
I've got Donald Trump to thank for my unusual middle name
This wasn't a bet for money. Instead, it was stipulated that whoever lost would legally assume a new middle name. Being gamers of a certain vintage, we drew from the Nintendo canon. If my friend had lost, he'd have become James Edward Bowser Price. Should I lose, I would take on the middle name Waluigi. For the uninitiated, Waluigi is a decidedly second- or even third-tier baddie from Mario Kart, who wears dark blue dungarees and a purple hat.
Having lost, I duly filled out the requisite paperwork and my friend came over to witness the deed poll being signed. Like Gandalf the White, I was reborn. No longer Madeline Mary Grant, but Madeline Mary Waluigi Grant.
Being a woman of my word, there is no changing it back. Soon a passport renewal beckons and when I get married this weekend the vicar insists that, legally, the full name must be read out in church, which may prove a shock for my extended family, who don't yet know about this change of identity.
As embarrassing as this may be, I do rather enjoy an unexpected or jarring middle name. Politics affords plenty: Keir Rodney Starmer, Mark Gino Francois, Richard Milhous Nixon. Some middle names are eerily prophetic. Unity Mitford had Valkyrie as hers. Coupled with the fact that she was conceived in Swastika, Ontario, nominative determinism begins to look undeniable.
In terms of the politics of ordinary relationships, there is a perfect role for middle names as a sort of compromise zone. It is to the middle name you can demote a much-loved great-grandparent, schoolteacher or cat, still honouring them but without making your child walk around with a ridiculous name. It's not only an act of compromise with school bullies of the future, it's also an act of compromise with whoever has provided the other requisite slice of the chromosomes. You will have fond memories of Great Uncle Zerubbabel, but your significant other might not. A middle name is therefore the perfect compromise, preserving filial dignity and marital harmony.
Should we have a son, my fiancé is agitating to inflict a variety of names on him. The current frontrunners are Banastre, Sacheverell or Chrysostom (after the most violent British commander of the US War of Independence, the clerical controversialist of the reign of Queen Anne and the great preacher of 4th-century Byzantium, respectively). I'm hoping for 'Edmund'. Happily, this is where middle names really show their utility.
The real experts in this department were the Puritans, whose extreme derangement didn't stop at regicide. The already 'creatively' named Praise-God Barebone had a son whom he called Nicholas 'If-Jesus-Christ-had-not-died-for-thee-thou-hadst-been-damned-unless-Jesus-Christ-had-died-for-thee-thou-hadst-been-damned' Barebone. Must have been a nightmare for the school uniform nametapes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
25 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Tennis fans call for BBC to axe commentator after Wimbledon final
Viewers took to social media as the men's singles final was broadcast on Sunday. The BBC has faced calls to remove one of its Wimbledon commentators after a slew of complaints were posted on social media. Former British No. 1 player Andrew Castle was commentating on the men's singles final between Italy's Jannik Sinner and Spain's Carlos Alcaraz on Sunday, July 13. The 61-year-old has regularly featured in the broadcaster's Wimbledon coverage, having appeared as a player in the 1980s, WalesOnline reports. The pre-match build-up and analysis for the clash featured insights from former players Tim Henman, Todd Woodbridge, John McEnroe and Pat Cash, alongside host Clare Balding. However, the handover to the commentary team saw Castle take over, prompting a flood of posts online. One viewer complained: "Why oh why do the BBC put Andrew Castle on lead commentary for the Men's Singles final every year, he's terrible. My ears have already start to bleed." Another agreed: "Massive build up to this #WimbledonFinal and then BBC put Andrew Castle on commentary. Way to kill the match for me before it even starts." A third commented: "Wow Andrew Castle is so bad he is already trending internationally," noted a fan. "Heart sinks when I hear the words '... and your commentator is Andrew Castle'. Ruins enjoyment of every match. @BBCSport needs to cut the chord." Another added: "Andrew Castle being given such an important role in this final after all of the complaints about him in the semi is embarrassing. He really adds zilch to the commentary booth." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Castle's role at Wimbledon had already been discussed during this year's tournament, particularly after 1992 champion Andre Agassi joined the commentary team for the semi-final match between Alcaraz and Taylor Fritz of the USA. The change saw several positive reactions from fans who preferred his views over Castle's. Australian player Nick Kyrgios, known for being outspoken, appeared to share the same opinion. In 2024, he took issue with comments made by Castle on-air about Fritz and Alexander Zverev, claiming they were disrespectful. This year's BBC TV coverage saw a stellar team of pundits assembled, with Martina Navratilova, Billie Jean King, Tracy Austin, and Annabel Croft also providing discussion, joined by other commentators including Andrew Cotter, Jo Durie, Anne Keothavong and Nick Mullins. A further line-up of experts on BBC Radio 5 Live featured Marion Bartoli, Kim Clijsters, Laura Robson, Greg Rusedski, Naomi Broady, Daniela Hantuchova, and Leon Smith.

