Chicago-area contractor accused of bribing Amtrak official with trips, steaks and a puppy in Philadelphia train station project
Mark Snedden, 69, of Munster, Indiana, the founder and president of Dolton-based MARK 1 Restoration, was charged in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia in a criminal information made public Friday with one count each of conspiracy to commit federal program bribery and making a false claim, court records show. An arraignment date has not been set as of Monday.
The charges carry a maximum possible sentence of 10 years in prison, though Snedden has been cooperating with the investigation since at least 2019 and is expected to plead guilty in exchange for a recommendation for a reduced sentence from the U.S. attorney's office.
Prosecutors are also seeking about $1.5 million in forfeiture from Snedden, according to the charges.
Snedden's Chicago-based attorney, Joseph Duffy, was not immediately available for comment.
Three other current or former employees of Mark1, Donald Seefeldt, Lee Maniatis, and Khaled Dallo, have pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing, court records show.
The charges come nearly four years after the Tribune exposed the Chicago-area connections to the investigation, which centered on an Amtrak official, Ajith Bhaskaran, who allegedly approved tens of millions of dollars of extra payments for MARK 1 over the course of the project to restore the facade of Philadelphia's 30th Street train station, nearly doubling the amount promised in the original contract.
Among the gifts allegedly bestowed upon Bhaskaran by Snedden's company was a Tourneau watch that cost more than $11,000, according to the charges.
Shortly after receiving the watch, Bhaskaran approved millions in additional spending for MARK1, the charges alleged. On Jan. 23, 2017, Maniatis forwarded the approval of the change order to Snedden with the notation, '$ ding.'
Later that year, Maniatis, with Snedden's approval, $4,700 related to the purchase of a purebred German shepherd puppy from Mittelwest breeders in Wonder Lake, according to an FBI search warrant affidavit unsealed several years ago. Bhaskaran later named the dog Matcha.
About a month after receiving the dog, Bhaskaran requested that Amtrak authorize an additional $5.7 million for the façade restoration project, with much of the requested funds to go to MARK1.
Then, in early 2018, Bhaskaran emailed Maniatis a $1,475 invoice from a dog-training school with instructions to 'Please call and discuss this with me.' Credit card records show Maniatis paid for that invoice as well as an additional charge from the training school for $3,875 in March 2018, the affidavit alleged.
FBI agents later were watching Bhaskaran at his home and took photos of him with the dog.
'Your affiant is aware, based on FBI surveillance, that Bhaskaran is the present owner of a German shepherd,' the affidavit stated.
Bhaskaran was found dead in his home of an apparent heart attack in October 2020. At the time, he had been negotiating a plea deal with the government on separate charges alleging he bilked the Social Security program out of a quarter-million dollars, the Tribune previously reported.
The bribery scandal, which began when an anonymous letter accusing Bhaskaran of fraud was sent to Amtrak's inspector general in March 2018, is one of the biggest to ever hit Amtrak, a quasi-public corporation that is heavily subsidized by the U.S. government, with nearly $4.3 billion in taxpayer funds going to the agency in 2022.
Amtrak has said it 'took swift and definitive action to terminate the employees' involved in the scheme and enhanced its oversight to 'protect the company from criminal activities.'
'We continue to cooperate with the investigation,' the company has said in previous statements.
The contract to restore Philadelphia's 30th Street train station was inked in December 2015 and originally called on MARK 1 to be paid $58.5 million to restore and clean the almost 90-year-old building's limestone facade and provide a 'complete window restoration,' records show.
To do the job, MARK 1 had to replace nearly 950 limestone panels, which were made from stone mined in Alabama and then fabricated in Chicago before being shipped back to Philadelphia for installation. The company also replaced or restored more than 2,000 window panes from the old Art Deco windows, outsourcing some of the work to an Oregon glass manufacturer to match the originals.
As a program manager for Amtrak's major capital construction division, Bhaskaran oversaw work on the project and had control over the purse strings, approving payments to MARK 1 as well as any applications for additional funds due to cost overruns, according to the charges.
