German interior minister seeks direct migrant deportation deal with Taliban
In August, Germany resumed flying convicted criminals of Afghan nationality to their home country, after pausing deportations following the Taliban's takeover in August 2021, with the support of what Berlin said were 'key regional partners.'
Germany does not recognize the Taliban government as legitimate and has no official diplomatic ties with it.
'My idea is that we make agreements directly with Afghanistan to enable repatriations,' Dobrindt said in the interview published online on Wednesday evening.
'We still need third parties to conduct talks with Afghanistan. This cannot remain a permanent solution,' added the politician from the conservative CSU, the Bavarian sister party of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's CDU.
Merz had pledged to deport people to Afghanistan and Syria, as well as halt refugee admission programs for German agencies' former local staff in Afghanistan and suspend family reunification as part of the conservatives' election platform.
Migration was a pivotal issue in February's national elections following the rise of the far right and several high-profile attacks by migrants.
In the interview, Dobrindt said Germany was also in contact with Syria on reaching an agreement on deporting criminals of Syrian nationality.
Syrians and Afghans are the two largest groups of asylum seekers in Germany, with 76,765 Syrians and 34,149 Afghans applying for the status in 2024, according to federal migration office figures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
US Supreme Court sides with Trump in South Sudan deportation fight
WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court again sided with President Donald Trump's administration in a legal fight over deporting migrants to countries other than their own, lifting on Thursday limits a judge had imposed to protect eight men who the government sought to send to politically unstable South Sudan. The court on June 23 put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Brian Murphy's April 18 injunction requiring migrants set for removal to so-called 'third countries' where they have no ties to get a chance to tell officials they are at risk of torture there, while a legal challenge plays out. The court on Thursday granted a Justice Department request to clarify that its June 23 decision also extended to Murphy's separate May 21 ruling that the administration had violated his injunction in attempting to send a group of migrants to South Sudan. The US State Department has urged Americans to avoid the African nation 'due to crime, kidnapping and armed conflict.' Two liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the decision. The court said that Murphy should now 'cease enforcing the April 18 injunction through the May 21 remedial order.' Murphy's May 21 order mandating further procedures for the South Sudan-destined migrants prompted the US government to keep the migrants at a military base in Djibouti. Murphy also clarified at the time that non-US citizens must be given at least 10 days to raise a claim that they fear for their safety. After the Supreme Court lifted Murphy's April injunction on June 23, the judge promptly ruled that his May 21 order 'remains in full force and effect.' Calling that ruling by the judge a 'lawless act of defiance,' the Justice Department the next day urged the Supreme Court to clarify that its action applied to Murphy's May 21 decision as well. Murphy's ruling, the Justice Department said in court filings, has stalled its 'lawful attempts to finalize the long-delayed removal of those aliens to South Sudan,' and disrupted diplomatic relations. Its agents are being 'forced to house dangerous criminal aliens at a military base in the Horn of Africa that now lies on the borders of a regional conflict,' it added. Even as it accused the judge of defying the Supreme Court, the administration itself has been accused of violating judicial orders including in the third-country deportation litigation. The administration has said its third-country policy is critical for removing migrants who commit crimes because their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal members dissented from the June 23 decision pausing Murphy's injunction, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor calling it a 'gross abuse' of the court's power that now exposes 'thousands to the risk of torture or death.' After the Department of Homeland Security moved in February to step up rapid deportations to third countries, immigrant rights groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of a group of migrants seeking to prevent their removal to such places without notice and a chance to assert the harms they could face. In March, the administration issued guidance providing that if a third country has given credible diplomatic assurance that it will not persecute or torture migrants, individuals may be deported there 'without the need for further procedures.' Murphy found that the administration's policy of 'executing third-country removals without providing notice and a meaningful opportunity to present fear-based claims' likely violates due process requirements under the US Constitution. Due process generally requires the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. The Justice Department on Tuesday noted in a filing that the administration has received credible diplomatic assurances from South Sudan that the aliens at issue will not be subject to torture.' The Supreme Court has let Trump implement some contentious immigration policies while the fight over their legality continues to play out. In two decisions in May, it let Trump end humanitarian programs for hundreds of thousands of migrants to live and work in the United States temporarily. The justices, however, faulted the administration's treatment of some migrants as inadequate under constitutional due process protections.
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
German Chancellor calls Saudi Crown Prince to discuss regional developments
Saudi Gazette report JEDDAH — Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman received on Thursday a phone call from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. During the call, they reviewed bilateral relations and ways to further enhance and promote the relations in various fields. The leaders also discussed recent developments and efforts being made to strengthen security and stability in the region.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Saudi crown prince receives phone call from German chancellor
RIYADH: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman received a phone call from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, Saudi Press Agency reported. During the call, Saudi-German relations and ways to strengthen them in a number of areas were discussed. Important developments and efforts made to enhance security and stability in the region were also discussed during the call, SPA said.
