Marvell's AI Bet: Will NVLink and UALink Drive Custom Chip Wins?
Marvell Technology MRVL is enhancing its role in artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure by expanding its custom chip capabilities. Marvell continues to integrate its custom compute platform with new components that improve performance, scalability, and integration across large-scale systems.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, Marvell reported record Data Center revenues of $1.44 billion, up 76% year over year. The growth was driven by the rapid scaling of custom AI silicon. To support continued momentum, Marvell recently announced multiple strategic additions to its custom silicon platform.
In May 2025, Marvell partnered with NVIDIA to offer NVIDIA's NVLink Fusion technology to customers deploying Marvell's custom cloud platform silicon. This enables custom XPUs to connect with NVIDIA's rack-scale hardware architecture. Marvell noted that its custom silicon with NVIDIA NVLink Fusion offers its customers greater flexibility and options in developing next-generation AI infrastructure. This announcement reflects that MRVL's custom chips are gaining credibility and traction, even among companies like NVIDIA.
In the same month, Marvell introduced its new multi-die packaging solution, which is built on its proprietary interposer technology. The solution is already in production for a customer-specific XPU program. The platform enables more efficient die-to-die interconnect, lowers power consumption, enhances yield and lowers product cost.
Earlier this month, Marvell introduced a third addition to its custom platform — Ultra Accelerator Link (UALink) scale-up solution. The solution delivers an open-standards-based scale-up interconnect platform with high compute utilization and low latency. UALink is paired with Marvell custom silicon capabilities. This allows compute vendors to build solutions, including custom accelerators with UALink controllers and custom switches, enabling optimal performance for rack-scale AI.
Together, these additions support Marvell's push to enable full rack-level custom infrastructure. Moreover, with new components entering production, Marvell is positioned to play a crucial role in powering the next generation of large-scale AI systems.
How Competitors Fare Against MRVL
Advanced Micro Devices AMD is advancing its rack-level AI solutions through its acquisition of ZT Systems. This acquisition enables Advanced Micro Devices to reduce deployment time for hyperscalers by combining AMD's CPUs, GPUs, and networking components. This move also enables Advanced Micro Devices to accelerate time to market for its OEM and ODM partners.
Broadcom AVGO is aggressively scaling its AI networking portfolio. In the second quarter of fiscal 2025, AVGO's AI networking revenues jumped 170% year over year and now comprise 40% of its total AI semiconductor revenues. Broadcom also introduced the Tomahawk 6 switch with a 102.4 Terabits per second switch capacity. It is designed to enable AI clusters of over 100,000 AI accelerators to be deployed in 2 tiers. This move enables Broadcom to achieve better performance in training its next-generation frontier models through lower latency, higher bandwidth and lower power.
MRVL's Price Performance, Valuation and Estimates
Shares of Marvell Technology have plunged 31.9% year to date against the Electronics - Semiconductors industry's growth of 6.4%.
MRVL YTD Price Return Performance
From a valuation standpoint, Marvell Technology trades at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 7.36X, lower than the industry's average of 8.15X.
MRVL Forward 12-Month P/S Ratio
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for MRVL's fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 earnings implies year-over-year growth of 77.71% and 27.73%, respectively. The earnings estimates for fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 have been revised upward in the past 30 days and seven days, respectively.
MRVL currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Zacks Names #1 Semiconductor Stock
It's only 1/9,000th the size of NVIDIA which skyrocketed more than +800% since we recommended it. NVIDIA is still strong, but our new top chip stock has much more room to boom.
With strong earnings growth and an expanding customer base, it's positioned to feed the rampant demand for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things. Global semiconductor manufacturing is projected to explode from $452 billion in 2021 to $803 billion by 2028.
