Feb 8: The rapidly changing Arctic, and more
On this episode of Quirks & Quarks with Bob McDonald
A little bit of scratching can do some good, but too much can hurt
Scratching an itch can feel great, so scientists decided to dig into why that is the case since we know too much scratching isn't good for us. Dr. Dan Kaplan, a professor of dermatology and immunology at the University of Pittsburgh, said they found that scratching drives inflammation to the skin, which, in light moderation, helps to fight bacterial skin infections. But he warns that continual or excessive scratching can prolong an itch and potentially damage the skin. Their study is in the journal Science.
A wildlife manager in the US has found that drones can be a safe and effective way to discourage problem bears from troubling human habitation and livestock. Wesley Sarmento started working in the prairies of Montana to prevent bear-human conflicts, but found the usual tricks of the trade were not as effective as he wanted them to be. Previously he tried to use noisemakers, dogs, trucks, and firearms, but buzzing bears with flying robots turned out to work much better. Now a PhD student at the University of Montana, he published an article about his hazing research in Frontiers in Conservation Science.
Wildlife manager says drones are 'magic tools' to help reduce bear-human conflicts
29 days ago
Duration 0:42
Research biologist and former wildlife manager Wesley Sarmento started using drones to chase bears away from people, and found that it was much safer and more precise than traditional methods.
Ants can remember and hold grudges against those who trouble them
When ants fight with those from another nearby colony, it makes an impression. A new study has found the insects can remember the chemical signature of the aggressors, and will respond more vigorously and violently the next time they cross paths. Volker Nehring, a researcher at the University of Freiburg, Germany, describes the phenomenon as "the nasty neighbour" where ants are most aggressive to ant colonies closest to them, and says this is due to resource protection. Nehring and his team's research was published in the journal Current Biology.
Scientists on the front line of permafrost thaw describe changes in the Arctic
The acceleration of change in the Arctic due to global warming is transforming the landscape on a year-to-year basis, often in surprising ways. That's according to scientists who've been studying the effects of climate change in the North.
One study found that lakes in Western Greenland shifted from pristine blue to dirty brown from one year to the next due to increased permafrost melting and runoff. Jasmine Saros, a lake ecologist from the University of Maine, said they were astonished by the magnitude of change they saw in all 10 lakes they studied and how quickly it happened. That study was published in the journal PNAS.
We also speak with William Quinton, a permafrost hydrologist from Wilfrid Laurier University and the director of the Scotty Creek Research Station in southern Northwest Territories, an area he describes as "the frontline of permafrost thaw." Quinton was part of a research team, led by Anna Virkkala from the Woodwell Climate Research Centre, that found that 34 per cent of the Arctic Boreal Zone — a region where carbon was safely locked up in the permafrost for thousands of years — has now become a carbon source. That study is in the journal Nature Climate Change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Crisis in science is turning Nobel laureates into fighters for scientific revolution