In March 2016, just three months after the contract was granted, a MARK 1 project manager emailed Maniatis saying he had been given inside information by Bhaskaran and that they had plans to take him out to dinner, the affidavit stated. 'Keep it tight between us,' the email quoted in the document stated. 'When r u coming into Philly? … Steak dinner, cigars and whiskey. Let me know.'
Maniatis replied with a smiley face emoticon and wrote, 'Plan on steak Tuesday night baby.'
The affidavit alleged that over one two-day period, Maniatis and his team racked up more than $2,000 in charges at a high-end Philadelphia steakhouse and a nearby cigar bar.
After one such excursion in Jan. 19, 2017, Maniatis received notification that Amtrak had approved extra funding submitted by Bhaskaran and sent a text to MARK 1's owner reading, 'Dinner was worth it,' according to charges filed against Maniatis last year.
FBI agents raided MARK 1's headquarters on Maryland Avenue in Dolton on Nov. 14, 2019, seizing cellphones and other items from company executives and employees involved in the Philadelphia project, the records show.
Bhaskaran was arrested the same day on separate wire fraud charges alleging he used his deceased former mother-in-law's information to fraudulently collect $250,000 in Social Security benefits, court records show.
At the time of his arrest, Bhaskaran had an 'armada' of fancy cars in the driveway, including a Mercedes and two BMWs, according to a filing by prosecutors. He also had a number of fraudulent passports and other government-issued IDs and more than $7,000 in cash that he could not explain, the filing stated.
In a post-arrest statement to investigators, Bhaskaran 'admitted to accepting tens of thousands of dollars in bribes from contractors performing significant contract work for Amtrak,' according to prosecutors.
He was negotiating a plea deal with the government when his body was found at his home in Cherry Hill on Oct. 16, 2020, according to court records.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
13 minutes ago
- CBS News
Politics may have spurred August purge of 5 veteran FBI agents
When the FBI fired five veteran agents earlier this month, Director Kash Patel offered no explanation. Shock at the firings has continued to reverberate through the storied agency. And now, details are emerging about the possible motivation, several sources close to the agents tell CBS News. "There is a despicable purge underway of senior FBI officials, all of whom have risen in their careers as nonpartisan, and who have been targeted for vindictive, political purposes," said Mark Zaid, a whistleblower attorney who represents a number of federal workers dismissed under President Trump. Without any public comment from FBI or Justice Department officials, the agents, including, Brian Driscoll, who served for a short time as acting director at the start of the Trump administration, and Steven Jensen, head of the powerful Washington field office, were summarily fired and given little explanation for their removal. None had reached retirement age, meaning the abrupt dismissals will deprive them of their full pensions. One agent's expulsion came a month after his wife died of cancer. CBS News spoke with multiple sources close to the agents for this story. All of those interviewed spoke on the condition they not be identified for fear of retribution. Some of the agents may have been targeted solely because they worked on one or more of the criminal investigations of Mr. Trump, while others who were ousted in an earlier spate of firings worked on the Biden administration's Jan. 6 investigations, sources close to the agents said. But the most senior agent, Driscoll, by outward appearances, was in good standing with Patel. Driscoll, a highly decorated agent who took part in numerous daring counterterrorism operations, began his short stint as acting director with what many agents viewed as a singular act of bravery, resisting calls from a top Trump appointee at the Justice Department to turn over the names of FBI employees who had participated in the Jan. 6 investigation. Nevertheless, Patel kept Driscoll on after his Senate confirmation, putting him in a high-profile post as head of the bureau's Critical Incident Response Group, which oversees the FBI's elite Hostage Rescue Team and its aviation unit. Jensen, a veteran agent who helped oversee the Jan. 6 investigation from his position as chief of the FBI's domestic terrorism section, was given a significant promotion by Patel to be the assistant director in charge of the Washington Field Office, one of the largest outposts in the country. One source with knowledge of the matter told CBS News that Patel relied on both agents and particularly admired Driscoll, whom he viewed as a swashbuckling tactical operator. Another said that the FBI director opposed some of the firings. "I think Kash tried to save these people, honestly," the source said. Yet there are also some indications that both men may have crossed FBI leadership over loyalty and personnel matters. Zaid is part of a team of lawyers preparing to sue the federal government on behalf of some of the fired FBI agents. He told CBS News he suspects outside political interference. "If you look at Patel's testimony from his confirmation hearing when he promised the committee there would be no politicization or retribution at the FBI under his leadership," Zaid told CBS News, "you have to conclude that he was either lying or, giving him the benefit of the doubt, that he was directed to take these actions, and that could only come from the White House or the Justice Department." Patel promised senators during that hearing, "There will be no retributive actions taken by any FBI, should I be confirmed as FBI director." Democrats on Capitol Hill see the firings as baldly political and damaging to U.S. national security. