Labour councillor's cutting throats comment at rally ‘out of character'
A video of Jones addressing crowds in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest.
Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the now-suspended councillor said: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.'
He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd.
Suspended Labour councillor Ricky Jones, hiding behind his hat in a car as he left Snaresbrook Crown Court on Tuesday (Yui Mok/PA)
Giving evidence on Thursday, Jones's friend Kevin Courtney, a retired teacher and former joint general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'I had not heard him say those words or anything in any way similar to that.
'I think they are wrong. I was surprised that Ricky said them… I think it is completely out of character.'
Both men have campaigned for anti-racism group Stand Up To Racism and have been at rallies together before, the court heard.
Mr Courtney had been at the August 7 rally in Walthamstow, had met Jones and the pair had taken a selfie together, but Mr Courtney told the court he did not hear what Jones had said and only became aware of it when he saw videos later.
Asked by Hossein Zahir KC, defending, whether Jones had ever encouraged any form of violence, Mr Courtney said: 'No, it was a complete shock when I saw that video.'
'Ricky's speech was wrong, but it didn't fit at all with the mood of the gathering that we were at. The mood was peaceful…Ricky's words just didn't gel with that at all.'
The retired teacher added: 'Ricky's words didn't fit with that (mood), therefore people didn't respond to them as anything they should do, it just didn't fit with that at all.'
The demonstration on August 7 (PA)
The August 7 demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau, jurors were told.
It followed the nationwide violent disorder that occurred last summer after the Southport murders.
Before the protest, the councillor had been warned to stay away from such demonstrations by the Labour Party.
Jones previously told the court he would 'have attended anyway' despite this, adding: 'It's important for us to turn up to demonstrations like this to support our communities.'
The 58-year-old, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night.
Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder.
The trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Millions more Britons now worried about cost of living than when Labour came to power
Millions more Britons are now worried about the cost of living than when Labour came to power, new Office for National Statistics polling suggests. Almost six in ten adults said their cost of living has increased in the last month - higher than the 45 per cent of people who said this when Labour won the General Election in July 2024. The most commonly reported reason for a rise in the cost of living was increases in the price of food shopping, with 95 per cent of people saying this had driven their outgoings up. Some 57 per cent said the price of energy bills had increased their cost of living and 45 per cent said the price of fuel had done so, with this proportion increasing from 38 per cent the month before. Younger adults - aged under 50 - were more likely to give the cost of living as an important issue for them while older adults - aged over 50 - were more likely say that the NHS is important to them. The cost of living was the most reported issue among those aged 16 to 29 years - with 86 per cent saying this - and 30 to 49 years with 92 per cent of people in this age group raising living costs. The NHS was most commonly reported by those aged 50 to 69 years - with 87 per cent saying the health service is an important issue - and 70 years and over with 85 per cent of people in this age group raising the NHS. The ONS carries out monthly polling on public opinions and social trends to get insights into the daily life of the British public and track how this changes over time. The latest research was carried out between July 2 and 27 and sampled 9,564 households, with results representative of the population. When asked about the important issues facing the UK in July, the most commonly reported issue was the cost of living, with 85 per cent of people citing this. Some 81 per cent said the NHS was an important issue and 67 per cent said the economy. Over the past three years, the proportion citing the cost of living and the economy have declined from 93 per cent and 79 per cent respectively in October 2022, while the proportion citing the NHS has remained largely stable. The proportion reporting that their cost of living has increased has been declining since April this year, when 72 per cent said their outgoings were going up. In July 2024 45 per cent said their cost of living had increased but this had risen to 59 per cent in July this year. The proportion of people saying immigration and crime are important issues has increased over the years, the ONS said. In October 2022, 43 per cent of adults cited immigration and 49 per cent cited crime as important issues facing the UK, but these have now risen to 63 per cent and 58 per cent respectively.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Tories and Reform decry two-tier justice as suspended Labour councillor cleared
Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court accused of the offence after he described demonstrators as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. He was cleared on Friday. Nigel Farage and shadow home secretary Chris Philp both pointed to the idea of 'two-tier justice' in relation to the case. This is another outrageous example of two-tier justice. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 15, 2025 Mr Philp compared the case to that of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' and 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks last year. In a post on X, Mr Philp said: 'The development of two tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming.' Ex-Reform chairman Zia Yusuf also referred to Connolly's case, and said that 'two tier justice in this country is out of control'. Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X, which meant she did not face a trial. In Jones' case, a jury deliberated for just over half an hour before they found him not guilty. A video showing Jones addressing crowds on Hoe Street in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year went viral on social media after the protest, which had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It is astonishing that Labour councillor Ricky Jones, who was caught on video calling for throats to be slit, is let off scot free – whereas Lucy Connolly got 31 months prison for posting something no worse. The development of two tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming.