logo
Sentence for ex-Goldman banker in 1MDB case ‘too short': Malaysian minister

Sentence for ex-Goldman banker in 1MDB case ‘too short': Malaysian minister

Al Jazeera4 days ago

Malaysia's Commodities Minister Johari Abdul Ghani has called a two-year prison sentence for a former Goldman Sachs banker implicated in the multibillion-dollar 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) corruption scandal too lenient.
On Thursday, New York judge Margo Brodie sentenced German-born banker Tim Leissner, a former chairman for Goldman Sachs in Southeast Asia, to two years in prison for his role in the scandal.
Leissner, who previously pleaded guilty to US bribery and money laundering counts, faced a maximum sentence of 25 years.
During sentencing, Brodie described Leissner's conduct as 'brazen and audacious'. Visibly emotional as he read out a statement in court, Leissner offered a 'sincere apology to the people of Malaysia' and said he 'deeply regret[s]' his actions.
Ghani, chairman of the 1MDB asset recovery taskforce, said on Friday that Leissner should have been given the maximum jail sentence as he was 'one of the masterminds' of the scheme, which saw billions of dollars in public money siphoned off Malaysia's investment fund.
The 1MDB fund was created as a vehicle to attract foreign investment for energy and infrastructure projects in Malaysia, but was pilfered by officials and bankers.
Malaysian and US authorities estimate that around $4.5bn was stolen in total, in an elaborate scheme that spanned the globe and implicated high-level officials, including former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, who was jailed in 2022.
In 2018, Leissner pleaded guilty to bribery and money laundering counts in relation to his role in the scandal, including paying roughly $2bn in bribes to foreign officials and splitting another $1bn in kickbacks with others in the scheme.
A US Department of Justice spokesperson said he will begin serving a 24-month sentence in September.
US prosecutors had called for leniency due to the 'extraordinary' assistance he had provided the probe. Leissner served as the star witness in the 2022 trial of his former colleague and Goldman Sachs Managing Director Roger Ng.
Judge Brodie sentenced Malaysian national Ng to 10 years' imprisonment in March 2023 for, among other crimes, 'conspiring to launder billions of dollars embezzled' from 1MDB and paying more than $1.6bn in bribes.
Leissner also provided details regarding the involvement of Low Taek Jho, the Malaysian financier known as 'Jho Low', who stands accused of stealing billions from the fund but remains at large.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off
South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off

Al Jazeera

time6 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off

It all boils down to one thing – Yoon Suk-yeol's botched martial law decree. The former president, who narrowly won the last presidential election in 2022, was supposed to serve for five years. But his declaration of martial law on December 3 – which brought armed soldiers onto Seoul's streets, evoking traumatic memories of past military rule – prompted the opposition-controlled National Assembly to impeach him that same month. The Constitutional Court upheld the decision on April 4 in a move that obliged the country's caretaker leaders to call a presidential election within 60 days. Yoon has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing. He has described his decree as a legitimate act of governance meant to raise public awareness of the danger of the opposition-controlled National Assembly, which obstructed his agenda and impeached top officials. The decree lasted only six hours as enough legislators, including from Yoon's party, managed to enter the parliament house and vote it down. It unleashed political chaos, however, including mass protests, a riot at a courthouse and three caretaker leaders in six months.

South Korea's presidential election aims to restore democratic credentials
South Korea's presidential election aims to restore democratic credentials

