Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules
A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower-court decision blocking them on grounds that he had exceeded his authority by imposing them.
The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico.
The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the duties to remain in place while the appeals play out.
The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature, have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices.
The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The May 28 ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties, and the other by 12 U.S. states led by Oregon.
Jeffrey Schwab, an attorney for the small businesses that sued, said Tuesday's federal appeals court decision was disappointing, but it did not mean that the Trump administration would win in the end.
"It's important to note that every court to rule on the merits so far has found these tariffs unlawful, and we have faith that this court will likewise see what is plain as day: that IEEPA does not allow the president to impose whatever tax he wants whenever he wants," Schwab said Tuesday.
'The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country's national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking. The US Circuit Court of Appeals' stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement.
Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs.
Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit.
The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Howard Goller, Stephen Coates and Nick Zieminski)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump admits immigration sweeps are causing labour shortage in farming and hotels
President Donald Trump conceded on Thursday that his 'very aggressive ' immigration policies are causing labour shortages in farming and hotels. Mr Trump said he would soon issue a 'common sense' order that would protect those two industries. 'Our farmers are being hurt badly, they have very good workers,' he said. 'They've worked for them for 20 years. They're not citizens, but they turn out to be, you know, great, and we have to do something about that.' Earlier on Thursday, Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that nationwide raids on people in the country without documentation is also hurting hotel and service business too. 'Our great farmers and people in the hotel and leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he wrote. 'Changes are coming.' The comments were a stunning reversal for a president who ran on a campaign promise to conduct the largest deportation operation in the country's history. They also come amid worsening national tension, after he sent thousands of armed troops to Los Angeles to quell protests that erupted at the weekend over his administration's anti-immigration policies. The protests ignited after immigration agents went to the car park of a hardware shop where day labourers are known to gather. On the campaign trail, Mr Trump said he would focus on criminals and gang members, and that he would seal the southern border shut. Since he took office this year, immigration agents have conducted sweeping operations on restaurants, building sites and businesses, detaining hundreds of people, many without criminal records, and in some cases those in the country legally. The effort has largely affected Latin American migrants, many of whom are in the country illegally, and yet are indispensable – albeit underpaid – workers in the farming, building and service industries across much of the country. The arrests and deportations, often without due process, have separated families and deeply hurt communities. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the nation has 'a very broken labour system' and that it was a matter of national security for it to be fixed. 'We have to make sure our workforce is legal and is here legally,' Ms Rollins told CNBC on Thursday. 'But the President understands that we can't feed our nation or the world without that labour force, and he's listening to the farmers, which I really appreciate.' On Thursday, Democratic Senator Alex Padilla from California was forcibly removed from a news conference in Los Angeles after he tried to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who was in the city to address the continuing protests and promote federal law enforcement's immigration crackdown efforts. Mr Padilla said he had concerns with that effort. 'I am Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' he said, as men in plain clothes rushed towards him and pushed him out of the room. He said he was briefly handcuffed and detained but was later released.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that an Israeli strike on Iran "may very well happen', as he confirmed that the US was evacuating some US officials and their families from the region. The US is evacuating non-essential US embassy staff and their dependents from the embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Other reports said the US was evacuating some staff from embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait, but the embassy in Bahrain denied a change in its posture on Thursday. Trump on Thursday said the risk of "massive conflict" led the US to draw down staff in the region. CBS News reported on Thursday that Israel is prepared to launch an attack on Iran's nuclear sites, and that US officials have been discussing how the US could assist Israel without taking a direct role. The report said options could include aerial refuelling or intelligence-sharing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The steady drumbeat of leaks raises questions about whether a strike could take place in the future, or if the Trump administration is trying to put pressure on Iran ahead of a sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled to be held in Oman on Sunday. A US diplomat at one of the embassies restricting travel said the orders they have received were not out of the ordinary during flare-ups in local tensions. 'These steps don't necessarily mean military action is imminent. Still time for talks, it takes time to move people out. But these are steps that it would make sense to take as part of preparations, and to show seriousness. Provides important leverage in nuclear talks,' Danial Shapiro, a former US ambassador to Israel, said on X on Wednesday. 