'Structural racism': Top taxpayer-funded academy rife with DEI programs, hefty executive salaries
NASEM, which the New York Times reported in 2023 derives 70% of its budget from federal funds, received $200,616,000 in taxpayer funding from grants and contracts in 2023, according to its own Treasurer's Report.
That budget includes several salaries for top-level positions at NASEM that exceed $1 million per year, according to the organization's 990 forms reviewed by Fox News Digital.
National Academy of Medicine President Victor Dzau receives a salary of $1,026,973 per year, National Academy of Engineering President John Anderson earns $1,027,185 per year, and National Academies President Marcia McNutt earns $1,061,843 each year.
Additionally, NASEM's chief diversity and inclusion officer, Laura Castillo-Page, earned $333,788 in 2023.
NASEM has used its federal funding to promote a variety of liberal causes, including putting on events related to climate change, racism and "health equity."
In 2021, NASEM helped put on an event that discussed how "environmental injustice" and "structural racism" exacerbate climate change for "communities of color." Attendees discussed ways to use "stories" to influence elected officials on climate policy, including "the powerful indigenous voice about the existential threats that humanity faces."
A 2021 NASEM workshop examined how "spatial justice" can exacerbate public health problems among "historically marginalized communities."
NASEM organized an event a year later that examined how "structural racism" and biased "social norms," including "representation in media and body image," contribute to obesity.
NASEM issued a report in 2023 detailing recommendations for federal policies to improve "racial, ethnic, and tribal health equity" and another report in 2023, titled Advancing Antiracism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Organizations, recommending ways to address widespread racial discrimination in science, engineering, and mathematics organizations in the U.S.
In another report in 2022, NASEM outlined the need to define and incorporate "structural racism" into scientific study and policymaking.
A 2021 NASEM workshop examined "anti-Black racism" in "Science, Engineering, and Mathematics."
"A planning committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will organize a virtual public workshop to explore facets of anti-Black racism in U.S. science, engineering, and medicine (SEM)," NASEM wrote. "The workshop will review the discussions at recent workshops of the Roundtable on Black Men and Black Women, identify policies and practices that perpetuate racism in SEM, and lay a foundation of knowledge for others to move more effectively towards anti-racist outcomes."
NASEM also held a workshop in 2022 called "The Roles of Trust and Health Literacy in Achieving Health Equity," where a speaker blamed non-diverse leadership of healthcare institutions for alienating minority patients.
McNutt has also been critical of DOGE chief and X owner Elon Musk on social media and said last year, "This will be my last post on Twitter/X. I can no longer be part of a platform that actively encourages disinformation and amplifies misinformation, especially when its CEO colludes to undermine democracy."
In a statement to Fox News Digital, a NASEM spokesperson said, "Each year, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct hundreds of studies, workshops, and other activities at the request of federal and state agencies, Congress, foundations, and private-sector sponsors on a variety of critical issues facing the nation."
The spokesperson added that 58% of NASEM's funding came from the government in 2024.
"For decades, our work has advanced the American economy, strengthened our national security, bolstered U.S. global competitiveness, and improved our nation's health and safety. We have taken measures to ensure that we are in compliance with executive orders, including closing our Office of Diversity and Inclusion. We stand ready, as we always have, to advise the new administration on its priorities."
NASEM's spending comes under the backdrop of the newly formed DOGE efforts by Musk and the Trump administration to rid the federal government of DEI and wasteful spending.
Trump's January executive order removing DEI from the federal government has already had an affect on NASEM and caused it to close its DEI program and remove DEI from its website, the New York Times reported.
