CMOs at Cannes Lions talk about how AI is reshaping marketing and the connection to customers
This article is part of " CMO Insider," a series on marketing leadership and innovation.
The convergence of tech and marketing is impacting the way that companies form and nurture connections with consumers. The CMO Insider breakfast event at Cannes, with BCG as a founding sponsor, offered an invite-only group of CMOs the opportunity to hear from different voices on AI and other ways marketers are connecting with consumers through tech.
Speakers included will.i.am, a musician, producer, and entrepreneur; Jessica Apotheker, chief marketing officer at BCG; and a panel of senior marketing leaders from ELF Beauty, Mercedes-Benz USA, Citi, and Salesforce.
Founder of the platform FYI.Ai, will.i.am led off the event in discussion with Jamie Heller, editor in chief of Business Insider, and explored where AI is now and how it can be used in the future. He likened the state of AI to video games from the 1980s and early 1990s, and said that AI is actually in its "infancy." "It's Pac-Man," he said. "It ain't even Halo yet."
His point was that early video games required a level of imagination from the player in the absence of sophisticated graphics and a real story. He said this same level of imagination is needed from "the people that love AI, the folks whose imagination is doing the work as you're training it or it's learning from your imagination." He added that AI will not stifle creativity, but provide room to enhance it.
Will.i.am also spoke about the role and need for AI in higher education. Through a partnership with Arizona State University, FYI.ai will provide technology to help enhance the learning experience and prepare students for the reality that awaits them upon graduation at the end of the decade.
"When you go out into the world, you're not just competing with humans," Will.i.am said, referring to today's students. Rather, he said, there's an "onslaught of agents" that are replacing the jobs students are going to school for — and no one is trying to help them compete.
Will.i.am said FYI.Ai is going to provide a path so that students can build an AI agent of their own; when they graduate, so will their agent. "Humans have to be able to compete with the marketplace," he said. "That marketplace is going to be like ghost bots that are going to be doing amazing work."
BCG data shows the optimism and pressures facing marketing leaders
Jessica Apotheker, the CMO of BCG, took the stage next for a conversation with Orlando Reece, the global head of sales for Business Insider. Apotheker shared insights from a recent BCG survey of more than 200 CMOs, which found 71% of those polled plan to invest more than $10 million annually in AI, up from 57% last year.
"AI is the buzzword of the moment," Apotheker said.
Though CMOs are optimistic about the technology, Apotheker said that leaders are also dealing with cost pressure and want to understand how the technology will help them growth their businesses.
"It's not like CEOs are writing huge checks for marketers," Apotheker said. "Most people are not seeing ROI from that investment yet at scale."
She said the data shows marketers are using AI for optimizing content workflows, hyper-personalization, and digging deeper into consumer insights.
Apotheker said that marketing leaders have the potential to drive AI-fueled transformation within their own function, and across companies.
"As CMOs, what is so exciting is we can be at the center of really reshaping marketing, because it's one of the functions that is the most disrupted," she said. "And also inventing the future services and offerings of our companies."
In order to take advantage of this moment, marketers need to cultivate skills of creativity, business management, and science, she said.
"We'll need much more teams in the science space than we used to — we'll need more left-brain marketers to make it work," Apotheker said. "We'll also need people who are more creative than they used to be so that they can really add value to AI. What is the balance of skill sets of my teams of tomorrow? That should be top of mind for everyone."
Taking the lead from customers
A panel of marketing leaders, moderated by Joi-Marie McKenzie, Business Insider's editor in chief, Life, spoke about how the convergence of technology and marketing, including AI, could affect the customer experience.
For Melody Lee, CMO of Mercedes-Benz USA, part of that is through the Mercedes app, which connects the car to the consumer. It's intended for the consumer to experience the brand and car in a seamless way— being able to start the car with the app alone and not a key, for example.