'Might help, could blow it' Trump himself toys publicly with the idea that the threat of an Israeli strike may help the US's negotiating position. "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump said, referring to Israel, before quickly adding, "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." In some ways, the reports that Israel is "poised" to strike Iran are redundant. By Trump's own admission, Israel has been lobbying him for months to bomb Iran. One senior US official recently told Middle East Eye on the condition of anonymity that the Trump administration has been impressed by plans Israel shared with it that lay out unilateral strikes against Iran's nuclear programme without direct American involvement. The plans were discussed in April and May with CIA director John Ratcliffe, MEE reported. 'The Israelis have pinpointed everything they can take out that supports Iran's nuclear sites down to the water supply and power generation, etcetera,' the US official told MEE, referring to a process called Target Systems Analysis, by which militaries assess specific nodes to attack that support a bigger main target. Trump says Iran's proposal 'unacceptable' as Tehran touts intel on Israeli nukes Read More » Israel has also discussed combining cyberattacks and precision military strikes. Iran's nuclear facilities are buried deep in fortified bunkers in the Natanz desert and inside a mountain called Fordow. Analysts say Netanyahu has refrained from attacking Iran in defiance of Trump because he wants to share political responsibility if the strikes go wrong and preserve an American backstop in the likely case of Iranian retaliation. On Thursday, Axios reported that Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, told some Republican Senators that the administration fears Iran could retaliate against an Israeli strike with ballistic missiles, causing a 'mass casualty event". The article did not mention that Israel is widely understood to have its own arsenal of nuclear weapons. The Iranians have kept pace with Trump and upped their own rhetoric. During past flare-ups, Iranian officials have sent signals that they could shut down the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf, where 30 percent of the world's oil transits, and have leaked that they could bomb US bases in Gulf states if attacked. Iran has now clearly stated that threat. "All its [the United States] bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister added. Israel and Iran had two unprecedented exchanges of fire in October and April 2024. The US came to Israel's defence, shooting down missiles and drones in an attack Iran had carefully telegraphed beforehand. IAEA tensions Ahead of the talks on Sunday, tensions have also been rising with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Diplomats said the IAEA's board of governors adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "non-compliance" with its nuclear obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The resolution was carried by 19 votes in favour out of 35. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October. This mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then-US president Barack Obama. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, said the resolution was "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, he said Iran would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. The issue of whether Iran will be able to enrich uranium on its territory has become the main roadblock to nuclear talks with the US. Trump has insisted Iran will not be allowed to enrich any uranium.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel 'could very well' strike Iran, Donald Trump says
US President Donald Trump on Thursday said Israel may well strike Iran but stressed that he had cautioned against an attack while nuclear talks with Tehran continue. Mr Trump's comments come as the US has authorised the departure of non-essential personnel from Iraq and elsewhere as fears grow that Israel may attack Iran's nuclear sites. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. The prospect of military action in the Middle East comes as the US-Iran nuclear talks appear to be stalled over whether Tehran would be able to continue to enrich uranium in any capacity. Mr Trump this week said he was less confident a deal could be reached, and Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. But Mr Trump on Thursday said the US and Iran are 'fairly close to a pretty good agreement'. 'We've had very good discussions with Iran. It's got to be better than pretty good, though, but it's got to be – I prefer an agreement, as long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think that would blow it,' Mr Trump said. In another sign that a strike on Iran may not be imminent, US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff plans to travel to Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of talks with Iran. 'Discussions are expected to be both direct and indirect, as in previous rounds,' a source said. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed to Iranian news outlet Tasnim that a delegation from Tehran would attend the talks. Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, and if it were attacked over its nuclear programme, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike the country's uranium enrichment sites. Further fuelling tension, Iran on Thursday said it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment plant, after the UN's atomic watchdog agency censured Tehran for failing to comply with non-proliferation obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. The US State Department has begun preparing to evacuate non-essential staff from the American embassy in Baghdad. At the same time, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the departure of military dependents from locations across the region. The US embassies in Kuwait and Bahrain have not changed their staffing levels, the State Department said. Meanwhile, the UK Maritime Trade Operations on Thursday said in an advisory note that the situation in the Middle East remains 'highly volatile'. The UKMTO has advised ships to use caution when passing through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz.
