India's Bajaj Auto to take control of KTM with $906mln debt deal
The move will see the 'Pulsar' motorcycle manufacturer, which has been a minority investor in KTM since 2007, shift from a dormant stakeholder to a strategic lead, aligning governance and injecting fresh capital to restore KTM's operations.
KTM AG, which develops and sells motorcycles under the KTM and Husqvarna brands and exports to around 80 countries, filed for court restructuring proceedings in November amid severe liquidity issues.
Its creditors are set to receive 30% of their claims in cash by May 23.
As part of the restructuring, Bajaj Auto has already infused 200 million euros in KTM and will deploy an additional 600 million euros to settle creditor claims and restart the business.
Bajaj will acquire a controlling stake in its unit Pierer Bajaj AG and indirectly take control of KTM's parent, Pierer Mobility AG.
KTM and Bajaj jointly develop products in India. Bajaj Auto holds a 37.5% stake in the KTM business via its unit.
How much its stake would rise to after the deal was not immediately clear.
Bajaj Auto did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. ($1 = 0.8828 euros) (Reporting by Meenakshi Maidas and Indranil Sarkar in Bengaluru; Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Why Narendra Modi Can't Compromise On Market Access To Us On Agri, Dairy?
By Nitya Chakraborty The India-US trade war over Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff on Indian exports to the USA with effect from August 27 this year has assumed a major political dimension linking the political future of both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the United States President Donald Trump. For Narendra Modi, the outcome has also personal implications as the decision impacts the future of farmers as also dairy industry in his own state Gujarat. The trade disputes have always have got major political dimensions, but in the current India-US trade talks, five rounds of which have already taken place, the main focus has shifted to the US demand for market access to the Indian agriculture and dairy sectors. The US farmers bodies as also the companies which are involved in agri and dairy products are anxiously waiting as for the first time, the vast Indian market of 1.42 billion population will be opened up to them if Narendra Modi agrees to the Trump pressure in the final round of talks. Why the market access is crucial for the Republican President Donald Trump at the India-US trade talks? The farmers organisations are very powerful in shaping the direction of US politics and they have big political lobbies in the US Congress covering both Republicans and Democrats. The appeasement of the US farmers lobby is a distinct part of the Republicans who depend on the farmers votes in the elections, especially in the swing states. The midterm elections to the Congress and the Senate are due in November 2026. Both Republicans and Democrats are poised for a bitter battle in this crucial poll. The farmers, across the US, especially in the six swing states of the US, will be a determining factor in the 2026 polls. Trump is under tremendous pressure from the US farm lobby which is also a big contributor to the President's election campaign. Any compromise by Trump meaning denial by Narendra Modi of market access to vast agri and dairy sectors in India as also fisheries, will be used by the Democrats in the election campaign terming it as the let down of the farmers by President Trump. Trump can not afford this setback at this hour. That is why the US President is so angry with Prime Minister Narendra Modi since the Indian negotiators in the last round of trade talks in Washington firmly told the US side that no market access to Indian agriculture could be allowed. That is the reason Trump reacted in anger by saying that no further trade talks if tariff issues were not solved. The US team was scheduled to arrive in New Delhi for another round of talks on August 25 this year, but Trump's remarks have cast shadow on the certainty of the Sixth Round of India-US trade talks though till now, the Indian side has got no formal indication for cancellation of the visit. But the signal is clear. The additional 25 per cent tariff due to India's buying of Russian oil is going to take effect from August 27. Trump wants India to indicate two things-first no buying of Russian oil from now and granting market access to the US in Indian agriculture sector. Now for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it is politically suicidal for him to agree to any of the Trump's two demands. The Russian oil tariff issue can be sorted out if there is a sort of agreement between Trump and Putin at the Alaska meeting on August 15. If the final understanding takes a few days more after August 15 following the possibility of a final meeting with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, there is possibility of an escape route on additional 25 per cent tariff if an agreement is reached by the end of the month. But on market access in Indian agriculture issue, the US side is adamant at the directive of Trump. Trump may not agree to the total trade deal if India does not agree to granting US market access in agriculture and dairy industry. Right now as on August 13, two days before the Independence Day address of the Indian Prime Minister, indications are that Narendra Modi has decided to fight President Trump on the agriculture and dairy