logo
Exclusive: Brazil judge targeted by US sanctions confident of Trump reversal

Exclusive: Brazil judge targeted by US sanctions confident of Trump reversal

Reutersa day ago
BRASILIA, Aug 20 (Reuters) - The judge at the center of escalating tensions between Brazil and the United States told Reuters he is counting on a change of heart from President Donald Trump to unwind sanctions against him, which he said lack consensus within the U.S. government.
Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ratcheted up restraining orders against former President Jair Bolsonaro during his trial for an alleged 2022 coup plot. Trump demanded an end to the case that he calls a "witch hunt" as he slapped a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods and hit Moraes with financial sanctions that are putting Brazil's banks on edge.
Despite fears of a spiraling crisis for bilateral relations, the judge expressed confidence in a late Tuesday interview at his Brasilia office that sanctions would be unwound against him via diplomatic channels or an eventual challenge in U.S. courts.
"A judicial challenge is possible and I have not yet found a U.S. or Brazilian lawyer or scholar who doubts the courts would overturn. But at this moment, I've chosen to wait. That's my choice. It's a diplomatic matter for the country," said Moraes.
The standoff with Trump is the highest-profile test yet for the 56-year-old jurist, whose bald visage and muscular frame have come to define the Brazilian high court he joined eight years ago. He has taken the lead on many of the court's most prominent cases, cowing Elon Musk in a showdown over his social media platform, sending hundreds of right-wing rioters in the capital to prison and barring Bolsonaro from running for office.
Navigating the U.S. crackdown on his personal finances and bilateral trade with Brazil has done little to change his routine, he said, which includes boxing, martial arts and a new favorite book: Henry Kissinger's "Leadership," the late U.S. diplomat's final volume on 20th century statecraft.
Moraes said he trusts diplomacy will restore his standing in Washington. He said prosecutors blamed the current fallout on a campaign by allies of Bolsonaro, including the former president's lawmaker son Eduardo, who is in the U.S. and under investigation in Brazil for courting Trump's intervention in his father's case.
"Once the correct information has been passed along, as is being done now, and the documented information reaches the U.S. authorities, I believe it won't even require any legal action to reverse (the sanctions). I believe that the U.S. executive branch itself, the president, will reverse them," Moraes said.
Pressed on the reason for that confidence, Moraes said he was aware of internal divisions in the U.S. government that had slowed the sanctions and could still undermine them.
"There was reluctance in the State Department and great reluctance in the Treasury Department," he said, without elaborating or explaining how he received that information.
A State Department official with knowledge of the matter told Reuters separately that the sanctions against Moraes had faced substantial pushback from career officials.
The actions against Moraes were "completely, legally inappropriate," said the source on condition of anonymity, adding that officials from the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control had initially said no but were overruled.
A Treasury spokesperson said: "The Treasury Department and Office of Foreign Assets Control, along with the entire Trump administration, is in lockstep that Alexandre de Moraes has engaged in serious human rights abuse. Rather than concocting a fantasy fiction, de Moraes should stop carrying out arbitrary detentions and politicized prosecutions."
The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Brazilian courts could punish Brazilian financial institutions for seizing or blocking domestic assets in response to U.S. orders, Moraes also said in the interview.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Moment news reporter has her phone snatched out of her hands live on TV
Moment news reporter has her phone snatched out of her hands live on TV

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Moment news reporter has her phone snatched out of her hands live on TV

Watch the moment a news reporter has her phone snatched by a man speeding past on a bike while she was live on TV. Journalist Beatriz Casadei, who works for Record News, was preparing to speak outside a prison in Sao Paulo, Brazil, when a cyclist rode past the front of the camera, taking her phone in the process. The live recording, filmed outside the prison gates of the Pinheiros Provisional Detention Centre, shows Ms. Casadei visually shocked, helplessly running out of shot after the ordeal.

Trump's huge civil fraud penalty thrown out by New York appeals court
Trump's huge civil fraud penalty thrown out by New York appeals court

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump's huge civil fraud penalty thrown out by New York appeals court

NEW YORK, Aug 21 (Reuters) - A New York state appeals court on Thursday threw out an approximately half-billion-dollar penalty that Donald Trump had been ordered to pay after a judge found the U.S. president fraudulently overstated the value of his properties and other assets to bolster his family business. The decision by a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division in Manhattan represented a defeat for New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the civil fraud lawsuit against Trump in 2022. James' case had been among Trump's biggest legal losses in a slew of lawsuits against him in recent years. Lawyers for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment. James' office did not immediately respond to similar requests. The appeals court was splintered. Two judges found Trump was properly held liable, and James "vindicated a public interest" by pursuing her fraud case, but the penalty was an excessive fine that violated the U.S. Constitution. Two other judges also found James had authority to sue, but a new trial was necessary because the trial judge should not have held Trump liable for fraud at the outset. The fifth judge said the case against Trump should have been dismissed. Trump was appealing a judgment entered by Justice Arthur Engoron in a state court in Manhattan, following a three-month nonjury trial. Engoron found Trump had inflated his wealth over several years before first becoming president in 2017, to dupe lenders and insurers into providing better terms to the Trump Organization. Trump has denied wrongdoing. His lawyers argued that the penalty was too high and that James had overreached. In February 2024, the judge ordered Trump to pay $454.2 million in penalties plus interest, which has continued to accrue. Trump was personally liable for nearly 98% of the judgment, with his eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg responsible for the remainder. Referring to Trump and other Trump Organization figures, Engoron said their "complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological." Engoron also banned Trump and the Trump Organization from applying for loans from banks registered in the state for three years, and effectively barred Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump from running the business for two years. The appeals court put these restrictions on hold during the appeals process, while letting a court-appointed monitor for the Trump Organization continue her work.

