logo
Delaying Medicare enrollment. What to know

Delaying Medicare enrollment. What to know

Dear Liz: When my husband was approaching 65, he was employed and covered by a high deductible healthcare plan (HDHP) with a health savings account by his employer. Neither his employer nor our local Social Security office had concrete advice on how to proceed about enrolling in Medicare, but after tremendous research, he eventually delayed enrollment. Now I am approaching 65. My husband is still working, and I am still covered by his health insurance, although both are in his name. Do I enroll in Medicare at the appropriate time or do I delay enrollment like he did?
Answer: Delaying Medicare enrollment can result in penalties that can increase your premiums for life. If you or a spouse is still working for an employer with 20 or more employees, however, generally you can opt to keep the employer-provided health insurance and delay applying for Medicare without being penalized. If you lose the coverage or employment ends, you'll have eight months to sign up before being penalized.
Delaying your Medicare enrollment also allows your husband to continue making contributions on your behalf to his health savings account. In 2025, the HSA contribution limit is $4,300 for self-only coverage and $8,550 for family coverage, plus a $1,000 catch up contribution for account holders 55 and older. Once you enroll in Medicare, HSA contributions are no longer allowed.
Medicare itself suggests reaching out to the employer's benefits department to confirm you are appropriately covered and can delay your application. Let's hope that by now your employer's human resources department has gotten up to speed on this important topic.
Dear Liz: We read your recent column about capital gains and home sales. Our understanding is that if you sell and then buy a property of equal or greater value within the 180 day window, the basis for tax purposes is the purchase price, plus the $500,000 exemption, plus the improvements to the property, minus the depreciation, whatever that number comes to, and then the profit above that has to be reinvested or it is subject to capital gains. We talked to our CPA about this and he referred us to a site that specializes in 1031 exchanges.
Answer: You've mashed together two different sets of tax laws.
Only the sale of your primary residence will qualify for the home sale exemption, which for a married couple can exempt as much as $500,000 of home sale profits from taxation. You must have owned and lived in the home at least two of the previous five years.
Meanwhile, 1031 exchanges allow you to defer capital gains on investment property, such as commercial or rental real estate, as long as you purchase a similar property within 180 days (and follow a bunch of other rules). The replacement property doesn't have to be more expensive, but if it's less expensive or has a smaller mortgage than the property you sell, you could owe capital gains taxes on the difference.
It is possible to use both tax laws on the same property, but not simultaneously.
In the past, you could do a 1031 exchange and then convert the rental property into a primary residence to claim the home sale exemption after two years. Current tax law requires waiting at least five years after a 1031 exchange before a home sale exemption can be taken.
You can turn your primary residence into a rental and after two years do a 1031 exchange, but you would be deferring capital gains, while the home sale exemption allows you to avoid them on up to $500,000 of home sale profits.
Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner®, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at asklizweston.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Health Insurance Not Covering Enough? 5 Reasons To Consider Secondary Insurance
Health Insurance Not Covering Enough? 5 Reasons To Consider Secondary Insurance

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Health Insurance Not Covering Enough? 5 Reasons To Consider Secondary Insurance

Having insurance doesn't always mean being fully covered, with many Americans still facing big bills for basic care, let alone anything unexpected. According to KFF, annual premiums for employer-sponsored family health coverage hit $25,572 in 2024, with workers paying an average of $6,296 out of pocket. The average deductible for single coverage now stands at $1,787 — money that has to come out of pocket before insurance kicks in. Read More: Check Out: GOBankingRates spoke with two experts about when secondary insurance might be needed and what to know before making a move. Basic policies rarely handle everything. Many treatments, specialists or medications simply aren't included in standard plans. Kris Barber, founder and principal attorney at The Barber Law Firm, explained that secondary insurance can help with expenses 'like vision care, dental treatment, co-payments or even deductibles.' Explore More: High deductibles and frequent co-payments can strain even those with good coverage. When costs start stacking up, secondary insurance 'can relieve your burden considerably' by helping cover what primary leaves behind, according to Barber. Frequent appointments, therapies or medications, especially for chronic conditions, can burn through coverage fast. Patients with recurring care needs may often benefit from secondary plans that fill in those regular, costly gaps. For Medicare beneficiaries, Original Medicare doesn't cover everything. Eligible senior patients can 'consider Medigap policies to enhance coverage for expenses not included in Original Medicare — coinsurance and deductibles,' according to Barber. Secondary coverage doesn't have to be complicated to get. According to Melanie Musson from it's often available through a spouse's employer, via the Affordable Care Act marketplace or even as a separate policy for those on a parent's plan. Private insurance firms and government programs also offer supplemental plans for those who qualify. Sometimes a separate insurance policy isn't the best tool. If secondary insurance isn't an obvious need, a flexible spending account (FSA) or health savings account (HSA) might be the better move. Musson explained it's a good option because 'instead of paying premiums, you can put your money in an account where it grows.' HSAs, for those with high-deductible health plans, offer rollover benefits, investment growth and portability. FSAs, while less flexible, still provide tax advantages for near-term medical expenses. Both options may be better suited for covering moderate, expected out-of-pocket costs, without committing to ongoing premiums. Not every situation calls for secondary insurance, so weighing the cost of premiums and deductibles against the expected benefits is a good place to start. If the numbers line up, coverage can make a real difference. If not, a tax-advantaged account might offer more freedom and financial control. More From GOBankingRates 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on Health Insurance Not Covering Enough? 5 Reasons To Consider Secondary Insurance Sign in to access your portfolio

