Derbyshire leader's SEND comments "shameful", says minister
"This is frankly shameful", she told the BBC. "I've met with parents in Derbyshire who've been badly failed by the local council, who have been seriously let down and their children are really struggling."We are determined to deliver a better system of support for children with SEND but this kind of characterisation gets us nowhere."It's really damaging and I think it's shocking. And parents will be really concerned about those comments."Some councils like Derbyshire are now, under Reform, taking a very reckless approach in terms of the language they're using."
Data from the Department for Education released in June shows an increase in the number of EHCPs - legally binding documents which enable children to access the support they need from local authorities.There were 638,745 in place across the country in January 2025, up 10.8% on the same point last year.In Derbyshire, the rise has been higher, with 8,000 EHCPs in place by spring this year, a rise of 17.8% on 2024. The government is looking to reform the SEND system with proposed changes expected to be announced in October. However, Phillipson declined to confirm whether education health and care plans (EHCPs) would remain in place when the government sets out its position. "We're looking right across the system about the support that's needed", she said.
In a letter to the Guardian newspaper last month, campaigners said without EHCPs in mainstream schools, "many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether"."Whatever the Send system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections," they said.Signatories to the letter include the heads of charities, professors, Send parents including actor Sally Phillips, and campaigners including broadcaster Chris Packham. The Liberal Democrats' education spokesperson Munira Wilson said talk of removing EHCPs would be "a great cause of concern for parents", adding that "no child, or their family, should face uncertainty over receiving the support they need".
"I think there is widespread recognition including from parents that the system we have just isn't working, I've heard that directly from parents in Derbyshire", Phillipson told the BBC on Tuesday."Children with SEND will continue to have legal protections, that is important. But I don't think anybody looks at the system that we've got right now and thinks that it's working well. We take too long to put in place the support that's needed for children."She added: "But we are listening to parents."
Phillipson added the reforms would ensure councils would be "in a much better position to provide support" amid spiralling bills for SEND provision.Derbyshire County Council's special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) services are currently being monitored by the government after a damning Ofsted report last year.The council's costs to support children in special schools rose by £15m to about £38m in 2024-25, according to council documents.
The leader of Derbyshire County Council Alan Graves was approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Morecambe announce agreement in principle for sale of club to Panjab Warriors
An agreement in principle has been reached for the sale of Morecambe to new owners, the club have announced. The club are currently suspended by the National League over their financial issues and at risk of closure, but a statement was published on the club's website on Thursday afternoon announcing a deal was now in place for the transfer of majority shareholding to Panjab Warriors from the Bond Group. Bond Group said in a statement: "We would like to thank all of the staff at the club for their forbearance and can only apologise for the stress this has caused." The club said final legal documentation was now being prepared, and that "immediate steps" were being taken to inform key stakeholders, including the National League. The club said they hoped the agreement "paves the way for continued stability and a positive future both on and off the pitch". Panjab Warriors have been contacted for comment. There have been fears Morecambe could follow the same path as Bury, who were expelled from the EFL in 2019 over their financial issues. The club's plight has drawn political attention, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer expressing his concern last week and urging everyone involved to "do the right thing". That followed Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy writing to Morecambe owner Jason Whittingham calling on him to sell up.
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Controversial shopping site plan withdrawn hours before decision
Controversial plans which could potentially have allowed a building owner to convert part of a shopping centre into residential accommodation have been withdrawn just hours before they were due to be decided on by proposals for the CPS Centre in Culcheth included changes to bikes and bin storage and the building itself but not a change of use, although Warrington Council officers said a future intention for residential did "appear to be the case".The scheme has been controversial after traders were evicted from the centre, and it was raised in parliament by the area's BBC has contacted the agent representing the owner for a comment. Nearly 140 objections to the scheme had been raised by locals and councillors, with residents planning to attend the meeting later to show their at the council had recommended the scheme for approval in a report produced ahead of the meeting.A previous plan for the site was rejected by the authority last Smith, Labour councillor for Culcheth, Glazebury and Croft, said: "Our community really came together to fight this potential threat to the CPS Centre."The disappointment is that the applicant left it until now to withdraw, they could have taken this step weeks ago when they saw the objections come in."Smith, who was due to speak against the plans at the meeting, said: "I'm sure there will be further applications in the future, but for now, it's fair to say our voices have been heard loud and clear." See more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A-level results: Is the government doing enough to tackle regional disparities?
