logo
Australians studying in the US to face tougher social media screening

Australians studying in the US to face tougher social media screening

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce would not confirm the contents of the cable during a briefing in Washington but said the government would 'continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that's coming here', whether they were students or others.
'Every sovereign country has a right to know who is trying to come in, why they want to come in, who they are, what they've been doing, and at least hopefully within that framework determine what they will be doing while they're here,' she said.
The US embassy in Canberra directed inquiries back to Washington.
The move is one of many that the Trump administration has taken against top US universities, especially Harvard, which President Donald Trump accuses of indulging antisemitism on campus and persisting with affirmative action policies for student admissions.
Loading
The government is directing federal agencies to terminate contracts with Harvard, while Trump said he was considering taking away $US3 billion ($4.67 billion) in grants and giving it to trade schools instead.
Harvard has refused to bow to Trump's demands, instead twice suing the administration, and Trump indicated the university's intransigence was leading him to take harsher action.
'Harvard is treating our country with great disrespect, and all they're doing is getting in deeper and deeper and deeper,' he said in the Oval Office on Wednesday (Thursday AEST).
'The last thing I want to do is hurt Harvard. They're hurting themselves, they're fighting,' Trump said, making a comparison to Columbia University in New York, which he said was co-operating.
'But Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they're getting their ass kicked … every time they fight they lose another $250 million. Yesterday, we found another $100 million.'
The Trump administration has demanded that Harvard supply a list of names of its foreign students, as well as any disciplinary action against them. Trump said on Wednesday that many of these students were 'very radical people' from radicalised countries and 'we don't want them making trouble in our country'.
'Let's be clear, this has nothing to do with combating antisemitism'
Jacob Miller, former president, Harvard Hillel Jewish association
He also suggested Harvard was enrolling too many international students – just shy of 7000, or a quarter of its total – and it should be capped at about 15 per cent. 'We have people [in the US] that want to go to Harvard and other schools; they can't get in.'
Britt Suann, an Australian who has just completed a master of public health on a Fulbright scholarship, said she had 'gotten away with it'. But friends who are continuing on at Harvard were uncertain about where they stood, as were the Australians due to replace the current cohort.
'A lot of them aren't sure if they're going to get their visas or not,' she said. 'A lot of people have already stopped working in preparation for coming over. It's a huge deal.'
David Hogan, who finished a master of real estate, said his phone had blown up with messages from fellow Australians uncertain about their fate. But Hogan, who is a member of the Harvard Republicans, was more relaxed about the situation.
'This is just classic Trump playing hardball. He does it in every single facet of political life,' he said. 'There's uncertainty and people are scared. People forget – if the university just complies, this threat isn't acted upon.'
'We're all freaking out'
A third Australian at Harvard, who did not want to be identified for fear of retaliation by US authorities, is currently in Europe with fellow students and said there was unease among the cohort.
'We're all freaking out being, like, 'can get back into the country?'' she said. She and others had thought about returning to the US early, while the injunction was still in place, but decided not to.
'We don't really want our lives to become bargaining chips,' she said. 'A lot of us have accepted we might become collateral damage. It's still the right thing for Harvard to [fight back], even if it f---ks up my life.'
Loading
Concerns about antisemitism on campus go beyond just Harvard and the Ivy League, following more than 18 months of protests against Israel and its destruction of Gaza, prompted by the October 7 Hamas attacks.
In an interview with National Public Radio this week, Harvard president Alan Garber, who is Jewish, said his university had made substantial progress in combating antisemitism over the past 12 months.
But the most common and disturbing way antisemitism manifested on campus was social exclusion, he said, which was more difficult to manage and meant people were not exposed to different opinions.
'We shouldn't be in an echo chamber. Everyone in our community needs to hear other views,' Garber said. 'That is one reason why it is so important for us to be able to have international students on our campus. There is so much that they contribute to our environment, and they enable everyone else to open their minds.'
At a campus rally, Jacob Miller, a former president of the Jewish association Harvard Hillel, said the Trump administration was using antisemitism as an 'absurd' excuse to target people based on their identity.
'Let's be clear, this has nothing to do with combatting antisemitism,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's restaurants replace American beef with Australian beef amid trade war: reports
China's restaurants replace American beef with Australian beef amid trade war: reports