Al Jazeera

time19 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

South Korea's presidential election aims to restore democratic credentials

Seoul, South Korea – After six hours of emergency martial law, hundreds of days of protests, violence at a Seoul court and the eventual impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol, South Korea is now hours away from choosing a new leader in the hope of restoring stability to an unsettled nation. From 6am to 8pm on Tuesday (21:00 to 11:00 GMT), South Koreans will vote for one of five presidential candidates in a race led largely by the opposition Democratic Party's Lee Jae-myung. He is followed in the polls by the governing People Power Party candidate Kim Moon-soo. The election – involving 44.39 million eligible voters – is expected to see either of these two top contenders replace Yoon. The expelled former president last week attended his fifth court hearing where he faces charges of leading an insurrection and abusing power due to his failed imposition of martial law on December 3. If convicted, Yoon could face a maximum penalty of life in prison or even the death sentence. Participation in the election is predicted to be at an all-time high amid the political turmoil resulting from the brief imposition of military rule, which still resonates in every corner of society and has sharply divided the country along political lines. There are those who still support Yoon and those who vehemently oppose his martial law decision. The Democratic Party's Lee is currently the clear frontrunner, with Gallup Korea's latest poll on May 28 placing his support at 49 percent, compared with People Power Party Kim's 36 percent, as the favourite to win. Early voting, which ended on Friday, had the second-highest voter turnout in the country's history, at 34.74 percent, while overseas voting from 118 countries reached a record high of 79.5 percent. In the last presidential election in 2022, Yoon narrowly edged out Lee in the closest presidential contest in South Korea's history. After his crushing defeat in 2022 to a voting margin of just 0.73 percentage points, Lee now has another chance at the top office, and to redeem his political reputation. About a month ago, South Korea's Supreme Court determined that Lee had spread falsehoods during his 2022 presidential bid in violation of election law. In addition to surviving a series of bribery charges during his tenure as mayor of Seongnam and governor of Gyeonggi Province, which he claimed were politically motivated, Lee also survived a stabbing attack to his neck during a news conference in Busan last year. Fortunately for Lee, the courts have agreed to postpone further hearings of his ongoing trials until after the election. On the campaign trail this time around, Lee addressed his supporters from behind bulletproof glass, with snipers positioned on rooftops, scanning the crowds for potential threats, as counterterrorism units patrolled on foot. Lee has also been joined on his campaign by conservative lawmakers, his former opponents, who have publicly supported his run for office numerous times during the past month, seeing him as a path back to political stability. People Power Party candidate Kim was served an especially hard blow when his parliamentary colleague, Kim Sang-wook, defected from the party in early May to join Lee's Democratic Party. According to polling data from South Korea's leading media outlet Hankyoreh, only 55 percent of conservative voters who supported Yoon in the 2022 election said they would back the People Power Party's Kim this time around. While such shifts represent the crisis that the mainstream conservative party is facing after the political fallout from Yoon's botched martial law plan and removal from office, it also testifies to Lee's appeal to both moderate and conservative voters. 'The events of the martial law, insurrection attempt and impeachment process have dealt a heavy blow to our democracy,' said Lim Woon-taek, a sociology professor at Keimyung University and a former member of the Presidential Commission on Policy Planning. 'So, the new president will receive a heavy burden when assuming the president's seat,' Lim told Al Jazeera. Youth unemployment, social inequality and climate change have also become pressing issues that Yoon's administration failed to tackle. According to recent research, South Korea's non-regular workers, including contract employees and part-timers, accounted for 38 percent of all wage and salary workers last year. Lee has promised to champion business-friendly policies, and concentrate on investment in research and development and artificial intelligence, while refraining from focusing on divisive social issues such as the gender wars. His stance has shifted considerably from his time moving up the political ranks when he promoted left-wing ideas, such as a universal basic income. Events on the night of the declaration of martial law on December 3, also helped cement Lee's image as a political freedom fighter. A former human rights lawyer, Lee was livestreamed scaling the walls of the National Assembly as the military surrounded the compound, where he rallied fellow legislators to vote and strike down Yoon's decision to mobilise the military. Among Lee's most central campaign pledges has been his promise to bring to justice those involved in Yoon's martial law scheme and tighten controls on a future president's ability to do the same. Lee also wants to see a constitutional amendment that would allow presidents to serve two four-year terms, a change from the current single-term five years. While Lee's closest challenger, Kim, has agreed on such policies and made sure to distance himself from Yoon, the former labour-activist-turned-hardline-conservative has also said the former president's impeachment went too far. The election also unfolds as United States President Donald Trump has proposed a series of tariffs on key South Korean exports such as steel, semiconductors and automobiles. In the face of those threats, Lee has promised to stimulate demand and growth, while Kim has promised to ease business regulations. Kim also emphasised his plan to hold an immediate summit meeting with Trump to discuss the tariffs. Lee, on the other hand, has promised a more pragmatic foreign policy agenda which would maintain relations with the US administration but also prioritise 'national interests', such as bridging closer relations with neighbouring China and Russia. On North Korea, Lee is determined to ease tensions that have risen to unprecedented heights in recent years, while Kim has pledged to build up the country's military capability to counter Pyongyang, and wants stronger security support from the US. Lee has also promised to relocate the National Assembly and the presidential office from Seoul to Sejong City, which would be designated as the country's new administrative capital, continuing a process of city-planning rebalancing that has met a series of setbacks in recent years. Another major issue that Keimyung University's Lim hopes the future leader will focus more on is the climate situation. 'Our country is considered a climate villain, and we will face future restrictions in our exports if we don't address the immediate effects of not keeping limits on the amount of our hazardous outputs,' Lim said. 'The future of our country will really rest on this one question: whether the next president will draw out such issues like the previous administration or face the public sphere and head straight into the main issues that are deteriorating our society.' The results of Tuesday's vote are expected to emerge either late on Tuesday or in the early hours of Wednesday morning. In the 2022 election, Yoon was proclaimed the winner at 4:40am the morning after election day. With Lee the clear frontrunner in this election, the outcome could be evident as early as Tuesday night. But enhanced surveillance at polling stations this year due to concerns raised about counting errors may be a factor in slowing down any early announcement of the country's next president.