Billionaire GOP megadonor Ken Griffin is confused: Why is the US trying to bring back 'jobs that'll never pay much'?
Billionaire GOP megadonor Ken Griffin is confused: Why is the US trying to bring back 'jobs that'll never pay much'?

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Billionaire GOP megadonor Ken Griffin is confused: Why is the US trying to bring back 'jobs that'll never pay much'?

Ken Griffin had no good answer. The billionaire founder of the $66 billion hedge fund Citadel and its sister company, market maker Citadel Securities, Griffin is a megadonor to the Republican Party and was excited for the American economy after President Donald Trump's election. Less than half a year since Trump's inauguration, Griffin said he was asked during a recent visit to China, "Why are you trying to be like China?" He said there isn't a logical reason the US would want to bring manufacturing "jobs that'll never pay much" to the country, but that seems to be the goal of the tariff policies pursued by Trump's administration. "It's one thing to make Nikes, it's another thing to make F-35 fighters," he said Thursday morning at the Forbes Iconoclast conference in Manhattan. Griffin has been critical of the administration's tariff policies in recent months, calling them a mistake that will hurt the economy and consumers. He said Thursday that they were an "anti-growth agenda," and the expected growth of the US economy has been cut in half since Trump took office. He continued his criticism of Trump, whom he voted for, focusing on the current tax bill, which was passed by the House of Representatives and is now in the Senate. Griffin said it will add "several trillions" of dollars to the deficit and lacks "tough decisions." "The United States' fiscal house is not in order," Griffin said, questioning the decision to cut taxes on small and medium-sized businesses when the deficit was rising. He said credit markets have noted the uncertainty plaguing the US thanks to the administration's policies, noting that "the risk of a US default is priced the same as Italy or Greece." "There's just no words for it," he said. If there was any optimism in his talk, it was about the resilience of American CEOs. He said hiring and capital expenditures will slow as long as there is uncertainty from Washington. Still, he was impressed with how individuals like Doug McMillon, the CEO of Walmart, explained the impact tariffs would have on the consumer. "We should not criticize CEOs for being honest," he said, adding, "shame on the administration" for scolding McMillon and other CEOs for talking about the tariffs' impact. There's still time for Trump and his team to return to pro-growth economic policies, he said, and there's no time to wait. "The United States desperately needs growth" to pay for entitlements like Social Security, he said.

The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy
The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy

Whether retirement is like a sunrise on a distant horizon or you can already feel its golden rays warming your golden years, one thing is clear: Your money needs to be ready. While there are universal pillars of smart saving, such as keeping savings in a high-yield savings account, investing consistently and maintaining an emergency fund, each generation approaches retirement saving a little differently. For You: Check Out: When GOBankingRates teamed up with New York Life to understand how people are feeling about their finances today, one insight stood out. In a survey of more than 1,000 Americans ages 18 and older, only 20.81% of respondents age 65 and older said they rely on a 401(k) for income. In contrast, 43.93% said they receive income from an employer pension. If you're thinking that Gen Z or Millennials might not have the same access to pensions, you're right. The way people save for retirement is changing — and future retirees will need a more self-directed strategy. In the survey, respondents of all age groups were asked about their sources of household income. Unsurprisingly, older respondents — those in the 65-and-older group — reported high reliance on Social Security (90.17%) and pensions (43.93%). More surprising? A relatively small portion of Baby Boomers — just 20.81% — reported income from a 401(k). That figure is nearly on par with the catch-all category of 'other savings.' But that may not be shocking to those familiar with how retirement planning has evolved. As retirement writer Donna Fuscaldo noted in a piece for Kiplinger, 'For many of the baby boomers' working years, they had access to pensions and a strong job market. They didn't have to worry about where their income in retirement would come from.' Explore More: Fuscaldo pointed out that by the time Gen X entered the workforce in the '80s and '90s, many companies were shifting away from pensions and toward 401(k) plans. Essentially, the onus for saving for retirement began falling to the employee instead of the employer. Boomers also came into, and out of, the workforce during a time when Social Security largely seemed secure, or at least, not something they had to worry about long-term, giving them one more reason to feel financially secure in retirement. It's only natural that younger generations — Millennials, Zoomers, and even Gen X — rely mostly on income from their current jobs. While they're not withdrawing from their retirement accounts just yet, it's worth noting that 12.78% of respondents aged 55-64 reported 401(k) income, just eight percentage points below the 65-and-older group. As pensions become less prevalent, especially in the private sector, younger generations are expected to lean more on the 401(k) in the future. The survey found that 16.77% of respondents ages 45-54 and 15.43% of those 35-44 reported a 401(k) as an income source. That may sound surprisingly high, especially for those under 45, but it's likely reflective of multigenerational households, where income from a parent's or older relative's 401(k) factors into the household total. Either way, the data underscores the growing importance of self-funded retirement strategies for future generations. Younger generations are also more likely to piece together income from multiple streams. Notably, 36.21% of respondents ages 18-24 said they earn money from side hustles. This age group also reported 0% participation in annuities — a traditional retirement product — compared to 11.56% of Boomers and 6.11% of respondents aged 55-64. This suggests younger Americans could stand to boost their awareness of long-term savings tools. Boomers largely benefitted from a retirement system that included pensions, stable Social Security, and less personal responsibility to actively manage long-term investments. But the same cannot be said for today's rising generations. As Fuscaldo writes, 'In the early days of 401(k)s, people weren't saving, and there wasn't a ton of information available about saving, investing and planning for retirement.' That's no longer the case. Today's workers have access to an abundance of financial education about 401(k)s and virtually every other type of financial product, but they also face more responsibility. And many are skeptical about the long-term viability of Social Security. According to the Nationwide Retirement Institute, 45% of Gen Z and 39% of Millennials believe they'll never see the Social Security benefits they've earned. Perhaps that's why Gen Xers now on the cusp of retirement, as well as Millennials and Zoomers, are embracing new and diverse ways of saving for retirement, from 401(k)s to side hustle savings to life insurance with cash value components. The retirement playbook has changed. And while Boomers may have been able to count on a few key institutions, rising generations will have to get more creative, more informed, and more proactive about their financial and New York Life Insurance surveyed 1,009 Americans aged 18 and older from across the country between March 19 and March 125, 2025, asking twenty-one different questions: (1) What is your current employment status?; (2) Which of the following category or categories best describes your race or ethnicity? (If more than one category applies, please select all that apply); (3) What are the source(s) of income for your household? (Please select all that apply); (4) Please choose the approximate level of investible assets for your household; (5) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I often take the opportunity to discuss my knowledge of financial products or services with others'; (6) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I regularly read financial news or financial publications'; (7) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'Thinking about my future sometimes keeps me up at night'; (8) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I have enough money to live the way I would like to'; (9) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I believe that The American dream is within reach for people like me'; (10) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'Stories in the media sometimes make me nervous about my financial future'; (11) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I can't really take risks in my life because I don't have a safety net if things go wrong'; (12) Thinking about the nation's economy, how would you rate economic conditions today?; (13) A year from now, do you think that during the next twelve months we'll have good times financially, or bad times, or what?; (14) Compared to 6 months ago, how has your level of uncertainty changed regarding the following societal and economic issues?; (15) Do you own any of the following products? (Please select all that apply); (16) Do you currently have a financial plan?; (17) On a 1 to 10 scale, where 1 means not at all confident and 10 means completely confident, how confident are you that you will meet your financial goals?; (18) What kind of financial professional have you worked with? (Please select all that apply); (19) Using the slider below, please indicate which statement best describes you.; (20) Using the slider below, please indicate which statement best describes you.; and (21) Using the slider below, please indicate which statement best describes you. In order to take the survey the respondents had to pass two screener questions (S1)Who is the primary financial decision-maker in your household? with the answer being they were at least involved in the households financial decision making and (S2) Which range best describes your total annual household income before taxes? with an answer above $50K. GOBankingRates used PureSpectrum's survey platform to conduct the poll. More From GOBankingRates 4 Things You Should Do When Your Salary Hits $100K If a Financial Advisor Doesn't Ask These 5 Questions in Your Consult, Keep Shopping 5 Steps to Take if You Want To Create Generational Wealth Robert Kiyosaki: 5 Money Habits of People Who Retire Early This article originally appeared on The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store