Hegseth orders US navy to strip Harvey Milk name from ship amid Pride month
The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has ordered the US navy to strip the name of prominent gay rights activist and navy veteran Harvey Milk from a ship during the middle of June – a month meant to celebrate the LGBTQ+ community – according to multiple outlets.
The order to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler, was in a memorandum from the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, which was reported on and viewed by Military.com and CBS. Those reports note that the navy secretary, John Phelan, was instructed to strip the ship of its name by Hegseth.
The timing of the announcement, which comes during Pride month, was reportedly intentional.
The renaming is being done to ensure 'alignment with president and SECDEF objectives and SECNAV priorities of reestablishing the warrior culture', referring to Donald Trump, Hegseth and Phelan, per the memorandum.
The decision to rename the ship will be publicized on 13 June, per Military.com
The Guardian has contacted the defense department for comment.
The vessel was initially named after Milk in 2016 during the Barack Obama administration. Milk was a prominent gay rights activist who served in the US Navy during the Korean war. He later went on to run for office in California where he won a seat on the San Francisco board of supervisors. As one of the US's first openly gay politicians, Milk became a forefront figure of the gay rights movement across the country before his assassination in 1978 by a former city supervisor.
In addition to renaming USNS Harvey Milk, the defense department plans to rename other vessels that have been given names of various icons throughout American history.
Documents reviewed by CBS showed that vessels on the US navy's 'recommended list' include USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Medgar Evers.
In response to reports of the defense department renaming its vessels, the California representative and former House speaker Nancy Pelosi said: 'In San Francisco, we take great pride that our Harvey's name adorns a mighty ship among a new class of navy vessels – named for the conscience of the Congress, John Lewis – which honor titans in the fight for freedom. The names of those who fought for civil rights and human rights bring luster to these ships – as their leadership brought luster to America.'
She went on to say: 'The reported decision by the Trump administration to change the names of the USNS Harvey Milk and other ships in the John Lewis-class is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American dream. Our military is the most powerful in the world – but this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos. Instead, it is a surrender of a fundamental American value: to honor the legacy of those who worked to build a better country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
16 minutes ago
- Times
Trump's summer White House is ‘unacceptably unhygienic'
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries
June 5 (Reuters) - Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the United States expressed dismay and disbelief on Thursday at President Donald Trump's new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown. Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the U.S. starting on Monday, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists." The order was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Citizens of seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Trump's justification did not stand up to scrutiny. "Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world," the official said. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the U.S. or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women's rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her U.S. visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Trump's order. "Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of us into ashes," she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons. Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban. "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: "It can't come soon enough." The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country. The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of U.S. citizens and athletes traveling for major sporting events like the World Cup. "Trump has learned from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said. Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the U.S. to address Trump's security concerns. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests
Donald Trump accused Elon Musk of suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome', as he signalled the official collapse of their once warm relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' His remarks illustrate the president's intense anger over the world's richest man's meddling with his legislative agenda after leaving the White House with a golden key and a warm televised send-off. Mr Musk immediately hit back, writing on his social media platform, X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Since stepping down as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency last week, Mr Musk has slammed Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt. Discussion of their broken friendship overshadowed the president's Oval Office press conference with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, as Mr Trump said his former ally was lashing out because he did not get his own way. He claimed the Tesla chief executive was upset that his ally had been rejected as the next administrator of Nasa and that the bill meant the end of tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions to his company. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' he said. 'And if you saw the statements he made about me … he said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Mr Trump added that Mr Musk was probably missing the Oval Office and the trappings of power. 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. 'But we have it with others too. 'They leave and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone.' Mr Musk appeared in the Oval Office last Friday for his send-off. At the time, Mr Trump said he was 'not really leaving' and would continue to visit the White House. Things quickly unravelled when Mr Musk went on a six-hour X session on Tuesday night, posting his criticism of the bill, particularly that it does not do enough to cut federal spending. Independent analysts warn that its spending cuts are not balanced by tax breaks, with the result that the bill will add more than $2 trillion to the national debt during the next decade. Mr Musk kept up his attacks on Thursday, live tweeting during the president's Oval Office sit-down with Mr Merz. He rejected claims that he had supported the bill when he was at the White House. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it,' he posted. Earlier, he resurfaced an old tweet of Mr Trump's. Wise words — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 And he continued as Mr Trump went on the attack, posting a message suggesting he might be amenable to a trimmed down version: 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' The bill is crucial to Mr Trump's strategy. It contains much of his domestic policy agenda, as well as the campaign promises that propelled him to victory in last year's election, such as ending taxation on overtime and tips. This week, Mr Trump all but disappeared from view as he focused on meetings and phone calls to keep Republicans on side. The bill has already passed the House but faces a difficult passage through the Senate.