Global news media as well as prominent scientists are highlighting the crisis in both physics and cosmology, and predicting a major scientific revolution. This week, an article appeared in The Atlantic magazine [titled 'The Nobel Prize winner who thinks we have the universe all wrong']. It featured Adam Riess, who won a Nobel Prize for the shocking discovery that the expansion of universe is accelerating, due to Dark Energy. But now he thinks that the theory must be wrong. The article warned about scientists talking of revolution. A growing number now say that the 'standard model of cosmology' should be replaced. Adam Riess is among them. Way back in 2013, in a conversation with WIRED, David Gross, a Nobel laureate in physics, warned about the crisis in physics and advocated a revolution. ['Nobel laureate says physics is in need of a revolution'; WIRED; Peter Byrne]. An article in NewScientist (Dan Hooper) was titled 'The four puzzles that tell us a cosmological revolution is coming'. Another article in Live Science (Kelly Dickerson) was titled 'Why a Physics Revolution Might Be on Its Way: Physics may be turned on its head soon'. Global newspapers (BBC News, The New York Times, The Guardian, Forbes, et al) are raising alarm over the crisis in both physics and cosmology. Actually, science is in crisis, because nature does not draw clear lines between biology, chemistry, physics, math, and cosmology. Such demarcations are human-made, and artificial. After all, biology is based on chemistry, which in turn is based on physics. Global news media as well as prominent scientists are predicting that a BIG scientific revolution is imminent. A scientific revolution is INEVITABLE because of four strong reasons: 1) All three conditions are satisfied. The three key steps to overthrow and replace any accepted scientific theory are: a) Reproduce the successes of the presently accepted theory. b) Explain what it cannot. c) Make new predictions that differ and can be tested. 2) Physics and cosmology are both in crisis due to wrong notion about the shape, size and workings of the universe. The universe is actually like a (hyper) balloon, and is expanding. 3) Science rests on faulty Math. Luckily, the mistakes are so easy to comprehend that even the common people can easily understand what is wrong. A baker can understand, and so can butchers or cobblers. 4) Einstein was wrong. His concept of four dimensional SpaceTime continuum is the biggest mistake in science. Time itself is NOT the fourth dimension; time emerges from motion along 4th space dimension. Every scientific revolution in the past has ended up having enormous social and cultural influence. For example, Copernicus's helio-centrism threatened human sense of being right in the center of the universe (and hence the 'sun centric model' was bitterly opposed by the powerful church but ultimately all oppositions proved futile. In fact, the church had to issue a public apology recently for its role). Darwin's theory of evolution challenged the intuition that humans were fundamentally different from other animals. People during that time were outraged and dismissed it as plain nonsense. Yet, yesterday's nonsense ended up as today's commonsense! Einstein's relativity upended all faith in common sense ideas about the flow of time. Time started mixing with space for very fast moving objects, and time revealed its character as another dimension! The upcoming scientific revolution shall be the greatest ever, and force humans to change the way of thinking about the most basic features of the universe, including the nature of space and time. Space and Time underlies Physics and Cosmology, and are the most fundamental concepts imaginable in entire Science. It will be a conceptual revolution that would have implications far beyond the world of science. The scale of social and cultural impact of the upcoming scientific revolution is quite unthinkable. A scientific revolution is unstoppable. No one can stop a revolution whose time has come. [194 National Anthems tunes have been merged into a single tune using World's most intelligent, musical A.I. software 'Emmy', to create this United Nations Anthem (World Anthem). Kindly watch and share: ] Mr. Joseph T. Kurien (a former Cochin University graduate) is an independent researcher and a part-time science writer. He presently works in Manappuram software and consultancy. Media Contact Company Name: Manappuram software and consultancy Contact Person: Joseph T. Kurien Email: Send Email State: Kerala Country: India Website:
CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
Marc Garneau honoured at school that bears his name
Marc Garneau is being remembered as a trailblazer in science and later a public servant in politics. On Thursday, CTV's Scott Lightfoot visited the school that bears Garneau's name.