See This Stock Now for Free >>
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD): Free Stock Analysis Report
Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL): Free Stock Analysis Report
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO): Free Stock Analysis Report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
5 minutes ago
- National Post
Major projects bill expected to pass before MPs leave for the summer
OTTAWA — If you blink, you might miss it. Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial major projects bill was set to finish its dash through the House of Commons today — the final day of the sitting before summer — with support from the Conservatives and not-so-quiet grumblings from the other opposition parties. Article content Article content 'Usually, on the last day of sitting before the summer, everyone is smiling, we're in a good mood, we pat ourselves on the backs. But today, I would say that's not really the case,' said Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval during a speech on Friday. Article content Article content The final vote on Bill C-5 in the House is set to happen shortly after 5 p.m. before making its way to the Senate for a final adoption expected within a week, on Friday, June 27. Article content Article content The legislation has two parts. The first, which has more support across party lines, aims to eliminate internal trade and labour mobility barriers in Canada. The second part, which would give cabinet sweeping powers to approve natural resource and infrastructure projects deemed in the national interest, has raised considerably more concerns. Article content Indigenous communities, environmental groups, opposition parties and even some Liberal MPs have said they are uncomfortable with the lack of consultation with First Nations, Inuit and Metis people prior to tabling the bill, but also the extent of the powers that would give the government of the day the power to ignore other federal laws for five years. Article content 'Pretending that this unprecedented power grab was ever discussed in the election is a sham, and we can add an 'e' to that. It's a shame,' said Green Party leader Elizabeth May. Article content C-5 was rushed through committee earlier this week. Despite that, opposition parties managed to pass amendments which include exempting a number of laws — such as the Indian Act and the Conflict of Interest Act — from being ignored when considering major projects and publishing a list of national interest projects with timelines and costs. Article content 'These amendments matter,' said Shannon Stubbs, energy and natural resource critic for the Conservatives when describing the changes in the House. 'They bring transparency, accountability, more certainty, more clarity and integrity to a bill that originally had none.' Article content Stubbs said despite those changes, 'major concerns' remain. She cited the need to prevent ministers from removing projects from the national interest list at any time but also add in the bill clear timelines to approve projects to increase certainty for investors. Article content On Friday, opposition parties claimed a small victory. NDP MP Jenny Kwan, with the help of the Bloc's Marilène Gill, argued the Speaker of the House should divide C-5 into two distinct parts so that MPs could vote on the portions on internal trade and major projects separately at third reading. Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia granted their request.
Globe and Mail
11 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
GICs are simple and safe – and a lousy way to build wealth
This may be a naive question, but if I have $7,000 in cash to contribute to my tax-free savings account, why would I invest it in a dividend exchange-traded fund rather than a guaranteed investment certificate yielding 4 per cent to 4.5 per cent? GICs have their place in a well-balanced portfolio. Because their principal value doesn't fluctuate and their returns are guaranteed, they provide stability and peace of mind during periods of market volatility. That's why, for the fixed-income portion of one's portfolio, GICs are a good solution. However, that stability comes at a cost – several costs, actually. First, GICs don't offer any growth potential. If you invest in a five-year GIC that yields 4 per cent (a rate you'd be hard-pressed to find right now, by the way), you'll make 4 per cent annually – no more, no less. You'll feel like a genius if the stock market treads water or falls over that period, but if the market rises substantially, that GIC won't look nearly so appealing. History has clearly favoured stocks over GICs. Over the past decade, the S&P/TSX Composite Index has posted an annualized total return of about 9 per cent, including dividends. No GIC can keep up with that. True, the stock market had plenty of ups and downs over that period, but volatility is the price investors pay for the superior returns that stocks deliver. Your dividend and DRIP questions answered The financial – and emotional – benefits of dividend ETFs A second drawback is that GICs lock up your money for a fixed period. If you need the cash to buy a new car or replace your furnace, you won't be able to access your funds (exceptions are sometimes made in unusual circumstances, depending on the financial institution). For that reason, you should only purchase a GIC if you're certain you won't need the funds before the maturity date. A third downside of GICs is that the interest is taxed at your full marginal rate. This isn't a factor in a TFSA, registered retirement savings plan or other registered account in which investment earnings are not subject to tax. But in a non-registered account, the tax hit on interest tops out at more than 50 per cent in most provinces for the highest income bracket. On an after-tax basis, GICs may not even keep up with inflation. Dividend stocks and dividend ETFs don't have the same drawbacks. In addition to providing the potential for capital appreciation, dividend stocks and ETFs also typically increase their income over time. Many companies – such as banks, utilities and power producers – have been raising their dividends for years, driven by their growing earnings, out of which dividends are paid. The yield of a GIC, on the other hand, is fixed. Stocks and ETFs are also more liquid than GICs. If you need the money for an unexpected expense, you can always sell a portion of your holdings. Finally, dividend stocks and ETFs also win in the tax department. Thanks to the dividend tax credit, the income from dividends is generally taxed at much lower rates than interest from a GIC. In Ontario, for example, someone with $100,000 of income would pay combined federal and provincial tax of 31.48 per cent on interest but just 8.92 per cent on eligible dividends. In the lowest income brackets, the tax rate on dividends is actually negative in many provinces. According to an Ontario resident with taxable income of $52,886 or less would have an effective tax rate on eligible dividends of negative 7.55 per cent for 2025. Because the dividend tax credit is a non-refundable credit, the government won't send you a cheque for the negative amount, but you can use the credit to offset your other taxes owing. Let me be clear: I am not trying to steer you away from GICs. I own them myself. They are especially useful if you are saving for a large future expense, such as a home purchase or a child's postsecondary education, and don't want to put your principal at risk. Many investors also use GICs for the fixed-income portion of a balanced portfolio. Building a GIC 'ladder' – with maturities ranging from one to five years – can be a useful way to diversify your GIC holdings and control your interest rate risk. When the one-year GIC matures, you would roll the proceeds into a new five-year GIC, and so on. But for long-term growth of both capital and income, stocks and ETFs are the clear winner. So don't let your desire for safety prevent you from enjoying the historically higher returns that stocks offer. E-mail your questions to jheinzl@ I'm not able to respond personally to e-mails but I choose certain questions to answer in my column.