It is unclear if DOGE's efforts will continue to effect the day-to-day operations at NASEM.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX's Expensive Starship Explosions Are Starting to Add Up
(Bloomberg) -- When one of SpaceX's Starship vehicles burst into flames during a routine fueling test in June, the Elon Musk-led company decided it was time to bring in reinforcements. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Shortly after the incident, roughly 20% of the engineering group working on the company's flagship Falcon 9 program were reassigned for six months to Starship, a reusable rocket Musk hopes will someday carry humans back to the moon and to Mars, according to people familiar with the company's planning. SpaceX and Musk have a history of tackling engineering problems by throwing additional staff at them: Last year, Boring Co. staff were flown to Las Vegas to get its Prufock machine back online following water damage, according to people familiar with the matter. In 2018, employees of Tesla Inc., Musk's car company, were flown in from across the country to California to help ramp up production of the Model 3. The added muscle for Starship is intended to help improve the craft's reliability and individual component testing, as well as the rate at which the company can produce more of the rockets, one of the people said. SpaceX revealed in August that a pressurized bottle holding gaseous nitrogen had been damaged, causing it to fail and lead to an explosion during fueling. The test-stand incident was the latest in a series of recent setbacks for Starship. In three test launches this year from the company's south Texas facility, two exploded prematurely, and a third failed to deploy its test satellites and spun out of control as it returned to Earth. Those failures have led to increasing questions about whether Starship will be able to fulfill Musk's aims. A New York Magazine story asked: 'Is Elon Musk's Starship Doomed?' SpaceX's impressive track record, including the construction of the Starlink satellite-internet network and its innovation on reusable rocket technology, has had a deep impact on the space industry and US space policy. It has also made SpaceX among the most highly valued private companies in the world. Since its inception, SpaceX has made highly visible test flights that sometimes fail in spectacular ways something of a calling card, with cinematic broadcasts on X, Musk's social-media platform. Its process is designed to learn from failures fast. Yet Starship's recent struggles are revealing how rapidly updating rockets that cost hundreds of millions to make can lead to a cascade of expensive issues. 'When you're changing lots of things in the design at once, all of those ripple effects start adding up,' said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who focuses on space policy. 'And it becomes more and more likely that you're not going to catch things and you will have a catastrophic failure during a test flight.' Musk has made bold predictions about Starship. In his telling, it will not only be the first fully reusable orbital rocket, but orders of magnitude cheaper than any rival. Starship would also help meet his loftiest goal: bringing humans to Mars. So far, however, Musk's early projections that it would be safe to carry humans to space by 2023 and land people on the moon as early as this year haven't panned out. 'It's really one of the hardest engineering challenges that exists,' Musk said at an event for Tesla owners in July. 'When we first started talking about Starship, people thought this was impossible. In fact, even within the company, we sort of thought it was impossible.' The misfires haven't deterred investors. The 23-year-old company has continued to raise new capital at rates more befitting a keenly watched startup than a mature, capital-hungry business. Most recently, SpaceX has been planning a sale of stock that would value the company at about $400 billion. Yet there are also signs that for SpaceX to achieve a substantially greater valuation, investors may need to see more progress on Starship. During its latest fundraising effort, in which new investors don't participate, the company had discussed a $500 billion valuation, before lowering it after consultation with backers, people familiar with the matter said. Much will hinge on what happens next. The company is aiming to launch its tenth test flight of Starship as early as Aug. 24. It's possible that SpaceX will be able to continue to absorb more testing failures, but the perception that the company is moving forward in Starship development will be key to their long-term investment success and fulfilling contractual agreements with NASA. Starship Scramble Starship is one large piece of a growing web of programs that make up the SpaceX business plan. The company began with its Falcon rocket program and added the Dragon capsule to deliver cargo and people to space. Now, the majority of its revenue comes from Starlink, which relies on a massive system of satellites in low-Earth orbit that beam broadband internet to Earth. To make Starship work, SpaceX is betting that it can draw resources away from its core rocket program at a time when the company faces weak competition. Some planned launches of SpaceX's Starlink satellites on Falcon 9 rockets would potentially be pushed from the end of this year to early 2026 because of the surge of Falcon engineers working on Starship, the people familiar with the company's planning said. SpaceX currently has about 8,000 Starlink satellites aloft, and removing a few launches from the manifest this year wasn't seen as a show-stopping problem, the people said. Maintaining Starlink's robust financial health is important for SpaceX to absorb Starship's costs. Building one of the rockets — comprised of the Starship spacecraft and Super Heavy booster — costs hundreds of millions of dollars, the people said. When one flight fails, the full cost of the lost vehicle falls on SpaceX, they added. The company is on the hook for other costs, too, including any environmental damage caused when failed rockets tumble back to Earth. Getting Starship right is critical to SpaceX's future. Eventually, Starship would be used to launch larger, more powerful Starlink satellites into space. Over time, the company plans to phase out the Falcon 9, making Starship its workhorse rocket, company executives have said. And above all, Starship is meant to be the primary vehicle to start a base on Mars — the reason that Musk has said he created SpaceX in the first place. A SpaceX representative didn't respond to a request for comment. Moon