"There's just an expectation from the world of consumer electronics that the car should also follow that same seamlessness and integration into our customers' lives," she said. "And so anything that we can do to enhance that digital experience is really important to us. It always comes back to what we're trying to do for the customer."
For customers of ELF Beauty, the digital experience includes giving feedback through email or social chats. Laurie Lam, the company's chief brand officer, said she or Kory Marchisotto, the chief marketing officer, reads and responds to that feedback and takes it into account during product development.
ELF Beauty has also recently integrated with Roblox and Twitch, places where younger consumers requested the brand to be. This has allowed the company to connect with hundreds of millions of consumers in a unique way that ultimately builds the brand.
Lam's advice for exploring new digital platforms is to not overthink and "just plunge into it."
"You'll find that you'll learn your way through it. And your community actually doesn't care if you don't come in guns blazing," she added. "They just care that you're there with them and authentically connecting with them."
Alex Craddock, chief marketing and content officer at Citi, said authenticity and trust are important for any brand, but perhaps particularly so in the financial industry. "I think we as consumers expect to be able to trust a brand, and a brand has to keep reinforcing that trust," Craddock said. "Not just through the excellence of its product and customer service, but I think through how it actually brings its products and its services to market."
He said the company has gone "from 0 to 250 miles an hour" in terms of AI in the past six months, but it was initially hesitant because it feared breaking the trust bond with clients.
Now, the company is pushing ahead and using AI in several different ways across its marketing function — from something as simple as summarizing reports and drafting emails to using Adobe Firefly in its in-house agency to create imagery and build content.
Ariel Kelman, president and CMO of Salesforce, said that although the company is using AI tools on the creative side, it has also been experimenting on the operational side to become more efficient. For example, producing leads for the sales organization is always important, but those lead follow-ups are a challenge.
Kelman said the company now uses AI agents to handle interactive follow-ups with leads, managing the first 80% of the conversation. As a result, the leads passed on to salespeople are of higher quality. Kelman said Salesforce has also improved lead response time by about 40%.
"There are lots of operational areas like that where I think we're going to see big improvements in productivity over the next couple of years," Kelman said.
Despite its increasing use, Citi's Craddock said he believes AI is still in its early days, which leaves room for taking risks.
"I think we're at the stage where we've got to be curious. We've got to be courageous and really lean in and be brave enough to make some mistakes," Craddock said. "That's the only way you're going to innovate."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia rally persists: What worries this analyst about AI trade
Nvidia (NVDA) climbs higher, hitting fresh record highs. However, the artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaker and its "Magnificent Seven" peers have underperformed other AI-related names in the S&P 500 (^GSPC), like Palantir (PLTR), Vistra (VST), and Dell (DELL). Wall Street Horizon head of corporate event research, Christine Short, tells Market Domination host Josh Lipton, Yahoo Finance anchor Julie Hyman, and Yahoo Finance Markets Reporter Josh Schafer that it's competition with Chinese AI companies that she worries could threaten the AI play. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Green all over the place, Christine, we just keep grinding higher here. What do you make of it? Yeah, look, investor appetite is there, right? AI enthusiasm has returned. We just talked about Nvidia. Um, I think there were some whispers today about is this, you know, signifying a bubble here? Is this .com 2.0 with Nvidia being at almost record highs here? And if you look at what analysts are saying, and I know we're going to hear from one, you know, that covers Nvidia here soon, um, no one's saying that this is overvalued. I think many are actually saying that we're still undervalued here on Nvidia because we haven't quite priced in AI and the impact on productivity. We heard from CEO of Salesforce today, Mark Benioff, saying that 30 to 50% of their workload is now done by AI. And we've seen a slew of companies cut, you know, positions because of AI, whether it be Salesforce or CrowdStrike, Klarna, so, or, or Duolingo, who's actually going to be more discreet about hiring because of AI. So I don't think we've, we've folded in the full impact. The one concern I have, and maybe it's not so much a concern, but what I'm watching is competition from Chinese AI companies. There was a great report in Datatrack Research earlier in the week that just showed the valuations are so much more appetizing on some of