Food ad ban which will 'end Christmas adverts' delayed until January
Food ad ban which will 'end Christmas adverts' delayed until January
Broadcasters will voluntarily introduce the new rules from October and it will become law next year
A mother and her two sons sit on the sofa enjoying a home movie night
Government plans to ban TV advertising for products high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) before 9pm will be delayed until January 2026, following concerns from food and media brands and confusion over enforcement guidelines. The delay to the ban, which was to have come into effect from October, comes as ministers prepare to amend legislation to ensure brand-only advertising, which does not show specific HFSS products, is not caught under the rules.
Regardless, key industry stakeholders including ITV, Channel 4, the Advertising Association and the British Retail Consortium, have committed to complying with the restrictions from October 1. The restrictions will legally take effect on January 5.
A Government spokesman said: 'Obesity robs children of the best start in life and sets them up for a lifetime of health problems, which costs the NHS billions. We have secured a unique and public commitment from advertisers and broadcasters so that from October 1 2025, adverts for identifiable less healthy products will not be shown on TV before 9pm or at any time online, and this will be a legal duty from January 2026.
'The junk food advertising restrictions on TV and online are a crucial part of our plan for change to raise the healthiest generation of children ever. By reducing children's exposure to junk food advertising, we will remove up to 7.2 billion calories from UK children's diets each year.'
It is understood that a four-month pause will now allow the Department of Health and the Advertising Standards Authority to work on a clearer interpretation of the restrictions. This is despite many retailers, including major grocers, previously committing to a voluntary October 2025 start.
Article continues below
An Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) spokesman said: 'The Government has set out its intention to bring in amending legislation to push back the implementation date on LHF (less healthy food and drink) ad restrictions and to consult on changing the law on brand exemption. We recognise the importance of this issue for a range of stakeholders, therefore, together with Ofcom, we will now carefully assess what this means for the process to develop and implement the rules and guidance and will provide a further update as soon as possible.'
The decision comes amid concerns raised by retailers and broadcasters about the impact of the ban. In April, the Government was forced to reassure businesses that pure brand messages are not 'in scope' of the upcoming ban. However, it added that brands might have to be more creative in the way they showcase their food ranges.
Addressing the House of Commons last month, health minister Ashley Dalton said, 'While it is for a court to interpret the legislation, the Government's view remains that pure brand advertising is not in scope of this policy. This is because the legislation only restricts adverts that could reasonably be considered to be for identifiable less healthy products, and not adverts that could be reasonably understood to be advertising brands.
Article continues below
'We therefore expect that businesses will still have opportunities to promote their brands, provided that their adverts do not identify a less healthy product.'
Ms Dalton also said that the final interpretation of the junk food ad guidelines would be up to regulators, with the law providing 'considerable discretion' in how the new rules can be enforced. Speaking at the Retail Technology Show earlier this year, M&S chairman Archie Norman said the government's new HFSS advertising rules 'probably mean we can't run a Christmas ad', due to many festive foods not adhering to HFSS guidelines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Housing: Call to stop displaced children going 'missing' from schools
"I spent all of half-term looking for somewhere to live," says mother-of-three Shanice 29-year-old from west London rejected her council's most recent temporary accommodation offer "an hour away" from her children's Shared Health Foundation is urging the government to put in measures to stop children in temporary accommodation going "missing" from schools and GPs after widespread displacement of families across the country. The charity's new report calls for a notification system so that all authorities are aware when a child moves into temporary government says it is investing £1bn in homelessness services this year to help families trapped in temporary accommodation. 