Landing SpaceX maintains that Starship will be landing people on the moon within the next few years. NASA has awarded SpaceX contracts worth roughly $4 billion to use Starship to shuttle astronauts to the lunar surface. To live up to that bargain, SpaceX will need to demonstrate the ability to refuel Starship more than a dozen times in orbit with back-to-back flights. That maneuver has never been performed anywhere near the scale SpaceX needs — and Starship has not yet completed a full orbit of the Earth. The pressure to move quickly has affected decisions about the design of the rocket, according to a person familiar with the process who wasn't authorized to speak publicly about SpaceX's decision-making. For recent tests, SpaceX has used a Starship prototype known as Version 2, or V2. A few of the design decisions for this version have been made in an attempt to save time and money, the person said. It's a type of risk that SpaceX and Musk like to take, but the consequences of these choices can have cascading explosive effects, which in turn have an impact on public perception. 'I don't think anything that's happened with Starship invalidates SpaceX's approach,' Carissa Christensen, founder and CEO of BryceTech, a space analytics and consulting firm, said. 'That said, the persistent failures over multiple tests are happening in a context of One: high visibility. Two: a company that typically moves very fast and very successfully on innovation and Three: in a world where programmatic objectives depend on this vehicle,' notably NASA's moon mission. The frenetic pace of Starship's development may also be a contributing factor to its missteps, with quickly implemented changes sometimes having unforeseen effects on other parts of the vehicle. For instance, a seal on the vehicle's Raptor engines began to fail after SpaceX started adding more propellant on later flights, according to a person briefed on the matter who was not authorized to discuss the program's inner workings publicly. Many engineers at SpaceX continue to operate under the philosophy that every launch is a learning opportunity and that it's better to fail prematurely and often than wait years to execute a perfect flight. That thinking has been nurtured by the company's large resources and continuing access to vast sums of capital. SpaceX is known to be 'hardware rich,' meaning that it is consistently producing multiple rocket prototypes that are available to test and tweak. It is committed to testing its remaining inventory of V2 Starships despite a consensus at the company that the design is subpar, according to people familiar with the matter. Engineers think there are lessons to learn from launching the rest of the V2s, the people said. Above all, engineers need to get better data from Starship's heat shield tiles to help perfect the vehicle's tiles haven't returned intact during any flights this year. This year, the White House proposed phasing out the Space Launch System, a massive rocket built by Boeing Co., after is third flight. The White House argued that SLS was overbudget and inefficient, and that it should be eventually replaced with commercial alternatives, with SpaceX's Starship an implied option. Ultimately, Senator Ted Cruz included more money for Space Launch System's fourth and fifth flights after Starship's setbacks sowed doubt that it would be ready to replace the Boeing-made vehicle in the near future. SpaceX has repeatedly proven to its naysayers that it can master what was once considered near-impossible engineering. Now, it needs to regain the confidence of doubters who fear that the company might be stuck in the mud. 'The number one thing is visible, demonstrable progress,' Christensen said. 'I think that's going to go a long way toward not creating negative perceptions. And the optimal outcome from that standpoint would be that they successfully reach space with a Starship return.' Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Study reveals how fat cells can fuel cancer tumors
Being overweight or obese has long been linked to a greater risk of developing or dying from breast cancer. New research suggests a reason: Certain breast cancer tumors may feed on neighboring fat cells. The findings may help scientists find ways to treat triple-negative breast cancer, which is notoriously aggressive and has lower survival rates. Moreover, the results may apply to any cancer that uses fat as an energy source, according to the report, published Wednesday in Nature Communications. Triple-negative accounts for about 15% of all breast cancers. It tends to be more common in Black women and women under 40 and is more likely to recur than other cancers. The breast tumor cells appear to gain access to the fat cells' content by poking a straw-like structure into the fat cells and then dislodging the lipids stored there. If researchers can find a way to block tumors from tunneling into neighboring fat cells without harming patients, they might have a way to cure the often deadly cancers, said the study's lead author, Jeremy Williams, a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, San Francisco. 'Aggressive cancer cells can co-opt different nutrient sources to help them grow, including by stimulating fat cells in the breast to release their lipids,' Williams said. 'In the future, new treatments might starve the tumor cells by preventing their access to lipids from neighboring cells.' Lipids are fatty compounds, such as cholesterol, that are used largely for energy storage in the body. Williams and his colleagues ran multiple experiments, some using tissue from breast cancer patients and others using a mouse model of a breast cancer patient. In the experiments exclusively using human tissue, the researchers examined fat cells at varying distances from tumor cells. They found that the closer the fat cells were to tumor cells, the more depleted in lipids they were. When the researchers blocked the tumor cells' ability to build the straw-like structures, officially known as gap junctions, the tumors stopped growing. They found a similar result in a mouse model, in which tumor cells from breast cancer patients were tweaked genetically so they lost some of their ability to make gap junctions. When the tissue was implanted in mice, the mice were protected. 'Knocking out a single gene impaired the formation and progression of the tumor,' Williams said. Williams and his colleagues started looking at mechanisms to explain an earlier finding from the lab he worked at. 'These tumors were burning fatty acids as a source of energy,' he said. 