ages of 19 and 64. It also requires states to conduct more frequent eligibility checks on Medicaid recipients to root out waste, fraud and abuse, and it would penalize states that provide state-funded health care to undocumented immigrants. The bill also seeks to lower federal costs by freezing states' provider taxes at current rates and prohibiting them from establishing new provider taxes, among other changes. While these Senate Republicans have generally been supportive of the work requirements, some have warned that they will not support the bill if it includes any cuts to Medicaid benefits. In a New York Times opinion piece published earlier this month, Hawley called "slashing health insurance for the working poor" both "morally wrong and politically suicidal." A handful of senators have also warned of the impact of freezing provider taxes at current levels, since states use the taxes to help fund their share of Medicaid costs, although Murkowski has expressed support for this. Hawley said he's concerned about the impact on rural hospitals, while also voicing opposition to new copay requirements for beneficiaries. "I don't like the idea of decreasing funding for rural hospitals. I'm worried that the House bill goes way too far in that regard," Hawley said in a CNN interview. "I also don't like what is basically a hidden tax on working poor people who are trying to get health care. I mean, this whole idea of we're going to charge them now additional copays in order to access healthcare — I have to say, that just sounds like a tax to me." Deeper spending cuts Meanwhile, a number of fiscal hawks have balked at the bill's spending cuts or even threatened to oppose the measure without securing deeper cuts, echoing the frustration expressed on the other side of the Capitol by members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus throughout negotiations on the package. Sen. Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, said the package's aim to cut $1.5 trillion "isn't squat, quite honestly." And Sen. Rick Scott, a Florida Republican, has also rebuffed the cuts, saying the amount is "not going to do it." "Their bill would not pass in the Senate, and I think there's plenty of us that would vote against it," Scott told reporters earlier this month, adding that the upper chamber should go through every line in the budget to find savings. Sen. Roger Marshall, a Kansas Republican, said "the job of the Senate is to try to increase the cuts in spending," calling the House cuts a "great start" while urging the Senate to hit $2 trillion. And Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, told the network that he believes "the Senate is going to cut spending more than the House." "We're going to see the Senate be more fiscally conservative," Cruz added. Rolling back IRA clean energy tax credits The House-passed bill would also roll back some of the clean energy tax credits under the Biden-era climate and health care law, including an earlier phasing out of a tax break for clean energy vehicles. But the provisions could face opposition in the upper chamber. Last month, Murkowksi, along with GOP Sens. John Curtis of Utah, Jerry Moran of Kansas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, penned a letter to the Senate majority leader to "emphasize the importance of maintaining a stable and predictable tax framework to promote domestic energy development." "While we support fiscal responsibility and prudent efforts to streamline the tax code, we caution against the full-scale repeal of current credits, which could lead to significant disruptions for the American people and weaken our position as a global energy leader," the group wrote. Tillis told reporters after the House passed the bill that the Senate needs to "look at the specifics" of revising the clean energy tax credits, saying "we've got to make sure the businesses who believe the government was setting this as a priority don't have a lot of stranded costs." At the same time, other Senate Republicans, like Johnson, have called for eliminating the clean energy tax credits, setting up a possible clash within the conference. State and local tax deduction Among the provisions that spurred extensive debate in the House was one allowing residents to deduct more in state and local taxes on their federal returns, known as SALT. Divisions over an increase to the SALT cap threatened to sink the package in the days leading up to its passage in the lower chamber as a handful of blue-state Republicans fought for a higher cap, ultimately settling for $40,000, an increase from $10,000. In the Senate, the deduction is not an issue, since none of the blue states have Republican senators. Accordingly, a number of Senate Republicans have indicated that they oppose its inclusion in the bill. "Eliminate it," Johnson, the Wisconsin senator, told reporters of the SALT cap increase. Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota told The Hill that the cap could potentially be cut in half once the Senate makes its changes. But the House speaker said he warned senators that changing the provision would not only risk getting it through the lower chamber again, but also the Republican majority. "In the House, we do have a number of members who are elected in places like New York and California and New Jersey, and they have to provide some relief to their constituents," the Louisiana Republican told "Face the Nation." "Those are what we call our majority makers. Those are the people who are elected in the toughest districts and help us have the numbers to keep the majority in the House, and so, this is political reality." Debt ceiling Fiscal hawks are also unhappy with the inclusion of a provision raising the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars. The House-passed bill includes a $4 trillion debt ceiling hike, while the Senate's budget blueprint contained a $5 trillion increase. The debate comes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told congressional leaders earlier this month that the federal government could be unable to pay its bills as soon as August if Congress doesn't act. Paul has been the most vocal in opposing an increase to the debt limit. The Kentucky Republican has said "there's nothing fiscally conservative about expanding the debt ceiling more than we've ever done it before." Paul said he could be convinced to support the package if the debt ceiling provision is removed and voted on separately. Instead, Paul has proposed a short-term increase of $500 billion, raising the debt ceiling for a matter of months, which he said would allow conservatives to verify that spending cuts have actually been implemented before approving a further hike. "If I vote for the $5 trillion debt, who's left in Washington that cares about the debt?" Paul said Sunday on "Face the Nation." "The GOP will own the debt once they vote for this." Paul's Senate colleague, Johnson, also backs splitting the package into multiple parts, as well as a smaller, short-term extension. Food stamps The package also cuts billions in federal dollars from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as SNAP or food stamps. The change will require states to cover a share of the costs to provide benefits that help low-income individuals and families pay for groceries. Currently, the program is fully funded by the federal government, although states take on some of the cost to administer it. Beginning in 2028, states will have to chip in for the program as well. "That's something that I heard some members voice concern about," Sen. John Boozman, an Arkansas Republican, said before Memorial Day. "So, we'll need to address that." and contributed to this report.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Group injured after lightning strikes canopy in Tarrant County storm
The Brief Over a dozen people have been treated for injuries after a Tarrant County lightning strike. The group of 14 people were attempting to hold down an outdoor canopy during a storm. Lightning struck the canopy, causing two people to be taken to a hospital for care, and the other 12 to be treated at the scene. TARRANT COUNTY, Texas - Fourteen people were injured by a bolt of lightning in Tarrant County on Sunday, officials say. According to Cresson Fire Chief Ron Becker, the incident happened when a group of people were attempting to hold down a canopy during a storm. What we know Becker said the group was at Benbrook Lake when Sunday's storm swept through the area. In the midst of the high winds, 14 people gathered under a canopy, which they attempted to hold down during the storm. Lightning struck the canopy, a tree, and a vehicle, Becker said, causing injuries to all 14 occupants. Of the injured people, 12 were treated for minor injuries and released at the scene, according to Becker. The other two were taken from the scene for non-life-threatening injuries. What we don't know During the same fast-moving storm that moved through North Texas on Sunday evening, large hail stones fell in Tarrant County while the weather pushed eastward. FOX 4 viewers submitted videos and images of hail that fell in Arlington and surrounding areas around 7:30 p.m. Sunday. The storm was moving eastward at around 25 miles per hour around 7:30 p.m. Sunday. Viewers reported hearing sirens as far east as Oak Cliff. The hailstones produced by the storms were large enough to cause damage to vehicles and other property. The hail could also cause injury to individuals outdoors during the storm. The Source Information in this story comes from FOX 4 weather coverage and viewer submissions.
