Milei orders immigration crackdown to ‘make Argentina great again'
Argentina's right-wing President Javier Milei issued a decree on Wednesday curbing immigration to the South American nation, a move coinciding with the immigration restrictions put in place by the Trump administration.
Advertisement
Milei's abrupt measures and declaration that newcomers were bringing 'chaos and abuse' to Argentina – a country built by millions of immigrants that has long prided itself on its openness – drew criticism from his political opponents and prompted comparisons to US President Donald Trump.
Milei's government welcomed those comparisons to its close American ally, with presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni saying it was 'time to honour our history and make Argentina great again'.
Wednesday's executive order tightens restrictions on citizenship, requiring immigrants to spend two uninterrupted years in Argentina or make a significant financial investment in the country to secure an Argentine passport.
People take selfies in front of the archway of Chinatown in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Photo: Xinhua
Immigrants seeking permanent residency must show proof of income or 'sufficient means' and have clean criminal records in their home countries.
Advertisement
The decree makes it much easier for the government to deport migrants who enter the country illegally, falsify their immigration documents or commit minor crimes in Argentina. Previously, authorities could only expel or deny entry to a foreigner with a conviction of more than three years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
2 hours ago
- Asia Times
US-China tensions surge as tech and mineral wars intensify
Beijing and Washington accused each other of violating the consensus reached during trade talks in Geneva, as both sides strengthened export controls on technology products and raw materials. Tensions have surged again since US President Donald Trump said in a social media post on May 30 that China 'has totally violated its agreement with us.' Trump said he made a fast deal with China on May 12 because he did not want to see Chinese 'civil unrest' sparked by a deterioration of the Chinese economy caused by his trade war. However, he added that he would no longer be 'Mr Nice Guy.' 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, the US has groundlessly accused China of violating the consensus, a claim that grossly distorts the facts. China firmly rejects these unjustified accusations,' an unnamed spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MoC) said Monday (June 2). 'The US has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations.' The MoC spokesperson said the US has seriously undermined the consensus reached during the China-US economic and trade talks in Geneva by introducing multiple, discriminatory, restrictive measures against China. These measures included issuing guidance on artificial intelligence chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and announcing the revocation of visas for Chinese students, including those studying technological-related fields. The spokesperson also criticized the US for undermining the consensus reached by Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in a phone call on January 17. In that call, Xi congratulated Trump on his reelection as president. He said confrontation and conflict should not be an option for the two countries. Trump said the US and China should get along well for years to come. The MoC's latest comments came after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on May 29 that US-China trade negotiations are 'a bit stalled.' Bessent said the two countries' leaders must speak directly about key issues. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on May 30 that China's reluctance to approve exports of key niche minerals is one reason why Trump said Beijing violated its side of the trade agreement reached in Geneva. White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told ABC News on June 1 that Trump and Xi could talk about trade as soon as this week. Hassett said both sides were willing to talk, but they did not set a specific date for a conversation between the two leaders. He added that Greer's team communicates with their Chinese counterparts daily, 'trying to move the ball forward on this matter.' It is unclear whether a Xi-Trump phone call will be possible in the short run, particularly after the recent volley of accusations. The Chinese side has not commented on the matter. On May 12, China and the US agreed to de-escalate their trade war by significantly lowering tariffs for each other for 90 days. The US agreed to lower its 145% tariff to 30%; China reduced its retaliatory 125% tariff to 10% after the Geneva meeting. According to a US-China joint declaration, China also agreed to adopt all necessary administrative measures to suspend or remove the non-tariff countermeasures taken against the US since April 2, 2025. Immediately thereafter, many Chinese pundits said China does not need to relax its key minerals export rules, as the US-China joint declaration did not state which non-tariff countermeasures would be canceled. 'The current situation is interesting. The US got a trade agreement with China but failed to get what it wanted most,' a Hebei-based columnist wrote in an article on May 13. 'Tariff matters are about money, but key minerals are related to national security, and there is no room for bargaining for this.' The writer said the Americans thought they had found China's weak spot, but they hit a wall. In fact, on May 9, the Office of the National Export Control Coordination Mechanism and several government departments held a meeting in Shenzhen about combating the smuggling of strategic minerals. According to the meeting, the government will take adequate measures to promote and regulate the enforcement of export controls on strategic mineral resources. It will also enhance implementation and refine institutional frameworks regarding methods, scope, timing and intensity. On May 19, China's Cailian Press reported that at least six Chinese companies were granted licenses to export seven types of medium and heavy niche minerals, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium. The seven types of minerals are raw materials used for producing parts for fighter jets, submarines, missiles and radars. China announced the export controls on these minerals on April 4, following Trump's imposition of reciprocal tariffs globally on Liberation Day on April 2. Cailian Press added that obtaining a license takes 45 to 60 days, and exporters must apply for a new license if the formulas of their products change. They also need to seek approval for each shipment. 