'It seemed an urgent question to answer where the fatty acids were coming from.' As it turns out, several medications that inhibit gap junction formation are being studied in early-phase clinical trials for other purposes, Williams said. How cancer 'grows and feeds itself' Dr. Julia McGuinness, a breast cancer specialist and an associate professor of medicine at the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, said it's the first evidence of a mechanism showing the association between fat and cancer. It's also 'suggesting one pathway to treat aggressive cancers for which we don't have any good therapies,' McGuinness said. 'We already know that obese women who have these kinds of cancer have worse outcomes.' The new research may also suggest that lifestyle modifications that would help women achieve healthy weights might also protect against such cancers, McGuinness said. 'Slimming down could be protective,' she said, adding that obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for all breast cancers. The authors of the study found ways to look at the mechanism linking fat to breast cancer growth in ways that couldn't be tested in human beings, said Justin Balko, the Ingram professor of cancer research at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. 'They found a new way cancer grows and feeds itself,' Balko said. 'If some of the same effects are observed in humans, it might be fodder for differences in the way we treat patients.' But there are caveats, Balko said. 'For example, we don't know if this is a major mechanism by which breast cancer grows in humans,' he said. 'But it makes a lot of sense.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Say They've Found a Way to Reverse Aging in Human Skin Cells
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Researchers have found that serum from younger blood can be combined with bone marrow cells and injected into older skin cells, producing rejuvenating effects. This is known as heterochronic parabiosis—the transfer of the blood of a younger animal to an older one. Previous trials on rodents showed a reduction in signs of aging. Experiments have been in vitro so far, and there still needs to be more probing into the mechanisms of rejuvenation, but serum injections might someday be viable. Eternal youth has become a lucrative market, enabling the sale of bottled promises in the form of creams and serums that may or may not erase dark spots and smooth wrinkles. And the 'promises' are getting... creative. From phototherapy to vampire facials that claim to use your own blood as an anti-aging serum, futuristic treatments promise to rewind years of visible aging. But most so-called miracle procedures touted by glossy magazines have not been made truly viable. Vampire facials might do nothing more that drain your blood and your wallet, but a team of researchers led by scientists from Beiersdorf AG Research and Development in Hamburg, Germany, claim to have figured out how blood serum (all of the parts of your blood that don't involve clotting) could reverse the ravages of time—if combined with bone marrow cells, that is. Extracting serum from more youthful skin and combining it with bone marrow cells actually showed visible effects on skin cultures in vitro. The researchers concluded that there must be an interaction between blood and bone marrow cells that causes skin rejuvenation. Without the bone marrow cells, the serum had no effect (which explains why vampire facials are more hype than anything else). While this sounds almost as macabre as Countess Elizabeth Bathory allegedly bathing in the blood of virgins to restore her youth, no human sacrifices are required for this treatment. What the countess probably would have been looking for today is a process known as heterochronic parabiosis, which involves combining blood from two animals of different ages. Such experiments have been previously tested on older mice (which were given injections of blood and bone marrow cells from juveniles) and older rats (which were injected with the same type of youth cocktail from piglets). Both had positive outcomes, but this had never been tried on human skin—until now. 'As the population's life expectancy increases, it has become a major interest to understand the mechanisms of aging with the aim to promote healthy aging and extend the disease-free lifespan,' the researchers said in a study recently published in the journal Aging. 'The skin, as our largest organ, is a valuable tissue to investigate aging, as first signs of aging are mostly visible, and it reflects the overall human health.' To see if this approach could potentially work on humans, the Beiersdorf team injected human skin cell cultures with serum—one sample that did contain bone marrow cells and one that did not. And the bone marrow seemed to be the key. Bone marrow is so potent because of the types of cells it contains—various stem and progenitor cells, both of which can differentiate into various other cell types. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), found in both blood and bone marrow, are immature cells that can develop into all types of blood cells and self-renew, making them a huge asset for regenerative medicine. Bone marrow stem cells are easily influenced by their surroundings, and depending on their environment, they secrete proteins that promote growth and help with tissue repair. But what is even more amazing is that they will migrate to skin and boost regeneration and repair while promoting homeostasis. Stem cells can lose some of their functionality and self-renewal abilities as skin ages, but when the skin cultures were exposed to blood serum and bone marrow cells from young donors, that re-introduction of young cells took years off the skin's biological age, increased the production of cells, and improved how the skin looked. The researchers think that this rejuvenation is caused by proteins from bone marrow cells responding to young blood—they discovered that bone marrow cells secreted 55 proteins related to age, and seven of these had rejuvenating abilities that improved the signs of skin aging. In upcoming studies, the researchers anticipate finding out whether young blood serum and bone marrow cells can possibly rejuvenate other organs, as well as how long the rejuvenating effects last. 'Future studies are needed to further validate our identified proteins in the context of systemic skin rejuvenation and aging [like] the prolongation of the culture time would be interesting to explore,' they said. Sorry, Countess Bathory. It turns out there is a valid scientific reason your blood baths were not the elixir of youth. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