'My family will soon be homeless' Ms Aird was living in a secure tenancy flat in Ealing with her three children, aged three, five and seven, but was moved to temporary accommodation in Hounslow in 2021 after witnessing a stabbing. She is now being evicted from the two-bedroom property by the landlord, but says Ealing Council has only offered her unsuitable alternative accommodation, including one flat an hour away from her children's Aird says she will soon be homeless and will have to "sofa surf with friends" after the council discharged her from their housing duty."We haven't been able to do anything this half-term because I'm constantly on the phone to councils, emailing, trying to get as much help as I can," she admits her children's attendance at school is "awful" as they do not have a permanent home."It's really horrible because as a mum you want to try and provide as much safety and happiness as you can." Ms Aird says she needs to be close to family and friends to help with her mental health. "I have bipolar type 2 and tend to go into depressive episodes, if it's a really bad episode it leads to me not being aware of what I'm doing," she says."I'm happy to move to another borough, as long as I've got some kind of family support network."Ealing Council said Ms Aird was recently made offers of "suitable properties both in and out of the borough within easy reach of her support networks", which she refused."Because of her refusal of these property offers, the council have discharged her main housing duty, and we have made a referral to children services at Hounslow Council who may be able to support her under the Children's Act," it added. 'Normal childhood' More than 164,000 homeless children are currently living in temporary accommodation across England, the highest number on record, figures of government data by homeless charity Shelter suggests there are almost 94,000 children in London living in temporary a result, families are being displaced with some Londoners being moved miles away due to a lack of permanent affordable housing in the capital, according to Alicia Walker, Shelter's assistant director for activism and advocacy."We're sending children and families from London to Manchester, but Manchester has the very same problem, then the children and families in Manchester might be moved to means we've got a country of displaced people," she says. Dr Laura Neilson, founder of the Shared Health Foundation which co-chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group on temporary accommodation, says they want to see children "still have access to education and healthcare" so they "get to live a much more normal childhood than these children are experiencing"."We are asking the government to be more curious about how many children are missing from education because of temporary accommodation," she adds. Felicity Afriyie has lived in temporary accommodation for 21 years with her three children aged 16, 19, and 20. In that time they have lived in more than 10 houses. Currently, they are living in a one-bedroom hostel in Lambeth, south previous temporary accommodation, she says her children's journeys to school took two 53-year-old says it took so long to do the school run she "spent the whole day" waiting for her children to finish school."Sometimes you see schoolchildren on the bus sleeping because they come from very far," she says. 'It's not a level playing field' Her daughter Grace, 20, says: "One of our school journeys was two hours. "Doing that distance to school every day was awful. It's had a massive impact on our education."You can't expect a 16 year old... that's moved houses more times than they can count to sit a set of exams that will change their life and expect them to perform as well as their more stable affluent counterparts. "It's not fair and it's not a level playing field."Grace says she has dropped out of university due to the stress of temporary accommodation."Some of us are actually trying to get out of the system," she says. "We've grown up like this and we don't want the generation after us to be in the same position. We're never going to get out of the system when it's stacked against us."Lambeth Council says it had made a direct offer of suitable permanent accommodation to Ms Afriyie but she turned it down and requested a review. The review found that the permanent property proposed was suitable. Local authorities have a legal duty to provide temporary accommodation to anyone who qualifies as Hug, housing spokesperson for the Local Government Association, is calling on the government to urgently increase the temporary accommodation subsidy in the upcoming Spending Review."Frozen temporary accommodation subsidy rates have left councils to pick up more than £700m in temporary accommodation costs that they are unable to claim back from government."The government says the forthcoming Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill aims to introduce better protections for all children and better join-up between children's social care, schools and other local the children not in school registers, there will be a single unique identifier for every child and a requirement for every council to have multi-agency child protection team."Protecting vulnerable children falling through the cracks are at the heart of the forthcoming Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which represents the single biggest piece of child protection legislation in a generation," a government spokesperson said."We are also investing £1bn in homelessness services this year to help families trapped in temporary accommodation, driving up housing standards and delivering on our commitment to build more social and affordable homes."