those Chinese AI names versus, you know, the US ones. And the returns have actually been higher for those names. So that's one area that I'm watching is, is the competition between us and those Chinese AI names. Josh, you know, Julie mentioned it briefly, but I want to get double tap on it. The mag 7 names, Josh, those giants, right? How have they been working? Yeah, yeah, Josh. So I have a visual representation over here on our big board, right, of sort of some of what Julie was talking about. And what I'm looking at here is just performance since the April 8th low. Uh, most of these stocks here are all in the top 20 of the S&P 500. They're all AI tied. So I looked at sort of an AI basket of stocks, right? You have Oracle, Broadcom, Dell, AMD, NRG, as Julie mentioned, Vistra, which is sort of an AI power play, and Palantir. What's interesting is all of the mag 7 have underperformed them, right? So Nvidia's up about 60% at a new high. Really the rest of these companies have come up about 25, 30% maybe from the bottom. Apple hasn't really gone anywhere. And Christine, I guess the question this sort of brings me to for you is just, is the next AI trade going to continue to be the broadening out of this trade into cloud computing, into energy, into some of the other chip names, or is that, is that sort of where it feels like this trade is headed as we go through kind of the second half of 25? Yeah, I think we, we are already seeing that broadening out. There's a lot of liquidity in the market, and I think what surprised me the most is how quickly we've rebounded from that April low. And it just goes to show the appetite, the enthusiasm amongst, you know, all of tech. So not just within the AI space, but there is liquidity there. There was cash on the sidelines for quite a while. And now, you know, many of those investors bought the dip, and now we're seeing it rip.


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate parliamentarian requests AI moratorium be rewritten in ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has asked Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to rewrite the controversial artificial intelligence (AI) provision in President Trump's tax package, a source familiar with the conversations told The Hill. Cruz and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee, met with the Senate parliamentarian Wednesday night, the source said, during which the parliamentarian expressed concerns the provision may violate the Senate's reconciliation procedural rules. Under its current language, the provision bans states from regulating AI models and systems if they want access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment in federal funding. The Senate Commerce Committee said the current language, which narrowed a previous version this week, 'makes clear the optional $500 million state AI program would not affect participating state's tech-neutral laws, such as those for consumer protection and intellectual property rights. But Democrats argue the bill would still impact $42 billion in broadband funding and not comply with the Senate's Byrd Rule, which prohibits provisions from making drastic policy changes. The parliamentarian's request comes just days after she first approved the provision last weekend. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to advance Trump's legislative agenda while averting the Senate filibuster. To do this, the Senate parliamentarian's approval of the provisions is needed for a simple majority vote. When reached for comment, Cruz's communications director Macarena Martinez said the office would not comment on 'private consolations with the parliamentarian.' 'The Democrats would be wise not to use this process to wishcast in public,' Martinez told The Hill. Despite the previous changes to the language, the provision is expected to receive pushback from a handful of Republicans. Republican Sens. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) told The Hill they are against the provision, while Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said he is willing to introduce an amendment to eliminate the provision during the Senate's marathon vote-a-rama if it is not taken out earlier. Some Republicans in the House are also coming out against the measure as a way to advocate for states' rights. A group of hard-line conservatives argued in a letter earlier this month to Senate Republicans that Congress is still 'actively investigating' AI and 'does not fully understand the implications' of the technology. This was shortly after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) confirmed she would be a 'no' on the bill if it comes back to the House with the provision included. 'I am 100 percent opposed, and I will not vote for any bill that destroys federalism and takes away states' rights, ability to regulate and make laws when it regards humans and AI,' she told reporters earlier this month. It has also received criticism from some Republican state leaders, like Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who warned in a Washington Post op-ed that the measure 'would have unintended consequences and threatens to undo all the great work states' have done for AI protections.


