logo
Interpol: Phishing and AI scams fuel cyber threat surge in Asia

Interpol: Phishing and AI scams fuel cyber threat surge in Asia

KUALA LUMPUR: Online scams, phishing, ransomware, and malware continue to be the most prevalent cyber threats across Asia, according to Interpol's Cybercrime Directorate.
Its director Dr Neal Jetton said phishing scams — often disguised as legitimate communications related to relationships, business deals or financial opportunities — had become the leading form of cybercrime globally.
"These scams are not confined to Malaysia or the Asia-Pacific region alone — they represent a global epidemic. In many instances, cybercriminals operating in one part of the world are targeting victims on entirely different continents," he said during the Cyber Games 2025 press conference held here today.
He said that about 75 to 80 per cent of cybercrime worldwide involved a human element, with phishing and social engineering comprising the majority of such incidents.
"We estimate that roughly 80 per cent of all cybercrime stems from human manipulation — whether through emails, messages, or platforms designed to deceive users into divulging sensitive information," he said.
Despite the increasing complexity of cyber threats, Jetton commended Malaysian law enforcement agencies for their commitment and close cooperation with Interpol.
"I've had the privilege of working with the Malaysian police and can confidently say they are diligent, progressive, and well-versed in the evolving threat landscape.
"Naturally, as with any country — including the US and Singapore — there is always room for more resources. However, Malaysia certainly ranks among the regional leaders in this area," he added.
Looking ahead, Jetton said that emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), in-game encryption, and other digital tools could be exploited by cybercriminals.
"Generative AI, for instance, has the potential to significantly enhance phishing and impersonation scams. Law enforcement agencies often struggle to keep pace with such rapid advances, so close collaboration with private sector experts and academia is essential," he said.
He also said Interpol was revitalising its Cybercrime Expert Group — a global platform that will unite specialists from its 196 member countries, including Malaysia.
"We are extending invitations to cybercrime experts from law enforcement agencies worldwide to join this initiative. There will be regular virtual meetings and an in-person session later this year.
"This initiative offers a crucial opportunity for nations to share intelligence, strengthen partnerships, and collectively tackle the evolving threat of cybercrime," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ITMAX new AI growth pillar a positive for company
ITMAX new AI growth pillar a positive for company

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

ITMAX new AI growth pillar a positive for company

PETALING JAYA: ITMax System Bhd 's latest artificial intelligence (AI) initiative, the 'Digital Twin' project, could generate a potential revenue of RM15mil to RM20mil per year. The 'Digital Twin' project involves the creation of a virtual 3D replica of Kuala Lumpur complete with buildings, road infrastructure and even slope analysis. This new growth pillar leverages ITMAX's data collection strengths, said Maybank Investment Bank Research (Maybank IB). The project will enable real-time simulation by authorities to enhance urban planning efficiency and is expected to be completed in December 2025, with monetisation targeted for financial year 2026 (FY26). After its meeting with ITMAX, Maybank IB came away feeling positive on the prospects of its core CCTV offering and its latest AI-enabled growth pillar. The research house maintains its FY25-FY27 earnings forecast. It retains its 'buy' rating on the stock with a target price of RM4.50. The shares closed at RM3.71 at the time of writing. The risk factors cited include the loss of subsisting contracts with the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to another competitor. It also includes higher-than-expected cost drag related to its expansionary initiatives, and a significant reduction in DBKL's operating budget that may impede continuity of existing contracts, as well as potential variation orders. However, ITMAX remains the research house's top Malaysian software pick for its robust growth offering and leading position as Malaysia's go-to smart city player. Having thus far secured contracts for 1,640 CCTVs across four Greater Johor Baru (GJB) districts, Maybank IB understands that Johor has adopted a single supplier policy for its smart city infra. This implies a 'when' rather than 'if' scenario for ITMAX securing CCTV contracts for the remaining 12 districts in the state. ITMAX is already in active discussions with Pengerang, Batu Pahat and Muar. The four GJB districts are also looking to increase CCTV installations ahead of a ramp-up in the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone economic activity. Maybank IB currently imputes a modest 2,000 CCTVs in Johor in FY25/FY26, but based on its sensitivity analysis, every additional 1,000 CCTV units installed in Johor could uplift ITMAX's core earnings by about 2.4% to 3.6% for FY25-FY27. Outside Johor, ITMAX'S CCTV prospects appear equally bright. DBKL has mandated for Kuala Lumpur to have 20,000 CCTVs by end-2028, implying a minimum 10,000 additional CCTVs over the next three years, which has been included in its forecasts.

Appeals Court set Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law
Appeals Court set Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law

The Sun

time14 hours ago

  • The Sun

Appeals Court set Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In Sept 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective.

Court to rule Aug 19 on activist's challenge to CMA provision
Court to rule Aug 19 on activist's challenge to CMA provision

The Sun

time14 hours ago

  • The Sun

Court to rule Aug 19 on activist's challenge to CMA provision

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In Sept 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store