West Australian

time31 minutes ago

  • West Australian

China's restaurants replace American beef with Australian beef amid trade war: reports

Restaurants in China are reportedly switching out American beef for Australian beef due to Donald Trump's tariffs. The US President triggered a trade war with Beijing by slapping meaty tariffs on Chinese goods. An ensuing tit-for-tat escalation peaked with the US imposing 145 per cent levies on Chinese products and China imposing 125 per cent duties on American products. Both sides have since backed down, with Washington agreeing to 30 per cent imposts on goods from China and Beijing agreeing to 10 per cent on US imports. But the tariffs have still hiked American beef supply costs for restaurants in the Chinese capital, prompting them to look to tariff-free Australian beef. Chinese state media reported on Tuesday that an American-themed restaurant in Beijing had made the switch because of 'cost pressures and declining supply stability of US imports'. The Global Times reported it spoke with a staff member at a 'branch of a restaurant famous for its American-style barbecue in Beijing'. The staff member said the restaurant 'stopped serving imported beef from the US starting from about one month ago due to the impact of tariffs', the Chinese government mouthpiece reported. The Global Times did not name the chain, but US business news channel CNBC has also reported that restaurants in Beijing are changing to Australian beef, including one eatery's 'The Great American' burger. A beef supplier told the network that American 'beef is fattier and tastier' but the 'high price is just too much to bear'. Australian beef is exported to China without any duties under the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. The Albanese government last year also cleared trade barriers for $20bn in Australian goods headed for Chinese ports, including lobsters.

China's Aussie move in US trade war
China's Aussie move in US trade war

Perth Now

time33 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

China's Aussie move in US trade war

Restaurants in China are reportedly switching out American beef for Australian beef due to Donald Trump's tariffs. The US President triggered a trade war with Beijing by slapping meaty tariffs on Chinese goods. An ensuing tit-for-tat escalation peaked with the US imposing 145 per cent levies on Chinese products and China imposing 125 per cent duties on American products. Both sides have since backed down, with Washington agreeing to 30 per cent imposts on goods from China and Beijing agreeing to 10 per cent on US imports. But the tariffs have still hiked American beef supply costs for restaurants in the Chinese capital, prompting them to look to tariff-free Australian beef. Chinese state media reported on Tuesday that an American-themed restaurant in Beijing had made the switch because of 'cost pressures and declining supply stability of US imports'. The Global Times reported it spoke with a staff member at a 'branch of a restaurant famous for its American-style barbecue in Beijing'. The staff member said the restaurant 'stopped serving imported beef from the US starting from about one month ago due to the impact of tariffs', the Chinese government mouthpiece reported. Restaurants in Beijing are reportedly switching from American beef to Australian beef due to the Trump administration's tariffs. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia The Global Times did not name the chain, but US business news channel CNBC has also reported that restaurants in Beijing are changing to Australian beef, including one eatery's 'The Great American' burger. A beef supplier told the network that American 'beef is fattier and tastier' but the 'high price is just too much to bear'. Australian beef is exported to China without any duties under the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. The Albanese government last year also cleared trade barriers for $20bn in Australian goods headed for Chinese ports, including lobsters.

