AI And Entrepreneurship Education: Preparing Students To Lead
Research indicates a fivefold increase in demand for AI skills, yet most schools still ban the use of ChatGPT. A recent survey found that 70% of graduates believe generative AI should be integrated into coursework, and more than half said they felt unprepared for the workforce. At the same time, 66% of teens aged 13-17 express interest in starting their own businesses, according to Junior Achievement data.
The disconnect is apparent: students want to build careers around emerging technology, but traditional education isn't teaching them how. While schools debate AI policies, forward-thinking programs are already training middle schoolers to launch AI-powered ventures and solve real problems. They're not preparing students for tomorrow's job market. They're teaching them to create it.
Real-World Learning Replaces Theoretical Education
The most effective programs abandon traditional classroom simulations in favor of authentic business creation. Students don't earn grades—they gain customers, revenue, and practical skills that transfer directly to college applications and future careers.
At WIT (Whatever It Takes), which I started in 2009, teens launch actual businesses and social movements that address real community problems. In the college-credit programs, students pitch for actual prize money, receive real-time coaching from successful entrepreneurs, and develop presentations that have landed participants in major publications.
We ask participants one question: "What problem are you passionate about solving?" We then provide the tools, mentorship, and structure to help them build effective solutions.
WIT has worked with over 10,000 young people, providing leadership and entrepreneurial education through hands-on experience. The results speak volumes—our alumni consistently report higher confidence levels, stronger college applications, and clearer career direction compared to peers who only engage in traditional academic activities or simulation business programs.
This shift toward authentic learning experiences isn't limited to K-12 education. As the demand for AI skills explodes across industries, universities are also abandoning traditional lecture-based models in favor of programs that prepare students to create rather than just consume technology.
Universities Embrace AI Integration
University of South Florida (USF) made history as the first university in Florida—and among the first nationally—to create an entire college dedicated to AI and cybersecurity. The Bellini College of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Computing will welcome 3,000 students this fall, with plans to double enrollment in the first five years.
The timing reflects urgent market demands. Research indicates a fivefold increase in demand for AI skills in U.S. jobs, while more than 40% of organizations report being unable to find enough qualified cybersecurity professionals. The National Science Foundation awarded over $800 million for AI-related research in a single year.
"As AI and cybersecurity quickly evolve, the demand for professionals skilled in these areas continues to grow," USF President Rhea Law explained. "Through the expertise of our faculty and our strong partnerships with the business community, the University of South Florida is strategically positioned to be a global leader in these fields."
Dr. John Licato, Associate Professor at The Bellini College of Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Computing, puts this educational shift in perspective: 'AI and cybersecurity already touch every single job on earth. Universities everywhere are trying to incorporate these technologies into their programs so students can practically leverage them, but at the same time further develop their own critical thinking and reasoning.'
USF Provost Dr. Prasant Mohapatra told me, "We're not just producing job seekers—we're producing job creators." The college leverages USF's existing strengths—approximately 200 faculty members already conduct research in related disciplines—while positioning the Tampa Bay region as a technology hub.
USF's bold move breaks from traditional models of higher education. Most universities incorporate AI courses into their existing programs. USF built an entire college around emerging technologies, combining technical training with business education because students need both skills to succeed.
Bridging the K-12 AI Knowledge Gap
Teenagers already use AI tools regularly. Data shows 63% of U.S. teens use chatbots and text generators for schoolwork. Yet most schools ban these tools or label them as cheating. This creates a problem: students learn AI exists, but not how to use it ethically.
WIT created WITY to fill this gap. Our AI platform helps teens develop business ideas and conduct market research to inform their entrepreneurial endeavors. Students learn to work with AI without losing their creativity or critical thinking abilities.
USF also works with younger students. The Bellini College offers workshops for K-12 students through partnerships with education programs. These sessions introduce kids to AI concepts through hands-on projects.
Dr. Mohapatra shared his philosophy with me: 'We want to show kids that AI isn't something to fear. It's something they can learn to use responsibly and creatively.'
