logo
Elderly British man says Taliban jail is ‘nearest thing to hell'

Elderly British man says Taliban jail is ‘nearest thing to hell'

Yahoo05-04-2025

A 79-year-old British man imprisoned by the Taliban alongside rapists and murderers has described his situation as 'the nearest thing to hell.'
Peter Reynolds, and his wife, Barbie, 75, were captured by the Taliban in February while returning to their home in central Afghanistan.
In a voice note provided to The Telegraph by his family, Mr Reynolds, speaking from the notorious Pul-e-Charkhi prison in Kabul, described his situation as 'the nearest thing to hell'.
He said: 'I am learning a lot about the belly, the underbelly of Afghanistan. The prison guards shout all the time and beat people. We just witnessed a guy being beaten just now by one of the wardens outside in the exercise yard.
'It's a horrible atmosphere, the nearest thing to hell I can imagine.'
The Reynolds, who have lived in Afghanistan for 18 years and have joint UK-Afghan citizenship, are being held separately in the Afghan capital.
The couple were married in Kabul in 1970, before war ravaged the capital, and later set up Rebuild, a company that provides education and training programmes for government and non-government organisations.
Mr Reynolds said: 'The other thing is, I've been joined up with rapists - by my ankles, ankle-cuffs, handcuffs - murderers and just even before this call, there is a guy here who killed his wife and three children, shouting away, a demon-possessed man.
'These things are an utter disgrace and shame so I'm appalled.'
Their family urged David Lammy last week to publicly condemn the Taliban and demand the couple's release.
Their relationship began at Bath University in 1968, when Mrs Reynolds, who grew up in India and spent summers in Afghanistan, first set foot in England.
Since the couple's arrest, their home has been ransacked and their house staff interrogated.
The Telegraph has learnt, however, that they are victims of a deepening internal power struggle within the Islamist regime.
Their arrest was ordered by a commander linked to the Haqqani network, a powerful Taliban faction led by Sirajuddin Haqqani, the interior minister.
The arrests have triggered intense disagreements between Taliban factions in Kabul and Kandahar, with 'heated phone calls' between the two power centres.
The couple decided to remain in the country when the Taliban took power in 2021. Their company's workshops focus on project-based learning and cover communication skills, emotional and social intelligence and conflict resolution.
Sarah Entwistle, the couple's daughter, told The Telegraph that the hardest part for her parents is being separated from each other - the longest they've gone without speaking since becoming sweethearts in the 1960s.
She said: 'We are able to talk to Dad several times a week, and he keeps insisting that his (locked and barred cell) is the VIP suite - because he only has to share a toilet with his interpreter, and they have a bunk bed.
'He says they are given one meal a day, but he's given extra food from the commander's table. He's lost weight, and has had some health scares, but Dad can find light in the darkest of places.'
She explained that her father and his interpreter are allowed to make family calls when 'the rapists, murderers and out of control prisoners are back in their cells.'
She said: 'While the guards scream at the other prisoners, they don't ever shout at Dad. This is because he's earned respect in a system that is terrifying and unpredictable.'
As for her mother, Ms Entwistle said: 'Mum too has found a way to help those around her. She's creating an informal programme for the women in prison to help them with spoken English. While they can read and write, they don't know how to speak it. She's showing a group how to instruct others when she's not around any more.'
'This is who our parents are,' Ms Entwistle added. 'Mum and Dad are still true to themselves in the middle of this—loving people, keeping peace, and creating solutions in one of the very darkest, violent and most hopeless places in the world.
'They understand the power of the Taliban, and the shocking stories around them. But they are literally prepared to sacrifice their lives for the welfare of these people.'
Faye Hall, an American citizen who was detained alongside them, was released last week in a deal cut with senior US officials.
Ms Entwistle told The Telegraph that if American officials were able to free Ms Hall, the Government should be able to free her parents.
She said: 'We will continue to wait in hope that the Taliban will not only release them, but choose to work with them for the good of the country.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer's Quest to Keep Everything from Escalating
Keir Starmer's Quest to Keep Everything from Escalating

