Scottish Government 'will need to find extra £2bn for welfare bill'
Spending on social security in Scotland totalled just over £6.1bn in 2024-25 but is forecast to grow to more than £9.4bn by 2030-31.
With the rise coming at a time when the UK Government is trying to cut its own welfare bill, economist Professor Graeme Roy, chairman of the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC), said that would leave Holyrood ministers increasingly having to fund more of the spending for this from its own budget.
The SFC revealed the amount the Scottish Government spends on social security, above what it receives from Westminster towards the cost of benefits, is 'expected to increase from £0.9bn in 2023-24 to £2.2bn by 2030-31'.
Roy said: 'In other words the government have to find £2bn either from taxation or other areas of spending to make the budget balance.'
Professor Graeme RoyHe highlighted this 'widening gap on social security' as one of the financial pressures the Scottish Government will have to face.
Roy also said ministers will likely 'have to find additional resources' to pay for public sector pay, with awards being made to workers already higher than the level set in the Government's public sector pay policy.
He stated: 'That means essentially money is going to have to be found from elsewhere in the budget in order to pay for pay awards coming in above the pay policy.'
Meanwhile, an 'economic performance gap' means the Government is raising less from income tax than it would if Scotland's economic performance matched that of the UK.
The SFC found that Scotland's different policies on income tax should raise just over £1.67bn this year, but its report said the 'actual projected income tax net position in 2025-26 is £616 million'.
As a result, Roy noted there was a 'performance gap of about £1bn'.
He added: 'That is an additional £1bn that is being foregone within the overall funding of the Scottish budget because of that relatively weaker economic performance.'
READ MORE: Labour's immigration stance poses 'critical economic threat' to Scotland, says FM
Roy noted that overall the funding to the Scottish Government 'continues to increase'.
But he said: 'Once you take into consideration things like social security commitments, when you take into consideration pay awards running ahead of the pay policy, when you take into consideration things like the national insurance increase, and the general pressure we are seeing on public service delivery, while funding is going up the spending pressures are continuing to go up at the same time.
'So the Government is continuing to work in a situation where they have really quite limited fiscal headroom to manage the pressures that they face.'
He added: 'Funding is going up, but once you start to look at some of the commitments the Government have made it is going to be a really challenging period for the short and medium term.'
READ MORE: The 44 Scottish firms named and shamed for failing to pay minimum wage
Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the report 'recognises the challenging financial environment that Scotland continues to face as a result of global uncertainty and higher inflation'.
She added that the Scottish Government's position was made worse by the 'failure' of UK ministers to fully fund the increase in employers' national insurance contributions in the public sector, as well as by the welfare reforms being pursued by Labour at Westminster.
Robison said the UK Government 'must change course on these welfare cuts, as well as removing the two-child limit and reinstating the winter fuel payment'.
Speaking for the Scottish Government, she added: 'By contrast, our social security policies are providing vital assistance to enable older people to heat their homes, help disabled people to live independent lives and keep thousands of children out of poverty.'
The Finance Secretary added: 'Our investment in this area over and above the money we get from the UK Government is projected to be less than 3.5% of the total Scottish Government Resource Budget by 2029-30.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
29 minutes ago
- Daily Record
UK to build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines in major defence shake-up
The UK will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in its warhead programme. The UK is poised to construct up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and will pour £15 billion into its warhead programme, with the Prime Minister set to disclose these plans on Monday during the Government's strategic defence review. Major investments are queued for the UK's nuclear warhead programme this parliamentary session, along with commitments to maintain the current arsenal, as supported by 62 recommendations the Government aims to fully implement. However, there's been a debate over defence spending promises, after the Defence Secretary was unable to verify if the Treasury had secured budgeting to increase it to 3% of GDP by 2034. Part of the Aukus deal with the US and Australia, the creation of these submarines is projected to sustain 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s, along with generating 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate positions over the forthcoming decade, according to the Ministry of Defence. Defence Secretary John Healey remarked: "Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression. "With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly skilled jobs across the country." The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will bolster the Government's pledges to sustain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, construct a new line of Dreadnought submarines, and facilitate all forthcoming enhancements. From the late 2030s, the array of up to 12 SSN-Aukus class attack submarines – conventionally armed yet nuclear-powered – are set to succeed the seven astute class submarines that the UK anticipates commissioning. The Government, in echoing the findings of the strategic defence review, has pledged to:. - Prepare the armed forces for readiness to engage in conflict should the need arise. - Enhance armament reserves and maintain scalability in production capacities to respond promptly in times of crisis or warfare. - Procure up to 7,000 domestically produced long-range missiles, a decision projected to preserve 800 jobs within the defence sector. - Establish a pioneering cyber command while committing £1 billion towards digital advancements. - Allocate an excess of £1.5 billion for refurbishing and updating service personnel accommodation. Sir Keir Starmer is expected to declare: "From the supply lines to the front lines, this Government is foursquare behind the men and women upholding our nation's freedom and security. "National security is the foundation of my Plan for Change, and this plan will ensure Britain is secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering a defence dividend of well-paid jobs up and down the country." The Shadow Defence Secretary, James Cartlidge, expressed scepticism regarding Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises, stating that they would be viewed with caution unless Labour could demonstrate that sufficient funding would be allocated. Labour's Shadow Defence Secretary, John Healey, had previously mentioned in an interview with The Times that there was "no doubt" the UK would achieve its goal of 3% defence spending. However, when questioned on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, he sidestepped queries about whether the Treasury had provided any guarantees for the necessary funding. Healey also acknowledged that he did not anticipate an increase in the number of armed forces personnel until the next Parliament, citing ongoing recruitment and retention challenges. When asked about the Army's target of 73,000 personnel, he replied, "We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining. "The first job is to reverse that trend and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number." In response, James Cartlidge argued, "All of Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises will be taken with a pinch of salt unless they can show there will actually be enough money to pay for them. "Whereas, far from guaranteeing the funding, John Healey has been hung out to dry by Rachel Reeves. "As recently as Thursday, Healey promised that defence spending would definitely hit 3%, but today he's completely backtracked. "These submarines are not due to enter service till the late 2030s, so how can we have any confidence Labour will actually deliver them when they can't even sustain a policy on defence spending for more than 48 hours?" Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire commented: "This signals absolutely the right intent about the need to bolster the UK's defences in the face of Putin's imperialism and Trump's unreliability. "But this must come with a concrete commitment and detail on full funding. "Labour's mere 'ambition' rather than commitment to reach 3% of GDP on defence leaves serious questions about whether the money for these projects will actually be forthcoming. "The 2034 timeline suggests a worrying lack of urgency from the Government. "Unless Labour commits to holding cross-party talks on how to reach 3% much more rapidly than the mid-2030s, this announcement risks becoming a damp squib."