AI Success Metrics That Matter
Programs that successfully prepare students for an AI-driven economy share several characteristics:
Authentic challenges: Students tackle real problems with genuine consequences, not hypothetical scenarios designed for assessment.
Interdisciplinary approach: Effective programs integrate technology, business, ethics, and social impact rather than teaching these subjects in isolation.
Confidence development: Students learn self-advocacy, self-worth, and self-value through entrepreneurial experiences. These capabilities transfer to college applications, job interviews, and leadership roles.
Early exposure: Rather than waiting until senior year, these programs introduce innovative thinking in middle school and early high school.
Research supports this approach. A 2022 Gallup survey found that students involved in entrepreneurship programs were 34% more likely to develop leadership skills and 41% more likely to report feeling prepared for future careers.
The AI Competitive Advantage
Students emerging from these programs possess advantages that traditional education alone cannot provide. They understand how to identify market opportunities, collaborate effectively with AI tools, and communicate their ideas clearly to diverse audiences.
College admissions officers increasingly recognize entrepreneurship as a marker of leadership, innovation, and problem-solving ability. Students who can demonstrate how they built something from the ground up bring more than just an application; they get a track record of action.
These experiences provide rich material for personal statements and interviews while demonstrating the initiative and resilience that colleges value in their incoming classes.
Building Tomorrow's AI-Driven Economy Today
Programs that combine AI literacy with entrepreneurial education create an exponential multiplier effect. Students don't just learn to use existing tools—they develop the creative mindset to identify problems that AI can solve and the business acumen to turn those solutions into viable ventures.
The students graduating from these programs represent a new breed of innovator. They're not just prepared for an AI-driven economy—they're actively architecting it, armed with both deep technological fluency and the entrepreneurial skills to transform breakthrough ideas into market-changing impact. This represents a fundamental shift in educational philosophy—from preparing students for predetermined career paths in a static economy to empowering them to create entirely new industries and opportunities in our rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Broken Promise: Rate Hikes Guaranteed, Coverage Expansion Dubious, After Lara's Secretive Model Reviews, says Consumer Watchdog
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 1, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara is breaking his promise to Californians by guaranteeing rate hikes without guaranteeing more coverage, said Consumer Watchdog today, following his approval of another black-box wildfire model for use in pricing home insurance. The confidential closed-door review of a model owned by insurance ratings agency Moody's, and two others over the last week, confirmed that modeling companies will not have to provide regulators or the public access to their models. The models' inner workings remain secret, denying regulators and the public the ability to test the validity of the rate hikes they will now drive. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Lara's actions implement part of his deal with the insurance industry allowing them to use secret models to raise rates without public justification of the reasons for those increases. In return, Lara promised Californians he would expand access to home insurance in wildfire areas. However, the rules implementing that promise give insurance companies multiple ways to avoid selling more policies to those who have lost coverage. "Lara made a deal with the industry: let them raise rates with secret models, and in return, they'd offer more coverage in wildfire zones," said Carmen Balber, executive director of Consumer Watchdog. "Today's action fulfills the industry's wish list. But for consumers, the promised coverage has vanished into a maze of loopholes and delays. Nothing in the rules guarantees new sales to those who were non-renewed and dumped on the FAIR Plan." "Today's announcement is just more public relations cover for a strategy that is a direct assault on the transparency that Californians rely on to hold insurance companies accountable," said Will Pletcher, Litigation Director at Consumer Watchdog. Secret Models Guarantee Rate Hikes: The Department's review of the Moody's and Verisk wildfire catastrophe models — algorithmic pricing models insurance companies will now be allowed to use to increase rates in future rate filings—was conducted through a secretive, closed-door process known as PRID (Pre-Application Required Information Determination). While Commissioner Lara claims the review was open to the public, PRID lacks the procedural safeguards, transparency, and public access required under Proposition 103. The commissioner's action will replace the current use of transparent data about wildfire claims to set prices with the unverified predictions of these algorithmic pricing models. "You can't claim public participation