South Wales Argus
42 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Coronation Street fans want awkward relationship to stop
Some have said Kit Green (Jacob Roberts) and Sarah Platt (Tina O'Brien) should 'pack it in' on the ITV soap, as they described their new relationship as 'forced and awkward'. Kit and Sarah became an item a few months ago after his connection with Daisy Midgeley (Charlotte Jordan) no longer had sparks flying, and Sarah's marriage to Adam Barlow (Sam Robertson) came to an end following her affair with Damon Hay (Ciarán Griffiths). Corrie fans brand Kit and Sarah's relationship 'weird' In a post discussing Kit and Sarah's chemistry, someone wrote on the subreddit r/coronationstreet: 'Anyone else think how forced and awkward this entire relationship is? 'They have zero chemistry and when they do interact it's like watching paint dry. They need to pack it in.' This viewer replied: 'I commented when he first arrived that they would end up together. It was when she planted evidence about something. Should they be together? No. Put her back with Adam. But it won't happen.' Another said: 'It feels a bit weird that she's pursing a relationship after he nearly wrecked her brothers marriage.' 8 Most Iconic British Soap Characters of All Time One person shared: 'Pretty much all of Sarah's relationships now are forced and awkward. The writers have a thing of getting her together with bad boys and having it make no sense too.' A Reddit profile also responded: 'I agree with you kit and Sara doesn't have chemistry they are so blah together don't know why they paired them up for anyway.' Meanwhile, others think Sarah still has 'amazing chemistry' with Gary Windass (Mikey North) and hope they end up together again. As this fan revealed: 'I've said it before and I'll say it again…Sarah and Gary are Endgame. They had insane chemistry.' Another agreed: 'To me Sarah still has amazing chemistry with Gary and they should have those two have ab [an] affair and eventually get back together.' Recommended reading: But others are in support of Kit and Sarah being together, as this person chimed in: 'Aww no, I quite like them!' Speaking about Sarah's daughter Bethany Platt (Lucy Fallon) set to appear on the cobbles again in the near future, this account wrote: 'Bethany is back soon. I hope they don't do some affair/ one night stand storyline with Kit and Bethany.' Do you love or hate Kit and Sarah's relationship on Corrie? Let us know if you want it to end in the comments below.


Glasgow Times
42 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Launch date for new series of Big Brother on ITV confirmed
The popular reality programme is set to hit screens this autumn for its third series after being relaunched in 2023 by the broadcaster. It has also been revealed that the new series will be longer and consist of 42 episodes airing over the course of seven weeks. These episodes will be broadcast every day with the exception of Saturday. When will series three of Big Brother come to ITV this year? According to reports from TV Zone, the new series of Big Brother will come to ITV on Sunday, September 28, 2025. While the cast will consist of a carefully selected group of newcomers, hosts AJ Odudu and Will Best will return. As usual, the programme will involve exciting tasks, housemate drama and live evictions. The public will also continue to play an important role in the show, with voting taking place throughout the season before a winner is crowned and handed the cash prize. Each episode will be followed by Big Brother: Late & Live and will feature a live audience and more exclusive content. When and where did Big Brother start? Big Brother was originally created by producer John de Mol in 1997 with the programme first being broadcast in the Netherlands in 1999. The name of the show is inspired by George Orwell's literary classic Nineteen-Eighty-Four which details a dystopian society featuring near-constant surveillance and an ever-present figure known simply as Big Brother. Recommended Reading: Following on from the success of the Dutch show, a British edition was commissioned by Channel 4 and broadcast yearly until 2018. As of 2025, there have been 1540 episodes of the show, with Big Brother having over 63 franchises globally. ITV have been approached for comment about the new series.