'We should adopt a dual-track strategy that bans the export of China's key minerals to the US but relaxes the export to the European Union,' Li Jian, a Shanxi-based columnist, writes in an article on June 2. 'Practically, we will loosen our key mineral export controls for the EU companies willing to share technologies with China, such as photoresist formula and magnet designs,' Li says. 'Whoever follows the United States' call to ban Huawei's equipment will receive fewer niche minerals from China,' he says. 'EU firms will then realise whether they should do business with the US or China.' He says China will build facilities in friendly countries, such as Hungary, to refine its key minerals, making it difficult for the US to intervene. After Washington reached a trade deal with Beijing on May 12, Bessent said the US did not want a generalized decoupling from China, but rather a 'strategic decoupling', particularly in the steel, critical medicines, and semiconductor sectors. On May 13, the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security rescinded the Biden administration's AI Diffusion Rule, and replaced it with three guidelines to forbid companies from: -using Huawei's Ascend chips, -deploying US chips to help Chinese firms train their AI models, or -re-exporting US high-end chips to China. On May 23, the US government informed the Electronic Design Automation industry about new export controls on electronic design automation (EDA) software to China and Chinese military end-users globally. The US also suspended the supply of CFM LEAP-1C engines, which power China's Comac C919 jets. 'What the US does overstretches the concept of national security, politicizes and weaponizes trade and tech issues, and is a malicious attempt to block and suppress China,' Lin Jin, a spokesperson of the Chinese foreign ministry, said on May 30. However, he said China is ready to strengthen dialogue and cooperation on export controls with relevant countries and regions to stabilize global industrial and other supply chains. Read: US eases trade war, pursues 'strategic decoupling' from China
South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US judge blocks Trump's veto on union bargaining for transport security officers
A federal judge on Monday said the administration of US President Donald Trump probably broke the law by stripping 50,000 transport security officers of the ability to unionise and bargain over their working conditions. Advertisement US District Judge Marsha Pechman in Seattle, Washington blocked the US Department of Homeland Security from cancelling a union contract covering TSA (Transportation Security Administration) officers pending the outcome of a lawsuit by four unions challenging the move. The lawsuit claims the Trump administration ended collective bargaining for TSA officers, who staff checkpoints at US airports and other transport hubs, as retaliation against the unions for suing over administration policies. Trump, a Republican, has moved to curb union bargaining for wide swathes of the federal workforce. A US appeal court in May allowed those efforts to proceed, pausing a lower-court ruling that had blocked seven agencies from cancelling union contracts while it considers an appeal. Because of the sensitive nature of their jobs, TSA officers are not governed by the civil service system and do not have the same rights to unionise and collectively bargain over working conditions as most other federal employees. Advertisement During former president Barack Obama's administration, the TSA granted officers the ability to bargain over certain subjects. Former president Joe Biden's administration expanded the scope of bargaining in 2021.
South China Morning Post
17 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's English-only order does irreparable harm to US and its people
One of the more innocuous-seeming edicts was one from March 1 making English the official language of the United States. This marks the first time the United States has designated an official language at the federal level since the country was founded. On the face of it, the order seems benign enough. After all, nearly 80 per cent of Americans over the age of five only speak English at home. Of those who speak another language, some 91 per cent also speak English very well. But as so often happens with Trump, there is more than meets the eye, particularly for Chinese people living in the US. Trump's actions are a dog whistle for his white, fiercely loyal and often rural base. As one of the largest, more recent migrant groups , the Chinese and broader Asian-American communities are the most language challenged and therefore the most vulnerable. A 2014 US Census Bureau report indicated that some 32 per cent of Asian-Americans had limited English proficiency , defined as speaking English 'less than very well'. That was compared to around 35 per cent for those of Latin American origin and 14 per cent for Pacific Islanders. The federal government's English primacy designation is likely to make interpretation and translation services optional. In practical terms, as budgets tighten, that effectively means many will be eliminated, reversing a mandate established by former president Bill Clinton that made translation of federal documents mandatory. Several, mostly Republican states had previously enacted this policy at the state level.