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement to CBS News that he believes agents should be commended for their ability to enforce the law impartially. "When we start purging agents for doing their jobs, instead of toeing a partisan line, we weaken our defense against everything from violent crime to foreign threats, and that makes us all less safe," Warner said. When asked who ordered the termination of the agents, the FBI declined to comment. A White House official deferred to the FBI to discuss bureau personnel matters. There are other factors that have led some sources close to the agents and lawyers representing them to question whether the abrupt removals were the result of outside political interference, possibly by the White House. One question surrounds the role of a small band of right-leaning former agents who clashed with FBI leadership under directors James Comey and Christopher Wray and have been vocal critics of a bureau they believe was "weaponized" against them. Among them is Kyle Seraphin, one of several former FBI agents and whistleblowers who were suspended or had their security clearances revoked for alleged misconduct during the Biden administration. The former agents, including Seraphin, have referred to themselves as "the suspendables." They have been targeting FBI officials they believe to be politically motivated. Seraphin has been among the most outspoken – and effective – members of the group. He has at times been critical of Patel for not aggressively and swiftly cleaning house at the bureau, but he has also had Patel's ear. Sources say he exercises considerable influence from his social media perch on X and his podcast, "The Kyle Seraphin Show." Seraphin has publicly claimed some of the credit for last week's purge. On August 4, he posted a thread on X under the heading "VETTING CRISIS CONTINUES," in which he identified one of the fired agents, Christopher M. Meyer. Meyer had been serving as one of the pilots of the governmental planes used by Patel until he was notified of his termination. Seraphin had publicly speculated, correctly it turned out, that Meyer had previously been on a squad based in the Washington Field Office that investigated Mr. Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents and conducted a search of Mr. Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate. The Justice Department brought criminal charges against Mr. Trump over the discovery of documents, but a judge eventually dismissed the case. Seraphin told CBS News in an interview, "I identified that the person that ran the Mar-a-Lago case that resulted in a search warrant at the president's home was rubbing shoulders in close proximity with the FBI director" as his pilot. He was concerned that "this is a person that's now in the kind of buddy space of your FBI director, and he doesn't even know who he's speaking to." On Alex Jones's "InfoWars" he said he gave a "heads up" to an "administration insider" about Meyer. He told CBS News his "Trump administration insider" was "in the president's orbit." On that same day, Patel directed Driscoll to fire Meyer, sources told CBS News. When Driscoll asked on what grounds, he did not get what he considered a satisfactory answer from Patel, according to the source. Without itr, Driscoll refused. Two days later, on Aug. 6, Driscoll was contacted by J. William Rivers, the No. 3 official at the FBI, and told he was being terminated, the source said. He was given no reason why but later received a letter formally notifying him that he was being fired. Around the same time, Jensen was also relieved of his duties. A source with knowledge of that matter said it was because he, too, refused to fire a subordinate agent in the Washington Field Office, though CBS News was not able to identify the person. Walter Giardina, a WFO agent who was also dismissed in the purge, had worked on a number of cases involving Mr. Trump and other members of his administration, including the prosecution of senior Trump aide Peter Navarro for contempt of Congress. The fifth agent fired earlier this month was Spencer Evans, who had been the special agent in charge of the FBI's Nevada field office until earlier this summer, when he was abruptly told he was being transferred to Huntsville, Alabama. By then, Trump supporters, including Seraphin, had been publicly critical of him over his enforcement of FBI COVID policies during the tenure of former FBI Director Christpher Wray. In April, Seraphin posted this on X: "After @Kash_Patel was nominated, he asked me about people in the FBI who were problems. I said Spencer Evans, the SAC of Las Vegas, was the man who PERSONALLY denied the religious accommodations for Covid 19 shots and testing protocols." Seraphin's