A Word, Please: ‘The Beyoncé of grammar' and why AI still needs writers
At a time when people refuse to believe doctors, journalists and anyone who says we went to the moon, everyone accepts the AI industry's claims about AI. It's genius. It's going to revolutionize life as we know it. It's going to render all us workers obsolete so we'll be unemployed and homeless but at least we'll be wowed by TikToks of Jennifer Lawrence talking through Steve Buscemi's face.
First on the chopping block, they say: editors and writers. Like me.
To check the ETA of my bleak future, I asked ChatGPT to write a grammar book in the style of June Casagrande.
The software cheerily obliged, promising to 'channel my inner June Casagrande and create a grammar book that's fun, fierce, and friendly — just like 'Grammar Snobs Are Great Big Meanies.'' Minus the cash advance for me, of course. Minus even the cover price of two books I wrote that another AI program literally stole, according to an Atlantic magazine database.
The ChatGPT book begins: 'Let's face it: grammar has trust issues. Not because it's sneaky or complicated — though we'll admit, it has its moods — but because you were probably introduced to it by someone who thought diagramming sentences was a fun Friday activity. Spoiler alert: it wasn't.'
Smooth, well-structured, accessible. At first, the writing seems impressive. But wait, 'trust issues'? ChatGPT meant that people don't trust grammar, which itself is a little off. But to 'have trust issues' means to be incapable of trusting others. So the first sentence doesn't make sense.
The word 'complicated' is also odd. Being complicated doesn't undermine trust, exactly. 'Spoiler alert' means something you have yet to learn, not something you learned decades ago. Then there's 'we'll admit.' Who's 'we'? This isn't an article in a sassy magazine in which the writer is speaking on behalf of the editorial staff. This is a book by just one author — an author who has written five books and more than 1,000 columns without once writing in the plural first person. (Nice job channeling me, ChatGPT.)
'We' appears a lot in the first few pages, like after saying grammar has a bad reputation, adding: 'We're going to clear that up.' Then, while talking about the voice in your head that makes you fear grammar, adding: 'To that voice we say: shut up.'
Check every book on your shelf and you probably won't find a single one written in the plural first person — and definitely not if the book has just one author.
Then, this 'intelligence' gets even less intelligent by switching to the singular first person a few pages later: 'I'm going to give you the tools you need.'
ChatGPT's manuscript contained lots of illogical statements, like the example sentence 'My cat screams at 3 a.m.,' the assertion that verbs are 'the Beyonce of grammar' (with no explanation why) and, my favorite, this bit about comma splices: 'Grammar says, 'not today, Satan.''
ChatGPT got facts wrong, too. It said the 'are' in 'We are never getting back together' is a linking verb. It's not. It's an auxiliary verb.
I could go on. But in the middle of writing this column, and I swear this is true, I was given a freelance assignment to revise a short video script written by AI and to 'make it sound more natural.'
The script wasn't just unnatural sounding. It was illogical, misguided and utterly clueless about what to focus on. It boasted at length about an AI writing program that could take 'P.R. pitches' and instantly transform them into newspaper articles.
That might sound great to P.R. firms making the pitches, but this script was promoting a technology to benefit newspapers and their readers — oblivious to the fact that journalism doesn't mean printing whatever P.R. firms want.
I rewrote the whole script, emphasizing the important work reporters do and how the new AI tools could support their journalism. The editor who assigned me the project wrote back, 'Your version is SO GOOD' (emphasis hers).
I'm still reeling from the irony. A human writer did an objectively better job than AI at writing advertising copy to promote … an AI writing program.
So the next time you hear tech billionaires boasting about AI products destined to change life as you know it, remember their own words: Not today, Satan.