… — Chris Philp MP (@CPhilpOfficial) August 15, 2025 The suspended councillor said in the clip: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jurors deliberated for just over 30 minutes and found him not guilty on Friday. Jones, who wore a navy blue suit with a white shirt and pale pink tie in the dock, was seen mouthing 'thank-you' at the jurors. Family and supporters hugged each other before Jones, who declined to comment on the verdict, was driven out of the court grounds in a car. The 58-year-old, who at the time was also employed as a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association (TSSA) union, was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton police station that night. Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by Labour the day after the incident. It is understood that a party investigation remains ongoing, and its outcome will decide what happens to his membership. A spokesperson for the party said at the time that his behaviour 'was completely unacceptable and it will not be tolerated'. Giving evidence in his trial, Jones said his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. Before he made the comment, jurors were shown video where he said to crowds: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays. 'They don't give a shit about who they hurt.' He told the court he was 'appalled' by political violence, adding: 'I've always believed the best way to make people realise who you are and what you are is to do it peacefully.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Robin McAlpine: Why I won't be reading Nicola Sturgeon's book
Not because I couldn't be fair-minded but because I wasn't sure everyone would think me fair-minded on the topic. But really, that wasn't my main reason for saying no. Much more to the point, I simply do not like political autobiographies and think it is an actively unhelpful genre. I do not read them and I'm not about to start. So, they asked me to explain why. The 'rapid memoir' is now a fundamental part of politics. A successful leader will get a book deal shortly after leaving office. Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss – they've all had a shot (Alex Salmond and Theresa May did something slightly different). Nicola Sturgeon at the launch of her memoir, Frankly (Image: PA) As someone who towered over Scottish politics for nearly a decade, there is no question Sturgeon has earned her book. But honestly, I wish none of them had bothered. I can't think of a single useful thing we learned from any of them. There is a simple reason for this. All long-form writing involves an author 'selling you' a story. They want you to believe in their thesis (non-fiction, biography), to buy into their plot (fiction) or to find their lives interesting (autobiography). In every case, the story serves the reader. Only in the political autobiography does the story exist to serve the author. A retired footballer doesn't relive all his key games trying to persuade you the referee robbed him or it was an unfortunate gust of wind and actually he was a better footballer than you thought he was. That's what political autobiographies do. READ MORE: BBC Scotland slammed over 'farcical' Debate Night impartiality ruling There are other problems. Politics is basically self-chronicling as you go along. Politicians tell you what they want you to think in real time. By the time Blair was writing his autobiography, we'd heard his justifications for the Iraq War so many times you wondered why he bothered writing them down again. A biography reveals things the subject doesn't want revealed so those can be useful. If you kept diaries, then they can be worth publishing as a contemporary record. Further down the line, the memoir, which is really a historical reflection, can be interesting and enlightening – if the politician is far enough past the events to no longer be trying to spin them. That's the fundamental problem for me. I was a spin doctor when they were still called spin doctors (pager and everything). I've seen so much narrative manipulation and distraction in my time that I am largely immune. I mean, I've been responsible for some of it and I didn't believe that either. Rapid political autobiographies are, without fail, manipulative and a distraction. They are always obsessed with litigating the legacy of the politician concerned. So, if you have a passionate interest in the minutiae of what happened 10 years ago then knock yourself out. I'm much more concerned with today. Across the Western world, there is a crisis in democracy and the public is losing faith in the system. From Gaza to poverty to climate change to AI, democracy seems incapable of stepping up to the challenges of our era. Abusive oligarchy is replacing the social contract. In Scotland, we're stuck in a constitutional impasse. Worse, there doesn't seem to be a single political party in Scotland capable of generating a convincing (never mind inspiring) new generation of leaders. At the moment, the future doesn't look great. All of this is happening right now and so, for me, looking in the rear-view mirror is an indulgence. Let me therefore offer you the two big pieces of advice I give anyone who cares about politics and cares about the future. READ MORE: Kate Forbes not barred from Summerhall, venue confirms First, ignore what they say and focus on the facts. All that matters is what is done, why it is done, how it is done and what happens as a result. Adjectives don't change facts. Second, just like with a magic trick, ignore the manipulation and distraction. Politics is often a game of distraction, but inside that distraction is the thing that counts, the purpose, the important thing. Stay focused on that and never look where the politician is guiding you to look. With Sturgeon, the facts you choose to look at will define your opinion. If it is electoral success, she was pretty impressive; if it is what was done with the power that resulted, she really wasn't. I am a 'power for a purpose' kind of person and for that reason I have long viewed the Sturgeon era as a criminally wasted opportunity. You may feel differently. Either way, anecdotes about tattoos and panic attacks change nothing at all.