post continued: "Kash said 'Gone.'" Seraphin attached a video to his post that showed that months after that conversation, Evans was still leading the Las Vegas FBI office, and Patel was praising its work in tracking down criminals. Then, last Wednesday, two hours before getting into his car to drive across the country for his new assignment, Evans received a call notifying him that he too was being terminated. He was given no reason. Two days later Evans received a formal termination letter signed by Patel. It said Evans "demonstrated a lack of reasonableness and overzealousness in the implementation of COVID-19 protocols and policies." After the August firings, Seraphin told CBS News a colleague in the FBI said to him, "You have four scalps hanging off your belt this week." Seraphin excluded Driscoll from the count, and referred to him as "collateral damage," and said he probably didn't deserve to be fired. Graham Kates contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Air Canada labor deal may reshape pay for North American airline crews
By Allison Lampert and Rajesh Kumar Singh MONTREAL/CHICAGO (Reuters) -A crippling strike by Air Canada flight attendants that grounded thousands of flights over wages and unpaid labor is the latest blow to the airline industry's compensation system that does not fully pay cabin crews for their hours at work. The union, representing more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, said on Tuesday they reached a tentative deal that ends unpaid work, without sharing further details. Analysts say any gains could influence upcoming contract negotiations in North America. The deal could also drive up structural costs in a cyclical industry. Labor is airlines' biggest operating expense after fuel. The four-day strike that stranded more than 500,000 passengers mirrors unrest at U.S. carriers, where flight attendants cannot walk off the job until the National Mediation Board grants permission. But cabin crews at American, Southwest, and Alaska Airlines last year rejected several contract deals, saying they did not address concerns about unpaid work. Flight attendants at United Airlines last month voted down a $6-billion tentative labor agreement, which did not provide compensation for time on the ground before and after flights. The Chicago-based airline's union is surveying its members before returning to bargaining in December. United and the union did not immediately respond to requests for comments. While cabin crews get paid for a minimum number of hours, they are mostly compensated when planes are in motion, neglecting the crucial tasks performed during boarding, deplaning, and other ground operations. Unions say this amounts to significant unpaid labor. In previous contract negotiations, airlines secured concessions from workers as the industry was struggling due to economic downturns or the pandemic. But a runup in inflation, stagnant wages, and increased workload have fueled resentment among flight attendants, bolstering demands for a change in pay practices. "The Air Canada strike helps negotiations everywhere. It defined the problem of ridiculous expectations for flight attendants to work without pay," said Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, which represents 55,000 flight attendants at 20 airlines, including United. "The striking flight attendants are an inspiration to working people everywhere." Nelson spoke with Wesley Lesosky, head of Air Canada's flight attendants union, on Monday to coordinate positions, representatives of both unions told Reuters. Shanyn Elliott, an Air Canada Rouge flight attendant, said when she started work in 2017, she would pick up long-haul flights to earn extra pay as her C$23 ($16.60) hourly wage did not cover the cost of living. Adding to her frustration, frequent flight delays after the pandemic meant longer hours, said Elliott, who heads the strike committee for Air Canada flight attendants at the Canadian Union of Public Employees. Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau said the industry needed to review its compensation models. In an interview, he said the Canadian carrier has accepted the concept of ground pay, adding other airlines will likely look at their own models. "I do think the industry has to take a closer look at this over time," Rousseau told Reuters. "We all should be open to change." American and Alaska have already begun compensating attendants for boarding time in their new labor agreements. American's flight attendants are now also compensated for some hours between flights. Those gains came after Delta Air Lines, whose flight attendants are not in a union, instituted boarding pay for cabin crew at half of their hourly wages in 2022 when they were trying to organize. HIGHER COSTS But paying for boarding and time on the ground would inflate airlines' operating costs. American Airlines' new flight attendant contract is estimated to cost it an extra $4.2 billion over five years. The company last month blamed increased labor costs in part for its margin underperformance. Canaccord Genuity analyst Matthew Lee estimates the proposed wage hikes at Air Canada would mean up to C$140 million in incremental costs. Air Canada's wage bill has increased about 26% since before the pandemic. The airline is already grappling with weak passenger traffic to the U.S. amid strained trade relations between Canada and the U.S., leading to a nearly 40% year-on-year decline in quarterly profit. But analysts warn holding the line on costs risks industrial peace. "The movement is on," said John Gradek, a faculty lecturer in supply networks and aviation management at McGill University. ($1 = 1.3855 Canadian dollars) Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel
Intel (INTC) rose roughly 7% on Tuesday, a day after SoftBank Group announced it would take a $2 billion stake in the struggling chipmaker. News of SoftBank's investment follows a Bloomberg report last week that said the Trump administration is considering taking up to a 10% position in the company. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a CNBC interview Tuesday that the investment would involve the US government converting Intel's grants from the Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act — worth $10.9 billion — into an equity stake aimed at stabilizing the company's US manufacturing business. Bessent did not confirm the size of the stake the government would take. Intel has fallen behind in an industry it once dominated. Its manufacturing division is bleeding cash, just as its legacy computer chip segment forfeits market share to rivals Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Qualcomm (QCOM) in the PC space. Intel is also woefully behind AMD and Nvidia (NVDA) in the AI race. The company's market capitalization of $111 billion is less than half of its value in 2021. And CEO Lip-Bu Tan has been forced to lay off 15% of the company's workforce and shelve plans to build plants in Europe. But the troubled chipmaker is the only large-scale US-based leading-edge chip manufacturer, giving it geopolitical significance as the nation looks to reshore semiconductor production. Intel's problems, however, may be too big for either SoftBank or the Trump administration to solve on their own. Intel in need of direction Deutsche Bank analyst Ross Seymore said news of the US potentially taking a stake in Intel, combined with the SoftBank investment, shows that "[Tan] is taking bold actions to solidify Intel's financial and strategic positioning during its ongoing difficult transformation process." Tan became CEO in March after Intel's board ousted former CEO Pat Gelsinger late last year. But others on Wall Street expressed skepticism that those investments would be enough to save Intel from its decline, which resulted from years of missteps. Loop Capital analyst Gary Mobley wrote in a recent note to clients that the support from SoftBank and, potentially, the US government may be "akin to a lifeline with no secure anchor at the other end," because while Intel may be "finding new buyers of its primary equity capital," that may not guarantee it can find customers for its manufacturing business. Gelsinger established Intel's third-party chip manufacturing business, otherwise known as its Foundry, in 2021 as a means of competing with rival TSMC, which produces chips for companies including Nvidia, Apple (AAPL), AMD, and others. But so far, its Foundry business has been a disappointment, struggling to secure customers. While Intel has said it reached agreements to build chips for Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT), the company is still its own largest manufacturing client. Intel's plan includes building chips based on newer technologies, including its 18A and upcoming 14A node design processes, part of Gelsinger's plan for five process nodes in four years. But 18A, which was initially supposed to roll out in the first half of 2025, is now slated to debut in 2026. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon was similarly critical of Intel's cash infusion in his own investor note, writing, "We do not believe that Intel's capability gap has anything to do with money." Rasgon also questioned whether the US taking a stake in Intel would be enough to complete the company's domestic manufacturing expansions. "Intel was originally supposed to get these CHIPS Act funds for free; giving up 10% of the company for them seems worse," he wrote in a note to clients. "And if the goal is to help Intel build substantial US capacity, $10.9B really isn't enough." Moor Insights and Strategy founder and chief analyst Patrick Moorhead told Yahoo Finance that while SoftBank's $2 billion investment and the prospect of a potential US stake are good things, the company would require as much as $40 billion to build out its next-generation 14A technology. Still, getting the US government involved, at least in the short term, could prove to be a boon for the company. "My short-term answer is that the US government is a kingmaker, and they just made Intel the king, and they are going to wrap policy around that to make Intel foundry successful," Moorhead said. If the government sticks with Intel for the long haul, though, Moorhead said it could further complicate the company's development problems, leading to a lack of innovation, inefficiencies, and growing costs. "My hope is that Intel gets back on its feet, it turns itself into a reputable, leading-edge foundry, and the government sells the stake," he said. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Sign in to access your portfolio