June Casagrande is the author of 'The Joy of Syntax: A Simple Guide to All the Grammar You Know You Should Know.' She can be reached at JuneTCN@aol.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
29 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Huge AI copyright ruling offers more questions than answers
While sci-fi movies from the 1980s and '90s warned us about the potential for artificial intelligence to destroy society, the reality has been much less dramatic so far. Skynet was supposed to be responsible for the rise of killer machines called Terminators that could only be stopped by time travel and plot holes. The AI from "The Matrix" movies also waged a war on its human creators, enslaving the majority of them in virtual reality while driving the rebellion underground. Related: Meta commits absurd money to top Google, Microsoft in critical race To be fair, the artificial intelligence from OpenAI, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and others does threaten to destroy humanity, but only sometimes. And it looks like the technology is mostly harmless to our chances of survival. But that doesn't mean this transformative tech isn't causing other very real problems. The biggest issue humans currently have with AI is how the companies controlling it train their models. Large language models like OpenAI's ChatGPT need to feast on a lot of information to beat the Voight-Kampff test from "Blade Runner," and a lot of that information is copyrighted. So at the moment, the viability of AI rests in the hands of the courts, not software engineers. This week, the courts handed down a monumental ruling that could have a wide-ranging ripple effect. Image source:This week, Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that AI company Anthropic, and others, can train their AI models using published books without the author's consent. The ruling could set an important legal precedent for the dozens of other ongoing AI copyright lawsuits. More on AI: Gemini, ChatGPT may lose the AI war to deep-pocketed rivalAnthropic shows the limits of AI as it scraps blog experimentAmazon's Alexa AI upgrade is even worse than expected A lawsuit filed by three authors accused Anthropic of ignoring copyright laws when it pirated millions of books to train its LLM, but Alsup sided with Anthropic. "The copies used to train specific LLMs were justified as a fair use," Alsup, who has also presided over Oracle America v. Google Inc. and other notable tech trials, wrote in the ruling. "Every factor but the nature of the copyrighted work favors this result. The technology at issue was among the most transformative many of us will see in our lifetimes." Ed Newton Rex, CEO of Fairly Trained, a nonprofit that advocates for ethically compensating creators of the data LLMs get trained on, had a unique take on the verdict after many headlines declared it a broad win for AI companies. "Today's ruling in the authors vs. Anthropic copyright lawsuit is a mixed bag. It's not the win for AI companies some headlines suggest - there are good and bad parts," he said in a lengthy X post this week. "In short, the judge said Anthropic's use of pirated books was infringing, but its training on non-pirated work was fair use." So Anthropic is on the hook for pirating the material, but the judge ruled that it doesn't need the author's permission to train its models. This means Anthropic's fair use argument stood up in court, but the ruling may not be as wide-ranging as it seems. "This is not a blanket ruling that all generative AI training is fair use. Other cases may go the other way, as the facts are different," Newton Rex said. "The Copyright Office has already pointed out that some AI models are more transformative than others - for instance, they singled out AI music models as less transformative. Lobbyists will say this decision confirms that generative AI training is fair use - that's not true." Related: Amazon coders have a surprising reason for hating GenAI The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Business Insider
34 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I help busy people organize their digital clutter. Here are 5 features you should start using on your phone and laptop immediately.
I was trained by Marie Kondo to help people declutter their homes. The results with my clients were dramatic, but there was always an elephant in the room: their digital clutter. So two years ago, I pivoted my business to focus exclusively on digital clutter. Now, high-achieving women reach out because they share a dirty little secret: their digital lives are in chaos. Their email inboxes are out of control. They grimace when I see their desktop. They're resetting passwords daily. And don't even get them started on their photo library. As a tech and productivity coach, I work with them to clear out digital chaos and turn everyday tech into personal assistants. Here are five game-changing hidden features I teach them: Gmail's Priority Inbox feature can help you organize your emails Gmail has a powerful, little-known feature called Priority Inbox, which divides your email into four clear sections: Important and Unread, Starred, Action Needed, and Everything Else. Use Gmail's important flags to train it on what's important and what isn't. Now, your most important emails will always rise to the top, while promotional emails sink to the bottom, making it much easier to unsubscribe and delete. My clients' favorite part? Adding colors and emojis to their newly organized inbox. Checking email begins to feel, dare I say … joyful? Your bookmarks bar can help you organize your tabs Gone are the days when we need to keep 67 tabs open because we're afraid of losing something. With a drag-and-drop, your active projects and most frequently visited sites can be at your fingertips. The trick: bookmark folders. Create folders on your browser's bookmark bar for things like: Italy Trip, Budget Proposal, Summer Camp, and put all of the relevant sites into that folder. Pro tip: Maximize precious bookmark bar real estate by deleting the text in the name of the bookmark and leaving just the logo. Siri and ChatGPT can be effective personal assistants I boss Siri around all day like she's my personal assistant, because she is. "Siri, remind me to take the chicken out to defrost when I get home. Siri, what's the weather going to be today? Siri, text Dad that I'm on my way." My other assistant? ChatGPT. Ask it things like "Help me plan a weekend in the Lower East Side with two toddlers. I'd like a hotel with a pool and free breakfast that's near a playground. Please provide recommendations for family-friendly restaurants." You will be amazed. Use Apple's Groceries list feature and share it with others Apple's little-known Groceries list feature takes the mental load out of grocery shopping. Go to the Reminders app and create a list. For List Type, choose Groceries. Now, when you say "Siri, add apples to the Grocery List," it will magically put apples on the list and auto-categorize them! Share the list with everyone who does the shopping, and be surprised and elated when they come home with something you took five seconds to add to the list a week ago. Try an app to declutter your photos Your phone has a few built-in tools for decluttering photos, but they're lackluster at best. To supercharge your photo organizing, try the CleanerKit app. It will scan your photo library and then suggest what to clear out, including blurry photos, landscapes, and even similar photos. Plus, the Cleaner Kit allows you to declutter month by month, eliminating the overwhelm that keeps most of us stuck staring down 18,000 photos at once. It's time to take advantage of all that our tech has to offer, and these five tips are the perfect place to start.