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Cut-price train operator to launch Stirling-London service next year
Regulators approve five Lumo services a day, linking Scottish stations with English capital for the first time Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Cut-price train operator Lumo is to launch new Stirling-London services next year, providing three Scottish settlements with their first direct link to the English capital. The company announced on Monday it will run five services a day from the spring after its plans were approved by rail regulators. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad They will operate via North Lanarkshire and the west coast main line, using second-hand diesel trains until new electric ones are delivered. The trains Lumo plans to use on the new service | Lumo Lumo has run London-Edinburgh services with brand new electric trains on the east coast line since 2021, which it hopes to win approval to extend to Glasgow. It said the new Stirling service would give Larbert, Greenfaulds, near Cumbernauld, and Whifflet, near Coatbridge, their first London link. Passengers will travel in five class 222 six-carriage trains which will also call at Motherwell, Lockerbie, Carlisle, Preston, Crewe, Nuneaton, Milton Keynes and London Euston. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The service was originally planned by new operator Grand Union, which had hoped to launch four trains a day on the route this year. Lumo's parent company, FirstGroup, bought the firm in is an "open access" operator which does not receive government funding, unlike east coast rivals LNER, which runs far more trains which also stop at many more stations. The new service will see it compete for passengers on the English section of the west coast line with sister firm Avanti West Coast, which is also owned by FirstGroup. Open access operators are concerned about their future under the Labour UK Government, which is nationalising English train firms, but the Conservatives said such operators should be "championed". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Affordable, fast and convenient' Lumo managing director Martijn Gilbert said: 'Today's announcement underscores Lumo's commitment to growing Scotland's rail network, providing passengers with more affordable, fast, and convenient travel options. "Our new service between Stirling and London has the potential to unlock significant economic opportunities for communities along the route, and we're proud to deliver this direct rail connectivity to towns previously overlooked by traditional rail services. "We are focused on further expanding our services in Scotland to ensure even greater connectivity across the country and the whole UK.' Scottish Conservatives transport spokesperson Sue Webber said: 'Lumo is actively investing in our capital city, not only bringing in tourists but also supporting our vibrant hospitality and events sector. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "We're looking at £740 million in economic benefits from Lumo by 2032. "Crucially, this is being delivered not by government mandate, but through private sector innovation and open access investment. "That's why I believe this model is one we should be championing.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Families of 1994 Chinook crash victims to sue MoD after 29 died
They want a High Court judge to be able to review information which they say was not included in previous investigations, and which they believe will shed new light on the airworthiness of the helicopter. RAF Chinook ZD576 was carrying 25 British intelligence personnel from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness when it crashed in foggy weather on June 2, 1994. All 25 passengers – made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army – were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members. READ MORE: Podcaster arrested after targeting councillor with racial abuse The families of the victims, who have coalesced into the Chinook Justice Campaign, said failing to order a public inquiry is a breach of the UK Government's human rights obligations. In a letter to the Government 31 years after the crash, the group said: 'The investigations conducted to date, whether considered individually or in combination, have failed to discharge the investigative duty.' They have also called for the release of documents that were sealed at the time of the crash for 100 years, something revealed in a BBC documentary last year. Solicitor Mark Stephens, who is representing the families, said: 'In this case, the families of those who were killed have seen more than enough evidence to convince them, and us, that there was a failure by the MoD to apply appropriate safeguards in order to protect the passengers and crew. 'In fact, they were put on board an aircraft that was known to be positively dangerous and should never have taken off. 'That is why we are seeking a judicial review into the Government's failure to hold a public inquiry – which the families have sought for more than a year.' Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK Government 17 years later, following a campaign by the families. READ MORE: Hamilton by-election campaign enters final days as parties make final pleas to voters A subsequent review by Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash. Esme Sparks, who was seven years old when her father Major Gary Sparks was killed in the crash, said: 'We don't want to have to take legal action against the Government and MoD but we do want and need answers surrounding the circumstance of this crash. 'We want to know who or what is being protected? Who made the decision to let this helicopter take off? What is being hidden? In our view, a public inquiry is key.' Andy Tobias, who was eight when his father, Lt Col John Tobias, 41, was killed, said: 'It's clear to me that a complete lack of duty of care was given to those passengers because they got on a Chinook that wasn't fit for flight. 'And really, the government need to show their duty of candour and really be open and transparent about what's in those documents and give us the opportunity to really understand anything that's in them that could give us more answers about what happened.' The MoD said that records held in The National Archives contain personal information and early release of those documents would breach their data protection rights. An MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died.'