One of the messages the education secretary was keen to get across during her media round on A-level results was the government's commitment to tackling the 'yawning inequalities' in educational attainment in England. Bridget Phillipson, a Sunderland MP who grew up in the north-east, is all too well aware of educational disadvantage and how some regions are worse affected than others. In the run-up to results day, she has made a point of drawing attention to poor exam outcomes for students from white working-class backgrounds. She says the government's 'plan for change', which includes reformed early years and revitalised family services, alongside wider efforts to tackle disadvantage such as expanding free school meals and free breakfast clubs, will help address inequalities. But is it enough to bring about real change? Regional disparities in education are nothing new, but what has concerned experts is that this year's results reveal that the gap between the strongest and weakest performing areas in England has grown even wider. The gap in A and A* grades between the highest performing area, London, where almost a third of students got at least an A, and the north-east, which remains the lowest performing, has grown to 9.2 percentage points – the widest regional gap since at least 2019. While in the capital, 32.1% of A-level entries were awarded A or A*, up from 31.3% in 2024, in the north-east the proportion of top grades dropped from 23.9% in 2024 to 22.9%. The West Midlands is the other region in England with a year-on-year drop in top grades – down from 24.8% to 24.2%. England's exams regulator, Ofqual, said that the differences in grades between schools within regions was actually larger than the aggregated differences between regions. Nevertheless, the chief regulator, Sir Ian Bauckham, said he shared the sector's disappointment at the widening gap and welcomed Phillipson's focus on the issue. According to experts, persistent poverty, deep rooted structural inequalities and the long-tail of Covid are all contributing to the divide. Chris Zarraga, the director of Schools North East which represents more than 1,150 schools in the region, said: 'North-east students have done brilliantly again this year, but the structural gap between our region and London has grown yet again. 'This is not about school quality. Every August, our students prove their talent and determination. But we cannot keep pretending the gap [between the north-east and London] is about standards. It is about deep-rooted structural inequalities that no government has seriously addressed. Without urgent, sustained action to tackle them, the gap will keep widening, and it will not be because our students or teachers are any less capable.' Henri Murison, the chief executive of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, also blamed 'significant and deep-seated regional disparities' for the attainment gap. Students who chose not to do A-levels or underperform 'do so as a result of their background, including coming from a disadvantaged family', he said. 'The pandemic has had long-lasting consequences and the grades our young people are using to apply for the most competitive university or apprenticeship places remain lower than those in regions such as London.' The gulf between university application rates in London and the north-east has grown from 19% to 26%. So what needs to be done? The partnership has called for pupil premium – which targets additional funding at students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds – to be restored to its full real-terms value, with a top-up for persistently disadvantaged children. There have also been calls for pupil premium to be extended to 16- to 19-year-olds. Natalie Perera, the chief executive of the Education Policy Institute, said: 'We can't ignore the fact that one of the main drivers is the higher and more persistent poverty in some areas.' Perera also called for 'targeted investment in high quality teaching at all stages of education and, crucially, a fully funded cross-government child poverty strategy'. She added: 'The other thing we know that makes a real difference is the quality of teachers. We know from our own research that schools in disadvantaged areas particularly outside London struggle to recruit high quality, highly qualified teachers.' Perera suggested there should be financial incentives to attract top teachers to schools serving disadvantaged communities. She also proposed incentives for schools to reduce exclusions, which disproportionately affect disadvantaged children. Is the government doing enough to close the gaps? 'Not yet,' said Perera.