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Millions of landline customers urged to contact their provider NOW ahead of digital switchover
MILLIONS of landline customers have been encouraged to speak to their provider now ahead of a big switch off. Two million vulnerable people rely on lifesaving telecare alarms to call for help in an emergency. 1 The alarms can alert call centres or carers if the user experiences an issue at home, such as a fall. Many of these devices use analogue landlines and copper networks to operate. But these analogue lines are being moved to digital as they have become increasingly unreliable and spare parts are no longer available. BT plans to retire its analogue service by January 2027, which means other providers that use BT's network must follow the same timescale. Other companies including Virgin Media plan to follow a similar timescale. The switchover will also affect thousands of households with landline telephones. It comes as a major campaign to urge millions of telecare users to contact their provider launches today. The campaign is funded by BT and Virgin Media and is backed by the Government. Once the customer contacts their provider an engineer will visit them to carry out the switchover and personally test the telecare alarm to ensure it still works. Customers will also be given a free battery back-up device so their landline will continue to work in an outage. Easy ways to slash your mobile bill Local authorities, telecare companies and landline providers have been working together to identify and contact vulnerable customers. More than two thirds of landlines have already migrated, so the campaign aims to contact the last customers who have not yet switched. Telecoms minister Sir Chris Bryant said: "We cannot afford to leave anyone behind during the vital transition to digital landlines. 'This industry-led campaign marks a further step towards keeping people safe as we boost the resilience of our networks for the digital age." I feel reassured after engineer visit Ann, 90, became reliant on her telecare device after a fall last year. The mother, from Stockport in Greater Manchester, is backing the campaign after her provider successfully migrated her landline to digital last year. Ann said she is feeling more 'reassured and confident' after the engineer's visit. She said: 'The visit with the engineer was most enjoyable and very smooth, they handled everything for me. 'It's also given my daughter Vickey peace of mind, knowing that if I need support, my pendant will work as it should. 'I'd encourage other people like me who rely on a personal alarm to get in touch with their landline provider for support.' He added that he has personally set a strict checklist of safeguards for the industry to comply with before they migrate a telecare user. What does the switchover mean for me? Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, said that moving from the analogue landline system to a digital network will give users clearer and more reliable connections. But the changes are understandably worrying for those who use a telecare device. She said: 'If you have a telecare system, your landline provider should reach out to offer support but if you haven't heard or have any questions, you should contact them directly to get the help you need.' She added that telecare and landline companies must ensure that no vulnerable customers are switched until they have a working telecare device. You can find your landline provider's number online or on any letters it has sent you. If you are unable to call yourself then ask a loved one or carer to do so for you. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Disposable vape ban is now in force across the UK... but will shopkeepers abide? MailOnline investigates whether corner shops have halted sales amid Government crackdown
Shopkeepers flouted the new vapes crackdown today by selling single-use e-cigarettes on the first day of a Government ban. MailOnline found that one vape dealer in four was willing to sell the banned disposables to a reporter posing as a customer. They were happy to trade in the sweet-flavoured and brightly-packaged throwaway devices which have been ordered off the shelves to protect children's health and the environment. One trader even checked whether we were from trading standards before selling us a cola-flavoured disposable for £6. Dealers who were abiding by the law which came into force today complained that they stand to lose a fortune in stock they cannot sell. MailOnline toured the vape shops, shisha bars, corner shops and supermarkets of south London just hours after they opened their doors to customers. They face a £200 fine if caught selling the one-use devices blamed for fuelling a boom in youth vaping and a mountain of discarded cases. So popular is the move in Westminster that although the Tories drew up the legislation, Labour took it over and pushed it through after winning last year's General Election. But the MailOnline investigator approached 12 different sellers and was able to buy a one-use device from three. In Catford, south London, a general storekeeper seemed oblivious to his legal duty to sell only multi-use vapes. Asked if he had any disposables left over following the law change, he pointed to a shelf full of colourful boxes and asked: 'Which one?'. He sold us a watermelon-flavoured 20mg/ml Elfbar 600 disposable pod for £5, but we could also have chosen apple peach, grape, banana ice or others. Another storekeeper happily sold us a triple melon-favoured Lost Mary BM600 disposable for £5. Reminded that they were now banned by the Government, he said they were left with stock which they were trying to get rid of. A third shopkeeper in nearby Lewisham told us she was not allowed to sell disposables any more and had cleared her shelves. But she then asked whether we were customers or checking up on whether the ban was being observed. When she realised we were not from the council, she brought out what she said was her last remaining single use vape - a cola-flavoured Lost Mary BM600 priced at £6. In nearby Lee, an employee at Vape Man, which was not breaching the ban, said: 'We've lost lots of business because customers prefer the disposables. 