Fast Company
37 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Legacy companies with rich data are transformed by AI
When people think about artificial intelligence, they often picture sleek start-ups or futuristic labs. But what happens when AI meets a company that has been innovating for over 100 years? Unilever is one of the world's largest consumer goods companies, home to brands like Dove, Hellmann's and Vaseline, with products used by 3.4 billion people every day. And behind those everyday items is a deep and evolving commitment to science. From soap and margarine in the early 20th century to today's breakthroughs in sustainable packaging and personalized skincare, Research and Development (R&D) has always been our engine of progress. But now, that engine is being transformed by AI. AI is not just a new tool in our labs, it is a new way of thinking. And for a company with a century's worth of scientific data, that is a game-changer. AI is reshaping every industry, but the companies that will be the most successful are the ones that know how to adapt, learn, and build on what they already know. While many legacy companies are exploring how to modernize through AI, the real opportunity lies in how they harness their institutional memory: the decades of research, product development, and consumer insights that can often sit untapped. This requires deep domain expertise, robust data stewardship, and a culture that values learning as much as legacy. When those elements align, AI can become a catalyst for transformation, by revealing the full potential of what has come before. Unilever was born in the Victorian era, shaped by the industrial and scientific revolutions. Over the decades, we have evolved by responding to cultural shifts; from the transformation of domestic life in the mid-20 th century to today's shifting expectations around skin health, beauty, and wellbeing to the growing urgency of sustainability. When new materials like Formica and stainless steel became common in mid-century kitchens, our scientists developed products tailored to these surfaces. This was not just chemistry, it was a scientific response to a changing way of life. That same mindset—science in service of real life—still drives us today. But the questions we're asking have become more complex: How do we support the skin's natural microbiome? How do we clean homes without disrupting the ecosystems that live on our surfaces? How do we design products that are both effective and sustainable? These are not simple problems, and they require new ways of doing science. That's where AI comes in. With machine learning, we can uncover patterns that would take human researchers hundreds of years to detect. We are using AI to understand how microbes interact with our products, how skin responds to environmental stressors, and how we can personalize formulations for different needs and regions. But here is what makes our approach unique—we are not starting from scratch. Like many legacy companies our R&D archives stretch back over 100 years. We have records of every formulation, every trial, and every consumer insight. This historical depth gives our AI models something incredibly rare: context. While many companies are just beginning to build their data sets, established companies like ours are standing on a foundation that has been carefully constructed for generations. Our scientists can unlock proprietary knowledge that was once siloed, scattered across teams, or locked in an archive. A century of skincare expertise is now structured, searchable, and ready to be applied. We are using AI to connect the dots across decades of research, accelerating discovery in new materials while simultaneously optimising formulations for specific needs, like different skin types. We're moving from research and discovery to formulation design and refinement in a single, integrated process, helping us respond faster and more precisely to people's needs around the world. This is not about replacing scientists with algorithms. It is about creating the conditions where human talent can thrive. Agentic AI systems give our teams the ability to ask better questions, explore more possibilities, and unlock insights from our data. By amplifying human creativity and empathy not automating it, we're enabling our scientists to focus on what they do best: imagining, experimenting, and designing products that meet real human needs. So why should this matter to anyone outside Unilever? Because it shows what is possible when legacy meets learning. In an era where AI is reshaping every industry, the companies that thrive will not just be the newest or the loudest, they will be the ones that know how to adapt, how to learn, and how to build on what they already know. AI rewards data maturity. It rewards curiosity. And it rewards companies that see technology not as a threat to tradition, but as a way to reimagine it. We do not have all the answers. But we have learned that staying curious, being a 'learn-it-all' not a 'know-it-all,' is what keeps a company relevant for a century. AI is helping us stay curious at scale. We believe the next 100 years of innovation will be driven by companies that embrace the partnership between human talent and agentic AI: hybrid systems that augment creativity, empathy, and scientific intuition. This is not just a story about technology. It is a story about legacy, learning, and the enduring power of science to shape the everyday—only now with a little help from artificial intelligence.