while locking the public out of the data and deliberations that will now determine billions in future premiums," said Pletcher. "This is the antithesis of Proposition 103, which requires insurance companies to justify rate hikes in full view of the public." No Guarantee of More Insurance Sales to Consumers: The Insurance Commissioner has widely claimed that insurance companies will have to cover more homeowners in exchange for the right to raise rates with these models' secret algorithms. However, the text of the regulation contains no such guarantee. As Consumer Watchdog has documented, the rule is riddled with loopholes allowing insurance companies to opt for token compliance rather than meaningful expansion. The regulation says insurance companies may commit to selling a number of policies in wildfire areas equal to 85% of their market share in less-risky areas. But it also allows insurance companies to instead say they will increase coverage in fire areas by just 5 percent. Companies may also opt for a third, undefined, "alternative commitment." The loopholes are explained in this KGO-TV story. Insurance companies then do not have to report they've met their commitments until two years after their rate hikes take effect. If after two years they have not sold more policies as promised, the regulation allows insurers to change their commitments. And there are no mandated penalties if a company fails. Ultimately, insurers may never be held responsible for increasing sales to Californians, said Consumer Watchdog. Moody's and Verisk's significant financial conflicts of interest have also been ignored. The largest shareholder of insurance rating agency Moody's RMS is Berkshire Hathaway, through the Warren Buffett-owned insurance companies National Indemnity Co. and GEICO. Wall Street financial services companies The Vanguard Group and BlackRock Inc., which manage hundreds of billions in assets for insurance clients, are the second and third largest shareholders of Moody's. Vanguard and BlackRockare the largest shareholders of Verisk. These shareholders benefit financially if models push rates too high, and this conflict creates powerful financial incentives to use the models' undisclosed algorithms to artificially inflate insurance rates, said Consumer Watchdog. Meanwhile, private insurers continue to drive more and more Californians onto the FAIR Plan—which now covers nearly 600,000 policyholders statewide. Without enforceable requirements and stronger accountability, Lara's strategy won't deliver real coverage—it will entrench an overpriced, under–serving system where consumers lose and insurers win. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Consumer Watchdog Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the agency that compiles the closely watched monthly jobs report usually toils in obscurity, but on Friday, the current holder of that job was loudly fired by the president of the United States. Erika McEntarfer, a longtime government employee, bore the brunt of President Donald Trump's unhappiness with Friday's jobs report, which showed that hiring had slowed in July and was much less in May and June that previously estimated. He accused her without evidence of manipulating the job numbers and noted she was an appointee of President Joe Biden. McEntarfer, a longtime government worker who had served as BLS head for a year and a half, did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press. But her predecessor overseeing the jobs agency, former co-workers and associates have denounced the firing, warning about its repercussions and saying McEntarfer was nonpolitical in her role. Here's what to know about Erika McEntarfer: McEntarfer has a strong background on economics McEntarfer, whose research focuses on job loss, retirement, worker mobility, and wage rigidity, had previously worked at the Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies, the Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the White House Council of Economic Advisers in a nonpolitical role. She has a bachelor's degree in Social Science from Bard College and a doctoral degree in economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She was confirmed as BLS head on a bipartisan vote McEntarfer was nominated in 2023 to serve as BLS head, and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions recommended that her nomination go to the full Senate for a vote. She was confirmed as BLS commissioner in January 2024 on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote. Among the Republican senators who voted to confirm her included then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, who is now Trump's vice president, and then-Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is now Trump's secretary of state. Before her confirmation hearing, a group called the Friends of the BLS, made up of former commissioners who served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, members of statistical associations and credentialed economists, said McEntarfer's background made her a great choice for the job. 