CTV News
32 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘What you're seeing is Mark Carney being frustrated': 580 CFRA's Bill Caroll gives his opinion on latest tariff news
Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada will adjust counter tariffs on some steel and aluminum products on July 21 to levels 'consistent' with progress made during trade negotiations with the United States. Newstalk 580 CFRA's Bill Caroll from the Morning Rush shared his opinion with CTV Morning Live Friday. 'I think it's Mark Carney realizing that, you know, we thought we'd have a deal before the G7 summit, and we didn't. And then we agreed we'd continue to talk and maybe have a deal within 30 days. But what happens on day 31? That was never clear,' Carroll said. 'So, I think what you're seeing is Mark Carney being frustrated saying, 'alright, we've lost the attention of Donald Trump.' We know he doesn't have a long attention span. And also, he is the president of the United States. And a lot of things have come up, so let's say Iran for example.' Caroll says he thinks that the prime minister is trying to put some pressure on the U.S. to grab the president's attention. He notes that Carney thought that things were going well, but the reality suggests otherwise. Carroll adds Canada had Trump's attention when Ontario Premier Doug Ford was being tough, especially when he threatened to cut off the electricity and add a tax on it. Carney, on the other hand, didn't act quickly. 'I think the steel industry told him weeks ago we should've countered their latest steel and aluminum tariffs. And we didn't do that,' Carroll said. 'I think they've started to look at Canada again as not in a big hurry, kind of weak, (we're) happy with what they're doing. The prime minister seems to like me. I didn't think that was the way to go. Again, I could be wrong.' Though what Carney is doing right now is a good thing, it's a bit too late, Caroll says , noting that Canadians have already started to see weakness in the economy, such as layoffs. 'Tariffs and counter-tariffs are made for both economies and, as a small open economy, Canada's best path to improving its standard of living is to have zero tariffs, even if other countries impose them on us. This is not two wrongs make a right or two bad policies cancel each other out; this is two egregious wrongs compounding each other into a colossal wrong,' Concordia University economics professor Moshe Lander told CTV News Friday. 'Giving time to try and find a path to zero and a return to where we were last summer is very diplomatic, but anybody currently caught up in the tariff war, such as the Canadian auto industry, will feel it is too little, too late, but that is also because they see things through their narrow self-interest, as they should.' Lander says the removal of interprovincial trade barriers and free trade deals with Europe and Asia are a great alternative, 'but nothing can substitute fully for the integrated free-trade deal with the U.S., and Mexico.' 'We are 10 days out from a deadline regarding interprovincial barriers, but I think progress has stalled, particularly at the provincial level. Removal of those barriers is worth about $200 billion (or nine per cent of Canadian GDP), a massive sum given the state of our economy,' Lander added. Carney said Thursday if sufficient progress is not made on resolving the ongoing trade dispute with the U.S., Canada will impose counter-tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum products on July 21. Lander says Carney will make decisions regarding the tariff rate 'and how broad-based it will be according to what happens between now and then. July 21 coincides with the end of the 30-day trade deal deadline announced after Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump met in Kananaskis, Alta., on the sidelines of the G7. With files from CTV News National's Luca Caruso-Moro