Pacific media face reckoning after US aid cuts
Pacific media face reckoning after US aid cuts

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

Pacific media face reckoning after US aid cuts

America's retreat from foreign aid is being felt deeply in Pacific media, where pivotal outlets are being shuttered and journalists work unpaid. The result is fewer investigations into dubiously motivated politicians, glimpses into conflicts otherwise unseen and a less diverse media in a region which desperately needs it. "It is a huge disappointment ... a senseless waste," Benar News' Australian head of Pacific news, Stefan Armbruster, told AAP after seeing his outlet go under. Benar News, In-depth Solomons and Inside PNG are three digital outlets which enjoyed US support but have been cruelled by President Donald Trump's about-face on aid. Benar closed its doors in April after an executive order disestablishing Voice of America, which the Unitd States created during World War II to combat Nazi propaganda. An offshoot of Radio Free Asia (RFA) focused on Southeast Asia and the Pacific, Benar kept a close eye on abuses in West Papua, massacres and gender-based violence in Papua New Guinea and more. The Pacific arm quickly became indispensable to many, with a team of reporters and freelancers working in 15 countries on a budget under $A1 million. "Our coverage of decolonisation in the Pacific received huge interest, as did our coverage of the lack women's representation in parliaments, human rights, media freedom, deep sea mining and more," Mr Armbruster said. In-depth Solomons, a Honiara-based digital outlet, is another facing an existential threat despite a proud record of investigative and award-winning reporting. Last week, it was honoured with a peer-nominated award from the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Japan for a year-long probe into former prime minister Manasseh Sogavare's property holdings. "We're just holding on," editor and co-founder Ofani Eremae told AAP. A US-centred think tank continues to pay the wage of one journalist, while others haven't drawn a salary since January. "It has had an impact on our operations. We used to travel out to do stories across the provinces. That has not been done since early this year," Mr Eremae said. A private donor came forward after learning of the cuts with a one-off grant that was used for rent to secure the office, he said. Its funding shortfall - like Port Moresby-based outlet Inside PNG - is linked to USAID, the world's biggest single funder of development assistance, until Mr Trump axed its multi-billion dollar budget. Much of USAID's funding was spent on humanitarian causes - such as vaccines, clean water supplies and food security - but some was also earmarked for media in developing nations, with the aim of bolstering fragile democracies. Inside PNG used its support to build an audience of tens of thousands with incisive reports on PNG politics: not just Port Moresby, but in the regions including wantaway province Bougainville that has a long history of conflict. "The current lack of funding has unfortunately had a dual impact, affecting both our dedicated staff, whom we're currently unable to pay, and our day-to-day operations," Inside PNG managing director Kila Wani, told AAP. "We've had to let off 80 per cent of staff from payroll which is a big hit because we're not a very big team. "Logistically, it's become challenging to carry out our work as we normally would." AAP has confirmed a number of other media entities in the region which have suffered hits, but declined to share their stories. The funding hits are all the more damaging given the challenges faced by the Pacific, as outlined in the Pacific Islands Media Freedom Index . The latest report listed a string of challenges, notably weak legal protections for free speech, political interference on editorial independence, and a lack of funding underpinning high-quality media, in the region. The burning question for these outlets - and their audiences - is do other sources of funding exist to fill the gap? Inside PNG is refocusing energy on attracting new donors, as is In-depth Solomons, which has also turned to crowdfunding. The Australian and New Zealand governments have also provided targeted support for the media sector across the region, including ABC International Development (ABCID), which has enjoyed a budget increase from Anthony Albanese's government. Inside PNG and In-depth Solomons both receive training and content-focused grants from ABCID, which helps, but doesn't fund the underpinning costs for a media business or keep on the lights. Both Mr Eremae, who edited two major newspapers before founding the investigative outlet, and Mr Armbruster, a long-time SBS Correspondent, expressed their dismay at the US pivot away from the Pacific. "It's a huge mistake on the part of the US ... the world's leading democracy. The media is one of the pillars of democracy," Mr Eremae said. "It is, I believe, in the interests of the US and other democratic countries to give funding to media in countries like the Solomon Islands where we cannot survive due to lack of advertising (budgets). As a veteran of Pacific reporting, Mr Armbruster said he had witnessed US disinterest in the region contribute to the wider geopolitical struggle for influence. "The US government was trying to re-establish its presence after vacating the space decades ago. It had promised to re-engage, dedicating funding largely driven by its efforts to counter China, only to now betray those expectations," he said. "The US government has senselessly destroyed a highly valued news service in the Pacific. An own goal."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store