Princess Elisabeth of Belgium's future at Harvard revealed
Princess Elisabeth of Belgium's future at Harvard revealed

Daily Mail​

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Princess Elisabeth of Belgium's future at Harvard revealed

Princess Elisabeth is set to resume her studies at Harvard University following Donald Trump 's move to ban international students. The academic fate of the Belgian royal, 23, appeared to be hanging in the balance earlier this year when in May, the US president revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students. But the prestigious Massachusetts university has resisted the lawsuit meaning the rule has been temporarily blocked. This means the future Queen will be able to return to her studies in September, when she is due to begin her second year of studying. 'I can confirm that, for now, all the conditions seem to be in place for the princess to continue her studies at Harvard,' the Belgian Royal Palace's communication director Xavier Baert said on Tuesday, confirming a newspaper report. The princess previously said she didn't want any 'special treatment' regarding her continued stay at Harvard. She believes it is essential to 'show solidarity with other international students,' some of whom are her close friends, a source told HLN. The sources added that Elisabeth is conscious about the message she sends to other students, as well as ensuring happy relations between Belgium and the United States. In June, a federal judge blocked the administration from implementing the proclamation Trump signed that sought to bar foreign nationals from entering the U.S. to study at Harvard. The future queen of Belgium is set to begin her second year of a two-year master's program in Public Policy at Harvard, a course designed to broaden students' perspectives and sharpen their skills for 'successful careers in public service', according to Harvard's website. Almost 6,800 international students attended the 388-year-old university in its most recent school year, comprising about 27 per cent of its student population. News that the princess would be able to continue her course on campus was reported on Tuesday by Belgian royal journalist, Wim Dehandschutter. 'The palace told me, "All indicators are currently green for her. There are no concrete reasons why she would not be able to return to Harvard in September",' he said. They added that sources close to the family had always been confident there would be a positive outcome. It is said that the family believed even in the 'worst case scenario' that it would at least be possible for the Princess to attend online lectures - or find a different campus in another country. Meanwhile Princess Elisabeth's parents King Philippe and Queen Mathilde were said to have found themselves in a difficult diplomatic situation - as they wouldn't want to create tensions with the US, according to Dehandschutter. Additionally, for Elisabeth - who has already has an undergraduate degree from the University of Oxford - a return to Belgium would have posed further issues such as having to choose between Dutch-speaking and a French-speaking university, and between a Catholic and a liberal one. Continuing her studies abroad is a priority for the Princess, as her father King Phillipe spent a semester studying at Oxford and three years in the US at Stanford University. After she completes her studies, Elisabeth is expected to take up a more active role in Belgium and become an active Crown Princess. Following the announcement made by President Trump in May earlier this year, the family released a statement saying they were 'investigating the situation' and were awaiting a decision. Trump's ban would force foreign students to transfer to other schools or lose their legal status in the US. The president had threatened to expand the crackdown to other colleges. Elisabeth, who has spent the summer in her native country, will be Belgium's first reigning Queen when she ascends the throne. The eldest of four children born to King Philippe and Queen Mathilde, she also has studied at the Royal Military Academy in Brussels. She speaks Dutch, French, German and English. At Harvard, the princess is studying Public Policy, a two-year master's degree program that prepares students for a life of public service. Before studying in the United States, she earned a degree in history and politics from Oxford University in the United Kingdom. The Trump administration has said it is trying to force change at Harvard and other top-level universities across the US, contending they have become bastions of leftist 'woke' thought and antisemitism, which they deny. The administration has appealed the judge's ruling, but with the new school year set to begin on Sept 2, the injunction against the foreign student ban remains in effect. Harvard enrolls almost 6,800 foreign students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, accounting for more than a quarter of its student body. Most are graduate students, coming from more than 100 countries. The Harvard Kennedy School has almost half its student body from abroad and Harvard Business School is about one-third international students. The university has several notable alumni who are not American-born, including Canadian author Margaret Atwood, Indian billionaire philanthropists Ratan Tata and Anand Mahindra, and author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Following the announcement made by Trump, the university filed a lawsuit un federal court in Boston, saying the the government's action violates the First Amendment and will have an 'immediate and devastating effect for Harvard and more than 7,000 visa holders.' Since then, a federal at Boston court released a block on the White House's ban, allowing international students to return to school while court proceedings play out. It was reported last week that Harvard and the Trump administration are getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store