Campaigners fight to save 120-year-old tree from ‘irrational' local council
Haringey Council in North London has said the tree on Oakfield Road, Stroud Green, must be removed because it has caused damage to properties nearby.
A notification on the felling from the council said 'the tree has contributed to tree root damage to the adjacent properties. Pruning was unsuccessful, and movement of the properties has continued'.
Residents now have until 17 June to respond to the notice.
Annette Elder, solicitor and member of Haringey Tree Protectors, said the decision from the council was 'completely irrational'.
'Mature trees like the Oakfield plane are vital in urban areas—for cooling, biodiversity, air quality, and residents' wellbeing,' she told The Independent.
'It makes no sense to remove them without robust evidence that they are causing active harm.'
The council said the trees have caused subsidence in nearby properties. Subsidence occurs when the foundations of a home become unbalanced due to the ground sinking. This can move walls and floors from their original groundwork and cause severe damage.
Trees can cause subsidence when its roots grow into clay soil and take up enough moisture, which causes the soil to dry out and shrink.
Ms Elder told The Independent claimed that the owners of the two houses affected by the subsidence have reached agreements with their insurance companies to pay for repairs on the house, so there was no need to fell the trees.
'There's no clear evidence that the tree poses a real or immediate threat—especially once underpinning takes place,' Ms Elder added.
'Even Haringey's own Tree and Woodland Plan states that trees should not be removed or pruned solely because of a potential or perceived future subsidence risk.
'We believe this is a completely irrational decision.
'If you follow this logic, almost every street tree in the area could be considered a risk. Are we going to fell them all?'
Ms Elder said there are reportedly around 200 active insurance claims in the borough relating to potential tree-related subsidence.
'Subsidence is a wider issue—climate change, increased heat, and flooding all contribute to greater soil movement, particularly in clay areas,' she said.
'It's precisely because of climate change that councils, including Haringey, have pledged to increase canopy cover.'
A Haringey Council spokesperson said: 'We are currently consulting on a proposal to remove the tree.
'The court ruled in 2024 that a previous decision by the council to remove the tree was lawful and has refused permission to bring an appeal against this. We are undertaking a further consultation in view of new statutory requirements that have come into force since that decision.
'Our proposal is based on consideration of the evidence submitted on behalf of the owners of the properties.
'We will carefully consider all the feedback we receive, including any new information or changes of circumstances, before coming to a final decision on the future of the tree.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
South Shields pier gets CCTV to deter 'illegal access'
Plans for the installation of CCTV to deter "illegal access" and vandalism at a storm damaged pier have been Tyneside Council's planning department approved the Port of Tyne's proposals to erect a 26ft (8m) post and camera at the Grade II listed South Pier in South pier and its lighthouse sustained severe damage during Storm Babet in October 2023, and has been closed ever Port of Tyne, which previously warned that continued vandalism could delay repairs, listed incidents in its application including damage to lighthouse windows and the starting of fires that tripped the power supply. Another incident saw the removal of a cable for its copper, resulting in the lighthouse being without power for a number of months. The plans were approved on Tuesday, the Local Democracy Reporting Service were no objections from the Labour-led council's historic environment officer and it was argued "the public benefit of the CCTV installation would outweigh the harm" to the pier and watch Pier in Tynemouth was also damaged in the same storm and has been the target of vandals, the Port of Tyne previously said. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Sark marks 460 years of Royal Charter
Sark has been marking 460 years of the island's connection to the English of Sark, Christopher Beaumont, said Sark Fief Day dated back to 6 August 1565 when Helier de Carteret, the Seigneur of St Ouen in Jersey, obtained permission from Queen Elizabeth I to occupy Sark as a royal fief and add it to his it was formally settled it had been the home to groups including monks, French armed forces and Beaumont said: "In our own right, we are a jurisdiction ourselves, and all of that was created in 1565 and we've managed to maintain that ever since." He said the last time the event was "celebrated in style" was 10 years ago."I suspect the next big one will be the 500th in 40 years time, and we'll all have to defer to somebody else for that one," he said.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Inclusion of butter in UK recipe for cacio e pepe draws outrage from Italian media
One of the UK's most popular food websites has cooked up a storm in Italy after allegedly botching a recipe for the traditional Roman pasta dish, cacio e pepe, drawing diplomatic representations from the main trade association for Italian restaurateurs. A recipe on Good Food, formerly owned by the BBC, which continues to licence the web address – described cacio e pepe, a culinary institution in the Italian capital, as a 'store cupboard favourite' that could easily be whipped up for 'a speedy lunch' using 'four simple ingredients – spaghetti, pepper, parmesan and butter'. The notion that making cacio e pepe is easy was bad enough, but the presence of parmesan cheese and butter has been deemed a cardinal sin. Traditional cacio e pepe contains three ingredients: pasta (usually tonnarelli, a type of spaghetti), pecorino Romano cheese and black pepper. Such is the fury, Fiepet Confesercenti, an association that represents restaurants in Italy, said it would demand a correction from the website in order to 'safeguard this iconic dish'. Furthermore, it has taken up the issue with the British embassy in Rome. The recipe appears to have been on the site for about three months, but despite a couple of readers calling out the butter blunder, it only now seems to have caught the attention of Fiepet Confesercenti, which was also offended by the brief preparation video that runs alongside it showing a chunk of butter being put into a pan. Claudio Pica, the president of the Rome unit for Fiepet Confesercenti, said the association was 'astonished' to see the recipe on such a popular and esteemed food site, adding that letters have been sent to Immediate Media, the site's owner, and the British ambassador to Rome, Edward Llewellyn. 'This iconic dish, traditionally from Rome and the Lazio region, has been a staple of Italian cuisine for years, so much so it has been replicated even beyond Italy's borders,' he added. 'We regret to contradict the historic and authoritative British media, but the original recipe for cacio e pepe excludes parmesan and butter. There are not four ingredients, but three: pasta, pepper and pecorino.' Pica admitted that while some chefs may dabble with the recipe, the main concern is that the website has misled readers by presenting the dish as the original. The Guardian has asked Immediate Media for comment. Italian newspapers have had a field day over the controversy, with the Rome-based Il Messaggero writing: 'Paraphrasing the famous British anthem 'God save the king', Rome restaurateurs are now saying: 'God save the cacio e pepe'.' The Guardian's 2021 recipe for the dish by the food writer Felicity Cloake comprises just pasta, pepper and pecorino. It is not the first time the foreign media has become embroiled in an Italian food row. In 2021, the New York Times published a tinkered-with recipe for another classic Roman pasta dish, carbonara, which included tomatoes. While the description of the recipe, called 'smoky tomato carbonara' and created by Kay Chun, did warn readers that it was not the original, Coldiretti, the Italian farmers' association, lashed out, saying the alteration was 'the tip of the iceberg in the falsification of traditional Italian dishes'. Given that Chun's recipe was again published in 2023, it appears the newspaper was unperturbed by the indignation. Italians often mock foreigners for their interpretation of an Italian recipe, especially pineapple on pizza or mixing pasta with chicken. The New York Times also provoked outrage in the UK in 2018 after publishing a recipe in which it described the yorkshire pudding, a roast dinner staple, as a 'large, fluffy pancake' that was excellent for 'breakfast, brunch, lunch and dessert any time of the year'.