Los Angeles Times
21 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
A Word, Please: ‘The Beyoncé of grammar' and why AI still needs writers
At a time when people refuse to believe doctors, journalists and anyone who says we went to the moon, everyone accepts the AI industry's claims about AI. It's genius. It's going to revolutionize life as we know it. It's going to render all us workers obsolete so we'll be unemployed and homeless but at least we'll be wowed by TikToks of Jennifer Lawrence talking through Steve Buscemi's face. First on the chopping block, they say: editors and writers. Like me. To check the ETA of my bleak future, I asked ChatGPT to write a grammar book in the style of June Casagrande. The software cheerily obliged, promising to 'channel my inner June Casagrande and create a grammar book that's fun, fierce, and friendly — just like 'Grammar Snobs Are Great Big Meanies.'' Minus the cash advance for me, of course. Minus even the cover price of two books I wrote that another AI program literally stole, according to an Atlantic magazine database. The ChatGPT book begins: 'Let's face it: grammar has trust issues. Not because it's sneaky or complicated — though we'll admit, it has its moods — but because you were probably introduced to it by someone who thought diagramming sentences was a fun Friday activity. Spoiler alert: it wasn't.' Smooth, well-structured, accessible. At first, the writing seems impressive. But wait, 'trust issues'? ChatGPT meant that people don't trust grammar, which itself is a little off. But to 'have trust issues' means to be incapable of trusting others. So the first sentence doesn't make sense. The word 'complicated' is also odd. Being complicated doesn't undermine trust, exactly. 'Spoiler alert' means something you have yet to learn, not something you learned decades ago. Then there's 'we'll admit.' Who's 'we'? This isn't an article in a sassy magazine in which the writer is speaking on behalf of the editorial staff. This is a book by just one author — an author who has written five books and more than 1,000 columns without once writing in the plural first person. (Nice job channeling me, ChatGPT.) 'We' appears a lot in the first few pages, like after saying grammar has a bad reputation, adding: 'We're going to clear that up.' Then, while talking about the voice in your head that makes you fear grammar, adding: 'To that voice we say: shut up.' Check every book on your shelf and you probably won't find a single one written in the plural first person — and definitely not if the book has just one author. Then, this 'intelligence' gets even less intelligent by switching to the singular first person a few pages later: 'I'm going to give you the tools you need.' ChatGPT's manuscript contained lots of illogical statements, like the example sentence 'My cat screams at 3 a.m.,' the assertion that verbs are 'the Beyonce of grammar' (with no explanation why) and, my favorite, this bit about comma splices: 'Grammar says, 'not today, Satan.'' ChatGPT got facts wrong, too. It said the 'are' in 'We are never getting back together' is a linking verb. It's not. It's an auxiliary verb. I could go on. But in the middle of writing this column, and I swear this is true, I was given a freelance assignment to revise a short video script written by AI and to 'make it sound more natural.' The script wasn't just unnatural sounding. It was illogical, misguided and utterly clueless about what to focus on. It boasted at length about an AI writing program that could take 'P.R. pitches' and instantly transform them into newspaper articles. That might sound great to P.R. firms making the pitches, but this script was promoting a technology to benefit newspapers and their readers — oblivious to the fact that journalism doesn't mean printing whatever P.R. firms want. I rewrote the whole script, emphasizing the important work reporters do and how the new AI tools could support their journalism. The editor who assigned me the project wrote back, 'Your version is SO GOOD' (emphasis hers). I'm still reeling from the irony. A human writer did an objectively better job than AI at writing advertising copy to promote … an AI writing program. So the next time you hear tech billionaires boasting about AI products destined to change life as you know it, remember their own words: Not today, Satan. June Casagrande is the author of 'The Joy of Syntax: A Simple Guide to All the Grammar You Know You Should Know.' She can be reached at JuneTCN@