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Keir Starmer's Quest to Keep Everything from Escalating

Bloomberg Weekend The UK prime minister is 'gravely concerned' about Israel and Iran, Mali has a mud-brick building problem, and men in finance are suffering from pelvic-floor dysfunction. By Save Welcome to the weekend! This week, the companies behind many of China's most popular AI chatbots disabled some of their services prior to an annual event in which millions of Chinese citizens take part. What was it? Find out with this week's Pointed quiz.

The Shame of Trump's Parade
The Shame of Trump's Parade

Atlantic

timean hour ago

  • Atlantic

The Shame of Trump's Parade

Today—250 years since the Continental Army officially formed to fight for the independence of the American colonies against the British monarchy—marks a milestone in President Donald Trump's effort to politicize the U.S. military. Though they are rare, military parades have happened before in Washington, D.C. For the most part, these have been celebrations of military achievements, such as the end of a war. But today is also Trump's birthday, and what he and his supporters have planned is a celebration of Trump himself. A mark of a free society is that its public institutions, especially its military, represent the body politic and the freedom-enabling equal rights that structure civic life. If service members and the public begin to believe that the military is not neutral but is in fact the servant of MAGA, this will threaten the military's legitimacy and increase the likelihood of violent conflict between the military and the public. Today's events bring us one step closer to this disaster. I have seen the politicization of the military firsthand. Last month, I resigned my tenured position as a philosophy professor at West Point in protest of the dramatic changes the Trump administration is making to academic programs at military-service academies. Following an executive order from January, the Department of Defense banned most discussions of race and gender in the classroom. West Point applied this standard to faculty scholarship as well. As a result, my research agenda—I study the relationship between masculinity and war, among other things—was effectively off limits. I consider what the Trump administration is doing to the military-service academies as a profound violation of the military's political neutrality. That destructive ethos is the same one apparent in the parade scheduled for today. Before Trump was reelected, the Army had planned significant celebrations across the country to mark this day, including the release of a commemorative postage stamp and a visit to the International Space Station by an Army astronaut. But according to The New York Times, arrangements for today's D.C. event, unlike the other plans, began only this year. The day is scheduled to begin with a variety of family-friendly concerts, a meet and greet with NFL players, and military-fitness competitions, all on the National Mall. If all goes to plan, the celebrations will culminate with what organizers are calling a 'grand military parade' that starts near the Pentagon, crosses the Potomac River, and ends near the White House. The parade is anticipated to involve 6,700 active-duty soldiers and a massive display of Army equipment: dozens of M1A1 Abrams tanks and Stryker armored personnel carriers, along with more than 100 other land vehicles, 50 helicopters, and a B-25 bomber. Trump is scheduled to give remarks after the parade and receive a flag delivered from the air by the U.S. Army Parachute Team known as the Golden Knights. A fireworks show is set to follow later tonight. The organizers have made it abundantly clear that today's purpose is to directly laud Trump and his politics. In promotional materials, they tell us, 'Under President Trump's leadership, the Army has been restored to strength and readiness.' They credit his 'America First agenda' for military pay increases, enlarged weapons stockpiles, new technologies, and improvements in recruitment, declaring that he has 'ensured our soldiers have the tools and support they need to win on any battlefield.' Monica Crowley, the State Department's chief of protocol and a former Fox News host, went on Steve Bannon's podcast WarRoom to say that the concurrence of the U.S. Army's anniversary and Trump's birthday is 'providential.' She called it 'meant to be. Hand of God, for sure.' She added, 'It is really a gift, and we want to be sure that we celebrate in a manner that is fitting, not just of this extraordinary president but of our extraordinary country.' She also expressed hope that the crowd would serenade the president with 'Happy Birthday.' Clearly, Trump isn't merely the guest of honor; he is the reason for the party. During his first administration, members of Trump's own Cabinet often thwarted his efforts to corrupt the Pentagon. This time, Trump has appointed a secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, who is willing to tear down the boundaries separating politics and the management of national defense. Trump and Hegseth claim to be