South Korea's snap presidential election 2025: All you need to know
South Korea's snap presidential election 2025: All you need to know

Al Jazeera

time2 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

South Korea's snap presidential election 2025: All you need to know

Voters in South Korea are choosing a new president to replace Yoon Suk-yeol who was impeached and removed from office over his brief and ill-fated martial law bid in December. The snap election on June 3 is pivotal, with implications for South Korea's democratic future, as well as its ties with China, the United States and its nuclear armed neighbour, North Korea. The winner – who will serve a single term of five-years – faces the task of addressing the fallout from the martial law decree, which lasted six hours but unleashed political chaos, including mass protests, a riot at a court and three caretaker leaders in six months. The new president will also have to tackle a deepening economic downturn and manage tariff negotiations with the US, which has imposed a 25 percent levy on key exports such as steel, aluminium and automobiles. Here's what you need to know about the June 3 poll: There are six candidates on the ballot, but the main contenders are Lee Jae-myung of the opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DP), and Kim Moon-soo of the governing conservative People Power Party (PPP). Lee, 61, a human rights lawyer-turned-politician, is the clear frontrunner. A Gallup Korea poll on May 28 showed 49 percent of respondents favoured the liberal candidate, while 36 percent said they would vote for Kim, 73, a staunch conservative who served as labour minister in Yoon's government. Trailing in third place is Lee Jun-seok of the conservative New Reform Party, at 9 botched martial law bid has cast a shadow over the race. It put Lee, who lost the last election to Yoon in 2022, back on track for the presidency. The leader of the opposition was instrumental in foiling the president's plan. On December 3, when Yoon declared martial law – in a bid to quash the Democratic Party-dominated parliament, which he portrayed as 'anti-state' and a 'den of criminals' – Lee rushed to the National Assembly and climbed the walls of the building to avoid the hundreds of armed troops deployed there. He livestreamed his exploit, urging supporters to come to the parliament and prevent the arrest of legislators. Despite the troop blockades, enough legislators managed to make it to the parliament and vote to end martial law. The assembly went on to impeach Yoon on December 14. 'This election would not have happened if not for the declaration of martial law by Yoon Suk-yeol and his impeachment,' said Youngshik Bong, research fellow at Yonsei University in Seoul. 'These issues have sucked in all others like a vortex. Everything else is marginal.' On the campaign trail, Lee has pledged to bring to justice anyone involved in Yoon's failed bid and has also promised to introduce tighter controls on the president's ability to declare martial the opposition leader, has also proposed constitutional changes to introduce a four-year, two-term presidency – at the moment, South Korean presidents are only allowed a single term of five years. Lee has also argued for a run-off system for presidential elections, whereby if no candidate secures 50 percent of the popular vote, the top two candidates take on each other in a second round. 'A four-year, two-term presidency would allow for a midterm evaluation of the administration, reinforcing responsibility,' he wrote on Facebook, calling for a constitutional amendment to enable the change. 'Meanwhile, adopting a run-off election system would enhance the legitimacy of democratic governance and help reduce unnecessary social conflict.' The PPP's Kim has accepted Lee's proposals for a constitutional amendment to allow a two-term presidency, but has suggested shortening each term to three martial law bid, however, has left the PPP in crisis and disarray. Infighting plagued the embattled party as it tried to choose the impeached president's successor. Although Kim won the party primary, its leaders tried to replace him with former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo. On the eve of the party's campaign launch, they cancelled Kim's candidacy, only to reinstate him after party members opposed the move. Bong, at Yonsei University, said the infighting as well as divisions in the conservative camp over Yoon's decree has cost it support. 'Kim Moon-soo has not set his position clearly on the martial law declaration,' Bong said. 