'They like to buy the 600 pods but we can't sell them now so we are going to lose a lot of money. We have stock which we cannot sell. Business is definitely down. 'I'm not angry about it, but I am definitely worried. There is about £1,800 to £2,000 in stock there which we cannot get money back on. 'We don't know what to do with it. We can't send it back and we can't sell it so I guess it will have to be destroyed.' Other shopkeepers said they prepared for the ban by advising customers to switch from disposables to reusables before it came in. One, at Shisha Town, Lewisham, said: 'We told them we were going to have to get rid of the single-use ones and they gradually started switching over.' It is now illegal for businesses to sell or supply single-use vapes, such as Elf bars and Lost Mary, in shops and online. Only devices considered reusable - with a rechargeable battery and replaceable coil - will be allowed. Disposable vapes of varying flavours on sale beneath children's sweets and lollipops in a store close to Birmingham -- January 29, 2024 The law is aimed at protecting the environment and tackling a surge in youth vaping rates, which have soared from 0.8 per cent in 2013 to 7.2 per cent last year. Disposable vapes, known for their variety of flavours and brightly coloured packaging, have become increasingly popular among teenagers. Moreover, an estimated five million single use vapes, which are available to buy at pocket money prices, are thrown away in the UK every week. According to new research by online nicotine retailer, Haypp, 82 percent of disposable vape users planned to stockpile ahead of the ban. Although the crackdown sought to curb use among young people and reduce the litter and environmental impact, stockpiling poses a threat to the environment and the health of young people. Cllr David Fothergill, Chairman of the LGA's Community Wellbeing Board, urged shops to comply with the new ban on single-use vapes, dubbing them a 'blight [on] our streets.' He added: 'We would also urge caution to anyone stockpiling disposable vapes. Failing to store disposable vapes correctly could cost lives, given the significant fire risk they pose.' Yet stockpiling current vapes on the market isn't the only concern, as green campaigners have warned of cheap new models with the same feel, look, and price as disposable vapes, flooding the market. Material Focus, an advocacy group for circular economies, has said vape manufacturers have been developing new styles that are cheap but meet reusable criteria, meaning they essentially circumvent the ban. They added that increasingly popular 'big puff' vapes are cheaper per inhalation than disposable vapes, arguing there there is little incentive for customers to reuse the product. Scott Butler, executive director of Material Focus, said: 'Without quick and extensive action, the threat of a 'vapocalypse' remains and new big puff and pod vape models are already contributing to an environmental nightmare.' He added that vape company design teams have been 'working their socks off to get new legal models on to the market' while the regulatory work was being carried out. 'To most users of these vapes, and shopkeepers even, they may not notice any difference in the old disposable vapes versus the new re-useable ones,' he said. Mr Butler said that while the ban will take some of the most environmentally wasteful products off the market, the UK may need more flexible legislation to tackle challenges around new models and waste. Chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health, Hazel Cheeseman, has said the incoming new rules 'may be insufficient' by themsleves. 'The Government cannot expect leopards to change their spots,' she said. 'If they want a vaping market with products that have minimal impact on the environment, do not appeal to teens and are safe and effective to help adult smokers quit, then further regulations are needed.' Asked on Friday whether the legislation would be enough to stop vape producers flooding the market with similar products, nature minister Mary Creagh said: 'Well let's bring in the ban first. That's what I would say.' Ms Creagh said the Tobacco and Vapes Bill currently progressing through Parliament will look at further restrictions on vape sales and use. 'I'm confident that my colleagues in the Department of Health will not hesitate to use those powers should what we're doing this weekend not achieve the goals,' she said. 'But I'm confident that it is already sparking a conversation among young people… getting them to ask the questions, getting them to understand that there's no such place as 'away' and that these are really difficult to recycle.' She added that most big puff vapes on the market do not have replaceable coils so they are within the scope of the ban. The Government is considering further ways to drive up levels of separately collected electrical waste including vapes as part of reforms to waste electrical and electronic equipment regulations. Under current rules, vape producers already have a legal responsibility to finance their collection for recycling. Vapes contain valuable and critical materials such as lithium and copper that are regularly binned in household waste, and if littered, they can also cause fires and other damaging or toxic impacts on the environment as well as wildlife. To help drive up recycling rates, Material Focus is calling for retailers to make more collection points available as well as the launch of a major communications campaign to drive public awareness about recycling the devices. Mr Butler said: 'The majority of vapers are either unaware of where to recycle their vapes or don't have a good experience of recycling them.'