'The many reasons to quickly confirm Dr. McEntarfer as the new BLS Commissioner all boil down to this: the agency, like the entire statistical system, is undergoing an intense, significant period of change and Dr. McEntarfer's wealth of research and statistical experience have equipped her to be the strong leader that BLS needs to meet these challenges,' Friends of the BLS wrote. Her former associates and co-workers decry her firing William Beach, who was appointed BLS commissioner in 2019 by Trump and served until 2023 during President Joe Biden's administration, called McEntarfer's firing 'groundless' and said in an X post that it 'sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' Former Labor Department chief economist Sarah J. Glynn, who received regular briefings from McEntarfer about BLS findings, said McEntarfer was generous with her time explaining what conclusions could or couldn't be reached from the data. If the data didn't support something an administration official was saying, McEntarfer would say so, Glynn said. She also never weighed in on how the administration should present or interpret the data, Glynn said — she would simply answer questions about the data. 'She had a sterling reputation as someone who is concerned about the accuracy of the data and not someone who puts a political spin on her work,' Glynn said. Heather Boushey, a senior research fellow at Harvard University, served with McEntarfer on the White House Council of Economic Advisers and said McEntarfer never talked politics at work. 'She showed up every day to focus on the best analysis and the best approach to her field and not get political. That is what I saw from her time and again. She is brilliant and well-respected among labor economists generally,' Boushey said. 'She wasn't coming into my office to talk politics or the political implications of something. She definitely wasn't engaging on that side of things.' ___ Olson reported from New York. Associated Press writer Christopher Rugaber in Washington contributed to this report. Fatima Hussein And Alexandra Olson, The Associated Press
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Genworth Financial Inc (GNW) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Operating Income and ...
Release Date: July 31, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Genworth Financial Inc (NYSE:GNW) reported a strong adjusted operating income of $174 million for the second quarter. The company announced an increase in expected capital returns for 2025 to approximately $400 million. Insurance in force increased by 1% year over year to $270 billion, with robust new insurance written of over $13 billion. The company's credit portfolio remains strong, with a risk-weighted average FICO score of 746 and a loan-to-value ratio of 93%. Genworth Financial Inc (NYSE:GNW) maintained disciplined expense management, keeping expenses flat year over year despite inflationary pressures. Negative Points Adjusted earnings per diluted share decreased to $1.15 from $1.27 in the same period last year. Persistency decreased to 82% in the second quarter, down 2 points sequentially and 1 point year over year. The company faces uncertainties due to potential trade policy changes and reciprocal tariffs, which could introduce volatility. Home affordability remains challenged, with mortgage rates hovering close to 7%, impacting consumer purchasing power. There is a noted regional home price weakness in certain markets, such as Cape Coral, which could affect future performance. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you discuss the seasoning of recent origination vintages and how regional home price weakness might affect them? A: Rohit Gupta, CEO: Credit performance remains strong, supported by meaningful embedded home price appreciation (HPA) and a resilient economy. While some markets like Cape Coral have seen inventory increases, our pricing adjusts for such regional variations. Consumers continue to prioritize mortgage payments, and we don't see a high correlation between slight home price declines and defaults. Q: How do you view the addressable market for new insurance written (NIW) in 2025 compared to 2024? A: Rohit Gupta, CEO: We expect the MI market size in 2025 to be similar to 2024, around $300 billion. High mortgage rates have suppressed purchase origination, but private mortgage insurance usage remains strong. We are monitoring mortgage rates and tariff-related uncertainties, which could impact consumer behavior. Q: Does the current environment impact your capital return plans? A: Rohit Gupta, CEO: Our capital return guidance reflects our performance and macro environment considerations. We increased our 2025 capital return guidance to approximately $400 million, driven by strong credit performance and bottom-line results. We continue to evaluate based on business performance and market conditions. Q: Are you seeing any changes in housing credit fundamentals or delinquency outlook? A: Rohit Gupta, CEO: The labor market remains strong, and borrower balance sheets are resilient. We haven't seen significant impacts from economic uncertainties on our borrowers. Delinquency trends align with seasonal expectations, and we continue to see strong performance in the prime space. Q: Any updates on regulatory changes from Washington that might impact your business? A: Rohit Gupta, CEO: We maintain strong relationships with GSEs, FHFA, and legislators, engaging in dialogues on guideline changes and GSE programs. We actively participate in working groups to support a housing finance system that enables responsible homeownership. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