'He has not distanced himself from the legacy of Yoon, but at the same time, he has not made it clear whether he believes the declaration of martial law was a violation of the constitution. So the PPP has not really had enough energy to mobilise its support bases.' Still, Kim appears to have eroded what was a more than 20 percent point gap with Lee at the start of the campaign. But he has failed to convince the third placed contender – Lee Jun-seok – to abandon his bid and back the PPP to improve its chances. The New Reform Party's Lee, who is 40 years old, said on Tuesday there would be 'no candidate merger' with 'those responsible for the emergency martial law'. Although policy debates have taken a backseat, the outcome of the election could reorient South Korea's approach towards North Korea. The two neighbours are technically in a state of war as the Korean War of 1950-1953 ended in an armistice rather than a peace treaty, and ties between them are at a new low. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has called for rewriting his country's constitution to scrap the longstanding goal of unifying the war-divided nations and described Seoul as an 'invariable principal enemy'. Pyongyang has also severed communication lines, and the two countries have clashed over balloons and drones carrying rubbish and propaganda. Lee of the Democratic Party has promised to ease tensions if elected, including by restoring a military hotline, and committed to maintaining the goal of eliminating nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula. Kim, however, has backed Yoon's hardline approach, promising to secure 'pre-emptive deterrence' through tools such as ballistic missiles and the redeployment of US tactical nuclear weapons. He has said he would also seek a path for the country to pursue nuclear armament by securing the right to reprocess nuclear fuel, a key step towards building atomic weapons. The two candidates also differ in their approach to the US, the country's most important security ally, and to China, its biggest trading partner. Lee, who espouses what he calls a pragmatic foreign policy, has said it is crucial to maintain South Korea's alliance with the US and pursue security cooperation with Japan. However, he has pledged to prioritise 'national interests' and said there's 'no need to unnecessarily antagonise China or Russia'.Kim, meanwhile, has questioned Lee's commitment to the US-South Korea alliance, and has promised to hold an immediate summit meeting with US President Donald Trump if elected to discuss tariffs. 'I have a very friendly and trusting relationship,' with the US leader, Kim has said. He has also indicated a willingness to discuss sharing more of the cost of stationing US troops in the country, something Trump has demanded for years. Lee Sung-yoon, board member of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, described the policy differences between the rival camps as 'immutable' and referred to earlier comments by the Democratic Party's Lee, because of which some view him as being soft on China and Russia. 'In the past, Lee has said South Korea should not get involved in China's posture towards Taiwan, and just say thank you to both Beijing and Taiwan and stay out of the conflict. He has said of the trilateral defensive drills among US, Japan and South Korea as 'a defence disaster' and an 'extremely pro-Japanese act'. And more than once he has said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy incited Russia to invade because he was a political novice who said unfortunate things.' The analyst said Lee has – over the course of the election campaign – tried to walk back some of his statements in a bid to appeal to more moderate voters. However, 'I would venture to guess that people sitting in the councils of power in Washington, DC, or Tokyo or in Kyiv, Ukraine, are not overly jubilant at the prospect of a Lee administration,' he said. Koreans overseas have already cast their ballots, and early voting took place on Thursday and Friday. Large numbers of people turned out for the early vote, including the two frontrunners. According to the National Election Commission, some 44.4 million people in the country of 52 million are eligible to vote. On election day, which is a public holiday, polling stations will open at 6am (22:00 GMT) and close at 8pm (20:00 GMT). Counting will begin immediately and the winner will be known that evening or in the early hours of the following day. The candidate who receives the most votes will be deemed the winner, even if they don't win 50 percent of the votes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store