CTV News
6 days ago
- CTV News
First evidence of ‘living towers' made of worms discovered in nature
A 10-millimetre (0.4-inch) nematode tower twists and folds as the mass of worms reaches for the lid of its petri dish. (Perez et al. 2025/Current Biology via CNN Newsource) Nature seems to offer an escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, but the world at your feet may tell another story. Even in the shade of a fruit tree, you could be surrounded by tiny skyscrapers — not made of steel or concrete, but of microscopic worms wriggling and writhing into the shape of long, vertical towers. Even though these miniature architects, called nematodes, are found all over Earth's surface, scientists in Germany recently witnessed their impressive building techniques in nature for the first time. After months of closely inspecting rotten pears and apples in local orchards, researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and the University of Konstanz were able to spot hundreds of the 1-millimetre-long (0.04-inch) worms climbing onto one another, amassing structures up to 10 times their individual size. To learn more about the mysterious physics of the soft, slimy towers, the study team brought samples of nematodes called Caenorhabditis elegans into a lab and analyzed them. There, the scientists noticed the worms could assemble in a matter of hours, with some reaching out from the twisting mass as exploratory 'arms' sensing the environment and building accordingly. But why the worms formed the structures wasn't immediately clear. The team's findings, published Thursday in the journal Current Biology, show that even the smallest animals can prompt big questions about the evolutionary purpose of social behaviours. 'What we got was more than just some worms standing on top of each other,' said senior study author Serena Ding, a Max Planck research group leader of genes and behaviour. 'It's a coordinated superorganism, acting and moving as a whole.' Living towers: A closer look To find out what was motivating the nematodes' building behaviour, the study team tested the worms' reactions to being poked, prodded and even visited by a fly — all while stacked in a tower formation. 'We saw that they are very reactive to the presence of a stimulus,' said the study's first author, Daniela Perez, who is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior. 'They sense it, and then the tower goes towards this stimulus, attaching itself to our metal pick or a fly buzzing around.' This coordinated reaction suggests the hungry nematodes may be joining together to easily hitch a ride on larger animals such as insects that transport them to (not so) greener pastures with more rotten fruit to feast on, Perez said. 'If you think about it, an animal that is 1 millimetre long cannot just crawl all the way to the next fruit 2 metres (6.6 feet) away. It could easily die on the way there, or be eaten by a predator,' Perez explained. Nematodes are capable of hitchhiking solo too, she added, but arriving to a new area in a group may allow them to continue reproducing. The structures themselves may also serve as a mode of transport, as evidenced by how some worms formed bridges across gaps within the petri dishes to get from one surface to another, Perez noted. 'This discovery is really exciting,' said Orit Peleg, an associate professor of computer science who studies living systems at the University of Colorado Boulder's BioFrontiers Institute. 'It's both establishing the ecological function of creating a tower, and it really opens up the door to do more controlled experimentation to try to understand the perceptual world of these organisms, and how they communicate within a large group.' Peleg was not involved in the study. The unknowns in stacks of worms As the next step, Perez said her team would like to learn whether the formation of these structures is a cooperative or competitive behaviour. In other words, are the towering nematodes behaving socially to help each other out, or are their towers more akin to a Black Friday sale stampede? Studying the behaviours of other self-assembling creatures could offer clues to the social norms of nematodes and help answer this question, Ding said. Ryan Greenway Study coauthor Ryan Greenway, a technical assistant at Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany, sets up a field microscope that could record videos of the natural worm towers. (Serena Ding via CNN Newsource) Ants, which assemble to form buoyant rafts to survive floodwaters, are among the few creatures known to team up like nematodes, said David Hu, a professor of mechanical engineering and biology at Georgia Tech. Hu was not involved in the study. 'Ants are incredibly sacrificial for one another, and they do not generally fight within the colony,' Hu said. 'That's because of their genetics. They all come from the same queen, so they are like siblings.' Like ants, nematodes didn't appear to display any obvious role differentiation or hierarchy within the tower structures, Perez said. Each worm from the base to the top of the structure was equally mobile and strong, indicating no competition was at play. However, the lab-cultivated worms were basically clones of one another, so it's not clear whether role differentiation occurs more often in nature, where nematode populations could have more genetic differences, she noted. Additionally, socially co-operative creatures tend to use some form of communication, Peleg said. In the case of ants, it may be their pheromone trails, while honeybees rely on their ritual dance routines and slime molds use their pulsing chemical signals. With nematodes, however, it's still not clear how they might communicate — or if they are communicating at all, Ding said. 'The next steps for (the team) are really just choosing the next questions to ask.' Notably, there has been a lot of interest in studying cooperative animal behaviours among the robotics community, Hu said. It's possible that one day, he added, information about the complex sociality of creatures like nematodes could be used to inform how technology, such as computer servers or drone systems, communicates. By Kameryn Griesser, CNN