purging the military of politicization instilled by previous administrations and resetting the DOD around the nonpartisan matter of readiness for war. But in reality, they have used this rationale as a cover to insert an unprecedented level of political partisanship into the military. Other events in recent months have pointed in this same direction. For instance, in February, the administration fired the top lawyers for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. The only meaningful justification given for the move was Hegseth's claim that the fired lawyers might be roadblocks to the president's agenda—a frightening admission. In January, the administration banned transgender people from serving in the military, not because they allegedly pose a threat to unit cohesion or because their medical treatment is unusually expensive, but because they are supposedly bad people ('not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member'). At present, transgender soldiers who have met all performance standards are being discharged simply because of the administration's bigotry against them. The administration has also inserted its politics into all the military-service academies—the reason I left West Point last month. Trump and Hegseth have denied the validity of ideas that are taken seriously in a variety of disciplines and banned them from the classroom, including, as I noted above, matters pertaining to race and gender. Books and other works, most of which are by women and people of color, have been removed from the curriculum. The academic programs of the service academies are now structured around the Trump administration's ideological worldview. Faculty and cadets wonder if they are allowed to entertain perspectives inconsistent with the administration's politics. In May, Hegseth led an evangelical prayer service in the Pentagon's auditorium. Standing at a lectern with the Department of Defense seal, Hegseth led the audience in prayer to 'our Lord and savior, Jesus Christ.' The main speaker at this service was Hegseth's pastor, Brooks Potteiger, of the Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, in Goodlettsville, Tennessee. This church restricts all leadership positions to men, declares homosexuality immoral, and asserts that women should not serve in combat. Of course, there is nothing wrong with a secretary of defense acknowledging his religious faith. What's objectionable is the use of his authority to push his personal religious views on subordinates, especially as the director of a major institution of the secular state. The president now routinely speaks to uniformed service members in his red MAGA hat, using his trademark rhetoric centering himself and belittling, even demonizing, his critics. He openly suggests a special alliance between him and the military. At Fort Bragg on Tuesday, for instance, Trump encouraged uniformed soldiers to cheer his political agenda and boo his enemies. This is all extremely dangerous. Keeping the military a politically neutral servant of the constitutional order, not of the president or his political ideology, is vital to ensuring the security of civil society. Up until a week ago, the blurring of the boundaries between the administration's ideology and the military had not yet manifested as an attempt to employ the military directly on Trump's—or the Republican Party's—behalf. The steps taken until that point had been mostly symbolic. (The one possible exception was the deployment of the military at the southern border in what is essentially a law-enforcement matter.) But these symbolic expressions of military politicization have paved the way for that endgame—presidential orders that deploy the military for directly partisan ends. In just the past week, the Trump administration responded to protests against the enforcement of his immigration policies with military deployments. The likelihood that the administration will try to use the military against its political opponents is now very high. If that comes to pass, we will then learn just how successful Trump's efforts to politicize the military have been.

Police given extra powers after town centre trouble
Police given extra powers after town centre trouble

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Police given extra powers after town centre trouble

Police have been given extra powers after a rise in criminal damage, abuse of shop staff and dangerous bike riding in a town centre. Until Sunday night they will be able to arrest anyone who comes back into part of Kirkby, Merseyside, if they have previously been told to leave. Officers will also be able to seize any items that they suspect might be used to commit antisocial behaviour. Merseyside Police Insp Andy Robinson said the powers were not given or used lightly, but were necessary after a recent increase in trouble-making in the area. The area covered by the Section 60 dispersal order includes everywhere within a neighbourhood bordered by County Road, Webster Drive, Cherryfield Drive, and Hall Lane. The order runs until 01:00 BST on Sunday. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store