industry issue. On Thursday, Prime Minister was candid in declaring that he would not compromise farmer's interests and was even ready to pay a heavy personal price to protect the farmers. On Tuesday, the farmers organisations thanked the Prime Minister for his stand to protect the interests of the farmers. Prime Minister in his Independence Day address from Red Fort is expected to take this economic sovereignty and farmers interests issues to a high pitch and try to combat opposition challenge on SIR and Bihar polls. For Narendra Modi, there are some major political compulsions to project him as the protector of farmer's interests and defy Trump pressure on trade and tariff. The agriculture sector has 54.6 per cent of the total Indian workforce while the agriculture and allied activities account for 18.4 per cent of GVA at current prices during 2022-23. Similarly, the dairy market in India is most thriving and its business value in 2024 is estimated at Rs. 18.9 billion. The dairy industry employs eight crore people. Gujarat is the leader along with Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, All are BJP controlled states. As the topmost BJP leader and RSS man, Narendra Modi instinctively can not take any other position. He is getting full backing from the RSS. The US has not only been demanding low tariffs on certain farm products such as corn, soybeans, apples, cotton, almonds and ethanol, but also pitching for allowing entry of its genetically modified produce like maize, soy, canola and cotton into the Indian market. India can not agree to this absurd US demands at the cost of the Indian farmers. The US farmers are highly subsidized by the government. There is a continuous fighting between the farmers of USA and European Union on the extent of subsidy. The EU nations are also known for giving high subsidy to their farmers. New Delhi has traditionally kept agriculture out of Free Trade Agreements with other nations. Granting market access to the US could force India to extend similar concessions to other trading partners. The average Indian farm comprises just 1.08 hectares, compared to 187 hectares in the US. In dairy, the average herd size in India is two to three animals per farmer, compared to hundreds in the US. This difference makes it difficult for small Indian farmers to compete with their US counterparts. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has cautioned that permanent reduction of agricultural tariffs in the India-US free trade agreement could result in subsidised US grains overwhelming Indian markets during global price downturns. Past evidence shows that global grain prices plummeted between 2014 and 2016, with wheat prices falling under $160 per tonne, devastating African farmers. Food security is a major concern in a highly populated country like India. Indian leaders can not opt for a policy which will allow the market to be dominated by the others having no interest in the well being of the Indian farmers. Latest figures indicate Indian exports to USA in 2024 totalled US$ 78 billion. Out of this total, 55 per cent , will be impacted by the Trump tariff of 25 per cent now and 50 per cent from August 27 if there is no India-US understanding. The labour intensive sectors like textiles, apparels, gems and jewellery are the areas which have been impacted most.. Already, one lakh gem jewellery workers have been affected in Surat, the apparels and textile owners fear the adverse impact affecting lakhs of workers since the US is the prime destination of exports for their products. This is a serious situation at a time when the employment situation in the country is already precarious. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to take all the factors into account. If the US does not continue the trade talks further and India has to pay the additional tariff of 50 per cent from August 27, the adverse impact on Indian economy will be felt immediately and it will intensify. PM has to work out an alternative based on hard analysis of the global trade potentialities. For India, this crisis due to Trump's tariff can be turned into an opportunity to rebuild India. On the basis of strategic independence without depending heavily on any nation. Whether the BJP Prime Minister will take the bait, that is the million dollar question. (IPA Service)
Khaleej Times
13 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Grok sides with Altman in clash with Musk over App Store rankings
Elon Musk has accused Apple of unfairly favoring ChatGPT on its App Store and threatened legal action, triggering a fiery exchange with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on Tuesday. "Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation," Musk said in a post on his social media network X on Monday, without providing evidence to back his claim. "xAI will take immediate legal action," he said, referring to his own artificial intelligence company. X users responded by pointing out that China's DeepSeek AI hit the top spot in the App Store early this year, and Perplexity AI recently ranked number one in the App Store in India. DeepSeek and Perplexity compete with OpenAI and Musk's startup xAI. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called the accusation "remarkable" in a response on X on Tuesday, adding that Musk was alleged to "manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like." Musk then called Altman a "liar" in a heated exchange, prompting the OpenAI boss to ask whether Musk would sign a sworn legal statement declaring that he had never ordered changes to the X algorithm to harm competitors or help his own companies. A user then asked Grok, xAI's AI assistant, to evaluate the argument. Grok's reply, surprisingly, was in favour of Altman, saying that Musk indeed has a history of directing the X algorithm to be changed to help his own interests, as per ongoing probes. Forbes reported that Musk responded by saying that Grok relies on legacy media too much, and that this was an issue he intended to fix. OpenAI and xAI both released new versions of their AI assistants, ChatGPT and Grok, in the past week. App Store rankings listed ChatGPT as the top free iPhone app on Tuesday, with Grok in fifth place. Apple did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Factors going into App Store rankings include user engagement, reviews and the number of downloads. AI wars OpenAI and Apple announced an alliance in June last year to enhance iPhones and other devices with ChatGPT features. ChatGPT-5 rolled out free to the nearly 700 million people who use it weekly, OpenAI said in a briefing with journalists last week. Tech industry rivals Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and xAI have been pouring billions of dollars into artificial intelligence since the blockbuster launch of the first version of ChatGPT in late 2022. Chinese startup DeepSeek shook up the AI sector early this year with a model that delivers high performance using less costly chips. OpenAI filed counterclaims against multi-billionaire Musk in April, accusing its former co-founder of waging a "relentless campaign" to damage the organization after it achieved success without him. OpenAI alleged in legal documents filed at the time in the northern California federal court that Musk became hostile toward the company after abandoning it years before its breakthrough achievements with ChatGPT. The lawsuit was another round in a bitter feud between the generative AI (genAI) start-up and the world's richest person, who accused OpenAI of betraying its founding mission in a lawsuit last year. OpenAI alleged in its countersuit that Musk "made it his project to take down OpenAI, and to build a direct competitor that would seize the technological lead -- not for humanity but for Elon Musk." Musk founded his own genAI startup, xAI, in 2023 to compete with OpenAI and the other major AI players.
Zawya
14 hours ago
- Zawya
India set to allow its private firms to mine and import uranium to help nuclear expansion
India aims to allow private firms to mine, import and process uranium as part of plans to end a decades-old state monopoly over the nuclear sector and bring in billions of dollars to boost the industry, two government sources said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government plans to expand nuclear power production capacity by 12 times by 2047 and it is also relaxing requirements to allow foreign players to take a minority stake in power plants, Reuters reported in April. If it meets its expansion goal, nuclear will provide 5% of India's total power needs, according to government estimates. Until now, the state has maintained control over the mining, import and processing of uranium fuel because of concerns over the possible misuse of nuclear material, radiation safety and strategic security. It will retain its grip on reprocessing spent uranium fuel and managing plutonium waste, in line with global practice. But to help meet a surge in demand for nuclear fuel as it expands nuclear power production, the government plans to draw up a regulatory framework that would allow private Indian firms to mine, import and process uranium, the two government sources told Reuters. They asked not to be named because the plans are not yet public. The proposed policy, which the sources said was likely to be made public in the current fiscal year, will also permit private players to supply critical control system equipment for nuclear power plants, they said. The Finance Ministry, Department of Atomic Energy and Prime Minister's Office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Outside India, countries including Canada, South Africa and the United States allow private firms to mine and process uranium. DOMESTIC SUPPLY IS NOT ENOUGH India has an estimated 76,000 tonnes of uranium enough to fuel 10,000 megawatts of nuclear power for 30 years, according to government data. But the sources said domestic resources would only be able to meet about 25% of the projected increase. The rest would have to be imported and India would need to increase its processing capacity. In announcing its budget on February 1, the government made public its plans to open up the sector without giving details. Some of India's big conglomerates subsequently began drawing up investment plans. But analysts said amending the legislation could be complex. "It's a major and bold initiative by the Indian Government which is critical for achieving the target," said Charudatta Palekar, independent power sector consultant. "The challenge will be to define quickly the rules of engagement with private sector." New Delhi will have to change five laws, including the ones regulating mining and electricity sectors and India's foreign direct investment policy to enable private participation in many identified activities, the sources said. (Reporting by Sarita Chaganti Singh: editing by Barbara Lewis)
